Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Civil War Compromises

Good Essays
469 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil War Compromises
Compromise helped delay the Civil War by maintaining the balance of both slave and free states, discontinuing the slave trade in Washington D.C. and returning slaves to their original owners with the Fugitive Slave Act, The Missouri Compromise of 1820 maintained the balance of slave and free states for 30 years. This kept the North and south satisfied. Missouri was added as a slave state and to sustain the equality between both sides, Maine was carved out of Massachusetts and added as a free state. The compromise also drew in the latitude line of 36° 30’, which permitted all states north of that line to be free (except for Missouri) and all states south of it to be slave states. This line also maintained the states that would allow slaves in the western territories. This compromise clearly delayed the war for 30 years, keeping both sides relatively content. The north was satisfied with the discontinuation of the selling of slaves in Washington D.C. They were aware that abolishing slavery was not going to be simple but they put in effort to prevent the spread of slavery to the west. The south strongly desired the spread of slavery to new territories. However, they were kept satisfied with the Fugitive Slave Act, which was being more strictly enforced. This act made it so that slaves that had escaped using the Underground Railroad would be returned to their owners, as long as the owners had proof or evidence of ownership. Anyone assisting the escape of a slave would be charged with a $1,000 fine and up to six months in jail. The results of this compromise were that California entered the Union as a free state, and Utah would be allowed to enter the Union as a slave state if citizens voted by means of popular sovereignty. The Kansas-Nebraska Act is when a lot of the contentment on both sides began to fall apart. Senator Stephen A. Douglas, responsible for passing the Compromise of 1850, wanted a railroad running west through Chicago. The problem with that were the unsettled territories in the west. He organized these territories into Kansas and Nebraska. Under the provisions of the Compromise of 1850, these territories would be added as free states. This tilted the balance of the free and slave states and gave the north an unfair advantage. Senator Douglas chose to get rid of the Missouri Compromise and go about the issue of slavery by use of popular sovereignty as well. Residents of Kansas voted strongly for it to be a slave state and what ensued was an upheaval and a violent attack by the antislavery residents, led by John Brown. This is when the Civil War was becoming unavoidable and there were no more compromises that could delay it.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The constitution of California outraged many southerners because the constitution banned the slavery. Henry Clay worked to make a compromise that would both satisfy the South and the North. With the support of Daniel Webster, a powerful senator of Massachusetts, Henry Clay presented to the Senate a series of resolutions later called The Compromise of 1850. In order to appease North, the compromise regulated that California be admitted to the Union as a free state. To please the South, the compromise proposed a new and more effective fugitive slave law. To appease both sides, there was a provision allowed the right to vote for or against slavery called popular sovereignty. Even though Henry Clay put great effort on the compromise, the…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    compromise of 1850

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This compromise made four decisions. First, the new land from Mexico, California, would be admitted as a free state. This is because Texas was a slave state and therefore there would still be an equal amount of both free and slave states. Second, the compromise came up with a boundary line between the United States and Mexico. Third, slave trade was banned in Washington D.C. Lastly, there would be laws set to make slaves return to the South if they every crossed over to the North.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act was one of the sparks to the civil war. This Act allowed Kansas and Nebraska to become a territory in the United States. But there was a law called Popular Sovereignty. In these two new territories there were pro-slavery people and anti-slavery people. Popular Sovereignty stated that the people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska could vote on whether or not there would be slavery in the territory. Now if you think about it there are people that are for slavery and people that are against slavery in the same territory voting on whether or not there should be slavery in that territory. Of course there was going to be some tension between all the people, and tension leads to fights and arguments. Fights and arguments lead to wars, civil wars!…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was effective for the southern states even though California was a slave free state in 1849 when California joined the union. (1) Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois managed to push this agreement for California to enter the Union as a free state but there were concessions made to slave owners about other acquisitions. (1)With this result the people in the southern states felt a relief of tension and a cause for celebration. This gave the southerners the right to retain slaves in those territories. (1) Congress cried “The Union is Saved!” (2) The Compromise had five bills which was intended to stave off sectional strife. The goal was on to deal with the spread of slavery to territories which in turn to keep northern and southern interests in balance. (2) One of these new bills was the Fugitive Slave Act which enlisted federal magistrates in the task of returning the runaway slaves back to their owners. (2) Another bill was New Mexico and Utah were allowed to use popular sovereignty to decide on the issues of slavery. This meant that the people would pick whether the states would be a free or slave state. (2) Also, one of the other bills was that the slave trade be abolished in the District of Columbia. The ineffectiveness of the Compromise of 1850 was ultimately it led to a Republican victory in 1860 and to the Southern secession. Also, it led so much more animosity between the North and South.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Congress deal with the issue of slavery as new states were admitted and new territories acquired by passing a new law, The Compromise of 1850, which allowed Texas to be admitted to the Union as a slave state and California to be admitted as a free state. Proposals known as popular sovereignty took place and consist in voters in New Mexico and Utah would decide the slavery question themselves. In addition, the slave trade would be prohibited in Washington, D.C., and a strict fugitive slave law would be enforced nationally. These actions of the US Congress affected the tensions between the North and the South proving that the Congress could not easily resolve the nation's deep-seated differences over the issue of slavery trying to preserved the Union, it was just a temporary issue that eventually led to Civil War.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was an effort to pacify the rising tensions between the north and the south. The issue of slavery was becoming a problem that none could overlook. This bitter rivalry was heating up even more so after the Mexican-American war. America won substantial amount of land, which stretched all the way to Mexico City. This land would give the south a grand portion of political power, surpassing the North.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The compromise of 1850 was the first reason the Civil War was caused. The Compromise of 1850 was a solution to California’s wanting to enter the union and ended up upsetting the balance between slave and free states. On the website American Historama it says “The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt to smooth out the confrontation between the slave…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decade of Crisis 1850

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    2. The Compromise of 1850 was a response to the issues with slavery and the proposed succession of many southern states. Henry Clay was the head of this compromise and believed it had to resolve all the issues or the compromise would not survive. So in an effort to do this, he combined all the proposals into one proposal and sent it to the legislature. It covered, California’s admission as a free state, territorial governments in lands from Mexico with no slavery restrictions, and slave trade was obliterated, but not slavery in the District of Columbia. There were…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil War Essay

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Fugitive Slave Act was passed as part of the Compromise of 1850. This act forced any federal official who did not arrest a runaway slave liable to pay a fine. This was the most controversial part of the Compromise of 1850 and caused many abolitionists to increase their efforts against slavery. This act increased the Underground Railroad activity as fleeing slaves made their way to Canada. This benefited the south mostly when this was instated as an official bill. The north thought that this was unfair because if they made it up to the free territory then they should be able to have their freedom. The north couldn’t really hide them because if they were caught hiding a slave then they would face serious punishments.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    causes of civil war

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compromises are only temporary solutions, according to the United States history. They are used to give the people what they want without straying from the set rules of the constitution. However, sometimes these compromises can have the opposite effect and stir unkind feelings that could lead to something as horrible as war. The Civil War occurred for many reasons; certain compromises being some of them.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    6. The Compromise of 1850 called for California to enter the Union as a free state, had the people in New Mexico and Utah decide if they wanted slavery in their state, had the slave trade abolished in Washington D.C., and passed the Fugitive Slave Act.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For nearly 30 years, the compromise worked, with two states being admitted together, one slave, one free. Then, in 1850, California was admitted as a stand-alone free state, upsetting the balance 16–15, in exchange for a Congressional guarantee no restrictions on slavery would be placed on the territories of Utah or New Mexico and passage of the Fugitive Slave Act, which required citizens of all states to return any runaway slaves to their masters. In 1857, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Congress had no right to prohibit slavery in territories, as part of the decision in the Dred Scott case. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 repealed the 36-30 dividing line for slavery in the Louisiana Purchase area.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    us history module 1

    • 2463 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Compromise of 1850 – a series of congressional measures that allowed California to become a state, settled border disputes between Texas and New Mexico, and created the Fugitive Slave Act…

    • 2463 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Citizens of the North, led by President Abraham Lincoln, had declared that slavery violated the conscience of American citizens and therefore violated the fundamental foundation of the Declaration of Independence, that all men are created equal. Most southerners disagreed strongly with this declaration and could not accept that the slaves should be considered as “men”, they were after all, property, which had been bought with their money. These are not people who should be treated as an equal. The Southerners, mostly landowners needed manpower. They responded to this need and bought their slaves on the market. They had paid a fair price and were committed to holding on to their property and to the continuation of slavery. The Southern farmers and others, who needed the slave manpower to plant, manage and harvest their crops and to work at other tasks strongly supported slavery. The Southern gentlemen made the argument that they had paid good money for the slaves who had been brought over from Africa and insisted that those contracts be honored the same as if they had bought horses or cattle. As the discussion continued, the arguments became more heated and passionate. Finally, it was clear that the South would not yield and the majority of northern citizens, led by President Lincoln, could…

    • 2263 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 study guide

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages

    9. Compromise of 1850- CA admitted as a free state; Utah and New Mexico territories to decide to slavery issue with pop sov.; Ban slave trade in DC; New fugitive slave law; Texas ceded some land to US for $10 million.…

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays