Preview

Closing Argument on the Defentants of the Boston Massacre

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
303 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Closing Argument on the Defentants of the Boston Massacre
Teanna Palmer april 26, 2011
Mrs. Levertte

I John Adams is here today to address the jury of the innocence of the men that were involved in the killing of 5 civilians. On March 5, 1770 a riot broke out on the streets of Boston causing mayhem; British soldiers arrived on the scene to find the civilians out of control, and in order to gain order knowing the risk that was being taken they put their lives in danger to get a furious mob under control. No one man deserves to have his life taking and neither does he deserves to have it threatened and that is exactly what these men were experiecneing as they stood befor a raging crowd of civilians as they tore threw the streets of Boston. To have you're life threatened is just as bad as having it taken away from you ; Iam not saying that what they did was right but Iam saying that they were given no other choice considering the circumstances they were put under it was either kill or be killed and if they had not made the decision to take out the threat it would be civilians here today instead of these soldiers, If you were put in their shoes would you have not made the same choice? or is it just these soldiers who find that their life is valuable enought to protect? They were harassed, objects were thrown at them and they were threatened. Please allow these men to have a fair trial and please do not pass judgement upon them for they felt that they were doing something in defence of them selves as for every one of the world wants to be protected and when ever they feel threaten they will react the same way these men

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Boston Massacre is one of the most controversial events in American history that occurred in Boston before the American Revolution. Certainly, it has a fundamental role in the development of America as a nation, which led it to have a huge motivation for revolution. A heavy British military presence and having very high taxes in the country were some of the main reasons that made Boston citizens very irritated. Thus, there were already many disagreements and tensions between inhabitants and the British that could have led to the Massacre. In this essay, I will carefully analyze three primary sources, and compare these to the interpretation given by HBO’s John Adams. In my view, these sources can be divided into two groups in which the article of Boston Gazette and the picture of Paul Revere, “The Bloody Massacre” can stand together against the other two sources, the letter of Captain Thomas Preston and John Adams HBO miniseries. However, the most valuable and credible sources for me were the HBO miniseries John Adams (2008) and the letter of Captain Thomas Preston, which in my opinion, are very logical and describe the natural outcome of all the disagreements and tensions between Boston citizens and British soldiers.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was the Boston Massacre really a MASSACRE? There are many historical events that are unclear and the Boston Massacre is no exception. When most hear the word massacre, they think the killing of tons of people, not just a few. When history labels a small skirmish a massacre, there must be a reason. The Boston Massacre was one of the biggest turning points leading up to the Revolutionary War.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A few years before this, many incidents occurred which prodded colonists to rise up against the tyrannical British Parliament, one of such events was the event known as the Boston Massacre. This event occurred on March 5, 1770. A squad of British soldiers, come to support a sentry who was being pressed by a heckling, snowballing crowd, let loose a volley of shots. Three persons were killed immediately and two died later of their wounds. The British officer in charge, Capt. Thomas Preston was arrested for manslaughter, along with eight of his men; all were later acquitted. This horrendous event assisted in unifying the colonies with one goal: to end the tyrannical reign of the British Parliament and its violation of basic, essential human rights that no man, government, or group had any right to infringe upon. The Boston Massacre sparked the colonists’ desire for independence for all Americans. This desire was the main factor in the birth of the American Revolutionary War, and subsequently the United States of America.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although many historians believe that the Boston Massacre was an act of murder, it is clear that the incident was an act of self-defense. First reason why it was self-defense, is that the colonist Crispus Attucks was holding a cordwood stick and swung it at James Bailey. James Bailey then shot Crispus Attucks. James Bailey shot Crispus Attucks in act of self-defense. This led on to more shootings, but more colonists were getting angry and more violent. Another reason why it was self-defense, is that the captain of the British soldiers Preston, never did say fire and he never ordered his troops to fire. The colonists were taunting the soldiers by saying, "Fire, fire," which lead to more confusion. Also, Captain…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story "John Adams and the Coming of the Revolution”, author David McCullough discusses how John Adams was asked to defend the British soldiers in court of the soldier’s accusation of man slaughter, following the Boston Massacre. Being such a problematic case that could ruin his reputation, John Adams accepted to defend the soldiers because of his experience in difficult cases, and his strong principles and beliefs. John Adam’s reputation did not even tarnish because of how skillfully he handled the case gaining the respect of the people of Boston.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is often said to remember important mistakes, crimes, declines, anything negative so that, "History does not repeat itself." Some of the notable mistakes include strategic errors in wars; such as the French, in World War I, stacking the Maginot Line while the Germans marched around it, and in World War II doing the exact same thing. Other mistakes include incidents on domestic soil in which protests turn violent such as the Boston Massacre in 1770 and the Kent State Shootings in 1970. Other than each happening on Mondays and occurring almost two hundred years apart, the two draw deeper comparisons to one another which caused widespread protest leaving marks in American history. Upon reviewing these two cases it triggers the question, did history repeat itself?…

    • 3432 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crispus Attucks was an African-American man killed during the Boston Massacre and thus believed to be the first casualty of the American Revolution.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Adams was the only lawyer in Boston to take on the defense case of the British troops for the Boston Massacre. Adams agrees to take on the case, despite its unpopularity, because he believes that all men were entitled to a fair trial and deserved equal justice. He also has a position in Boston’s legislature as motivation, which is not shown in the film. We don’t get to see the rest of the defense team in the docudrama either; Josiah Quincy is left out. All accused men receive their own individual trial. All but two soldiers are acquitted; Hugh Montgomery and Matthew Kilroy are charged with manslaughter. Adams wins the case for his client and is elected to a higher position in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dear Billy Bob, it’s your cousin Samantha writing to ask you, how are you still a loyalist?Have you not heard about what has happened in Boston.One of the many laws that your king passed was the Quartering Act,this law allowed any troop to barge into your home with out your consent.Imagine having to provide for a stranger for as long as they liked while supporting yourself.Although this not all,an event called the Boston Massacre occurred on March 5th 1770.Gun shots and yelps were heard in the center of town,killing 5 colonists.This event caused an abundance of anger calling for the removal of troops in Boston.If you are still loyal to the king at this point here is another reason why you should become a patriot.The Tea Act was passed three…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boston Massacre

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2) The Boston Massacre was an incident on a cold night in Boston, MA, on…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The event that occurred on March 5th, 1770 should be named “The Boston Incident” rather than “The Boston Massacre” because the term massacre usually reminds many that many people have been slaughtered. But in the “The Boston Massacre” less than ten people were killed so I wouldn’t consider it a massacre due to very few deaths. From account number two, William Taint says, “People still continued in the street, crying, “Fire, fire, and be damned,” and throw some more snow balls; whereupon I heard a musket go off, and in the space of two or three seconds, I heard the word “Fire” be given, but by whom I do not know and instantly the soldiers fired one after another.” I think that it was the Americans who instigated this incident because they were…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a mob of colonist, throwing snowballs, stones and sticks at a squad of British soldiers. This resulted in the death of five colonist. The Boston Massacre was the tipping point to the boiling tension between the British and the colonist. The trial and verdict would set off the inevitable war between Britain and the colonies of that time. By analyzing the defenses, testimonies, historical facts, and common law of that time I agree and believe that the verdict of the Boston Massacre trials was just. I also came to the conclusion that this trial played an important role in the rising of patriotism and independence from British rule.…

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boston Massacre

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today is the last day of the trial. We have heard all of the witnesses and now we know that we must deliberate. I know that some of the "witnesses" are liars. Some make valid points and I know without a doubt in my mind that Captain Preston is an innocent man and that his men were provoked. As I listened to the witnesses, here is what I came to believe:…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I was interested in the Boston Massacre and found many testimonies and other primary resources there. However, as I read through I was intrigued by a comment in my readings about Captain Thomas Preston’s “London Letter”. In Preston’s letter to London, he intended only Londoners to read it and when the article was later published in the Boston Gazette it added annoyance to the already frustrated public in Boston. I was now, intrigued and determined to find Captain Preston’s newspaper article. I, then, asked for help from the research and technology desk. They guided me through the library database to find a website called American Historical Newspapers. They had many articles from 1700-1850 and I was able to find the actual article, with Captain Preston’s recollection of the “unhappy affair” (Preston’s quote), posted in the Boston Gazette from June 25th 1770, as well as, the original letter to London first published, in April 28th, in the London newspaper the Essex Gazette.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that the Boston Massacre was not a massacre. I think this because there was a lot of propaganda, and the low death toll. The definition of a massacre is an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people. The Boston Massacre consisted of 8 deaths. When everyone was yelling things, it confused the soldiers of what they should do.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays