Preview

Coke Current Ratio Analysis Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
529 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Coke Current Ratio Analysis Essay
Short-term Liquidity
Current ratio:
Coke's current ratio have growth constantly during the period (2014 - 2016). In 2016, the current ratio is 1.28 which is higher than the previous year ratio, 1.24. It means that Coke has more $1.28 current assets to cover every dollar of its short-term debt. In this year, the current asset in the total assets increases 1.84%. The factor that contributes to the increase of Coke's current asset is the significant increase of the Cash and cash equivalent account which rose 16.12% and took 20.80% in the total assets. Moreover, Coke's total current liability slightly reduced 1.47%. That was caused by the decline of account payable, note payable, and other current liabilities. Due to the increase in total current asset and the decrease of current liability, Coke becomes more liquidity in 2016. In contrast, in 2016, Pepsi's current ratio is 1.28 which decreased 0.03 in comparison to the 2015 ratio, 1.31. In fact, the growth of the current assets is 17.62% that is lower than the growth of the current liabilities, 20.24%. The increase of Pepsi's current assets coming from the increase of other receivables which is less liquidity than the cash and cash equivalent of Coke.
…show more content…
In 2016, Coke's acid ratio is 1.18 that rises 4.4% in comparison to the last year ratio, 1.13. By eliminating the inventories which generally is the least liquidity current asset and takes about more than 3% in the total asset, Coke still has $1.18 liquidity assets to cover its short-term liabilities. In comparison, Pepsi's acid ratio is 1.15 which slightly reduces in comparison to 2015, 1.16. Moreover, the note payable of Pepsi increased dramatically 69% in 2016. The information gives us more information about the ability to pay off short-term debt of the two companies and also proves that Coke is more liquidity in 2016 although its quick ratio was lower than Pepsi in 2014 and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Hsm/260 Financial Analysis

    • 2889 Words
    • 12 Pages

    An organization’s current ratio shows how liquid the assets of the agency are by comparison to the short term debts that the agency must pay to continue its operations. This ratio is calculated by taking the assets that can be converted to cash within a year (current assets) and dividing it by the liabilities that are either currently due or will become due within a year (current liabilities). The current ratio, ideally, should be at 1.0…

    • 2889 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acct4120

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Debt / Equity ratio increase and return on assets ratio decreases, it will not be good for Pepsi to operate…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    fin 341

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Liquidity ratios show the relationship between the current assets and current liabilities. These ratios provide us with a view of the company’s ability to pay its current liabilities. KR has a current ratio of 0.72 and a quick ratio of 0.25. WFM has a current ratio of 2.15 and a quick ratio of 1.77. Both companies’ consists largely of inventory. If both KR and WFM sold their entire inventory, they would be in the same comparable position. These ratios show that WFM is more liquid than KR.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fnt Task 1

    • 1124 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Current Ratio” measures the ability to pay current liabilities with current assets. The current assets divided by current liabilities. In 2011 the current ratio was 1.86. By 2012, it decreased to 1.79 rating in the lower second quartile group in the industry. Company G’s ability to repay its debt is consistent with showing a weakness from year to year based on the industry’s quartiles of 3.1 with a strong ability to cover liabilities 2.1median to 1.4 stating an weakness.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cocacola Analysis

    • 1314 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An eyeball assessment of the changes in Coke’s financial statements between 1996 and 2010 show that mainly all accounts are up. The total assets are up from 1996 to 2010 with an increase from $16,161 to $72,921. Also current assets increased 3.6% from 1996 to 2010 with total non-current assets increasing 5%. Revenue nearly doubled from 1996 having only $18,546 to increasing in 2010 to $35,119. The total current liabilities increased over the years from $7,406 to $18,508. The total long term liabilities also show an increase from 1996 having $2,599 to $23,410 in 2010. Also the shareholders equity increased greatly over the years from $6,156 to a total of $31,003 in 2010.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Xacc280 Financial Analysis

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Investors and potential investors in these companies will look at and consider a multitude of information before deciding which of these two companies would be a better investment. For instance, most investors will look at each company’s current assets and liabilities amounts. In 2004, Coca-Cola had more than 12 million dollars in current assets, while PepsiCo showed only 8.6 million dollars in their current assets. In 2005, Coca-Cola faced a decrease while PepsiCo had an increase in current assets. PepsiCo recorded 10.4 million dollars in current assets, while Coca-Cola dropped to 10.2 million dollars. Their current liabilities faced similar comparisons. In 2004, Coca-Cola had 11.1 million dollars in current liabilities, and then dropped that number to 9.8 million dollars in 2005. This…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acc561 Wk2 Dq1

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Solvency ratios are used to measure how well a company manages its debts. For instance, the total debt ratio is total assets minus total equity divided by total assets. Coca-Cola has a debt ratio of 60.5 percent. The debt ratio shows the percentage of Coca-Cola’s asset that is financed through debt. Approximately 61% of the company's assets are financed through debt. The Debt to equity ratio measures the stability of financing provided by stockholders compared to the financing provided by creditors. This is calculated as total liabilities/total equity. Coca-Cola’s debt to equity is 83 percent. A large amount of debt as a percentage of equity indicates that Coca-Cola is funding operations and growth through debt.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coca-cola total current assets were 39% and 34.83% in 2004 and 2005. Liquidity of PepsiCo decreased in 2005 and The Coca-cola increased in 2005. The assets of Coca-cola were 62% and 65.17% in 2004 and 2005. The current liabilities of PepsiCo were $6,753.00 and $9,406.00 in 2004 and 2005. The total assets were 24% and 29.65%. The total assets for Coca-cola were 35% and 33.43%. The liabilities of PepsiCo increased while the current debt of Coca-cola decreased. For both companies the total liabilities in 2005 were 55.08% and the total assets were 44.02%. The equity of PepsiCo was 48% of assets in 2004 and assets was 44.92% in 2005. In 2005 PepsiCo shareholder reduces the inventory. In 2005 the shares were 55.59% of assets for Coca-cola but in 2004 it showed shares there were only 51%. The shares for Coca-cola have been more than…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The objective of this paper is to compare the major players in the beverage/soft drink industry, Pepsi Co. & Coca Cola Co. This paper will give you sound information on which company to invest in as well as taking a deeper look at both companies over all. My analysis will be made based on the company’s income statements, horizontal, vertical analysis, balances sheets and financial statement ratios. This along with other information should give you a clear picture of which company is the best company to invest in.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ladbrokes Vs Hill

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Among those two companies, William Hill was more liquid than Ladbrokes. None of the companies have reached the recommended value of 1.0. Nevertheless, it is not a negative information for debt holders, due to the nature of the industry. Only in year 2013, it can be noticed that Ladbrokes could have some difficulties in meeting its current obligations. However, the lack of liquid assets could be balanced by short-term loans. What is interesting, is the fact that current and quick ratios from all selected years were the same, because of zero (Ladbrokes) or very low (William Hill) inventories in their operation.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Xacc280 Financial Analysis

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: Axia College. (2012). Appendix A Specimen Financial Statements: Pepsi Co, Inc. Retrieved from Axia College, XACC 280 website…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The higher the current ratio, the greater the liquidity of the corporate assets. The generally believed that the a reasonable minimum current ratio is 200%. According to the table 1, it shows us the current ratio both in 200Y and in 200Z are below 200%, and the current ratios are declined year by year. However, the selected industry ratios are rising year by year and greater than 200% in 200Y and 200Z. It implies that the Lamar Swimwear 's debt paying ability is less than average and trending downward. Nonetheless, the liquidity analysis just with current ratio is limited, and the quick ratio make up for this limitation. Both current ratio and quick ratio are reflected the liquidity of the…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acc 400

    • 406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    BYP13-4 The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo, Inc. provide refreshments to every corner of the world. Selected data from the 2004 consolidated financial statements for The Coca-Cola Company and for PepsiCo, Inc., are presented here (in millions).Coca-Cola PepsiCoTotal current assets $ 12,094 $ 8,639Total current liabilities 10,971 6,752Net sales 21,962 29,261Cost of goods sold 7,638 13,406Net income 4,847 4,212Average (net) receivables for the year 2,131 2,915Average inventories for the year 1,336 1,477Average total assets 29,335 26,657Average common stockholders’ equity 15,013 12,734Average current liabilities 9,429 6,584Average total liabilities 14,322 27,917Total assets 31,327 27,987Total liabilities 15,392 14,464Income taxes 1,375 1,372Interest expense 196 167Cash provided by operating activities 5,968 5,054Capital expenditures 755 1,387Cash dividends 2,429 1,329Instructions(a) Compute the following liquidity ratios for 2004 for Coca-Cola and for PepsiCo and comment on the relative liquidity of the two competitors.(1) Current ratio. (4) Inventory turnover.(2) Receivables turnover. (5) Days in inventory.(3) Average collection period. (6) Current cash debt coverage.(b) Compute the following solvency ratios for the two companies and comment on the relative solvency of the two competitors.(1) Debt to total assets ratio.(2) Times interest earned.(3) Cash debt coverage ratio.(4) Free cash flow.(c) Compute the following profitability ratios for the two companies and comment on the relative profitability of the two competitors.(1) Profit margin.(2) Asset turnover.(3) Return on assets.(4) Return on common stockholders’ equity.…

    • 406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    These analysis show: that the PepsiCo has had an increase in assets by 21%, with an increase in liabilities of 39%. This is a result of the company obtaining more liabilities.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ratio Analysis

    • 984 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Current Ratio: this expresses the relationship between current asset and current liabilities. That is, how an economic entity can settle its short-term obligations with it available short-term resources in a given period. Fan Milk Ghana Ltd’s (FML) current ratio fell from 2.68:1 in 2010 to 2.52:1 in 2011. This appears as a result of increase in assets or liabilities.…

    • 984 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays