Climate change mitigation is the action to reduce the intensity of radiative forcing in order to reduce the effects of global warming (IPCC, 2006). Climate change mitigation can be done through several means such as developing alternative energy which includes renewable and nuclear energy, decreasing the carbon intensity of fossil fuel through carbon capture and sequestering, reforestation and also simply by conserving energy. Based on the cost-benefit analysis of each methods, I believe that the effectiveness and practically of each methods can be ranked, in decreasing order, as such – (1) Reducing energy use by conservation (2) Developing renewable energy (3) Carbon capture and sequestering (4) Building more nuclear power plant and lastly (5) Reforestation. The most cost effective and practical way to mitigate climate change is through conservation of energy. Energy conservation encompasses using less energy, for example through behavioural change and using energy efficient innovations and designs. Energy conservation focuses on reducing our dependence on fossil fuels thus lowering the amount of carbon emissions generated by human activities. Unlike the other mitigation methods, energy conservation usually does not require huge investment cost and in the long run can also bring about cost savings to both the individuals and organisations. For instance, by switching from using CFLs to LED lights, one can experience a 100% annual cost savings as the annual operating cost of CFLs is twice that of the annual operating cost of LED lights (Design Recycle Inc, 2011). Energy conservation is also the most practical way for us to fight against climate change because it enables us to reduce our resource inputs to the economy, thus, it ensures that the non-renewable resources available will be able to support human activities for a longer period of time. Despite being the most cost-effective and practical way for climate change mitigation, it is definitely not an easy...
Cited: CBS News. (2011, May 14). Worker dies at damaged Fukushima nuclear plant. Retrieved March 20, 2013, from CBS News: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/05/14/501364/main20062987.shtml
Clean Energy Ideas. (2007). Pros and Cons of Solar Energy. Retrieved March 19, 2013, from Clean Energy Ideas: http://www.clean-energy-ideas.com/articles/pros_and_cons_of_solar_energy.html
Design Recycle Inc. (2011). Comparison Chart. Retrieved March 13, 2013, from Design Recycle Inc: http://www.designrecycleinc.com/led%20comp%20chart.html
Global CCS Institute. (2011). The Global Status of CCS: 2011. Canberra, Australia: Global CCS Institute.
IPCC. (2006). Glossary. Retrieved March 13, 2013, from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/glossary/ar4-wg3.pdf
REN21. (2006). Changing Climates, The role of renewable energy in carbon-constrained world. REN21.
Robinson, S. (2010, January 22). Cutting Carbon: Should We Capture and Store It? Retrieved March 19, 2013, from TIME Lists: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1954176_1954175,00.html
Sovacool, B. K. (2011). Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power. World Scientific.
World Nuclear Association. (2013, March 11). Nuclear Power in France. Retrieved March 20, 2013, from World Nuclear Association: http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Country-Profiles/Countries-A-F/France/#.UUkT5Bz7CJk
Please join StudyMode to read the full document