Preview

Cjus 200 Ref. Paper 3

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
304 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cjus 200 Ref. Paper 3
Running Head: Reflection Paper Three

Reflection Paper Three

Christina M. Bracey

Liberty University Online

Plea bargaining, also known as plea negotiation, is the most commonly used practice in the criminal justice process in which defendants are allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge or charges (Inciardi, 2010). Involved in this process are the prosecutor and the defense, along with the person accused of committing some sort of criminal activity. According to Inciardi (2010), “It is believed that more than 90 percent of criminal convictions result from negotiated pleas of guilty” (Pg. 302). There are numerous legal advantages for the state in the use of plea bargaining. One may consider plea bargaining as a useful source in reducing the financial burden of criminal prosecution, improving the overall efficiency of the courts because there are fewer cases to be tried, and also allowing the prosecution to spend more time on more serious cases (Inciardi, 2010). As for the person being accused, there are also advantages which include reducing the possibility of detention during the trial process, increasing the chance of a lesser sentence, and decreasing the cost of legal aid (Inciardi, 2010). Morally, plea bargains are not always acceptable because they apply different standards to different people. Two separate individuals could have committed the same crime, yet one could receive a harsher punishment than the other due to both being offered and accepting different plea bargains. Many innocent people that appear guilty to a crime have been imprisoned because they chose to accept the plea bargain being offered to them instead of risking their chances at a trial. It is unknown the amount of defendants that have chosen this option and have spent time in prison for crimes they never even committed. References

Inciardi, J. (2010). Criminal Justice (9th ed.). Columbus, OH:



References: Inciardi, J. (2010). Criminal Justice (9th ed.). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using the fairness and justice decision-making process it made me decide that the use of plea bargaining was unethical; due to the fact that it was not fair that criminals who have committed unlawful acts like rape, robbery, and numerous horrendous crimes were given leniency just because they are acknowledging they executed the offense. Stating your guilty doesn’t mean they reflected upon their actions and are ready to start a new leaf. They have instigated the felony and it is only right that they get the full consequence of their atrocity. Furthermore, what’s worse is that because of the pressure and fear of being convicted, the innocent plead guilty and the immoral run free and continue to disrupt the peace of the community. In conclusion, there is no fairness and justice when there is plea bargaining.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dual Court System

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    among the nation's founders about the need for individual states to retain significant legislative authority and judicial autonomy separate from federal control. The reason why we have a dual-court system is, back then; new states joining the union were assured of limited federal intervention into local affairs. The state legislatures were free to create laws, and state court systems were needed to hear cases in which violations of those laws occurred. Today, however, state courts do not hear cases involving alleged violations of federal law, nor do federal courts involve themselves in deciding issues of state law unless there is a conflict between local or state statues and federal constitutional guarantees. When that happens, claimed violations of federal due process guarantees especially those found in the Bill of Rights.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In other occasions court administrators, prosecutors and judges prefer to go for plea bargains to help reduce case volumes and in other cases granted time to the parties so they can prepare themselves for the case or to obtain further documentation to avoid losing time during the next hearing moving the case for a date where they might not have such big overload. Another option that the court administrators recur is to divide cases upon the crime in order to fit all short non complicated crimes in a day vs. having many complicated cases all together in one day since that would delay the case flow.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a justice system replaces jury trials with plea negotiations it contradicts the fair rules of evidence in front of a judge or a jury. Plea negotiations are very different from the formal process. Criminals end up of facing sentences that are lighter while victims are left unsatisfied. Plea Bargaining is very private which can affect the outcome and will not benefit the everybody. While the bargain might help that receive less severe penalties than a conviction at trial, the bargain may still leave you with a criminal record that can have a huge affect in the future. For example, in Erma Stewart’s case after she chose to plea guilty her entire life changed. As she explained she could not afford to pay her probation fines due to the fact…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three basic types of plea bargains can be summed up as: 1) Plead to a lesser offense. 2) plead guilty to receive lesser sentence. 3) plead guilty to one charge to have another dropped. If prosecutors decide to bargain, there are three main factors that play a role in whether or not to offer a bargain. The first is the seriousness of the crime. The more serious the crime, the less likely a bargain will be struck. The second factor taken into consideration before a plea bargain is offered, history. An offender’s past criminal history is taken into consideration when plea bargains are considered. The last consideration when plea bargains are being considered, strength of the prosecution’s case. If a case is weak, a plea bargain may be considered…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The concept of plea bargaining became a common means to resolve criminal cases in the early 1900s because not everyone that was accused of a crime had a lawyer to represent them in a trial. As the criminal justice system evolved, and there were more and more cases to prosecute, plea-bargaining was used more often so that all parties would have a faster resolution to the case, as opposed to going through a lengthy trial. The definition of plea bargaining is “the process whereby the accused and the prosecutor in a criminal case work out a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case subject to court approval [that] usually involves the defendant’s pleading guilty to a lesser offense or to only some of the counts of a multicounty indictment in return for a lighter sentence than the possible for the graver charge.” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011, Chapter 12, Plea Bargaining and Guilty Pleas).…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some pros of plea bargain is, creating a less over-crowed, over-whelmed system by taking simple cases away. With taking smaller cases away the prosecutors will have few trials to deal with and they will be more effective to the major cases they have. Another positive thing is that not matter if…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plea Bargaining Analysis

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A plea bargain (“offer”) is an acquiescent in a criminal case whereby the prosecution may offer the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty, conventionally to a lesser charge or to the pristine criminal charge with a proposal of a lighter than the maximum sentence. This opportunity sanctions defendants to avoid the risk of a conviction by trial on a more serious charge. This allows a court’s caseloads to be lighter without exhausting resources of a court, potential public advocators, and prosecutors who are all salaried at the expense of tax payers.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main fault that I see with a plea bargain is that it violates the six amendment. The reason why the sixth amendment is in violation is that plea bargaining goes against what it stands for. The sixth amendment states that everyone has the right to a fair trial; however, most cases are not even analyzed in front of a judge or jury because of a plea bargain. The main reason a plea bargain is put into play is to push a case through the system faster and resolve it quicker. Furthermore, everyone knows that when situations are rushed that information is likely to be missed. For example, there are many situations where defendants take a plea bargain to stray away from more intense punishment. However, many individuals who take this bargain are…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question we are debating today is whether or not plea-bargaining undermines the Criminal justice system? The job of the Criminal justice system is to protect the citizens of the United States. How are we protecting them if we give criminals shorter sentences than they deserve? When we plea bargain we release more criminals back into the streets and put citizens of the United States' safety at risk. A plea bargain is an agreement in a criminal case in which a prosecutor and a defendant arrange to settle the case against the defendant. The United states department of justice's mission statement reads: To enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans. This statement is being undermined because not…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargaining

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charge bargaining is a form of plea bargaining. Charge bargaining is when the prosecuting attorney has the capability of negotiating with the accused about the charges that may be filed. This allows for the prosecuting attorney to give the defendant the opportunity to “plead guilty” to lesser charges. (Larry J. Siegel, 2011) An example could be if the accused is pulled over for drinking while intoxicated and has a suspended license; the prosecuting attorney may offer the defendant a plea bargain of pleading guilty to the driving while intoxicated and dismissing the charge of driving with a suspended license. Sentence bargaining is another form of plea bargaining. Sentence bargaining comes in to play when the defendant accepts an agreement to pleading guilty in exchange for spending a less amount of time in jail or prison. (Larry J. Siegel, 2011) An example of a sentence bargain could be if an individual is being charged of murder and they have the death penalty in that particular state;…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with you. Some crimes can be handled differently depending how the offense is classified “Many states encourage diversion programs that remove less serious criminal matters from the full” (How Courts Work, n.d., para. 4) Plea bargaining can be accepted for reasons like, defendants avoiding the time in court. Also, the prosecutor can dedicate time to other cases. A valid approach is the agreement of both part on the case “obviously both sides have to agree before one comes to pass”. (How Courts Work, n.d., para. 2) As you mention, that should not be applied in the major…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People who have been caught because of the crime they’ve committed would refuse to go on trial because it would lead to more punishments and they don’t want to get convicted and being put in jail for a long period of time. So, instead they say they’re guilty of the crime they committed and make a plea bargain to get a lesser sentence. People chose to make a plea bargain because it helped the defendant plead guilty to a lesser charge. The mostly affected black people because they have been charged with crimes at higher rate than Whites. The reason for these huge punishments for such small crime is because of the mandatory laws which made people afraid to go on trial and be found guilty. People don’t go on trial because they are afraid to get…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Without question, plea bargains benefit many defendants who have committed crimes and receive lighter sentences than they might after trial. It also limits cases that require considerable time and expense in court.” (Oppel, 2011) Victims feel as though this gives them less jail time which in turn means that they will be back out on the streets sooner to resume committing these crimes again. Victims fear for their lives and the lives of their family as well because they feel as though there may be some retaliation brought to them because they file charges against…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First, what exactly is plea bargaining and where did it come from? It is, “allowing pleas of guilty in exchange for a reduction in the number or severity of charges or a prosecutor’s promise of a sentence recommendation” (Houlden 267). Now where did it come from? There is no clear answer to this question, but theories have been formed based on different studies. These theories state that “[t]he twin evils of caseload pressure and an irrepressible tendency toward cooperation among members of the courtroom "work group" are said to render plea bargaining unavoidable”…

    • 1696 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays