Preview

Civil War Compromises

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
975 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil War Compromises
In the years leading up to the Civil War there were three major compromises that were passed and one compromise that was drafted but never voted on. The compromises covered are The Missouri Compromise, The Compromise of 1850, and Crittenden’s Compromise; which was never acted upon by congress. These three compromises tried, and failed to, deal with the increasing sectionalism between the north and the south over the issue of slavery from 1820 to 1861. At the time the compromises were written there were overlying reasons in which the compromises were necessary. The expansion of the country and introduction of new territories and states resulted in congressional conflicts between North and South that would attempt the balancing of pro and free-states …show more content…
This compromise allowed California to be added to the country as a free state, and let the newly obtained territories of New Mexico and Utah decide, by popular sovereignty, whether or not they would be free or slave territories. The compromise also solved the problem of the slave trade flowing within the nation's capitol by abolishing it. The final clause in The Compromise of 1850 dealt with the Fugitive Slave Law. At the time before The Compromise of 1850, there was no law requiring northern settlers to give escaped slaves back to their southern owners, but after this compromise was passed there WAS a law that requiring northern settlers to give escaped slaves back to their southern owners. This compromise was needed because of the enormous amount of land that the United States bought from Mexico, which was immediately disputed over by the abolitionists and anti-slavery southerners. Most of the territory was based in the south, where under the 36º 30´ latitude line would have been southern slave territory, however the latitude line didn’t extend that far. The 36º 30´ latitude line extended from the eastern coast line to the end of the Arkansas Territory. Now the president at the time was in favor of just extending the 36º 30´ latitude line, however the Southern members of Senate wanted all of the land gained from Mexico. The Compromise of 1850 did lasting damage between the border states along the 36º 30´ latitude …show more content…
As time when on the causes for these compromises stayed the same, but the effect that they had on the country became divided. The compromises constantly forced senators into conventions to ‘solve the problem’ of a divided country over slavery, but that act in itself was impossible. These conventions proved that the two sections of the country were just too different, causing mounting amounts of sectionalism and tension between the North and South, and that there was just no middle ground between slavery and no slavery. There was no compromise that the delegates could have come up with that would have solved the country’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Pre-Civil War Apush

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the 1850s, the North and South could not agree on anything and were in constant disagreements. In 1850, Henry Clay created the Compromise of 1850. In the compromise, it was said that California would be admitted as a free state which created a stir in the South since it would mean that the amount of Free states and slave states would be unbalanced (Shown in Document B). The North would now have power of the Senate and superiority over the South. The country would give Texas ten million dollars if they gave up claims to Mexico. This would take away a large piece of territory for a relatively low sum. There would be abolition of slave trade in Washington D.C., but not slavery. This meant that emancipation of slavery in the nation’s capital was starting. Also, Mexico and Utah’s slave status rested on popular sovereignty which leaned toward Free State status due to the incompatibility of the plantation system with the environment. Then, there would be a Fugitive Slave Law put in to place which would compel local officials to capture and return runaway slaves along with denying them jury trials, which some congressmen were against (Document F). Daniel Webster also delivered the Seventh of March speech backing this compromise up as everyone else did not like the idea and explained why he thought it was necessary (Document A). This caused the South distress…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sectionalism

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The very first issue that caused sectionalism in the 1850's between the North and South was the Compromise of 1850. This compromise was a package of bills, passed in the United States in September 1850, regarding the status of territories acquired during the Mexican-American War. It was drafted by Whig Senator Henry Clay and was negotiated with Stephen Douglas in order to avoid secession or civil war in 1850. The Compromise of 1850 caused sectionalism in the Union because it first established California as a free state and turned down the Southern proposal to split California at the 35° parallel; causing the South to be frustrated at the admittance of California. To balance out the annexation of California, the South was pleased to hear that the territories of New Mexico and Utah would have slavery decided with popular sovereignty, meaning that the people who settled there would decide whether or not the territory would be free or slave. Little did they know that they were being cheated, because the land in New Mexico and Utah was unsuited for agriculture and not fit for slave plantations. The biggest blow that caused sectionalism in the Compromise of 1850 was delivered when the Fugitive Slave Law became more strongly enforced. The Fugitive Slave Law basically declared that all runaway slaves must be returned to their masters and anyone who assisted the runaway slave would be arrested. It also gave commissioners ten dollars for every slave that was returned to its master and five dollars for every accused slave released,…

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the founding fathers drafted the Constitution of the United States of America, the convention became divided over the continuation of slavery within the nation. Northern delegates, who already detested the institution on moral grounds, were further opposed to it due to added concessions to southern states (Document 1). One concession allowed for slaves to be counted as three-fifths of a person for representational purposes, and therefore gave the South an advantage in the House of Representatives, which assigned number of votes based on size of population. From the southern perspective these concession were necessary to preserve an economic system they were completely dependent on. Southern delegates went so far as to concede control on commercial regulation in exchange for the protection of slavery. The threat of southern delegates abandoning the convention forced northerners to compromise on this issue in order to ratify the Constitution. While the delegate’s compromise established initial unity between the North and South, it set out a precedent for sectional concessions, which became increasingly intolerable to the other side. Increased sectional tensions eventually resulted in southern secession.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    compromise of 1850

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This compromise made four decisions. First, the new land from Mexico, California, would be admitted as a free state. This is because Texas was a slave state and therefore there would still be an equal amount of both free and slave states. Second, the compromise came up with a boundary line between the United States and Mexico. Third, slave trade was banned in Washington D.C. Lastly, there would be laws set to make slaves return to the South if they every crossed over to the North.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1850s DBQ

    • 1291 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The tensions caused by the differing beliefs were slowly built up since the American Revolution. Slavery, being an established practice since America’s independence and a cause of the Civil War, was not an issue at the time, but was also left unresolved by the Founding Fathers. As time passed on, and as morals evolved, the views towards slavery changed as well. The original belief of slaves as nonhuman/property slowly progressed into slaves being lesser-humans. As beliefs changed, and the acceptance of slaves grew positively in the North, the basis of government became more and more unstable. With differing bases of thought, America’s ability to stay unified couldn’t happen with government trying to please both opposing sides, like found in the Compromise of 1850 (Doc 1). The Compromise attempted to alleviate the slavery situation that arose when California fulfilled the requirements to become an official state. The admittance of California threw off the Great Compromise and the Missouri Compromise. To counter that change, the Compromise made the New Mexico and Utah Territories free to become slave states via allowing them popular sovereignty. To add to the South-positive compromises, the Fugitive Slave Laws (Doc 3) were also employed, thus “balancing” the additions to both territories. The decision was technically correct for the event, as it settled the tension from the California, but in doing so, left the issue of slavery un-addressed and even strengthened slavery. The Compromise of 1850 only brought “compromise” in the regard of the free-slave states ratio, but greatly supported…

    • 1291 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    While there had already been tension building between the North and the South, the addition of new territory added new fuel to the fire. If the new states that emerged from the Louisiana Territory were all free, then the balance of power in the U.S. Senate would tilt decisively against slavery or vice versa . From the moment that the expansion of the United States emerged, there was conflict. Eventually after many years of debate the Missouri Compromise came to be in 1820. The Missouri Compromise was devised by Henry Clay . It was an attempt to defuse the tension causes by the addition of the Louisiana Purchase. It gave the pre-slavers the decisive state they needed to hold their position in congress. After much debate was had about which states would be free or slave states with the addition of the Louisiana Purchase, a compromise was worked out. To appease both sides Missouri would be admitted as a slave state and Maine (which used to be apart Massachusetts) would have the status of a free state, and minus Missouri, slavery was to be excluded at a certain latitude . With the Missouri Compromise; all states south of Missouri would be slave states and all states north of it would be free. The addition of Missouri as a slave state just ignited the already hot debate about the legitimacy of slavery. While the Louisiana Purchase would eventually help to…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just like I said before the South broke compromises to keep slavery going (Doc 1). The South felt like they had rights and powers the government could not deny (Doc 5). The South felt overpowered by the government and that is why they overridden compromises and led to states seceding from the Union. Southern states did not want follow the rules of the government so it could start a war and make them want to…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise, one of the most known agreements in American history, was an attempt presented by Henry Clay in calming sectional division between the Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery. While the Missouri Compromise found a temporary solution in regards to representation resulting in twelve free states and twelve slave states(G), it also, however, ignited the strong feelings, opinions, and justifications of two opposing sides and "heralded" the future unsuccess of the Union. No longer could our forefathers postpone such an imminent issue as was done during the infancy of the United States government. The Missouri Compromise was a success in a sense, not merely because of its contents, but rather because it caused people to voice their angered opinions about slavery, unavoidably causing the government to realize the importance of finding a genuine solution to the reality of slavery if the future of America was to survive and truly be united.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Compromises

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Slavery was also an issue that saw a lot of dispute. Generally, Abolitionists in the North wanted to abolish slavery completely; however, this didn’t sit right with the South, whose economy desperately depended on slaves to flourish. There were two compromises about slavery. The first compromise ended the slave trade, and the second addressed the accounting of slaves in a state’s population for the census, as well as taxes. Being that the northern views were already stepping on the South’s toes, they couldn’t afford any clash to bring about talk of a separation from the union. Their decision to account 3/5 of a slave when apportioning taxes and representatives favored neither…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Compromises

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The results of this compromise were that California entered the Union as a free state, and Utah would be allowed to enter the Union as a slave state if citizens voted by means of popular sovereignty.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1850, Henry Clay one of the most influential political leaders in American history introduced a set of resolutions, which aimed to please both North and South America. The five proposals were rolled into a single ‘omnibus’ bill, which offered a solution to the growing sectional conflict over slavery and westward expansion, which arose from the 1846 Mexican War. The 1850 Compromise, which Senator Douglas stripped down and effectively helped pass, failed for a number of reasons, the greatest of which was that it was unable to please both anti-slave and pro-slave groups. In fact it merely ‘papered over the crack’, and did not prove, as Daniel Webster a Clay supporter had hoped, ‘a finality that would give peace to a country long distracted by the quarrel over slavery’. Why did the Compromise ultimately fail, and lead to polarization, featuring a party, which had begun to establish itself in the 1820s.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1877

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The compromise opened the way for the Democrats to regain control of southern politics and marked the end of reconstruction. Do to this deal, the election was very controversial. You would think if one of the candidates had won in the majority of the votes then that would be the man most of America wants to lead the country. Making…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By giving the South more slave territories and implementing the Fugitive Slave Act, the Compromise gave the South more power with slavery then they had before. When this happened the Northern leaders decided to take action. One of the biggest Northern advocates in this instance was Abraham Lincoln, who was elected in 1860, a passionate anti-slavery politician. Fed up with slavery, Lincoln foreshadowed violence in his first Inaugural Address by stating “There needs to be no bloodshed or violence; and there shall be none, unless it be forced upon the national authority (Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address).” What Lincoln meant by this is that if the South decided to not follow the Union, succeed, and keep using slavery, that they are basically asking for the Union to forcefully put an end to slavery. Examples like this show how the Compromise of 1850 put the North in a position to use force to try and end slavery and inevitably, the start of the Civil…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Road to the Civil War

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 contained many different ideas, many of these ideas helping to prevent to war. Henry Clay tried to please both the north and the south. One of the first proposes was the introduction of California as a free state, which once again raised slavery issues considering the unbalance of free and slave states. This was made in favor of the north. Then the Fugitive Slave Act was developed to leave officials and citizens responsible for capturing and returning of slaves. This act made it a crime to help runaway slaves and let officials and citizens arrest runaway slaves. This act was made in favor of the south. The attempted Compromise of 1850 was an unsuccessful effort to prevent a civil war.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The southern states were concerned that they would lose ability to make decisions regarding slavery. The Constitution included the ⅗ compromise, which allowed the southern states to have more representation in the Electoral College and the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays