Preview

Choice Theories: Criminal Acts And Choice Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
980 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Choice Theories: Criminal Acts And Choice Theory
Criminal Acts and Choice Theories

CJA/204
December 13, 2011
Bob Bennett

The choice theory has a substantial part to perform when contemplating the argumentation proceeding to criminal vivacity. The choice theory has its intrinsic significance while composing a plan of action for managing or decreasing crime. It is essential to recognize the theory and in what way or manner it influences the potential of an individual engaging in lawlessness and in what manner would an effort to manage crime appear supporting the choice theory. The choice theory has been brought to light from the compositions of antecedent theorists, Jeremy Bentham, and Cesare Beccaria. The affects of the choice theory determines how mankind discourages criminal activity
…show more content…
The determination will rely upon the features of the mark and the methods available to execute the plan. It has been determined that offenders choose the location by the accessibility and ease of committing a crime with thoughts about the possibility of getting caught. Offenders pick their targets by pondering the character of the crime. A perfect example of this is how offenders will choose higher class households for burglaries or robberies, whereas he or she will select lower class households for the target of violent crimes such as in drug robberies from drug houses. Criminals learn the techniques of crimes to aid them in non-detection (Schmallager, …show more content…
The two models within the criminal justice system are consensus model and conflict model. Consensus model is defined as majority of individuals in a society who share the same values and beliefs. Criminal acts conflict with consensus values and beliefs, and here the term ‘conflict model’ comes into play. The consensus model explains that individuals within a society will agree on which activities should be considered against the law and will publish them as crimes. The consensus model assumes that a diverse group of individuals can have similar morals and beliefs. The consensus model presumes that when individuals stand together to form a society; the members will come to a fundamental agreement with the observance of shared norms, values, and beliefs. Individuals whose actions deviate from the standard norms and recognized values, and beliefs are considered to be a threat to the well-being of society, and must be punished. Societies pass laws to control and impede deviant behavior, which in return establishes boundaries for appropriate behavior within the society (Schmallager,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lifestyles and motivating factors are involved in the nature of a crime when it comes to choice theories.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two most common models that are used to determine which acts are considered criminal are the consensus model and the conflict model. The consensus model is a model in which the majority of the people within that society share the same basic values and beliefs. If anyone in that society deviates from the established norms of that society and their behavior threatens the well being of the group, than they must be punished. Consensus means majority, so that means that the majority of the people within that group must agree what is considered right and what is considered wrong in order to determine what is to be deemed criminal or not. So when that society’s…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While the original crime prevention efforts of rational choice theory…to make the risks far outweigh the benefits of committing crimes, I feel this is no longer an effective view of crime in today’s world.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ucsd Econ 143 Paper 1

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The primary question of this article is based upon the question of what is more useful for deterring crime. Is it a harsher sentence or a greater chance to be caught? There have been multiple papers on this topic, but most of the results have been inconclusive. Therefore, the researcher would like to shed more light upon human decision making in regards to deterring crime. The key benefits of this research would include providing valuable data on how to prevent crime using limited resources. Would it be better to spend more money on punishing a crime, or to spend more money on things such as inspection or law enforcement in order to catch more people committing crimes? This is a very interesting question because crime takes a large toll on national and state governments. Additionally, the decrease of crime would be extremely beneficial for society. Finally, this question tries to find a way to uncover the mystery that is human decision making.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Crime is caused by the individual exercise of free will. Human beings are fundamentally rational, and most human behavior is the result of free will coupled with rational choice.” (Schmalleger. 2011. P.81)…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In society, people always want to point a finger as to who did what and why. For centuries, theorists have come up with ideas to try to identify and explain why people commit crimes. What causes them the break the law, even when they know the repercussions for their actions. Many theories have been brought up, but only a few have surpassed time and are approved by society and law enforcement. These choice theories hypothesize on why how and why people commit crimes, they are also accepted through our society and they affect law enforcement as well as the government.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Different choice theories and models exist that relate to crime. Some of the choice theories that mention in the book Criminal Justice Today an introductory text for the 21st Century, 10th edition are as followed: Choice theory, the classical school, biological theory, psychological theory, and the labeling theory. Each has its own way to explain how and why a person commits a crime. Two models in the text are the crime controlled model and the due process model.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIS 170

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    They are many Criminal Theories from Psychological theories, social theories, deterrence theories and a few more but let focus on, Choice Theory, known as, rational choice theory. People will engage in delinquents and criminal behavior after weighting consequences and benefits of their actions. According to this review in, motivated people, after consideration, will commit crime if they believe that it will provide immediate benefits without the threat of long-term risk (David, et al, 2006). If people have a choice to do crime or do the right thing, why do they choose crime? What causes a person to choice crime? Poverty, conventional life styles, environment, social life, preexisting physical conditions, genetics or theirs past childhood. Many explanation can be an argument and it cause go on, and on.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. How might you use the strategies for applying creativity to problems and issues in addressing this topic?…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exam #1 Review 1. Conflict vs. Consensus Models of Criminal Justice Consensus Model a. This model of criminology views criminal law as reflecting the interest of the public b. Incorporates a utilitarian perspective Conflict Model c. According to this model of criminology, criminal law serves the interests of the elite and powerful at the expense of the majority of society. d. Rooted in traditional Marxism Consensus Perspective e. A product of social values and needs f. Emile Durkheim suggested that crime is functional to society by providing clear boundaries of socially acceptable behavior. Conflict Perspective g. Law is considered to be a reflection of the interests of the powerful and elite groups.…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rational choice theory says that we are choosing to commit a crime (Schmalleger, 2011). For example, a person has very little income and has a bill due. This person sits back and thinks of ways to come up with the money. Ultimately this person decides the only way to get the money is to commit robbery. Using the rational choice theory this person chose to commit the crime and must now deal with the consequences. The rational choice theory also states that the person who chooses to commit the crime feels the gain from the crime is far better than the repercussions of ignoring the law (Schmalleger, 2011). The rational choice theory is part of neoclassical criminology. Neoclassical criminology says that we are the ones who choose to commit crimes or choose to abide by the law (Schmalleger, 2011).…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term choice theories better yet known as rational choice theories were developed by DR William Glasser in 1995. In Doctor Glasser’s theories he explains human desire to satisfy their genetic needs one has in order to survive. These desires cause humans to make conscious choices and act upon them in any way they decide to ensure the needed desires are satisfied. These theories relate to criminal activity because criminals feel that crime is their only way of fulfilling these desires. The need to survive is a primal instinct shared by all humans. When a person breaks a law, their offense becomes criminal and this affects society through costly trials, the need for more corrections, and housing; thus impacting the economy in a negative way.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Conflict Model Of Crime

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Society uses models to see which acts are considered criminal acts. The two most common models of how society determines which acts are criminal are the consensus model and conflict model. Consensus model is defined as the justice system working together. Whereas the conflict model is distinct as justice agencies competing for promotions, pay raises and accountability. Conflict models show that there is no cooperation between agencies.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cusson, M . and Pinsonneault, P. (1986) The Decision To Give Up Crime, in Cornish, D. B. and Clarke, R. V. (eds.) The Reasoning Criminal, New York, Springer-Verlag.…

    • 6617 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Justice System

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crime is often defined in many ways, my main definition for crime is doing something that is completely wrong or against the rules. Committing a crime is punishable by the law. There are different types of crime in the criminal justice system. Crime is very well related to law in many ways. Law regulates the conduct of the public and it deters them from committing a criminal act. Society uses common models to determine what a criminal act is. The consensus model and the conflict models are used in the criminal justice system. The consensus model means about majority of the people have the same thoughts and perspectives on the subject. The consensus model backs up the values and beliefs of society by believing that crime is anything that goes against these values. The conflict model will pretty much determine what the criminal law is about. The conflict model goes against all the values and beliefs of the society and does not work in teams.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics