Preview

Clinical Research Ethics: The Belmont Principles

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1662 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Clinical Research Ethics: The Belmont Principles
Clinical Research Ethics
Between 1932 and 1972, a clinical trial sponsored by the U.S. Department of Health, welcomed 400 African Americans to join a trial. The perception of trial was very different from the participants and the researchers (sponsors). Participants thought they were getting treatment for “bad blood”, which means a minor illness. In exchange for participation, the participants received free medical exams, meals and burial insurance. Participants were not informed it was an experiment. The true purpose of the experiment was to study the effects of untreated syphilis among the 400 African American participants. Throughout the study, researchers refrained from treatment. Though they know penicillin was widely available, which
…show more content…
Due to the results of the Tuskegee syphilis study. the national research act was passed in 1974. The national research act created the national commission for the protection of human subjects of biomedical and behavioral research. (CITE POWERPOINT). The purpose of the commission charge was to recognize the basic ethical principles that should be a followed when conducting biomedical and behavioral research that involves human volunteers. When researchers conduct a trial they must be in conformity with principles. Thus the commission created the Belmont Principles. It is a guideline to resolve possible ethical problems that could arise among research with human participants. There are three core principles, respect for persons, beneficence, and …show more content…
They must arrange them exceptional food, shelter and veterinarian care. The U.S Department of Agriculture enforces the AWA through regular inspections of research labs and animal suppliers (Why do some people say animal research is wrong?).
Some misconception’s regarding the use of animals in research are that animals are constantly harmed. However, research’s have the duty and obligation to minimize the suffering of animals in their institutions. Through laws and observations, researchers have the duty to treat animals humanely (Why do some people say animal research is wrong?) Due to the continuous regulated research involving animals, a tremendous amount of lives and improved the quality of life for many people and animals. It is important for researchers to study animals, they are able to learn more about how living organisms work and how certain disease affect the human body. The biological processes are alike in humans and in animals, in certain ways. Researcher study simple organisms that help them understand why animals are prone to diseases like human diseases. Due to the similarities, researchers can study the roots of cause, prevention and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, many people debate whether or not using animals in research is humane. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. [2] Proponents of animal testing state that it has enabled the development of numerous life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, while opponents state that animal testing is cruel and often yields irrelevant results because animals are so different from human beings. Many different animals are used in scientific studies such as rabbits, mice, primates, dogs, cats, pigs, and cows. I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it provides opportunities to improve the lives of both humans and animals.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This introduced one of the first ethical implications in this experiment which was withholding information to gain consent.The USPHS conducted a screening in search of infected participants. After they had chosen the few hundred men to be apart of the experiments they began to moved forward with the study. The doctors lured these men into the study by saying that they were ill and had "bad blood".It was never explained to them why they were really being chosen for this treatment. In order to ensure the interest of the blacks, they began performing noneffective treatments on them such as giving the mercurial ointment. Also, they even used African American health care workers to mislead patients into compliance. These men endured much pain and were enrolled in various treatments without their consent.The second ethical implication was the withholding of treatment. This was the worst charge that the researchers had committed. Even in (year) when penicillin had become the primary treatment for syphilis, this information was also withheld and men were prevented from getting treatment. Though Alabama passed a law in 1927 requiring the reporting and treatment of diseases, the USPHS failed to do so when it came to tending to these…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humans are the most complex creature ever to exist on the face of the Earth. For many years, researchers have conducted studies and experiments solely dedicated to understanding the human body and the process of various pathogenesis. The ultimate goal is to discover new and improved ways to protect the body from pathogens threatening the health and well-being of the human race today. Without research, many of the innovations, treatments, practices, and knowledge today would not exist- medicine and patient centered care would be minuscule, life expectancy would be greatly reduced, and evidence-based practice would possibly not exist. There is no doubt that research is…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tuskegee Syphilis Study was developed to study the affects of Syphilis on adult black males. The intention of the study was to find ways to improve the quality of health in African Americans in the southern states. While the treatment phase of the program was beginning, America fell into the great depression and the benefactor, The Julius Rosenwald Fund no longer had the funds for the treatment of the men. What do you do with two hundred ninety-nine men with Syphilis that you can no longer or begin to treat?…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Tuskegee Syphilis Study was an ethical injustice of medical care. An ethical injustice of medical care is a violation of moral principles that apply values and…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tuskegee Study Inhumane

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout the duration of the Tuskegee Study, many unethical situations had occurred. In fact, these inhumane events led to the creation of The Belmont Report. (1) The Belmont Report was designed to protect human research subjects by requiring researchers to practice ethically. The 3 defining principles of The Belmont Report include: Respect for Persons, Beneficence, and Justice. (2)…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1932, he U. S. government announced a new health program in Macon County, Alabama. This program included free examinations and was directed toward male African-Americans. When the government tested 3,684 males, they found 1,468 cases of syphilis. Initial testing reduced that number to 408 subjects. Free medical treatments were offered for their “bad blood” even though the main commitment of this study was to determine the effects that untreated syphilis would have on the human body over a period of time.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (6) The Tuskegee Syphilis Study has been called “the most infamous biomedical research study in U.S. history”. From 1932 to 1942, government physicians studied untreated syphilis in 399 black men from Macon County, Alabama … (4) The participants… were not only denied treatment, but were also actively restrained from obtaining penicillin after the Center for Disease Control deemed it the drug of choice to combat the disease. This patent denial of treatment represented the lack of patient empowerment that characterized the medical profession at the time.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tuskegee Experiment

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Tuskegee Syphilis experiment is the most infamous clinical study conducted in the United States between 1932 -1972. The study of natural progression of untreated syphilis in rural Africa American men, led to a forty year study which was controversial for reasons related to ethical standards; researchers knowingly failed to treat patients after the 1940s validation of penicillin. The patients with syphilis were never told they had it, were part of a case study, could leave the experiment at any given time and were not being treated for properly for syphilis. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention the men were told they were being treated for “bad blood”, which is a local term for various illnesses that include syphilis, anemia, and fatigue (CDC, 2013).…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book BAD BLOOD: THE TUSKEGEE SYPHILIS EXPERIMENT by James H. Jones was a very powerful compilation of years of astounding research, numerous interviews, and some very interesting positions on the ethical and moral issues associated with the study of human beings under the Public Health Service (PHS). "The Tuskegee study had nothing to do with treatment … it was a nontherapeutic experiment, aimed at compiling data on the effects of the spontaneous evolution of syphilis in black males" (Jones pg. 2). Jones is very opinionated throughout the book; however, he carefully documents the foundation of those opinions with quotes from letters and medical journals. The book allowed the reader to see the experiment from different viewpoints. This was remarkable because of the initial feelings the reader has when first hearing of the experiment. In the beginning of the book, the reader will see clearly there has been wrong doing in this experiment, but somehow, Jones will transform you into asking yourself, "How could this happen for so long?"…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years, the debate of whether animals have moral rights or not has been thrown around court rooms, social media, and protests. Arguments are made defending animals and suggesting that they should be protected and recognized in human society. Medical researchers are scrutinized and harassed by these supporters for their part in animal testing and medical investigation. Scientific breakthroughs have been made, which has transformed the development of modern medicine. Lifespans have elongated and lives are being saved in every corner of the world, yet somehow, this is still debated as if it is the wrong thing to do. Research animals are pertinent tools of the medical world and humans are entitled to use them as such. As human beings with…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tuskegee Experiment

    • 2908 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The original study of the Tuskegee research was a disreputable medical experiment carried out in the United States between 1932 and 1972, in which almost 400 black Americans with syphilis were offered no medical treatment, allowing researchers to see the course of the disease. The events of the Tuskegee research triggered extensive values of legislation, including the National Research Act, and the experiment attracted a great deal of public attention. Many people regard the Tuskegee Experiment as an extremely shameful event in American history, and several organizations including the Centers for Disease Control have extensive archives on the experiment which are available to interested members of the public who want to learn more about it.…

    • 2908 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    `”God loved the birds and invented trees. Man loved the birds and invented cages” (Deval, Jacques). There are many things wrong about animal research, and I think that a lot of it is wrong. Animal testing is wrong because it harms animals, animals’ rights are violated in tests, it is expensive, there are better alternatives, and the results of these tests aren’t always accurate or reliable.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Tuskegee Experiment

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In 1932, in the area surrounding the Tuskegee, Macon County, Alabama, the U.S. Public Health Service created a government funded study to be conducted on 600 African American men that were lured in with the promise of free health care. What this study consisted of was testing these men for the sexually transmitted disease syphilis. After the testing was completed 399 infected and 201 healthy men were not told anything except that they had a condition called “bad blood” and that they must continue to come and receive treatment. In the early 1930s there was no definite cure for the disease so the study was supposed to treat the men with remedies until a cure could be found; instead funding ran out and treatment could no longer be provided . Even though there was no money coming in to pay for treatment for the men, the study was continued so that instead the effects of this deadly disease when it remains untreated could be studied. “The Tuskegee Syphilis Study is one of the most horrendous examples of research carried out in disregard of basic ethical principles of conduct. The publicity surrounding the study was one of the major influences leading to the codification of protection for human subjects.” (Jones, 1981) What these men went through over the 40 years of study can be labeled as one of the grossest injustices known to mankind.…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Ethics

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Animals are usually confined to small cages and being exposed to harmful fumes for human benefit.In their “Animal” Journal, Elisabeth H. Ormandy and Catherine Schuppli claim that "the use of animals in research fosters a diverse range of attitudes, with some people expressing the desire for complete abolition of animal research practices, while others express strong support (392)." Animal testing has stirred up an argument between two opposing sides regarding the ethics of the practice. The two opposing sides are those who disagree with animal testing and those who agree with animal testing. Nuno Henrique Franco author of "Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective" state that "Animal experimentation has played a central role in biomedical research throughout history. For centuries, however, it has also been an issue of heated public and philosophical discussion."(238) Those who are in favor of animal testing believe that it is beneficial to improving medicine. Those who are against animal testing believe that it is harmful to animals and that their are other ways to benefit humans. Being an animal lover, I oppose of animal testing for several different reasons. The first reason being animals are being subjected to all forms of suffering and isolation. The second reason is animals are not…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays