Preview

Chp 15 Identifications: Civil War Recruits And Conscriptions

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4829 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chp 15 Identifications: Civil War Recruits And Conscriptions
Chp 15 Identifications

War recruits and conscriptions
● Background Info: The Civil War armies would become the largest org. created in the US. By the end of the war, over 2m would serve in the North, and 800k in the South.
● At first, the raising of armies depended on local efforts. Uniforms were left mainly to local opinion, and officers ranked as high as colonels were democratically elected! In the South, cavalrymen provided their own horses.
● This democratic and informal way of recruits, however, could not withstand the stress of war nor the demand for recruits as casualties mounted.
● In April 1862, the Confederacy enacted the first draft in American history. The Confederacy’s Conscription Act called for all able-bodied male
…show more content…
● Lincoln’s informal western manners and early northern setbacks in the war convinced most Republicans that Lincoln was an ineffectual leader. Lincoln had to deal with Radicals in his own party, which included Chase, Sumner, and Stevens.
● But the Radicals never formed a tightly knit group. Lincoln’s distinctive style allowed him to disarm opposition by keeping his opponents off-guard. He had the dual benefit of leaving open communication with both the conservative and radical Republicans.
● Like Stephens, the Northern Democrats too opposed centralization. But unlike Davis, Lincoln could control his foes more skillfully because of his temperament.
● More importantly, party politics (which the South abandoned), helped Lincoln keep control. With Democrats’ opposition, the Republicans learned that no matter how much they hated Lincoln, they had to rally behind him, or risk losing office.
● And therefore, as the war progressed, the Union developed more political cohesion than the Confederacy as it managed its divisions more effectively.

Defining the Borders
● Background Info: Washington was bordered by VA, and MY, two slave

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Republicans cast about for a moderate possibility to run with their impartial stage. The chief Republican, William H. Seward, had made adversaries with his radical "higher law" tenet, which guaranteed that there was a higher good law than the Constitution, and with his "irrepressible clash" discourse, in which he proclaimed that North and South were destined to impact. Lincoln, notwithstanding, following blasting onto the national scene in 1858 had shown his unmistakable reason, practical insight, and strong Republican accreditations. That, and his living arrangement in Illinois, a critical state, made him alluring to the gathering. On the third tally, the representatives picked Lincoln. Crushed by Douglas in a state challenge less…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Answer: The Union states were able to raise a larger army than the Confederacy because the union states population was larger than the Confederacy.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lincoln entered the Presidency rooted in the beliefs that the executive branch’s power came second to the legislative, as stated in the Constitution. His “immediate predecessors—Democrats Franklin Pierce and James Buchanan—had set the pattern for a weak executive, conceiving their roles as little more than clerks...who either approved or disapproved legislation developed from Congress’s agenda,” (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 175). However, following the secession of seven southern states immediately after Lincoln’s election, his focus became reuniting the union: “he sought to reassure his fellow countrymen and to prevent more states from seceding,” (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 175). To accomplish this, Lincoln was headfast in his decisions, often reaching beyond traditional executive power and, in effect, overriding the other branches of government. These decisions were extremely controversial: Groiler Encyclopedia says, “As a commander in chief Lincoln was soon noted for vigorous…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also because of the Emancipation Proclamation of banning all slaves in rebellious states that made the South hate him even more now. Once Lincoln found his best General and leader Ulysses S. Grant with Grant’s and Lincoln’s victories at Gettysburg we defended are hardest and our best with our best top gun we had; even if the South had Robert E. Lee we still won and had another victory at Vicksburg controlling the Mississippi River and no trade to the South And Sherman’s push to Atlanta cutting it straight in half and burning it to pieces he knew every aspect of this war and how to get the right channel and he has general Grant the best general the North ever had and he became to be a very strong leader and he was the best he could be at his ability and all the success led us to a victory especially it is success at Vicksburg…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his time, the Congress was the dominant branch of government and had been so since the election of 1836. Starting then, no President had been reelected to office, and there had been, in fact, no strong President as Van Buren, Harrison, Tyler, Polk, Van Buren, Fillmore, Pierce and Buchanan were all nonentities. By achieving the preponderance of power within Congress, Lincoln was able to effectively have a program, and to achieve parts of it with the rest at least presenting the appearance of…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most aggressive and influential out of the three was the Radical Republicans. All of the Republicans were against slavery, but only this group of Republicans was very “radical” towards the issue (Faust, 1986). The conservatives were in favor for an emancipation and colonization of Freedman. The moderates favored only the emancipation. Meanwhile, the Radical Republicans saw this Civil War as a crusade for “Abolition” (Faust, 1986). The Radicals also dominated the other factions, because of the types of people that they had in offices. Even two of Lincoln’s cabinet members were Radical. Salmon P. Chase and Edwin M. Stanton were both Radicals. The strength of the Radicals mainly came from the North, specifically New England. Such policies…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the reasons that led the United States of America to the Civil War was associated with monetary and social differences between the North and the South. Black people freedom was not a priority for Lincoln administration. In the North, Blacks were…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When both the Union (North) and the Confederacy (South) entered into war with each other, neither side was thoroughly prepared for battle. Both the North and the South had issues gathering enough resources and raising funds to support their war efforts (Goldberg, ed. 7, The American Journey, 405). However, the Union did have an advantage over the Confederacy. The North had a large population, strong political and military leadership, and plentiful resources; while the South struggled to piece together an entirely new government and army. This early upper-hand by the Union was what helped them eventually wear down the Southern troops at the end of the war and win.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all, Abraham Lincoln was considered a peacemaker while members of his cabinet spun out of control. One thing that impressed me this most is how Lincoln stood in the center of a storm and never waiver by the opinion of his peers. He knew how to meet their needs without causing emotional imbalances. In some situations voices heightened; however, he successfully kept them…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The plan worked most of the time, except for the fact that the confederates had fewer ships called blockade runners. Most of these ships got through the blockade. If they did they make it through they made lots of money. The Union Navy captured or destroyed 1500 blockade runners. The blockade covered 3500 miles and 180 ports. Most Union soldiers were white from ages 14 to 45. Most Confederate soldiers were under 30. More than half the Confederate soldiers were farmers. Almost half of the Union soldiers were farmers.The Union Army was better supplied than the Confederates. The Union’s population was around 18.5 million people. The Confederate’s population was 5.5 million people and 3.5 million enslaved soldiers. The Union had more money than the Confederates. The Union Army had 2,672,341 soldiers in the Army. The Confederate’s had between 750,000 to 1,227,890. The Union had 101,000 factories, 1.1 million factory workers, and 20,000 miles of railroad. The Confederates had 21,000 factories, 111,000 factory workers, and 9,000 miles of railroad. The Union consisted of 48% farmers, 24% mechanics, 16% laborers, 5% Commercial, 4% miscellaneous, and 3% professional. The confederates consisted of 69% farmers,9% laborers, 5.3% mechanics, 55 commercial, 2.1% professional, and 1.6%…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North won the Civil War because they had many advantages including a large population, more advanced transportation, and a better war strategy. “It could draw soldiers and workers from a population of 22 million, compared with the South’s 5.5 million” (William Deverell and Deborah Gray White, United States History: Independence to 1914, California Edition, pp. 474-5). A larger population meant more people to fight in the war, which gave the Union a better chance of winning. On the other hand, the South approximately had one-fourth of the North’s population, and as a result they lost the war.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Disputes of 1820-1860s

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Political leaders made it less likely to settle disputes. Leaders such as President Lincoln were anti-slavery and fought to abolish it. Political leaders would argue over southern succession such as Representative Preston Brooks and Senator Charles Sumner (Doc E). Many state representatives decided to succeed from the Union and many were thinking about it. Abraham Lincoln argued that the disputes on slavery weren't just about politics (Doc G). Lincoln won the election of 1860 because the Democratic Party split. He won all of the Free states votes beside New Jersey (Doc H). Politics made the chances of compromise even worst.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    years, he worked there as a lawyer, earning a reputation as “Honest Abe” and serving…

    • 2487 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln was a strong, confident president who remained steadfast in his principles. At a time of crisis he led the nation into an unpopular civil war. He could have gone the easy route, and ignored the Confederate States of America, ergo avoiding conflict. However, he felt that the union was something exceptional, and was worth preserving. Lincoln was less concerned about his own personal life and what people thought of him. He remained strong and he fought for our country and his principles. President Lincoln gave his life and sacrificed the lives of his fellow American so the union would be preserved.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A House Divided

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Now, if you were a northerner and heard Lincoln’s speech, you would be jumping up and gladly voting for him. Although Lincoln himself did not say so in his speech, all civilians knew if he was elected, he would end slavery and the United States would become one again. You see…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays