Preview

civil war

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
360 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
civil war
1. The Civil War will claim 600,000 American lives. According to the reading that is the equivalent of how many Trade Tower attacks?
The death toll of the Civil War is equivalent to a Trade Tower disaster occurring every Tuesday for four years.
2. Why would the framers of the Constitution not even mention the word 'slavery' in the Constitution?
The framers of the Constitution didn’t mention the word ‘slavery’ because they feared that the Southern states would not then join the new government.
3. How was the 3/5 Clause a compromise?
The 3/5 Clause was a compromise because it gave slave states the right to count slaves as three-fifths of a person in order to pad their representation in the House but denied any right of citizenship to those slaves. States’ leaders chose to compromise rather than tear the US apart.
4. Why did the balance of free and slave states have to be maintained?
North and south both feared that the other would overpower it in Congress.
5. How does the Compromise of 1820 accomplish this?
The Missouri Compromise decided that slavery would be prohibited north of the southern boundary of Missouri.
6. How was the nation divided on the issue of tariffs?
On the issue of tariffs, the US were divided because the South had little industry, it bought many manufactured goods either from Europe or from protected Northern businesses.
7. What does it mean to "nullify" a law? How does that support "state's rights"?
To “nullify” a law meant making them null and void within that state. This raised the issue of states’ rights as states had the final say on which laws they will obey.
8. In 1850 the nation was evenly divided free and slave states. How does the Compromise of 1850 try to solve the impending problem of California coming in a free state?
California pressed Congress for admission as a free state, and it was admitted as a free state and they slave trade was abolished in the District of Columbia.
9. What is "Popular

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Northerners, during mid-century America believed in the preservation of the undissolvable Union. When the Constitution was framed in 1787, the founding fathers were concerned about leaving Britain and becoming a Union, as opposed to the issue of slavery that would later prevail. Henry Clay created the Compromise of 1850, which helped solve the problem of slavery in the territories (Document A). This was not included in the Constitut…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Columbia represents the Government and the thin man choking is the rebels breaking the rules of the Constitution.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1849 – California applied for statehoods – South responded with opposition because it would enter as a free state…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 DBQ

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By the 1850’s the Constitution, originally viewed as a document for national unity, had become a source of regional disagreements and tension that eventually resulted in the failure of the Union. The Constitution never outright mentions slavery, and created an unsolved problem that later resulted in compromises and the failure of the Union it formed.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was a good plan in theory. It made one state a slave state and another state free. It alternated between the two to keep it even. The Missouri Compromise made Missouri a slave state, and made Maine a free state. Eventually, they split slave states and free states along the 36-30 parallel, which divided the states into North and South. The North became free states and the South became the slave states. The Missouri Compromise helped keep things neat and even but split the states.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the Mexican War ended, America was ceded western territories. This caused a problem on whether these new territories would be admitted as slave states or free states. To deal with this, Congress passed the Compromise of 1850 which basically made California free and allowed the people to pick in Utah and New Mexico. The ability of a state to decide whether it would allow slavery or not was called popular sovereignty.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War was an extremely messy and complicated event in American History. While there are several factors that led to the Southern states to secede from the Union, it is historically impossible to pinpoint the last bullet fired. Moreover, in academia there is a barrage of opinions on what was the deciding factor for the Civil War; one thing it is evident is that there was animosity between both sides since the inception of the United States. Additionally, one has to examine the proposed amendments to the Constitution before the Civil War to notice that the jargon used never used the word ‘slavery.’ For instance, in February 1861, Representative Thomas Corwin proposed his and amendment that barred his last name to the 36th Congress that guaranteed the seceding states that the federal government would not intervene with the particular domestic institutions; however, the word slavery was never used in the document. Stipulating that the amendment had passed, the 13th Amendment to the Constitution would have been unconstitutional, and the banning of slavery would never have occurred.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nullification is described by The Tenth Amendment Center (n.d.) as “Any act or set of acts which renders a law null, void or just unenforceable.” States can enact laws that contradict the federal laws, but the federal government can use article six of the constitution clause two. Article six clause two states “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.” Article VI (n.d.) What this means in layman’s terms is that states may do what they want, but the federal government can still come into the state and uphold their federal laws. This is what is happened with marijuana in the state of Colorado. Colorado passed amendment sixty-four which allows “in the interest of the efficient use of law enforcement resources, enhancing…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Fifth Compromises

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ’s right. We know today’s constitution is changed many times, so some way is different with the original constitution. In the original constitution some ways did address slavery but some aspects not mentioned. “Three Fifth compromises” is a clause about the slavery. This clause made slave counted to three fifth human when the voting.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Baptist Anti-Slavery

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “We propose,” it reads, “to endeavor to remove this ignorance [of the true nature of Slavery] by the circulation of publications depicting its true character, and its appropriate remedy” (10). The Constitution therefore conceives the primarily problem of slavery as one of ignorance. At issue, then, is unveiling what slavery really is, which the Constitution assumes will make abolition appear as the only appropriate remedy. This assumption is worth dwelling on: what is entailed in viewing the persistence of slavery as primarily a problem of ignorance? How would the Society respond to charges that there are many, especially in the South in the heart of plantation slavery, who know slavery quite well, yet are anti-abolition? One answer, on the basis of the Constitution so far, is that those that maintain the tolerance or slavery, or, further, are politically committed to its maintenance, do so because of prejudice against people of color. Slavery is fundamentally related to the problem of racism. This more fundamental problem, according to the Constitution, could also be cast as a problem of ignorance. Racism, as a system and culture arranged by racial hierarchy, is about not knowing the truth about fellow human…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil War Compramises

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise included adding Missouri to the slave state list. but first they had to have another state agree to be a free state. which was Maine. For all of this to be passed and agreed on there were other things that had to be done. Slavery was to be outlawed in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase, and the north of Missouri. Missouri did not allow free black people into the area, but it was against the Constitution. Missouri wasnt happy about it, they redid the Constitution so they could alow it state by state.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main purposes of the compromise were to admit California into the union as a free state, and divide the Mexican Cession into two territories - Utah and New Mexico. The slavery issue in these states was do be decided by popular sovereignty. The compromise also proved for a Fugitive Slave Law, and banned the slave trade in the District of Columbia. The Fugitive Slave Law, which was part of the compromise, also caused a lot of controversy. The main purpose of the law was to allow the capture and return of slaves that escaped into the northern states back to their original owners. Special commissioners were authorized to arrest the escapees. Even if the captured person was a free black, they were still denied the right of a fair trial. Anyone who opposed the arrest of a slave was to be punished. The Southerners were not entirely favorable to the law, because they were forced to loose California. The North also reacted negatively to the enforcement of the new law. Many people like Ralph Waldo Emerson said that the Fugitive Slave Law was in a way contradictory to the Constitution itself. He said that it is considered a crime to enslave a man in Africa, while it is also "high crime and misdemeanor, punishable with fine and imprisonment, to resist the reenslaving a man on the coast of America" (Emerson). Another example of this would be the President James Buchanan's fourth annual message to congress. Buchanan did not want the southern states to secede.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Student

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. To what extent did slavery exist in the Northern Colonies? Why did it exist as it did? Why…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1787, at the time of the Constitutional Convention, slavery in the United States was a harsh reality. The census of 1790 counted slaves in nearly every state, the only exceptions being Massachusetts and the "districts" of Vermont and Maine. In the entire country 3.8 million people were counted; 700,000 of them, or 18 percent, were slaves. These statistics are a striking example of the prominence of slavery in the history of the United States. They also exemplify the obvious contradiction between the institution of slavery and the advocacy of equality presented by the framers of our Constitution. Despite the freedoms reserved in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, slavery was not only tolerated, it was regulated.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays