Preview

Civil War Cheat Sheat

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
427 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil War Cheat Sheat
1850 Compromise of 1850- Fugitive Slave act
1851 Uncle Tom’s Cabin- 300,000 copies, Harriet Beecher Stowe
May 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act- practice popular soverieghty
1855 Bleeding Kansas- fight for slave or free state, 200 died
May 1856 Charles Sumner was beat by Southerner Preston Brooks for talking bad about slavery
March 6, 1857 Dred Scott Decision- went north with owner then back south. Claimed to be free, sued but was told he was not a citizen and therefor a slave
1859 John Brown Raid- tried to arm slaves, Harpers farry
1860 Election of 1860- Lincoln was elected, south breaks off
1861 Fort Sumter- Confederates fire on Fort Sumter, start of Civil war, no one was killed
July 21st, 1861 1st Battle of Bull run- North loses, Stonewall Jackson gets his name
1862 Farragut Captures New Orleans- Union wins
Sept. 17 1862 Battle of Antietam- Union wins
Sept 22, 1862 Emancipation Proclamation- Lincoln frees slaves in those states in rebellion
July 1-3, 1863 Gettysburg- Union wins
July 4, 1863 Vicksburg- Union wins, splits south in two, takes control of Mississippi
1864 Sherman marches to the Sea- burns everything in the way
April 9, 1865 South Surrenders- Appomattox Courthouse, Lee surrenders to Grant.
Apr.14, 1865 Lincolns assassination-
Effects of Civil War 1. Major increase in the Federal government. a. They create the 13, 14, and 15 amendments. i. 13- forbids slavery ii. 14 all slaves are citizens iii. 15 freed blacks have right to vote 2. Segregation b. Citizenship c. Equal but separate
Keep Maryland to keep Washington dc in the union South economy inflates 9000% and north was only 80%
John brown raid- help murder slave owners
Robert E. lee homestate Virginia
John brown to arm blacks at harpers farry
Emancipation proclamation freed all slaves in rebellion states
Whiskey ring- filed false tax reports
South had greater ability to produce food
Bisquit made of wheat flour was hard

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    AP Gov Court Cases

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ogden was running a ferry service and tried to keep Gibbons’ service out of New York waters, citing that navigation was not commerce. Failed, Gibbons sued for entry. Dred Scott vs. Sanford – 1857, Declared that since Dred Scott was a slave, he couldn’t even bring the case to court, and also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Columbia represents the Government and the thin man choking is the rebels breaking the rules of the Constitution.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Johnson case, the Supreme Court sided in the end that a person as a citizen of the…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts: This lawsuit involves Dred Scott, an African American slave and his owner due to the passing of his previous owner Dr. Emerson, John F. A. Sanford. John F.A Sanford is the brother to the wife of Dr. Emerson. Dred Scott sued for his freedom in the Missouri Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis on April 6, 1846 . Dred Scott’s legal suit is for assault and false imprisonment: “A slave could be punished and kept as property, but a free person could not.”…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Dred Scott case came before the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was one of the five justices from states where slavery was legal. These five justices were the majority on the court, and believed that although the Missouri Compromise existed, a slave owner had the right to take his slaves anywhere he wished without fear that someone would remove his property from him. It was their feeling that regardless of the fact that Dred had lived in so called “free states,” he was still his owner’s property.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years leading up to the Civil War, the constitution did not provide a clear answer for deciding whether or not a slave had the same rights as a person. The federal government faced a divided country, and passed laws enforcing the return of slaves to their owner’s states, such as the Fugitive Slave Act. Contradicting this were “personal liberty laws,” which allowed states to decide who would be considered a person in their territory. However, both the Fugitive Slave Act and “personal liberty laws” were challenged in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. The ambiguity of the constitution would lead to a four-year-long war between the Northern and Southern states.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was a African American slave born in Virginia in the year 1800. In the 1830s Scott and Harriet Robinson lived in Fort Snelling in the 1830s working as free people as slavery was outlawed in the area. He lived there with an army surgeon named Emerson and was paid an independent salary. When Emerson was reassigned to the south they Scotts moved to fort Jesup in Louisiana. But soon returned to Fort snelling. In 1846 the Scotts decided to sue for their freedom because they were denied the optioned to buy it by Emerson's widow. In 1853 they filed in federal court. After Dred was freed in St. Louis circuit court in 1857, the supreme court made a decision based on the Dred Scott case stating that African Americans were not citizens and…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, Scott lost in his first trial due to lack of evidence. Scott, determined to win his freedom, was given a chance for a second trial. His main argument against Sanford was Sanford’s violation of Scott’s Fifth Amendment rights. The Fifth Amendment states that a person’s life, liberty, or property cannot be taken away without due process of law. They were taking away Scott’s liberty, but he deserved to be free because he was taken to a free state. Although Scott won the second trial, his freedom was short-lived. Sanford’s sister, Mrs. Emerson, appealed the court’s decision leading to the case being brought to the Missouri Supreme Court. Sanford argued that Scott did not have rights as a US Citizen because he was a slave. As a slave owner, Sanford argued that slaves are a man’s property, and cannot be taken away…

    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emerson’s widow. The next year the Missouri Supreme Court Decide to retried the case. In an 1850 retrial the St. Louis court ruled that Scott and his family were free.” Two years later the Missouri Supreme Court stepped in again, reversing their decision.Scott and his lawyer the brought the case to to federal court. “In 1854, the circuit court upheld the decision of the Missouri Supreme Court.” “After losing again in the federal district court, they went to the Supreme court in Dred Scott v.s Sandford.”(Wikipedia) Dred Scott had an argument that since he was in Illinois on free soil he should become a free citizen.” (Wikipedia) Scott claimed that him and John Sanford, who lived in New York, were citizens from different states. “The justices of the Supreme Court were biased regarding slavery. Seven of them had been appointed by pro slavery presidents, and five were families the owned slaves.”…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Dred Scott Supreme Court decision is an embarrassment in American history. Before the the case was brought to the court Dred Scott,an enslaved African American, tried to buy his freedom for $300 but the offer was declined. He finally went to the court to see if his freedom could be granted through the legal system. However he lost on a technicality because he could not provide sufficient proof that he was owned by Emerson’s widow. In 1850 there was a retrial in the Missouri supreme court, which granted them freedom. However two years later the Supreme court stepped in and reversed that ruling. He finally appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which ruled that because he was black he was not a citizen, in effect he restricted, or…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court first heard the case of Dred Scott vs. Sanford in 1857. Dred Scott was a slave who lived in Missouri with his owner. His owner took him to Illinois and Minnesota, two states that prohibited slavery. After the owner died, Scott proclaimed himself a free man and his family free due to the fact that he had resided on “free soil” for several years and that his four children had also been born on “free soil”. He sued the man’s widow and won and lost his case in several courts over an 11 year period. At this point in history, the Missouri Compromise had been in effect for about 40 years, but was never officially ruled on by the Supreme Court. Many Southerners were hoping that the Compromise be ruled unconstitutional due to the…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Recently an enslaved man, named Dred Scott, has sued for his freedom. Scott is the slave of a U.S. Army Surgeon, Dr. John Emerson. Emerson first acquired Scott from a man named Peter Blow, and then proceeded to move to Fort Armstrong in Illinois, which we all know is a free state. From there, Dr. Emerson moved Scott to Fort Snelling, located in the Wisconsin Territory. During his stay there, Scott married Harriet Robinson, which would have been unnecessary if he was a slave. Then, in 1843, Dr. John Emerson passed away in the Iowa Territory. After his death, Dr. Emerson’s widow, Irene continued to lease out the Scott family as hired slaves. Three years later, in 1846, Scott offered $300 for his family’s freedom, but Irene refused. After his…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court of the United States rendered its choice, deciding that Dred Scott was as yet a slave in March of 1857. Much more disputably, the Court decided that the Missouri Compromise was illegal; that all blacks, free or oppressed, would never be United States subjects, and that Congress did not have the privilege to choose the bondage question in the regions. This stacked choice, which should settle the servitude question for the last time and all the more significantly relieve the country's developing sectional emergency, wound up making more strain in the nation between the North and South. The response to the choice changed by district and political gathering, with it being scrutinized by northerners and Republicans, and commended by southerners and…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays