Preview

Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
669 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis
Quote Analysis from Civil Disobedience. By: Henry David Thoreau

“But, to speak practically and as a citizen unlike those who call themselves no-government men, I ask for not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it (Thoreau) ”
____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________

Over the course of time, not much has changed when talking about the United States government. Like the American government was criticized in the 1500’s, the same government receives the same criticism over one hundred years later. The main difference between the criticism
…show more content…
This passage is a very powerful one because Thoreau does not badger the government. Instead of saying that the government should change one thing into another thing he suggests that the government should re-evaluate something that needs change, and asks the government officials to take other viewpoints into consideration. In modern times, people have shown how uneducated are by having the audacity to say things like our country would be better off without a government. When people make statements like this, or take a similar approach towards a topic, they show how truly uneducated they are. Without a government, our country would be in complete havoc and turmoil. The mindsets of people in the 1500’s were completely different to the mindsets of people now. In today’s world, people have become accustomed to a society that is filled with drama and sarcasm. Because of this, people are constantly ridiculed and have learned to ignore the opinions of others. In the 1500’s the people wouldn’t make unrealistic statements because they didn’t want their opinion being made a joke, and would feel both humiliated and embarrassed if they were ridiculed by their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Human law and government are subordinate and antagonists to each other. Thoreau proposes that in an instance when each odd is against one another, an individual must choose their own moral path instead of the government path if necessary. Thoreau explains that people are not put in this world to make it a better place to live in, rather than to simply live it. He then describes that it is not man’s duty to devote himself to the moral wrong. It is man’s duty to avoid the moral wrong. For instance, if the government tells you to either kill your family members or be sent to jail, it is your duty to obey your conscience. Furthermore, Thoreau explains that the majority is not always correct either and thus, do not accurately determine justice. Although government has a place in human existence, man must eventually follow his own moral decisions and disregard human…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rebellion is a big difference between the two writings. Thoreau wants a world without government and wants to achieve that with peaceful rebellion. “It will not be worth the while to accumulate property; that would be sure to go again. You must hire or squat somewhere, and raise but…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In January 2008, appellant Citizens United, a nonprofit corporation, released a documentary (hereinafter Hillary) critical of then- Senator Hillary Clinton, a candidate for her party’s Presidential nomination. Anticipating that it would make Hillary available on cable television through video-on-demand within 30 days of primary elections, Citizens United produced television ads to run on broadcast and cable television. Concerned about possible civil and criminal penalties for violating §441b, it sought declaratory and injunctive re- lief, arguing that (1) §441b is unconstitutional as applied to Hillary; and (2) BCRA’s disclaimer, disclosure, and reporting requirements, BCRA §§201 and 311, were unconstitutional as applied to Hillary and the ads. The District Court denied Citizens United a prelimi- nary injunction and granted appellee Federal Election Commission (FEC) summary judgment.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Thoreau states that, “no government would be best”. However, as a citizen what does he call for at once? Why?…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau's utopian government is one, which enforces very few parameters. "I heartily accept the motto, 'That government is best which governs least'" "I believe--'That government is best which governs not at all'; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have " (On Duty of Civil Disobedience.) Thoreau makes it clear that all men should oppose every unjust law or guideline, which contradicts the conscience within each citizen who is under the government's control.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My thoughts: Here Mr. Thoreau states what he feels represent government in his day. He…

    • 5191 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He claimed that folks should not authorize governments to override or impact their awareness, and that man has a responsibility to evade and delay the efforts of governments to interfere in his thoughts and actions, which are open and destined only by nature. This privilege is obviously connected to the transcendentalist view of the self-reliant individual and is best summarized by Thomas Paine’s well-known statement, “That government is best which governs least”. Thoreau also claims that governments are somewhat damaging than supportive, thus their rightfulness is hardly defensible. The government was mainly a mediator of dishonesty and unfairness. Henry Thoreau was neither a supporter of democracy, as he appealed that majorities merely by…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his opening paragraph, he declares the bold and audacious statements: ‘[...] government is best which governs least [...]’ (lines 1-2) followed by, ‘[...] government is best which governs not at all [...]’ (line 4). Immediately the audience is—very clearly—exposed to his argument, which has an immense amount of force behind it. This is vital for Thoreau’s argument, as throughout his essay the audience hears a very strong and passionate voice, urging them to feel the same way about the topic, and that they too have been wronged by the government. Alongside Thoreau’s very forceful and powerful tone, a candid and critical tone is present. ‘This American government—what is it but a tradition, though a recent one, endeavoring to transmit itself unimpaired to posterity, but each instant losing some of its integrity?’ (lines 18-20). This very prominent line denounces the American government’s rectitude, implying that its partiality has reached to the point where it is just a pattern, and continued to increasingly execute unequitable behaviour. Though his attitude sounds negative and pessimistic, Thoreau does make a petition for action from society with an encouraging tone. ‘[...] I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it...’ (lines 45-48). Here, Thoreau uses ethos, as he knows that every man (and woman) wants to be respected, which then builds motivation for the people to take action against the current unjust government instead of heeding to its indoctrinated…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thoreau has had a large impact on American culture and society since he was alive, his writings and beliefs are very indicative of the way many people feel about the government today. He was very cynical towards the government and the belief that the government should not have more power than necessary. Thoreau believed that people should be able to make their own decisions and take ahold of their beliefs in order to live their lives unrestricted. This has come to be the thought of many Americans today, many believe that the government should have limited power and not be allowed to make decisions for its citizens. One of Thoreau’s main issues is the Mexican-American War, is he…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry David Thoreau said, "That government is best which governs the least, because its people discipline themselves."…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be considered ethical you must act in a way that harm is minimized. To be considered moral you must do what is considered to be “right”. I believe that in both cases it is a judgment call. What is moral or ethical to one may not be to another. In his writing of Civil Disobedience, Henry David Thoreau focusses on his views of the government and how he believed it to be unjust and unfair. Ethics and morality come to question throughout his writing. Thoreau talks of the laws being established by the majority and that those who stood up for a change were the minority. Thoreau points out, “Unjust laws exist: Shall we be content to obey them or shall we endeavor to amend them and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I told you a year ago that fear and hatred would run rampant throughout the U.S., you wouldn’t believe me. If I told you that public trust in the mainstream media was at an all time low, you wouldn’t believe me. If I told you that actual lies are being spun as “alternative facts”, you wouldn’t believe me. It sounds Orwellian. Because it is. This is our reality. Our reality is a president who spreads malicious lies about the press and gets away with it. A president who surrounds himself with the elite who are more interested in their financial gain than the American public. A president who might restrict the rights of LGBT communities, the rights of women, the rights of people of color, and --especially-- the rights of Muslims. We must resist…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States government has been a system that has grown and evolved since its creation. From the vantage point of 1932 looking backward, the federal government has grown in size and power for various reasons. Although at certain time periods a power struggle was very much apparent, much reform pushed the federal government to be a strong central government that was able to take on its responsibilities and uphold the law. Compared to its earlier days, the federal government in 1932 is much greater in its power and has a greater presence in the lives of American citizens. However in order to see how the federal government has grown and come into the role of sustaining its power and control over the United States, it is important…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On November 21, 2017 millions of people marched the streets of Washington, D.C., to protest the recently elected President Donald Trump. The protestors were protesting his views on women’s rights, health care, and immigration among other things. People like “members of Congress, world-famous actresses and countless citizens like Joanne Gascoyne of Albany, New York a 78-year-old retired teacher who traveled to New York City with her daughter and two granddaughters” came to protest the rights of women. The Women’s March was caused due to various remarks trump made over his campaign which has instilled fear in many Americans that he will make attacks on women’s rights. The protest didn’t only happen in D.C., but also all over the States and the world. Countries such as Australia, U.K., Japan, France, Germany, Greece,…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience Essay

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win”, said Mahatma Gandhi. Civil disobedience is public the refusal to obey certain laws and is done non-violently. This form of protest has been a method of political/social change since the beginning of time. Many leaders, such as Gandhi, M.L.K. Jr., and others have used civil disobedience to create change in society. Although civil disobedience has its faults, it is still an effective method of change.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays