Preview

Citizens United Vs Fec Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
199 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Citizens United Vs Fec Research Paper
The Supreme Court’s controversial decision in its 2010 Citizens United v. FEC decision to ban limits on independent political expenditures by corporations incited a massive national dialogue over the issue of corporate personhood and corporations’ rights to free speech. Though politicians, including the President of the United States, and political commentators have referred to the decision as a shocking affront to democracy, the decision stands upon jurisprudence extending back nearly 150 years. The essential question that campaign finance issues beg is whether or not money should be considered speech. In this paper, I will argue that it is impossible to separate speech from the money that enables its dissemination. Further, I have developed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This officer observed Sanders was hold his left wrist with his right hand. This officer photographed Sanders for further documentation. Sanders was escorted to a treatment room and he was secure to the bed. Sanders complained he was in severe pain and had limiter mobility of his right hand. Sanders was scene by a doctor and stated the following "I was in the back seat of the car and adjusted my wrists and heard a popping sound" "I twisted wrong with the cuffs on" Sanders also now claimed his right shoulder was injured. Sanders also told the doctor he broke his wrist twice once in a Humvee accident and when picking up a pallet.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Texas vs Cobb case a man named Raymond Levi Cobb was first arrested in 1994 and confessed to a home burglary. In this process he denied that he killed the woman and child in the home but later confessed to his father which his father then went to report this to the police. Even though Cobb later waived his Miranda rights and confessed he was still indicted and sentenced to death. Cobb argued to the Texas Court of Appeals that after his confession he was denied his right to counsel because his request for an attorney wasn’t renewed after the burglary case. The Court later said that the right to counsel carries onto the reason charged if any other offenses are closely related to the case. It was then declared with a five to four vote under…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The case Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission was argued before the Supreme Court on March 24, 2009. Citizens United produced a political documentary that discussed whether Hillary Clinton would be a good president, however, the FEC stated that this was violating the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA). Although the film could have been shown in theaters, sold on DVDs, downloaded from the internet, and distributed in the form of a book, the producers could have faced five years in jail if they offered the documentary on Videos on Demand.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Valeo and McConnell and Wisconsin Right To Life, independent expenditures mustn 't be touched by the government. Subsequently, corporate contributions and their requirements have also come under scrutiny by critics of the Citizens United ruling. This case deals solely, with independent expenditures as it upholds the previous rulings that corporations must disclose their contributions to candidates. It was written by Justice Kennedy during the Supreme Court 's hearing of Citizens United v. FEC, "Disclosure permits citizens and shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way." Donating to campaigns, therefore must be regulated in order to prevent corruption, but is still an effective way to communicate to voters and candidates. Most important, the verdict of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, upholds the ideal that corporations must be treated as…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book, Big Money: 2.5 Billion Dollars, One Suspicious Vehicle, and a Pimp- on the Trail of the Ultra-Rich Hijacking American Politics, author Kenneth P. Vogel writes on the newly less regulated, and arguably more corrupt relationship between the American political system and big money donors. In this response paper I will address the main questions in relation to the text. One, which Supreme Court decision allowed for the rise in “Big Money’s” influence over the American political system? Two, how did the Supreme Court decision addressed in question one change both the American political landscape and the fundraising techniques used by those involved in political fundraising? And third, how did the Republicans and Democrats each respond in 2012 to “Big Money” in the American political system. I will follow the answers to these questions with a later section in my paper devoted to a personal response to Vogel’s text, as well as connections between his text and broader topic discussed in our Interest Groups class lectures.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Debates about the Citizens United case have been ripe throughout the entire country. In the case, the majority of the Supreme Court ruled that company broadcasts could not be limited. In addition, they ruled that there was no cap on company funding on candidates, but that there had to be a middleman of a superpac. Setting dangerous future implications, this decisions greatly undermines the future democracy of the country through condoning skewed political power based on wealth and by giving first amendment right to a company (Citizens 1).…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is supporting multiple issues, but two issues stand out. The first of these issues is the death penalty, or capital punishment. Mainly, the ACLU is against the death penalty because of the lack of evidence in multiple cases and the isolated location of the death penalty. . For example, of the 1,392 executions, 995 occurred in the South. Furthermore, the ACLU is against the experimentation of drugs on other people. In fact, the execution process is far from perfect and occasionally fails, putting the prisoner in great pain and suffering.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court ruled that corporations and unions are entitled to the protection of the First Amendment for political speech and that restrictions on the ability of corporations to speak directly, rather than through separate PACs, are unconstitutional. Finding that the restrictions must survive strict scrutiny – that is, must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling interest – the Court rejected the Justice Department’s argument that the law was essential to prevent corruption in the political process. Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy explained that “[t]he fact that a corporation, or any other speaker, is willing to spend money to try to persuade voters presupposes that the people have the ultimate influence over elected…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    corporations and unions provided unprecedented amounts of soft-money contributions during the 1996 and 2000 election cycles. At the same time, the Federal Election Commission had its budget cut, making the commission virtually helpless to prevent the parties from skirting existing campaign finance laws. In light of the impact soft money made on elections, reformers believed soft money must either be eliminated or severely limited. The McCain-Feingold legislation imposed a soft money ban on all federal elections. It also limited the amount of soft money contributors may give to state, district, and local committees. The ban on soft money was one of the highlights in the legislation, but it was expected to come under attack in light of Buckley v. Valeo. Critics of the soft-money ban argue that the contribution of money to political parties is a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment. In December 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of these limits by a vote of 5–4. The McCain-Feingold legislation actually increased the amount of "hard" money that individuals and other supporters could contribute. The amount of money individuals might contribute to state parties in federal elections increased from $5000 to $10,000. The total amount these individuals might contribute to federal candidates, parties, and other organizations increased from $25,000 to…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The outcome of cases that have gone through the United States Supreme Court judicial branch have each had a major impact on how the laws and amendments of the United States Constitution are interpreted. Two cases in particular that expanded constitutional liberties is the case of Engel vs. Vitale (1962) and the case of Tinker vs. Des Moines School District (1969). Not only did both of these cases expand constitutional liberties in general, they more specifically, expanded rights within the school system.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roe v. Wade research paper

    • 2154 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the controversial case, Roe v. Wade, a pregnant woman who was given the name Jane Roe to hide her identity attempted to get an abortion but they were illegal in Texas so she sued the state for invasion of privacy. Roe's real name is Norma McCorvey; she was an ex-carnival worker who was raped and became pregnant. In 1969, when she moved back to her home state, she was denied and abortion on grounds that her health was not threatened. She started to look for other options, such as an abortion clinic out of the country, but those were too risky. She had given up searching for a safe, clinical abortion when two lawyers contacted her about her story. These lawyers were Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington. Weddington had herself been through the search for an abortion clinic that was decent. She was lucky; she was able to live in Mexico for several weeks and could pay the high price for a safe abortion. Weddington did not want others to go through the insecurity of an illegal abortion like she had. Coffee was a practiced lawyer who was a strong supporter of abortions. John and Mary Doe, a couple that had offered their services in a previous abortion case, approached Coffee and Weddington who quickly included them in the case. Coffee and Wellington made a perfect couple to head up the fight against the District Attorney of Texas, Henry Wade. Wade had been the District Attorney for twenty years and on March 6, 1970 he received the paper that stated Jane Roe and John and Mary Doe were suing him. He had shown many times before his firm beliefs in preserving the Texas abortion laws. Henry Wade chose one of his most capable lawyers, John Tolle, to defend him in this suit.…

    • 2154 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kouakou Koffi Professor Sharifian GOVT 2305 07 October 2017 Civil Liberties vs Civil Rights “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” This passage drawn from the Declaration of the United States Independence encompasses two notions, which at first glance look like the same, the Civil Liberties and the Civil Rights also known as Equal Rights. The laws enacted from these rights, even after all the efforts provided to make them fit to U.S. citizen’s live, are still subject of conflict when it comes to apply them. In this reflection, after an attempt of definition of each term, similarities and differences of both of them will be subject of analysis on one hands and on the other hands which sequence of them impact the most our everyday life.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has always been a debate about weather the 1st amendment is more important Than the 2nd amendment. In this article I will be talking about why I think the 2nd amendment is more important than the 1st, the reason I believe the 2nd amendment is more important is that it allows us to bear arms, this means we are allowed to own weapons such as guns, knives, brass knuckles, etc... Also even if the 1st amendment didn’t exist we would still have the rights to own a gun or other lethal weapons in use of protection, so in other words even through the 1st amendment…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The arguments between the Anti-Federalists and Federalists led to the creation of a document that has stood the test of time and new governments have repeatedly modeled their governmental structure off of the Constitution. Despite the overwhelming majority of the Anti-Federalists’ concerns over many of the Constitution’s provisions being unfounded, their apprehensions regarding disproportionate amount of influence men of property could have on government officials have since become a scary reality, ironically due to their own insistence on implementing a Bill of Rights. Since the Supreme Court deemed that the United States government had no right to limit money spent on elections in Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, wealthy donors, including corporations, have contributed millions upon millions of dollars into elections at all different levels of…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution is the supreme law if the land, produced by our founding fathers more than 200 years ago. However, since the era of Presidents Washington and Jefferson is gone, many things have lost it is original intent, specifically the subject of the judicial review system, better known as judicial activism.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays