Preview

Civil Disobedience Metaphors

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
382 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Disobedience Metaphors
Malcolm X and MLK disagreed on whether to use violence or use civil disobedience.This was a huge topic among civil rights leaders in the 60s.Should we fight back or should we just stand there and do nothing?A lot of the people knew that if they chose to fight back then they will die.On the other hand, if they did not fight back, then some of them will still die.That was the biggest decision people would make; if we are going to die then we might as well die fighting.

Many authors wrote about civil disobedience.A really good one is “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau. This story has a lot of metaphors and it makes a lot of interesting connections.When he talks about machines,he is referring to men that just follow the system and
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr
    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr

    The PBS video, “Malcolm and the Civil Rights Movement” is important in showing the varying views of both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. The video makes it well evident that both men were striving for the same end result, which was “defeating white racism and empowering African Americans. However, as the video explains, while both men had the same destination in mind, they both sought different journeys to get there.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Devices
    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Devices

    These lines are from Thoreau’s essay, Civil Disobedience. In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau speaks out in a personal voice, where he exemplifies the Transcendentalist movement and philosophy he follows. The tone of these lines are portrayed by the use of the language, which indirectly describes that he feels negatively toward the State “forcing” people to live their life in in accordance to the set regulations of the State. In these particular lines, he demonstrates his opinion on how he will not be forced by the State to conform to society, and suggests that people should not live a forced life. He writes “They force me to become like themselves”, which directly shows how the State is pressuring Thoreau to abide their laws and rules.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Witness To The Assassination Of Malcolm X Summary
    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Witness To The Assassination Of Malcolm X Summary

    The death of the great Malcolm X was a most tragic day. On February 21, 1965 Malcolm X was preparing to address the Organization of Afro-American Unity in Manhattan’s Audubon Ballroom where he was gunned down by three men, one of the gunmen was a member of the Nation of Islam Talmadge Hayer (Journal, 2014). Malcolm X was a great leader not because he wanted equality but because he wanted unity among blacks in America. His words were mush wiser than those of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. This is because Mr. X wasn’t afraid to take actions were deemed necessary. Though peace is good, can one really fight violence with peace? This is the question I believe Malcolm X was trying to answer. As many whites try to stop our movement by violence and murder Malcolm X was the only one courageous enough to give them a taste of their own medicine! Some might argue that Malcolm X’s…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil Rights, Malcolm X and Mlk Joining Up
    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Civil Rights, Malcolm X and Mlk Joining Up

    Martin Luther King Jr., a calm, inspirational figure in the fight against Civil Rights. Malcolm X, a controversial, aggressive speaker who had just as many followers. These men changed our nation for the better and we are still living in their words. Their styles on Civil Rights are very different even though they want the same thing. I believe if they both spoke in the same venue and teamed up the results would have not been as good. The two styles are so different it would have divided the crowd. From what I have seen you either have a peaceful protest with calming words or a more energetic protest with more aggressive thinking. It’s tough to mix the two harmoniously. I think the message would have not had the same impact.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis
    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page

    Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

    “Civil Disobedience” by Henry Thoreau warns its readers that we are at the mercy of our government and have no power as a minority that conforms to the majority, which represses our desire to resist the wrongs we believe in without the support of the masses. The place for an honorable, just man is within prison, which he explains through his personal experience. In part 1, Thoreau exposes how the government is without a conscience, susceptible to corruption for their own advantage, and are served not by men but by “machines” (5). We are left “to the mercy of chance” under the power of the majority. Part 2 explains that Thoreau didn’t believe in the voting system so would not pay poll tax, and was sent to jail only to find that he felt more…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Malcolm X Speech Rhetorical Analysis
    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Malcolm X Speech Rhetorical Analysis

    Martin Luther King, Jr. wanted a more peaceful approach. He hoped that with sit-ins and peace marches to appeal to the ideals of dignity and justice in the white people of the time. To show them the wrong they were doing so that they would want to correct it in themselves out of their own personal honor. Malcolm X on the other hand believed that white people would never give up their power, at least early on in his career as a civil rights leader. He believed they would only give it up if forced to do so, and that meant through militant means. He eventually give this idea up in favor of more peaceful means after finding white Muslims who treated him and other black men as brothers; and black men who treated white people as brothers as well. And with this he began to realize that they could live in peace, and so he switched to a more peaceful style in his protests in the…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Civil Disobedience
    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Civil Disobedience

    Some synonyms of the word ‘government’ include: ‘authority’, ‘regime’, and ‘leadership’. Now simply replace those words with: ‘manipulative’, ‘prejudicial’, and ‘corrupt’ and there lies the Thoreau’s startling precept about our government. In Henry Thoreau’s From Civil Disobedience, modern government and its regime are questioned— highlighting its inherent ineffective praxis. Though flaws in the government systems are alluded to, Thoreau declares that he is not in favour of the government being eradicated per say, just improved. Society however, are called to realize that—even if the government is deemed ‘better’— there are ‘congenital’ defects of such an omnipresent and invasive authoritative body. Thoreau brilliantly uses diction, tone,…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    1960s Dbq
    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1960s Dbq

    Malcolm X and King were both fighting for the Black’s but with different ideas. King wanted White’s and Black’s to get along so that their future children will live in a world where people are not judged based by their color of their skin or race. King wanted to achieve this goal through non-violence, which did help in the long run. Malcolm X wanted Black’s and White’s to work and be educated separately. X wanted to accomplish this through violence. The reason that I think that King’s philosophy was better for the 1960’s because it was time for a change. Many people were to afraid of change, so they just needed a push; which is what King did. King gave them a push so they can do what’s right. This is my opinion, whose philosophy do you think was better for the 1960’s, Martin Luther King Jr or Malcolm…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. Vs. And Malcolm X
    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Martin Luther King Jr. Vs. And Malcolm X

    Almost everyone we meet will have different stances on various subjects. We were all blessed with the ability to think for ourselves and decide what we agree with. Often, this can cause conflict between two parties because their views are so drastically opposite. Martin Luther King, Jr. preached about equality and the desire for peaceful protest. Malcolm X promoted black supremacy and rejected the idea of integration. While Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X agreed that black people should not be treated as lower class citizens, they were different when it came to continuing segregation because of class rank and the backgrounds they came from.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis
    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

    Thoreau has had a large impact on American culture and society since he was alive, his writings and beliefs are very indicative of the way many people feel about the government today. He was very cynical towards the government and the belief that the government should not have more power than necessary. Thoreau believed that people should be able to make their own decisions and take ahold of their beliefs in order to live their lives unrestricted. This has come to be the thought of many Americans today, many believe that the government should have limited power and not be allowed to make decisions for its citizens. One of Thoreau’s main issues is the Mexican-American War, is he…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

    To be considered ethical you must act in a way that harm is minimized. To be considered moral you must do what is considered to be “right”. I believe that in both cases it is a judgment call. What is moral or ethical to one may not be to another. In his writing of Civil Disobedience, Henry David Thoreau focusses on his views of the government and how he believed it to be unjust and unfair. Ethics and morality come to question throughout his writing. Thoreau talks of the laws being established by the majority and that those who stood up for a change were the minority. Thoreau points out, “Unjust laws exist: Shall we be content to obey them or shall we endeavor to amend them and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience: A Rhetorical Analysis
    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Civil Disobedience: A Rhetorical Analysis

    If I told you a year ago that fear and hatred would run rampant throughout the U.S., you wouldn’t believe me. If I told you that public trust in the mainstream media was at an all time low, you wouldn’t believe me. If I told you that actual lies are being spun as “alternative facts”, you wouldn’t believe me. It sounds Orwellian. Because it is. This is our reality. Our reality is a president who spreads malicious lies about the press and gets away with it. A president who surrounds himself with the elite who are more interested in their financial gain than the American public. A president who might restrict the rights of LGBT communities, the rights of women, the rights of people of color, and --especially-- the rights of Muslims. We must resist…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Malcolm X Dbq
    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Malcolm X Dbq

    MLK and Malcolm X once again are at their differences. MLK wanted to solve this problem with non violence whereas Malcolm X wanted to use violence to solve the problem. “Bomb our homes and threaten our children; send your hooded perpetrators of violence into our communities and drag us out on some wayside road, beating us and leaving us half dead, and we will still love you. But we will soon wear you down by our capacity to suffer” (Doc H) This is what MLK said in his Stride Toward Freedom book when he was finally starting the move of segregation being put to an end. He was saying that no matter how badly or how much the white people beat up the blacks, the blacks will still love them and respect them for who they are and not fight back because if they fought back it would just make everything worse. You can not fight one wrong with another wrong, two wrongs don’t make anything right. In the other hand, Malcolm X thought the best way to fix the racism was to fight it with violence. “ I believe we should protect ourselves be any means necessary when we are attacked by racists.” (Doc K) Malcolm is literally saying that if anyone gets attacked that they should fight back even though that isn’t always the safest plan. The safest way to go at this point would to just take in the beatings until the whites get sick of it and give up because it would be pointless to just fight back and…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience Research Paper
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Civil Disobedience Research Paper

    “Civil disobedience is a form of protest in which protesters deliberately violate a law” (suber). It is a way for society to reform itself to reflect its current values while maintaining its fundamental ideals. Some may argue civil disobedience is a “slippery slope” leading to anarchy or it cannot be justified in a democracy. Civil disobedience, while not optimum, is a way to accomplish change with the intent of reform and stabilizing communities.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Symbolizing Disobedience
    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page

    Symbolizing Disobedience

    On letter day this past Friday I wore a letter D on my shirt to symbolize disobedience. This is a specific vice that I have struggled to conquer throughout my life. In my case, it is not that I truly intend to be a rebellious teen that wants to be a non-conformist rather it's due to the fact of opposing differences between myself and others. When I got to school my experience was definitely what I expected it to be. Many people were curious as to what it stood for and many seniors remembered the project and were curious. But I kept to my promise and kept quiet without revealing the sin. Even my parents were confused as to what I was doing and asked why I was wearing a decorated letter “D” on my shirt, but again I kept silent and bowed my head.…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics