Preview

Close A Prison Door Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1030 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Close A Prison Door Analysis
Educate a Convict, Close a Prison Door
/They’re trying to build another prison/ For you and me to live in/ Another prison system/ for you and me/ Minor drug offenders fill your prisons you don't even flinch/ All our taxes paying for your wars against the new non-rich/ All research and successful drug policy show that treatment should be increased/ And law enforcement decreased while abolishing mandatory minimum sentences/ In 2001, Serj Tankian and Daron Malakian, members of the band System of a Down, wrote this song in frustration about the mass incarceration of poor American’s, for minor drug offenses, that was going on then and , unfortunately, is still going on today.
Prisons in America are where law breakers are sent as a punishment for
…show more content…
Ernest Drucker, Professor Emeritus of Family and Social Medicine at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, states, “Drugs have been so heavily criminalized that they spawned an epidemic—mass incarceration” (36); also, Angela Hattery and Earl Smith, professors of Sociology, at Wake Forest University, state, “The United States incarcerates more of its citizens on drug convictions alone than the entire incarcerated population of the European Union, which has a population far greater than ours” (7). All of these esteemed scholars, of so many different fields of expertise, cannot be wrong; hence, this daunting attack on drug addiction has not only failed, but it has also led to millions of citizens going through a prison experience that did more damage, than good. The second cause of the detention of such a large number of people is the recidivism rate of over 69% of parolees that are released from prison: the lack of education to secure lucrative employment and no support system make reintegration back into society almost impossible (Hattery and Smith 13-14). By passing fair sentencing laws, treating prisoners for their drug addictions, and giving them the education they will need for reentry into society, America can reduce the prison population and lower the recidivism …show more content…
Mandatory minimums where laws that were put into place to detour drug users away from using drugs. The common consensus, of society at time when these laws were passed, was that giving someone longer time in jail for using drugs would make them not want to use drugs—it did not work. The mandatory sentencing laws need to be changed because they do not lower the crime rate; instead, longer prison stays actually raise the rate of recidivism and, in turn, lead to even more people in prison. Scholars from various fields at the University of Michigan claim, putting criminals in prison for longer periods of time keep the prisons full longer but does nothing to reduce crime rates; also, when new lawbreakers are sent to prison at a faster rate the prison populations continue to expand because of the high return percentage (McMillon, Simon, and Morenoff 21). Mandatory minimums were voted into place under the assumption that these stiffer sentencing laws would stop crime; consequently, they sparked a massive growth of prisons, decimated millions of peoples’

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    As an American who is privileged enough to live in a wealthy community, attend a good school, and not have to worry about where my next meal will come from, many of my country’s most pressing issues aren’t problems I’m faced with on a daily basis. However, many Americans are uninformed and subsequently overlook one such issue, unaware of the harmful effect it has on their lives. The “it” in question is mandatory minimum sentencing policy. While most people assume these laws have no affect on anyone excluding the person being sentenced, in reality, the effects of mandatory minimums are far reaching. Aside from the prisoner and his/her family, the tax dollars or hard-working citizens are used to pay for the extended prison stays of thousands of fellow Americans. A whopping 67% of them are nonviolent drug offenders, according to a U.S. Sentencing Commission Report to Congress. It is imperative that the American government abolishes mandatory minimums because they have an…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clearly there are several issues of Mandatory Minimum sentences. Moreover, there is evidence that says it decreases drug possession and violence, federal judges can argue otherwise. Often, innocent people go to jail for harmless acts for an unreasonable amount of time in jail, for a one time use or a non-violent act of drug use. If federal court systems continue laws of Mandatory Minimum sentences, they need to question and use evidence to support whether the individual is really guilty or innocent.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory minimum sentences are another method that was designed to limit judicial discretion while maintaining a “get tough on crime” approach. Mandatory sentences are sentences where all people convicted of certain crimes will be punished equally with a set minimum prison term. I believe the intentions were good when these reforms went into place. I think the intended purpose was to get tough on crime, eliminate bias on the part of the judge, to make criminals think twice about breaking the law, and provide equal punishment to all criminals who commit the same crimes. Unfortunately these sentence guidelines do not allow a judge to take into consideration the first time offender, differentiate the deviance level of the offender, and it does not allow for the judge to tailor a punishment to each individual case. The “drug war” they were trying to control with these sentences has had a backfire effect. The drug lords they were trying to stop are not the ones being affected by the sentences; it is the nonviolent, low-level drug users who are overcrowding the prisons as a result of these sentences.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Beyond the Prison Bubble

    • 729 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The second section of the article (para. 8-16) shows how ineffective our incarceration systems have been. Increase in spending to build prisons and maintain their populations began to exceed needed funds for vital public services. This resulted in state budgets being pushed to the point of crisis. Crime was reduced to a degree, but with massive the costs spend on new prisons it was really not worth it. The offenders that are leaving prison now are more likely to have fairly long criminal records and lengthy histories of alcohol and drug abuse, significant periods of unemployment. As well, many don’t need to stay very long in prison and could be let out after a year or two to make room for extremely…

    • 729 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mandatory minimums are laws which require automatic prison terms for certain crimes, such as drug possession. These laws were passed to ensure that individual criminals served long prison sentences. However, there some critics that have voiced their concerns about mandatory minimum penalties in the United States.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Transtheoretical Model

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Substance abuse and dependency persist as a major health and social concern in America. Author Joseph A. Califano, a former secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare notes, “it is hard to find an American family or circle of friends that substance abuse has not touched directly (Califano, J. A., p. 1, 2008).” Califano further explains that although Americans are 4 percent of the world’s population, Americans consume 65 percent of the world’s illegal drugs. Furthermore, one in four Americans will have an alcohol or drug disorder at some point in his or her life. Most of these individuals have parents, children, siblings, friends, community and colleagues who will “undergo psychological and social harm" (Califano, J. A., p. 1, 2008.).” Authors…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hiller (1999), suggest that the main type of treatment program adapted within the United States prison system is the “In-prison Therapeutic Community”. This particular program sole intent is to house prisoners receiving treatment for drug and alcohol abuse separately from the general population throughout the prison. According to Hiller (1999), this programs foremost goal or function is to operate differently by adhering to stricter treatment protocols enhanced values and beliefs and to increase the functionality of the staff. They should also have shorter treatment durations and give emphasis to “self-help recovery and relapse prevention.” Hiller (2009), states that drugs and crimes are interrelated and that within the United States, over 68% of new arrestees test positive for illegal drugs; as the levels of illicit drug use increase as does the percentage of drug distribution and other…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are over two thousand drug courts in America, each one specializing in its own level of drug abuse. A drug court’s primary role is to handle cases with offenders of substance abuse. They offer offenders an opportunity to enter a rehabilitation program in lieu of sentenced jail time. The road to recovery is of course challenging and difficult, making the drug courts so strict and costly. Drug courts were generally created for non-violent drug abusers. Although these offenders are given the chance to avoid jail time they are extremely supervised by the court officials. Drug tests, substance abuse treatment, must make regular appearances in court and constant checkups are required to continue in the program. These offenders’ cases are usually dismissed due to their involvement in the program or their sentence is only shortened. Participation in these programs are completely voluntary and if qualified to enter, the offender must agree to complete all the tasks given and report to every summoning from the court. If an offender doesn’t complete the program, they can be prosecuted or their sentence will be revised and will be placed in jail. Drug courts are considered one f the most effective ways to eliminate drug abusers and avoiding incarceration. While in the program offenders are monitored and results of every drug court case is very astonishing, but the long term effect of these cases are beyond the rulings of the court. It is not known if those who participated in the programs continued their lives drug free. These courts have been examined and tested to see if the results justify the cost of the program. The operations evaluated such as the number of participants, referrals issued, and drug court graduates. The cost savings of processing the offenders through the program instead of straight jail time, and results compared with those who have been completed their sentenced jail time as opposed to those in the programs. The therapeutic jurisprudence theory…

    • 346 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States only has 5 percent of the world's population and uses 75 percent of the world's prescription drugs. The United States has the highest prison population out of all the countries and almost half of the prisoners are there because of drug crimes. Due to the ever increasing drug use in the U.S. today, our society would benefit from less punishment and more rehabilitation, some benefits include less spending, lower incarceration rates and lower death rates.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States prison system is not a suitable place for nonviolent drug offenders. The high rate of recidivism is caused by one thing and one thing only, prison sentences. Nonviolent drug offenders will have no choice other than to socialize with other inmates, some who have committed irreprehensible crimes, thereby greatly increasing their chance of becoming violent. The population of prisons in the United States is on a steady rise. One way to stop this is by reevaluating the three strikes law, because the proof that this law discourages repeat offenders is simply not there.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A number of historical developments have set the stage for the shift from being primarily “tough on crime” to effective treatment, but the critical role of substance abuse treatment in the history of rehabilitation in American Corrections is often overlooked. Substance abuse treatment has demonstrated success over the…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the text “Reconsidering Mandatory Minimum Sentences: The Arguments for and Against Potential Reforms” By Evan Bernick and Paul Larkin,it stated, “Mandatory minimum sentences also prevent crime because certain and severe punishment inevitably will have a deterrent effect.” In other words, sentencing a person with a precise amount time in prison would leave a long-term effect on the person that they would mostly like not commit another crime. Their statement is invalid because in the article “ Against his better Judgement” by Eli Saslow, it states, “But most mandatory sentences applied to drug charges and according to police data, drug use had remained steady since the 1980’s even as the number of drug offenders in federal prison increased by 2,200 percent.” That being said, drug use rates neither increased nor changed but Mandatory Minimum sentencing, once again, fed into the increase of prison rates.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Evan Bernick and Paul J. Larkin, Jr.(2014), “mandatory sentencing was passed in the 1980s, by U.S. Congress and many state representing two bodies with yearnings that it will the settled jail terms to those arraigned particular infringement, much of the time drug offense”. Rather, this cruel sentencing adversely, packing the penitentiaries with low-level transgressors at a higher cost to taxpayers. As indicated by Paul Larkin and Evan Bernick (2014), “mandatory minimum sentences have not eliminated sentencing disparities because they have not eliminated sentencing discretion; they have merely shifted…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    More than half of prisoners are currently serving time for non-violent drug related offenses, as the popularity for “war on drugs” has increased over the last decade. The majority of inmates are harshly sentenced, including doubling of imprisonment time for repeat offenders. For example, the federal law issues that selling 28 grams of crack cocaine requires a sentence of at least five years. Because even more convicts are being sent to prison, overcrowding has forced institutions to release prisoners early to meet budget requriements. Most of these inmates become homeless and are diagnosed with many medical problems, often getting little to no help. Being that this subject is an issue currently in society, I also had to cope with consequences…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today in my generation I have noticed a huge amount of incarcerations that I’ve seen publicly on television and in the media. The Smarter Sentencing Act does not repeal any federal mandatory minimum sentences, but instead reduces prison costs and populations by creating a fairer, less costly minimum terms for nonviolent drug offenders (). The 4 main things it will do will be to save billions spent on incarcerating nonviolent drug offenders, save expensive prison beds for more dangerous offenders, remedy a long-standing racial injustice and strengthen black communities, and address over-criminalization ().…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays