Preview

Collectivised Farm Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1539 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Collectivised Farm Analysis
Assess the impact of collectivised farms on the Russian peasantry

Leszek Kolakowski, a famous philosopher referred to collectivisiation as 'probably the most massive warlike operation ever conducted by a state against its own citizens.' Collectivisation aimed to achieve socialism in the countryside by converting privately owned farms into collectivised farms which were to be run amongst the peasants, requiring them to hand over produce to the state. There were many impacts, mainly negative impacts, of collectivised farms on the Russian peasantry. These include, the economic effects and the effects on the standard of living, the elimination of the kulaks, and the creation of opposition.

Collectivisation was introduced so that the state
…show more content…
However this was not the case, between 1928 and 1934 there was a fall in the production of grain from 73.3 million tonnes to 67.6 million tonnes. With a fall in agricultural production and with the state collecting produce, it was inevitable for there to be a knock on effect on the quantity of food available for areas in the Soviet Union. ''There are hundreds of people bloated with hunger. I don't know how many die every day. Many are so weak that they no longer come out of their houses... We've eaten everything we could lay hands on...The trees have been stripped of their bark and the horse manure has been eaten. We fight over it.'' [V. Kravchenko, I Chose Freedom, 1947]. The author, Kravchenko, became a senior Communist Party official. This strengthens the evidence from the source because as a communist official he would not be likely to be against the idea of collectivisation but still admits there food shortages that followed. The source shows the extremes people would go to in order to survive from starvation which emphasizes the severity of the famine, however 1947 was long after collectivisation was introduced therefore there could be other factors which affected the levels of food in …show more content…
A lot of the peasants were completely against the idea of collectivisation as it limited the amount of profit they could personally earn and enjoyed the freedom they used to possess in comparison to being on collectivised land. Halfway through 1929, fewer than 5% of the country's peasants were in collective farms. In January 1930 Stalin announced his plans to have 25% of farms producing grain to be collectivised by the end of the year but the Central Committee doubled this prediction which came as a surprise as collectivisation was meant to be voluntary and gradually introduced. ''Oh Brothers! Oh sisters! Don't go into the collective farm. Antichrist will lay his mark upon you three times, once on the hand, the second on the forehead for all to see, and the third on the breast. If you believe in God, don't join the collective farm. And if you are in the collective farm, oh sisters, leave.'' This was a popular rhyme in 1930 that shows the opposition towards collectivisation. From this source you can see that some peasants believed that abiding the Soviet government and joining a collectivised farm is like a sin as the rhyme states that 'antichrist' will punish those who do so. Due to the vast amounts of opposition and resistance to collecetivisation, the Soviet government sent in many reinforcements. 25,000 party activists from cities were sent out to help control the farms in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Joseph Stalin established a modern totalitarian government in Soviet Russia. He is known as the “Man of Steel”. A totalitarianism is a type of government that takes total, centralized, state control over every aspect of public and private life of their people. His rule had changed the people of his empire in numerous ways. Stalin had total control over economic needs. According to document 6 “By 1940 Russia produced more pig iron than Germany, and far more than Britain or France. Numbers of cattle grew in the 1920s, but fell increasingly during the collectivization of agriculture after 1929, and by 1940 hardly exceeded the figure for 1920. Since 1940 the industrial development of the Soviet Union has been impressive, but agricultural production has continued to be plumiding”. The document illustrates how pig iron had significantly increased as a result of the “Five Year Plan”, however heavy industry led to expense of food supplies. This would cause limited production of consumer goods. It caused a step back because of the severe shortages of housing, food, clothing as well as other necessary goods. The Five Year Plan didn’t help much to excel their economic as Stalin hoped, it impacted by creating famine. Stalin rising to power promised an economic boom for Russia however, in that process many people suffered and died of starvation. According to document 5, “The purge began its last,…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The peasants were essentially bound to their land as they had no access to funds or passports to travel. The two types of farms faced disadvantages, for example the Kolkhozy farms (collective state farms) had to meet state obligations which were 60-70% of their output and only received trivial rewards in return (such as sacks of potatoes). Even though the war had caused so many deaths, the Politburo remained to see the peasants as disposable after the war. Also Stalin did not trust the peasants as he said they were “too individualistic to make good socialists” and therefore increased the taxes on them. So this is not recovery as the lifestyle, especially for peasants, got worse.…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq Research Paper

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were several reasons. Stalin sought to reorganize the Soviet Union via his Five Year Plans, which called for a radical industrialization as well as collectivisation to increase agricultural production and efficiency. This increased agricultural output was necessary to support the rapid industrialization he espoused; how else could the workers be fed? Many peasants who had been awarded or taken their land...to liquidating the kulaks as a class" (Document 5.3 Collectivisation 181). Millions were sent to labor camps, deported and died. The impossible demands made on the peasant farmers of increased production, only to turn everything over to the state, resulted in peasants that remained on the land at first hiding, then burning their crops/killing their animals rather than give them up "Stock was slaughtered every night..." (History in Quotations #5). An infuriated Stalin sent industrial workers into the country to show the peasants 'Bolshevik firmness' "without any rotten liberalism...[or] bourgeois humanitarianism...[and with]extreme measures" to get the grain. (Document 5.4 Horror in the Village…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soviet Union DBQ

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stalin was a part of the Bolsheviks which was the communist party of the Soviet Union. The Kulaks were the wealthy landowners and they were capitalists and did not approve of Stalin’s beliefs and methods. One of the changes Stalin implemented in order to achieve his one of his many goals, was to collective farms. Collectivization is the act of seizing land from the wealthy (which in this case were the Kulaks) and using it for communal use. This means that the Kulaks’ farms would get broken up to little parts and given to the peasants. In document 4, an excerpt from a speech that Stalin delivered in 1929 he says, “The socialist way, which is to set up collective farms and state farms into large collective farms, technically and scientifically equipped, and to the squeezing out of the capitalist elements from agriculture.” Stalin was determined to remove any and all capitalist that were not in his favor. Another change Stalin implemented was to stop feeding the livestock with the wheat being grown. In document 5, there is a graph showing the declination of the livestock in the first and second five year plan. In a total of 10 years, the amount of livestock was virtually cut in half! In comparison, the wheat production increased significantly in the ten years in which the livestock was cut in half. The wheat being…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev was a politician who led the Soviet Union during part of the Cold War. Around 1954-55 in the power struggle triggered by Stalin’s death in 1953, Khrushchev emerged as number one. In 1956, Khrushchev gives a “secret speech” where he discussed Stalin’s crimes for the first time, starting a process called “de-Stalinization.” Khrushchev believes that the Soviet system has become too bureaucratic. He wanted decentralization. He abolished the tractor station, which were the centralizing mechanisms that gave the party/state control over the collected farms because the collected farms did not own their own machinery. It was a control mechanism. Ultimately, most of Khrushchev’s reforms had very bad, unintended consequences.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin imposed collectivism, which took all the farm land from the Kulaks, leaving them homeless and unemployed It was forbidden to give aid to the Kulaks, and eventually they were forced in to slavery to survive, and any Kulak who refused slavery was deported Forced Famine under the rule of Joseph Stalin By 1932, 75% of all farmland had been acquired by Stalin’s regime and he was exporting so much food from this region, there was no food left to feed the Ukranian people (Trueman, 2013) The Ukranian Communist party reached out for support from the Soviet Communist party and were soon stamped out by Stalin’s loyal soldiers, sent to subdue the Ukranians Starvation was so prevalent that people fled the country side to larger cities, only to find starvation there as well, with bodies of the dead lining the streets Forced Famine under the rule of Joseph Stalin…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agriculture was a crucial area which needed to be reformed if Russia was to ever be modernised. At the root of the inherently backward Russia was the peasant workforce, who mainly worked in the agricultural sector, which left Russia a world away from other European Countries in terms of industry. ‘Out of the 60 million people in European Russia in 1855, 50 million were peasant serfs’1; this was a huge obstacle to modernisation as it limited. The goal of Emancipation was to release the peasants from the land that they were bound to in order to create an industrial workforce that would drive modernisation. The predominantly agricultural workforce would now work in factories thus changing Russia into an industrial juggernaut, which would be key in modernising Russia. The reform was also crucial as it was the first step in the deconstruction of the Ancien Regime within Russia. Emancipation was key in establishing support for the monarchy, ‘in other countries Serf emancipation took place as a consequence of social and organic change’2, this meant that in Russia the monarchy had…

    • 1981 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia progressed towards an economic system of government owned business and redistribution, known as communism. Prior to Russia developing into communism they were a capitalist state. The last time we see a non communist state in Russia before 1939 would be under Czar Nicholas II. Previous social conditioning in Russia led to popular beliefs among the peasantry that the land belongs to the farmers, or at least it should. However, a small number of the peasantry had owned any land at all. And they also had other reasons to hold feelings of discontent. The Russian working conditions were simply atrocious. Workers saw work jour of 12, 14, and 16 hours long. And the factories which they worked on were overcrowded and were obvious dangers to their long-term and immediate health. And for all of the hardship faced workers would see dismal pay, barely enough to supply for their family. However, what led Russia past the threshold…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Holodomor is a definitive example of collectivism values as formerly wealthy farmers known to the Communists as Kulaks, were to be “liquidated” as a class according to Stalin’s policies. This is where the out-of-group homogeneity effect comes in as Stalin and his regime saw these members as all alike and considered “enemies of the people” (Waller, 2007). Stalin’s law forbade helping the Kulaks as they were left with nothing and were brought to settlements located in the wilderness. Soviet mines and large industrialized organizations took these members including unmarried girls and grown men to become their personal slave-workers (The History Place, 2000). The farmers who rejected being a part of this new collective structure ended up being…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    15. How did the Agricultural revolution in the Soviet Union impact the peasants and production in the country?…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This was just the initial stages of Stalin’s war against the Ukrainians or “kulaks” as Stalin called them. But the quota he set for them to produce was six almost seven million tons of grain. This was an impossible quota to meet, especially since collective farms were always less productive than private…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer’s “Down on the Factory Farm” and E.B. White’s “Death of a Pig” illustrate practices of raising animals for human consumption. The care and environment provided for the animals by both White and the factory farmer’s that Singer discusses can be labelled as ‘animal husbandry’. White and the factory farm worker’s animal husbandry methods can be deemed as ethical, or unethical. Bernard E. Rollin defines good animal husbandry as “keeping the animals under conditions to which their natures [are] biologically adapted, and augmenting these natural abilities by providing additional food, protection, care, or shelter” (6). Through this definition of ethics and the criteria established by the “Principles” found in James P. Sterba’s “Reconciling Anthropocentric and Nonanthropocentric…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The money that was received from the wheat that was being sold to other countries went towards Stalin’s Five Year Plan to modernize the Soviet Union and to help finance his military. It was estimated that Stalin sold enough wheat to feed all of Ukraine for two years (“Stalin’s Forced Famine”). They had so much excess grain that they would even dump some into the sea or let it rot right in front of the Ukrainian people’s eyes (Perloff). The Soviet Union then closed off all borders so that nobody in Ukraine could get anything in or out of the country. Anyone that got caught with food could be shot on the spot or get put in prison. Starvation started to spread throughout the country and the effects of malnutrition started taking its toll on the Ukrainian people. The Soviet Army dug deep holes where they would throw all the dead bodies that were lying around on the street. People started to cook any animals they could find, whether it was a cat, dog, or bird. They even had to resort to cannibalism (“Stalin’s Forced Famine”). Some people wanted to get the agony over with so they would commit suicide if they had the strength to do it. Others would lay out on the street, too weak to even talk, and just wait until there body was reduced to just skin and bones (Perloff). At the height of the famine, they projected that about 25,000 people died every day and around 7,000,000 died…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thank you for contacting my office regarding your thoughts on the greater sage-grouse. It is important to hear from constituents as I begin my work in Congress representing the people of Washington’s 4th District. I sincerely appreciate you reaching out and sharing your views on this important issue.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ukrainian Genocide

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Joseph Stalin specifically started the famine and targeted Ukrainian farmers to remove them from society in order to quell feelings of nationalism and uprising in the country. The Kulak farmers made up the majority of the population and so Stalin targeted the Kulak class of farmers because he “believed any future uprising would be led by the Kulaks, who were pro-Tsarist and anti-Soviet, thus he implemented policies intended to eliminate the Kulaks as a class of Ukrainian farmers” (Krawczewski). The Kulaks did not support Stalin’s government and so he viewed that class of farmers as a threat. All of Stalin’s actions against Ukraine (the arrests, deportations, and collectivization policies) specifically targeted the private farmers in order to prevent uprisings against him. Therefore, the genocide was thought out and brutally planned with one goal in mind, submission of the country. Later, the famine affected many more rural farmers as it was created solely to punish the Ukrainian people. Stalin did not just merrily order the country to export tons of grain, he ensured that the people would starve to death in the processes. In order to create the famine, the “Soviet Union increased production quotas that were impossible to meet, cut rations to those still in Ukraine, and coordinated food seizures in Ukrainian villages. This resulted in widespread malnutrition and starvation” (Krawczewski). The Soviet Union purposely increased the productions quotas for the country and slowly wiped out all other existing food supplies. The resulting starvation from this purposeful famine was meticulously and cruelly thought out. Ukraine ended up exporting huge amounts of grain even as the people farming it were starving. Even though there was a surplus amount, all the grain was taken away from the Ukrainian people. Certainly, the specific targeting of the farming…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays