Preview

Chicago Gun Policy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1284 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chicago Gun Policy
The United States has been in a conflicting stance upon the subject of guns, as some people oppose the idea of the government taking away their guns as this act would deny them the second amendment while others have been in favor for eliminating guns from the equation of entirety, as it leads to crime related activity, suicide and mass shootings over the years. The question then arises: Do we need a strict gun policy that allows people to own guns by having certain criteria fulfilled in order to acquire them or eliminate guns completely to avoid any potential disaster? As research suggests, in the United States, guns can be linked to many things like suicide, homicide, and armed robbery among many other things but it is included in studies …show more content…
In Chicago people must carry a permit to have a concealed weapon and must have background checks before any purchase has been made. Unfortunately, it has the third highest murder rate within the US. Some argue that Chicago’s gun policy may be weak but it's actually quite the opposite. The main problem for the people in the Chicago is the gangs that plague the city with violence. In an article from the New York Times by Monica Davey, she referred to a raid that the Chicago Police department performed that was two days long and is currently the largest gang-related raid in the history of the city. Following the successful raid, the department made the claim that the city’s violence could be from the few but very hostile gang members. According to the police department of Chicago, the raid was efficient and effective, as raids could be more frequent in an attempt to reduce the murder rate in Chicago. Monica gives an account of the police report following the successful raid. ”Chicago officials say that a small number of people perhaps only 1,400 in a city of 2.7 million are driving the majority of the violence. The police said they seized 23 guns, more than $45,000 worth of drugs and hundreds of packs of illegal cigarettes. Charges included illegal possession of guns and selling drugs” (12). Following this raid, the police have gathered 23 guns and $45,000 worth of drugs. This is a possible reason why the homicide …show more content…
More importantly, how would he respond? King is synonymous with the idea that we should only judge people by the context of their character, not by the color of their skin, people always fall victim to stereotyping whether on purpose or not certain events eventually shape someone’s perspective on a certain topic. For example, if someone would go to Chicago knowing the situation it’s experiencing, people would think before going there as they would associate Chicago as gang territory. As a response to this stereotype, King would use a line from his paper titled “Facing The Challenge Of A New Age “ saying the following:” "Freedom and Justice through Love." Not through violence; not through hate; no, not even through boycotts; but through love. It is true that as we struggle for freedom in America we will have to boycott at times. But we must remember as we boycott that a boycott is not an end in itself; it is merely a means to awaken a sense of shame within the oppressor ”(33). What King is implying in this passage is that history shows multiple times that many a path to a more prosperous land, we must follow the original goal of gaining peace and freedom for the community with acts of love and compassion rather than alienating ourselves from such a goal by inciting acts violence that only deters progress. In terms of today’s society, King’s approach may seem futile, as the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The ruling in McDonald v. Chicago had the same outcome as D.C. v. Heller, a 5-4 decision with all Justices voting the same way. Ironically, Chicago's Mayor, Richard Daley predicted mass chaos and death when the D.C. handgun ban was struck down in 2008. Obviously, his prediction never came to fruition as Washington's murder rate plummeted over 25% in 2009 alone. The drop compares with only a 7% drop nationally. Additionally, robberies involving guns fell over 14% and assaults with guns fell over 20% during that time same time…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Birmingham Jail Thesis

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From a critical viewpoint, King makes a very persuasive argument using logic and emotions to influence the audience that he is in fact right in taking a non-violent action but more so justified from the basic humanity laws. He denies idea that he is supporting some laws while breaking other by making a distinction between just and unjust laws. He talks about the difference between moral and political and just and unjust laws. For example, Parade law that put him in jail is just in letter but unjust when applied to violate constitution. King also justifies breaking laws by citing historical examples of civil disobedience, such as: the Old Testament, Early Christians in Rome, Socrates, Boston Tea Party, Freedom Fighters against Hitler. He then uses emotions to convince his readers that it is the white moderate that are really at fault, conveying the message that he is a victim of circumstance and society. He uses this to lead into the criticism of his extremism. King is really a moderate between two extremes of black action between doing nothing and becoming violent. He cautions that without his movement, the extreme of hating whites will win out and cause more violence. He then shows that he is indeed a pacifistic by recognition and praise of those whites who have helped his cause. King tries to refute the clergyman’s disapproval of the actions that occurred in Birmingham, he tries to redirects praise to the civil rights protestors, and reconstructs a harmonious…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “The Accessibility of Guns Lead to Gun Crime,” written by Alan M. Ruben apprises us that firearms have one sole purpose and that is to cause harm, meaning committing an injury, homicides, or suicides. Most people believe that owning a firearm gives the reassurance that they are protected and no harm can come to them. Ruben shows statistics that guns are not the most secures ways of bringing protection, but it can actually bring danger. “States with the highest level of gun ownership have 114 percent higher firearm murder rates and 60 percent higher total homicide rates than states with the lowest gun ownership”(Ruben). Gun ownership has shown that there is more danger being brought upon rather than protection. Statistics have made an estimate that not every gun owner is capable of having the responsibility of a firearm. “It is estimated that over 40 percent of gun acquisitions occurs in the secondary market. That means that they happen without any background whatsoever… guns show rank the second to corrupt dealers” (Ruben). Not every person who purchases a firearm are trustworthy, some may have a negative use instead of a greater purpose.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chicago is a city that has enforced very strict gun laws in order to lessen crime rates. However, despite all their limits and restrictions, Chicago has a high number of gun-related crimes.As a matter of fact, according to Chicago Police, 20% of the 1375 guns retrieved from criminal activities from 2008 to 2012 were purchased from a single shop called Chuck’s Gun Shop, just a few miles away from the city in the village of Riverdale, Illinois. This shows that despite all the strict gun laws in Chicago, criminals are still able to find a way to retrieve firearms through neighboring cities and states to commit their crimes. It illustrates how stricter gun laws must be enforced throughout the entire nation to ensure that criminals will not be able…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it comes to violence, there is one type of violence I think is skyrocketing out of control in Chicago: Gun violence. As residents and I believe we all can agree that it is shame that for the past 5 years or so, gun violence has taken such a toll. Especially, if you were born and raised here. I remember growing when gun violence was not a huge concern.…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proponents of stricter guns laws believe mass shootings and other violent crimes would decrease with stricter gun control but opponents believe making guns harder to get will take away our second amendment right to bear arms and that if everyone had a gun they would be able to protect themselves and that in itself would reduce violent crimes. Both sides of the issue has opinions, facts and statistics that support their claims. However, I still stand firm in my conviction for stricter guns laws. I believe the pros definitely out weight the cons. Stricter guns laws should include more comprehensive background checks to include gun owners and anyone who has access to the guns, longer waiting periods, and evaluations for mental illness and depression.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He says, “Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred.” This is a crucially important statement, as King’s leadership was defined by civil disobedience, not violence. He proved that real legal change could be made without resorting to violence. Though there was much violence during the Civil Rights movement, through it all he was always for peace. He always urged others to protest peacefully, what he refers to in his speech as “the high plane of dignity and discipline.”…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although guns provide a good way to protect us, they also offer an effective method to kill others. Perhaps many people may argue that gun is just one of the numerous tools killers use, they believe that gun control can’t eliminate murder. However, “The biggest problem with firearms is they kill quickly and they kill efficiently. The problem there is the instant impulse leads to death” (Schoener). Even though the government set up several restrictions for owning guns, killers can easily get them. What is worse, with the gun culture, people are more likely to release their anger by shooting. These entire make the gun law the most dangerous law we’ve ever…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Its crazy how young people is just wasting their lives and other lives in Chicago. Its not just in Chicago, its all over the U.S.A. The U.S centers of Disease Control and Prevention reports that in 2007 35%of teens nationwide reported that they knew someone who had been shot. That's crazy because 92% of Chicago youth killed by firearm involved handguns. Everyday in the U.S guns cause the death of 20 children and young people under the age of 25. Last year 56%…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guns do a lot of bad, but do a lot more good for society. Banning guns will not stop the problem, but will just make it worse. Guns are apart of our society as Americans they have been around since colonial years, and are not leaving anytime soon. “The number of guns in America has increased by more than 50 percent since 1993, and in that same period the gun homicide rate in the United States has dropped by half. (Kristof, The Times).” Guns offer protection for individuals. One day you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and a shooting breaks out, you will pray there is someone else there with a concealed firearm to help control the situation while waiting for police to arrive. They can’t do that if guns are banned. “We need to understand that we cannot stop crimes and murders. And banning guns would be a step, or two, backwards instead of moving forward in the right direction (The Times News).” The research conducted to produce this paper was drawn from a multitude of sources all with different…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Opposing Gun Control Laws

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Watch out! Murder and mayhem is surely on the horizon as gun control laws are being dropped, and penalties could be imposed on those who do not comply. The debate over the use of guns in the United States can be traced back as far as 1791. The United States has the greatest percentage of private firearm ownership in the world. Most people do not just own one gun they own two or more guns. The average citizen comes to the realization that in order to deter and defend themselves and their loved ones against crimes, the burden becomes theirs. The police cannot protect every individual from a crime. The book “Dial 911 and Die”, through different stories, proves that citizens need to rely upon themselves for their own personal protection. Even though each state has its own individual gun control laws, there is no nationwide system of gun control. Criminals can very easily have someone buy a gun for them in a state with slack gun laws and then have it brought back to a state with stricter gun laws. With that being said, a gun that is locked in a gun cabinet, disabled, or even just unloaded is less readily available as one that is left loaded and ready to use. People should not have limited access to their guns in our society because it’s a person’s right to bear arms; in addition, opposing gun control laws does not lessen crime rates and it is counterproductive in saving lives.…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Gun Control

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gun control is a controversial and divisive issue in our routine life, not only in the United States, but also all over the world. Basically, gun control refers to governmental efforts to limit or restrict the production, sale, possession and use of guns by private citizens. Some people believe that it is necessary that federal and state laws allow citizens to purchase and possess guns, or even actively require adult citizens to maintain weapons in their house, and periodically to train in their use. However, others think gun control is indispensable in our society because gunshots are the main cause of death in the United States. As for me, I prefer to support the second view because guns are lethal and the fewer people that have them the better. The only function of a gun is to kill. The more instruments of death are removed from our society, the safer we will be. With my research, I found a lot of striking data about guns menacing people’s lives. There should be gun control in the United States because guns are a menace to people’s lives.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States has been a gun culture country since the day the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776. After many decades, gun ownership had rapidly increased, and many lives have been saved with a gun. An American citizen can legally purchase a handgun at age twenty-one and a rifle at the age of eighteen with a cleared background check by a licensed dealer. In recent months’ guns has become a very conversional topic because of all the incident happening around. For example, Orlando mass shooting, where 49 people died, and Dallas sniper shooting where 5 police officer died. Compared to early days USA have powerful police forces protecting its citizen. All the firearms should be banned because guns have already caused many deaths.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each year, a number of people die from guns. The popular saying is “guns do not kill people, people kill people” which is true; however, guns are used to aid in violence and many would argue that eliminating guns through stricter laws would decrease violence. As the number of gun owners in the world increases the government and its citizens would benefit from implementing stricter regulations regarding the safe keeping of guns in the home. The lack of gun safety results in the ability to access these guns with distressing outcomes. While many individuals argue that guns need to be restricted within the United States, the real argument is for allowing the Constitutional right to bear arms while implementing stricter laws to ensure these firearms do not fall within the wrong hands.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays