Preview

Civil War Compromises

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
975 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil War Compromises
In the years leading up to the Civil War there were three major compromises that were passed and one compromise that was drafted but never voted on. The compromises covered are The Missouri Compromise, The Compromise of 1850, and Crittenden’s Compromise; which was never acted upon by congress. These three compromises tried, and failed to, deal with the increasing sectionalism between the north and the south over the issue of slavery from 1820 to 1861. At the time the compromises were written there were overlying reasons in which the compromises were necessary. The expansion of the country and introduction of new territories and states resulted in congressional conflicts between North and South that would attempt the balancing of pro and free-states …show more content…
This compromise allowed California to be added to the country as a free state, and let the newly obtained territories of New Mexico and Utah decide, by popular sovereignty, whether or not they would be free or slave territories. The compromise also solved the problem of the slave trade flowing within the nation's capitol by abolishing it. The final clause in The Compromise of 1850 dealt with the Fugitive Slave Law. At the time before The Compromise of 1850, there was no law requiring northern settlers to give escaped slaves back to their southern owners, but after this compromise was passed there WAS a law that requiring northern settlers to give escaped slaves back to their southern owners. This compromise was needed because of the enormous amount of land that the United States bought from Mexico, which was immediately disputed over by the abolitionists and anti-slavery southerners. Most of the territory was based in the south, where under the 36º 30´ latitude line would have been southern slave territory, however the latitude line didn’t extend that far. The 36º 30´ latitude line extended from the eastern coast line to the end of the Arkansas Territory. Now the president at the time was in favor of just extending the 36º 30´ latitude line, however the Southern members of Senate wanted all of the land gained from Mexico. The Compromise of 1850 did lasting damage between the border states along the 36º 30´ latitude …show more content…
As time when on the causes for these compromises stayed the same, but the effect that they had on the country became divided. The compromises constantly forced senators into conventions to ‘solve the problem’ of a divided country over slavery, but that act in itself was impossible. These conventions proved that the two sections of the country were just too different, causing mounting amounts of sectionalism and tension between the North and South, and that there was just no middle ground between slavery and no slavery. There was no compromise that the delegates could have come up with that would have solved the country’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    6. The Compromise of 1850 called for California to enter the Union as a free state, had the people in New Mexico and Utah decide if they wanted slavery in their state, had the slave trade abolished in Washington D.C., and passed the Fugitive Slave Act.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Dbq

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    t the time when the United States was a new nation, there were a number of issues that needed to be addressed in order for the Union of states to become a working country. In a short period, the North had become more progressive and industrialized. There were larger urban populations and the issues that faced northern areas were different from those that faced the South. When new territories were added to the nation, it was politically relevant that they were added in such a way that the balance of power was maintained. The Compromise of 1850 addressed this balance. The Compromise was a group of five laws that addressed slavery and overturned the Missouri Compromise. The climate of the time quickly becomes one of the northern states against…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    us history module 1

    • 2463 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Compromise of 1850 – a series of congressional measures that allowed California to become a state, settled border disputes between Texas and New Mexico, and created the Fugitive Slave Act…

    • 2463 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the Constitution was received by the greater part of the States in 1789, uniting the States into one country, contrasts between the States had been worked out through compromises. By 1861 these contrasts between the Northern States (which incorporated the Mid-Western and Western States) and the Southern States had turned out to be great to the point that compromise would no more work. Along these lines, a contention began inside of our country that was known as the Civil War. This Civil War was absolutely encouraged by the vigorous requests of numerous Northerners for the prompt abrogation of subjugation. Yet, an examination of the occasions driving specifically to war will demonstrate that Southern politicians likewise must share a great…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    1850s DBQ

    • 1291 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The tensions caused by the differing beliefs were slowly built up since the American Revolution. Slavery, being an established practice since America’s independence and a cause of the Civil War, was not an issue at the time, but was also left unresolved by the Founding Fathers. As time passed on, and as morals evolved, the views towards slavery changed as well. The original belief of slaves as nonhuman/property slowly progressed into slaves being lesser-humans. As beliefs changed, and the acceptance of slaves grew positively in the North, the basis of government became more and more unstable. With differing bases of thought, America’s ability to stay unified couldn’t happen with government trying to please both opposing sides, like found in the Compromise of 1850 (Doc 1). The Compromise attempted to alleviate the slavery situation that arose when California fulfilled the requirements to become an official state. The admittance of California threw off the Great Compromise and the Missouri Compromise. To counter that change, the Compromise made the New Mexico and Utah Territories free to become slave states via allowing them popular sovereignty. To add to the South-positive compromises, the Fugitive Slave Laws (Doc 3) were also employed, thus “balancing” the additions to both territories. The decision was technically correct for the event, as it settled the tension from the California, but in doing so, left the issue of slavery un-addressed and even strengthened slavery. The Compromise of 1850 only brought “compromise” in the regard of the free-slave states ratio, but greatly supported…

    • 1291 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    While there had already been tension building between the North and the South, the addition of new territory added new fuel to the fire. If the new states that emerged from the Louisiana Territory were all free, then the balance of power in the U.S. Senate would tilt decisively against slavery or vice versa . From the moment that the expansion of the United States emerged, there was conflict. Eventually after many years of debate the Missouri Compromise came to be in 1820. The Missouri Compromise was devised by Henry Clay . It was an attempt to defuse the tension causes by the addition of the Louisiana Purchase. It gave the pre-slavers the decisive state they needed to hold their position in congress. After much debate was had about which states would be free or slave states with the addition of the Louisiana Purchase, a compromise was worked out. To appease both sides Missouri would be admitted as a slave state and Maine (which used to be apart Massachusetts) would have the status of a free state, and minus Missouri, slavery was to be excluded at a certain latitude . With the Missouri Compromise; all states south of Missouri would be slave states and all states north of it would be free. The addition of Missouri as a slave state just ignited the already hot debate about the legitimacy of slavery. While the Louisiana Purchase would eventually help to…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the Mexican War ended, America was ceded western territories. This caused a problem on whether these new territories would be admitted as slave states or free states. To deal with this, Congress passed the Compromise of 1850 which basically made California free and allowed the people to pick in Utah and New Mexico. The ability of a state to decide whether it would allow slavery or not was called popular sovereignty.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    While the southern states were in favor of slavery, the northern states vehemently opposed the idea. An expansion of slavery would have meant an increase in the territorial space and population. This in turn would give the Southern states increased power in the House. Although the Civil War had some time to initiate, the Compromise played a major role in the laying the groundwork for the war that was to come. It contributed to the division and disagreement between north and south, surrounding the topic of slavery. The issue built severe tension between the two sides of the…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pre-Civil War Apush

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the 1850s, the North and South could not agree on anything and were in constant disagreements. In 1850, Henry Clay created the Compromise of 1850. In the compromise, it was said that California would be admitted as a free state which created a stir in the South since it would mean that the amount of Free states and slave states would be unbalanced (Shown in Document B). The North would now have power of the Senate and superiority over the South. The country would give Texas ten million dollars if they gave up claims to Mexico. This would take away a large piece of territory for a relatively low sum. There would be abolition of slave trade in Washington D.C., but not slavery. This meant that emancipation of slavery in the nation’s capital was starting. Also, Mexico and Utah’s slave status rested on popular sovereignty which leaned toward Free State status due to the incompatibility of the plantation system with the environment. Then, there would be a Fugitive Slave Law put in to place which would compel local officials to capture and return runaway slaves along with denying them jury trials, which some congressmen were against (Document F). Daniel Webster also delivered the Seventh of March speech backing this compromise up as everyone else did not like the idea and explained why he thought it was necessary (Document A). This caused the South distress…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is said that the roots of the Civil War, which was fought, no matter the other theories, over the big problem of slavery, were implanted in the compromises of the Constitution on the controversy. That is likely to be true. Slavery, which began in cruelty and disorder in the kidnapping, shipping, and exchange of human capital, unfortunately required violence to eventually put a stop to it. After the travesty of the Revolutionary War and the strife in the U.S. because of the Articles, a moment of reconciliation and reconstruction was necessary to make the nation strong enough to a place where it could endure a civil war. The biggest misfortune is that in the almost 100 years from the start of the Revolutionary War and the ending of the Civil…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The southern states were concerned that they would lose ability to make decisions regarding slavery. The Constitution included the ⅗ compromise, which allowed the southern states to have more representation in the Electoral College and the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This compromise proposed that slavery would be allowed to exist in slave states and other laws would be adjusted to make the south content; however these changes would upset the north. Like the other attempts, this compromise also was rejected, and there was now nothing preventing the impending…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    compromise of 1850

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This compromise made four decisions. First, the new land from Mexico, California, would be admitted as a free state. This is because Texas was a slave state and therefore there would still be an equal amount of both free and slave states. Second, the compromise came up with a boundary line between the United States and Mexico. Third, slave trade was banned in Washington D.C. Lastly, there would be laws set to make slaves return to the South if they every crossed over to the North.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sectionalism

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The very first issue that caused sectionalism in the 1850's between the North and South was the Compromise of 1850. This compromise was a package of bills, passed in the United States in September 1850, regarding the status of territories acquired during the Mexican-American War. It was drafted by Whig Senator Henry Clay and was negotiated with Stephen Douglas in order to avoid secession or civil war in 1850. The Compromise of 1850 caused sectionalism in the Union because it first established California as a free state and turned down the Southern proposal to split California at the 35° parallel; causing the South to be frustrated at the admittance of California. To balance out the annexation of California, the South was pleased to hear that the territories of New Mexico and Utah would have slavery decided with popular sovereignty, meaning that the people who settled there would decide whether or not the territory would be free or slave. Little did they know that they were being cheated, because the land in New Mexico and Utah was unsuited for agriculture and not fit for slave plantations. The biggest blow that caused sectionalism in the Compromise of 1850 was delivered when the Fugitive Slave Law became more strongly enforced. The Fugitive Slave Law basically declared that all runaway slaves must be returned to their masters and anyone who assisted the runaway slave would be arrested. It also gave commissioners ten dollars for every slave that was returned to its master and five dollars for every accused slave released,…

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery was an issue in slave states from South and Free states North in 1800s. South states were the agricultural area so they needed slaves and support it, but not the North state. Several disputes exists, Congress performed compromises to settle these disputes. But these compromises could not hold for longer. (1820 - 1861: HOLDING THE UNION TOGETHER) Missouri Compromise in 1820, Nat Turner's Rebellion in 1831,…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays