Cinderella And The Brother's Grimm Comparison

These two tales offer quite a bit of perspective in the two cultures they derived from. These societies had brazen and bold ideals fashioned in similar ways. Ultimately showing parallels in the expectations of good vs. evil; however, they poignantly draw differences in the cultivation of the story by adverse reasoning and direction.
Perrault wanted the story to come off as elegant and pleasant to the reader. Thus, attracting an audience of patience and moral depth. Most likely trying to convey the message to be understood and evaluated from within your own awareness. He creates a connection of honest conscious so that you can predict the right and wrong of the story and more closely relate to your own morality/character. His style of writing
Perrault story draws from the death of a mother and an absentee father. This is a formidable contribution to the plight of Cinderella. Grimm opens with the moments before the death of her mother using dark tactics to create woe and mistrust. A father, however not absent but mostly unconcerned with the interactions with his second wife and
One that is gone and unaware, shows cowardice and remorse of the situation. Nonetheless, still a man who can easily be forgiven for his transgressions. Contrary, a father that remains as the head of household and has no innate desire to be bothered with tending to his daughter’s needs shows a brooding pride that is common in that culture. We now understand why we don’t connect with the father in Grimms’ interpretation. He is steering us to a more powerful delivery of self intervention. Aschenputtel has no guiding hand; hence, is made more responsible for her outcome. The differences between Perrault giving her a godmother is almost reminiscent of an entity above the human domain. Giving explicable and tangible reasons for her fortune. In comparison the brother’s seem to be imposing a naturalist ideal in using the animals and the tree as the providential handiwork that is bestowed upon her. From this understanding is when I understood the divide between the authors. There is a marginal respect for the good we are taught and the good we teach ourselves. I think the perception of how this seemingly needy child shows just how much society is willing to afford those less