Christianity Liberate Women Analysis

Did Christianity Liberate Women? In the taking sides article Did Christianity Liberate Women? neither Karen Jo Torjesen, nor Karen Armstrong deliver a winning argument. There are several flaws in each of their arguments and neither successfully prove to be correct. Despite each Professor making valid points with adequate support, neither of them were able to fully defend their claim. The each side of the argument discredits the opposing side. Professor Torjesen argues yes, that Christianity both liberated and provided equality for women, while Professor Armstrong argues no, that Christianity excluded women from full participation in a male-dominated church. The two articles make valid points, both of which discredit the other. Several strong points are made, and supported by
The basis of her argument was grounded in the social status of women during the time period, being that they did not play a prominent role publically. Professor Armstrong also roots her argument in the sexual weakness of men, quoting Jesus by saying, “A man who looks at a women lustfully has already committed adultery in his heart” (52). This quote took its toll on the men of the time period, causing them to have an irrational fear of women. This literal interpretation of the time period provides validity to the shunning of women in the early Church because men truly thought that they would be capable of becoming more holy if they stayed away from women. Women became a prominent image of sex, thus adding to the reason to keep women away from men who were trying to be holy, “ She can cause a man to lust after her just by walking round looking beautiful” (52). It is also said that women scarred themselves, taking away their beauty in order to become a more influential part of the church, stressing the influence society had at the time, and the steps that had to be taken in order to repulse men rather then entice