Child abuse

Topics: Prison, Parole, Criminal justice Pages: 18 (5376 words) Published: December 16, 2013
When prisoners return to communities.
Petersilia, Joan, U California, Irvine, CA, US
Federal Probation, Vol 65(1), Jun, 2001. pp. 3-8.
Page Count:
US: Administrative Office of the United States Courts.
0014-9128 (Print)
1555-0303 (Electronic)
parole release; trends; parole supervision; politics; economics; social consequences; prison inmates; juvenile delinquents
Nearly 600,000 inmates arrive on the doorsteps of communities throughout the country each year, released from state and federal prisons and secure juvenile facilities. The issue of how to deal with "prisoner reentry" into the community is becoming a hot one, due to the cumulative impact of these hitherto unprecedented numbers, following upon years of huge incarceration rates. Petersilia points out the parole supervision issues raised by this situation, especially when it is compounded by reduced money for rehabilitation programs that might help offenders stay out of prison. Focus is on political, economic, and social consequences of parole release. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)

*Economics; *Parole; *Politics; *Psychosocial Factors; *Social Influences; Juvenile Delinquency; Prisoners; Trends
Criminal Law & Adjudication (4230)
Human (10)
IN 1999, STATE prisons admitted about 591,000 prisoners and released almost the same number--about 538,000. If federal prisoners and those released from secure juvenile facilities are included, nearly 600,000 inmates arrive on the doorsteps of communities throughout the country each year.

Virtually no systematic, comprehensive attention has been paid by policymakers to dealing with people after they are released, an issue that has been termed "prisoner reentry." Failure to do so may well backfire, and the crime reduction gains made in recent years erode, unless we consider the cumulative impact of tens of thousands of returning felons on families, children, and communities. In particular, failure to pay attention to parole services is unfortunate, since most inmates, at the point of release, have an initial strong desire to succeed.

Of course, inmates have always been released from prison, and officials have long struggled with how to help them succeed. But the current situation is different. The numbers dwarf anything in our history, the needs of parolees are more serious, and the corrections system retains few rehabilitation programs.

A number of unfortunate collateral consequences are likely, including increases in child abuse, family violence, the spread of infectious diseases, homelessness, and community disorganization. And with 1.3 million prisoners, many more people have real-life knowledge of the prison experience. Being incarcerated is becoming almost a normal experience for people in some communities. This phenomenon may affect the socialization of young people, the ability of prison sentences to scare and deter, and the future trajectory of crime rates and crime victimization.

Parole in the U.S.-Managing More People, Managing Them Less Well Changes in sentencing practices, coupled with a decrease in availability of rehabilitation programs, have placed new demands on the parole system. Support and funding have declined, resulting in dangerously high caseloads. Parolees sometimes abscond from supervision, often without consequence. Not surprisingly, most parolees fail to lead law-abiding lives and are rearrested.

Determinate Sentencing Means Automatic Release
Parole in the United States has changed dramatically since the mid-1970s, when most inmates served open-ended indeterminate prison terms--10 years to life, for example--and a parole board, usually appointed by the governor, had wide discretion to release inmates or keep them behind bars. In principle, offenders were paroled only if they were rehabilitated and had ties to the community--such as a...

References: Anderson, Elijah. 1990. Streetwise: Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community. W.W.
Abramsky, Sasha. 1999. "When They Get Out," The Atlantic Monthly, June: Vol. 283: No. 6:
Associated Press. 1999. State Agencies Lost Track of Parolees. Santa Barbara News Press.
Beck, Allen, Darrell Gilliard, and Lawrence Greenfeld. 1993. Survey of State Prison Inmates
Beck, Allen, and Christopher Mu mola. 1999. Prisoners in 1998. Washington DC: Bureau of
Justice Statistics.
Bloom, Barbara, and David Steinhart. 1993. Why Punish the Children: A Reappraisal of the
Children of Incarcerated Mothers in America
Blumstein, Alfred, and Allen J. Beck. 1999. Prison Growth in U.S. Prisons, 1980-1996. In
Prisons, edited by M
Bonczar, Thomas P., and Alien J. Beck. 1997. Lifetime Likelihood of Going to State or Federal
Bonczar, Thomas and Lauren Glaze. 1999. " Probation and Parole in the United States 1998,"
Washington DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. 1999. Mental Health and Treatment of Inmates and Probationers.
Burke, Peggy B. 1995. Abolishing Parole: Why the Emperor Has No Clothes, American
Probation and Parole Association, Lexington, KY.
Ditton, Paula. 1999. Mental Health and Treatment of Inmates and Probationers. Washington DC:
Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Hagan, John, and Ronit Dinovitzer. 1999. Collateral Consequences of Imprisonment for
Children, Communities, and Prisoners
Holzer, H. 1996. What employers want: Job prospects for less-educated workers. New York:
Russell Sage.
Legislative Analysts Office. 1999. Crosscutting Issues: Judiciary and Criminal Justice 1999
[cited 2/8100 2000]
Liebling, Allison. 1999. "Prison Suicide and Prisoner Coping." In Prisons, edited by M. Tonry
and J
Mauer, Marc. 1999. The Race to Incarcerate. New York: The New Press.
May, John P. 2000. Feeding a Public Health Epidemic. In Building Violence. How America 's
Rush to Incarcerate Creates More Violence, edited by J.P
McCaffrey, Barry. 1998. Drug Treatment in the Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC:
Office of National Drug Control Policy.
McDonald, Douglas C. 1999. Medical Care in Prisons. In Prisons, edited by M. Tonry and J.
Moore, Joan. 1996. Bearing the Burden: How Incarceration Weakens Inner-City Communities.
Petersilia, Joan. 1999. Parole and Prisoner Reentry in the United States. In Prisons, edited by M.
Reno, Janet. 2000. "Remarks of the Honorable Janet Reno on Reentry Court Initiative," February
10, U.S
Rose, Dina, Todd Clear, and Kristen Scully. 1999. Coercive Mobility and Crime: Incarceration
and Social Disorganization
Simon, Jonathan. 1993. Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Underclass, 18901990. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Snell, Tracy L. 1994. Women in Prison. Washington DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Stivers, Connie. 2000. "Impacts of Discretionary Parole Release on Length of Sentence Served
and Recidivism," unpublished manuscript, School of Social Ecology, University of California,
Tonry, Michael. 1999. Reconsidering Indeterminate and Structured Sentencing. Research in
Brief, National Institute of Justice, U.S
Travis, Jeremy. 2000. But They All Come Back: Rethinking Reentry, Research in BriefSentencing & Corrections: Issues for the 21st Century, Washington DC: U.S. Department of
Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Western, Bruce and Katherine Beckett. 1999. "How Unregulated Is the U.S. Labor Market.? The
Penal System as a Labor Market Institution," Princeton University, NJ.
Wilson, James Q. and George L. Kalling. 1982. Broken Windows. Atlantic Monthly March: 2938.
Wilson, William Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and
Public Policy
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Child Abuse Research Paper
  • Child Abuse
  • Child Abuse and Neglect Essay
  • Evaluation Essay(Child Abuse
  • Poverty and child abuse Essay
  • Research Paper Child Abuse
  • When Discipline is Considered Child Abuse Research Paper
  • Sigmund Freud, Women and Child Abuse Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free