The bus boycott demonstrated the potential for nonviolent mass protest to successfully challenge racial segregation and served as an example for other southern campaigns that followed. In Stride Toward Freedom, King’s 1958 memoir of the boycott, he declared the real meaning of the Montgomery bus boycott to be the power of a growing self-respect to animate the struggle for civil rights. On 5 June 1956, the federal district court ruled in Browder v. Gayle that bus segregation was unconstitutional, and in November 1956 the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed Browder v. Gayle and struck down laws requiring segregated seating on public buses. The court’s decision came the same day that King and the MIA were in circuit court challenging an injunction against the MIA carpools. Resolved not to end the boycott until the order to desegregate the buses actually arrived in Montgomery, the MIA operated without the carpool system for a month. The Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s ruling, and on 20 December 1956 King called for the end of the boycott; the community …show more content…
The sit-ins in Greensboro, Nashville, and Atlanta were not intended. College student wanted to end segregation in public places so they sat at the white only counter and were denied service, they didn't move. The biggest sit-in, took place in Atlanta where African Americans chose to sit in government offices, such as” City Hall, and the State Capitol. Martin Luther King led the people and was arrested for sitting in the all-white Mongolia Room Restaurant in Rich’s Department Store. In 1961, it was declared from the government that there would be no more segregation in