Preview

Civil Law Case Digest

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7347 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Law Case Digest
154 Amonoy vs. Gutierrez
G.R. No. 140420, February 15, 2001

FACTS
This case had its roots in Special Proceedings No. 3103 of Branch I of the CFI of Pasig, Rizal, for the settlement of the estate of the deceased Julio Cantolos, involving six (6) parcels of land situated in Tanay Rizal. Amonoy was the counsel of therein Francisca Catolos, Agnes Catolos, Asuncion Pasamba and Alfonso Formida. On 12 January 1965, the Project of Partition submitted was approved and xxx two (2) of the said lots were adjudicated to Asuncion Pasamba and Alfonso Formilda. The Attorney's fees charged by Amonoy was P27,600 and on 20 Jan 1965 Asuncion Pasamba and Alfonso Formida executed a deed of real estate mortgage on the said two (2) lots adjudicated to them, in favor of Amonoy to secure the payment of his attorney's fees. But it was only on 6 Aug 1969 after the taxes had been paid, the claims settled and the properties adjudicated, that the estate was declared closed and terminated.
Asuncion Pasamba died on 24 Feb 1969 while Alfonso Fornilda passed away on 2 Jul 1969. Among the heirs of the latter was his daughter, plaintiff-appellant Angela Gutierrez. Because his Attorney's fees thus secured by the two lots were not paid, on 21 Jan 1970 Amonoy filed for their foreclosure in Civil Code 4 No. 12726 entitled Sergio Amonoy vs. Heirs of Asuncion Pasamba and Heirs of Alfonso Fornilda before the CFI of Pasig, Rizal, and this was assigned to Branch VIII. The heirs opposed, contending that the attorney's fees charged were unconscionable and that the attorney's fees charged were unconscionable and that the agreed sum was only P11,695.92. But on 28 Sep 1972 judgment was rendered in favor of Amonoy requiring the heirs to pay within 90 days the P27,600 secured by the mortgage, P11,880 as value of the harvests, and P9,640 as another round of attorney's fees. Failing in that, the two (2) lots would be sold at public auction.
They failed to pay. On 6 Feb 1973, the said lots were foreclosed and on 23 Mar

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Janet (taxpayer) residing in Australia is named as the sole beneficiary of a property (1.85 hectares) with a large homestead as a result of the death of a relative on 7/10/2010. The property is not used for commercial purposes and at the date of death, the property was valued at $1.45million. Settlement took place on 21/12/2010. After moving into the homestead shortly after taking ownership, she planned to take a one-year trip which she had been planning for some time in late 2011. The taxpayer felt that the homestead was far too large for her (she is single),…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On April 11, 1996, Appellant Sandra Mitchell was having dinner at Appellee Friday's restaurant. Appellant was eating a fried clam strip when she bit into a hard substance which she believed to be a piece of a clam shell.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When property was purchase by Joseph and Hellen Naab, there was a house and a small concrete garage. Evidence showed that garage was constructed 20 years prior to the Naab?s purchased of the property. Neighbors (The Nolands) had their property surveyed, and requested that the Naabs?s remove the garage since it encroached 0.91 feet over the property line.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exhibit 16.5 is a final pretrial order for the United States District court for the Northern District of Illinois. The case on the pretrial order is Austin Bennaza vs Buddy Smith. The notice states stipulations and statements that deal with the case. It details each parties current state as well as their part in the case. It states what each party owes the other in dealing with the case. It also states how long the trial should take. It allocates specific time to each task associated with the case. The document needs to be prepared and submitted jointly by opposing trial counsel. The pretrial order also needs to be signed by the pretrial judge.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first case there is called Limited Jurisdiction Courts and the steps in there is 1- Initial Appearance – is the defendant’s first appearance in court, and the defendant is advised of the charges against you Arraignment – The defendant appears in court to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty,the next step is…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Superior Court Case Study

    • 8217 Words
    • 33 Pages

    Business owners and landlords have a duty to protect patrons and tenants from foreseeable criminal acts of third parties occurring on their premises.…

    • 8217 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Case Summary

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In December, Republican North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory signed into law a bill that limits Gov. –elect Roy Cooper’s power in making appointments by combining the elections board with the State Ethics Commission. The State Ethics Commission oversees ethics laws governing lobbyists, elected officials, and government employees. Under this law, governor successors are only able to appoint 50% of the new board’s members under the requirement that two must be Republicans. Legislative leaders would appoint the other 50% of the new board. Previously, the Governor appointed 60% of the Board of Elections members.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    James V. Taylor

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    FACTS: Eula Mae Redmon conveyed certain real estate to her children, W. C. Sewell, Billy Sewell, and Melba Taylor, by means of a January 1993 deed. The deed recited that the property was conveyed to the three grantees "jointly and severally, and unto their heirs, assigns, and successors forever," subject to a life estate retained by Mrs. Redmon. W. C. Sewell died in November 1993. Billy Sewell died two years later. After Mrs. Redmon passed away in 1997, Melba Taylor filed a declaratory judgment action in which she asked the court to rule that her mother had intended to convey the property to the three grantees as joint tenants and that Taylor, by virtue of her brothers' deaths, had become sole owner of the property under the right of survivorship. Descendants of W. C. and Billy Sewell (referred to hereinafter as "the Sewell descendants") opposed Taylor's request. They contended that Mrs. Redmon's deed created a tenancy in common, and that they had succeeded to the ownership interests W. C. and Billy Sewell held prior to their deaths.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defendant must be served with a statement of damages and that’s because the law requires that the plaintiff inform the defendant of the specific monetary damages sought before a default can be taken.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Comes Plaintiff, Constance Wolf F/K/A Constance Wolfgram, by counsel, and for her complaint states as follows:…

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    during Rizal’s time and werenotoriously corrupt. Justice was costly, partial and slow. Poor Filipinos had noaccess to the courts because they could not afford the heavy expenses of litigation.Wealth, social prestige, and color of skin were dominant factors in winning a case incourt. Even Jose Rizal, brother Paciano and his mother, Teodora was unjustlyarrested, deported or exiled to various part of the archipelago without due processof law.…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Please enter my subscription to dalawang daan (200) shares of your capital stock with a…

    • 734 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Succession Cases

    • 24671 Words
    • 99 Pages

    Melodia Ferraris left properties in Cebu City consisting of 1/3 share in the estate of her aunt Rosa Ferraris. Ten years have elapsed since the last time she was known to be alive, she was declared presumptively dead for purposes of opening her succession and distribute her estate among heirs. Hence, a petition for the summary settlement of her estate was filed. Melodia left no surviving descendant, ascendant or spouse, but was survived only by collateral relatives: 1) an aunt and half-sister of decedent’s father; and 2) her nieces and nephews who were children of Melodia’s only brother of full blood who predeceased her. In the settlement proceeding, Filomena Abellana de Bacayo, who is the decedent’s half-sister, was excluded as an heir pursuant to a resolution issued by the lower court. A motion for reconsideration was denied hence this action.…

    • 24671 Words
    • 99 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The CFI ruled that the donation was a donation mortis causa because the ownership of the properties donated did not pass to the donees during the donor’s lifetime but was transmitted to the donees only ―upon the death of the donors‖. It, however, sustained the partition of Lot 2502 since it was an extrajudicial partition. Both parties appealed to the SC, Andrea contending that it is a donation inter vivos while Alejandro contending it to be mortis causa.…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays