Preview

Chester V Afshar Law Case Review

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3664 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chester V Afshar Law Case Review
DENTAL LAW IN PRACTICE
Introduction
I graduated in nineteen ninety three from the University of Sheffield. This seems like a long time ago now, however I have always strived towards my own constant personal development. During my training years at Sheffield if I am honest there was little or no training in Dental Law apart from a couple of lectures. On reflection I believe we were only just coming out of the era ‘where the clinician always knows best’. On graduation I did my vocational training in a single handed practice in a very small village in Yorkshire. I had a fantastic year with a great trainer. My trainer was approaching retirement which meant he had seen and done everything clinically and was always at hand to help and advise.
When I look back at that year I very much learnt about Dental Law as my trainer interpreted it. The following year I became an associate in a very busy NHS multisurgery practice. My colleagues here were very much of a different generation and I started to learn more about real Dental Law. Over the years and as my experience has grown I feel my understanding of Dental law has grown. Indeed the introduction of formal Continuing professional development and the inclusion of core subjects have expanded the professions knowledge. In the last ten years I have owned and developed my own multipractice group of dental practices which I have recently sold to a large corporate body. The last ten years saw a massive expansion in my business which led to more and more new dentist joining. I developed an induction programme and as a protection for my patients and my practice had a rigorous amount of dental law education included. This need for my business stimulated me more to learn and research dental law and ethics so I was in a position to impart some of this knowledge to our new dentists. I am now at a stage where I have more time for myself and hence why I have chosen to formalise my Dental law knowledge. I feel the



References: Chapman v Mid-Essex Hospital Services [2001] All ER (D) 239 Chappel v Hart (1999) Lloyds Law Reports 223

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Katz (the appellant) was convicted under an eight-count indictment, charged with transmitting wagering information by telephone from Los Angeles to Miami and Boston. The evidence, telephone conversations overheard by the FBI agents with an attached electronic listening and recording device, to the phone booth Katz used. The Court of Appeals rejected the contention that the recordings had been obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment.…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Morrison v. Olsen, the issue of the Independent Counsel Provision in the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 was challenged and the court decided that it was not unconstitutional because it did not violate the separation of powers by taking power from the Executive and giving more to the Judicial or Legislative branches. Alexia Morrison had been appointed as the independent counsel to investigate Morrison to see if he had violated federal law; he sued her arguing that the Independent Counsel had taken away powers from the executive. The majority held that Morrison was an “inferior officer” due to the ability of the Attorney General to remove her for “good cause”, she can only perform certain limited duties, she is limited in jurisdiction, and…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Petitioner Graham was a diabetic that asked his friend to drive him to a convenience store to purchase orange juice to counteract the onset of an insulin reaction. On scene the respondent Connor (city police officer) made an investigative stop ordering them to wait until he found out what had happened in the convenience store. The respondents backup police officers decided to handcuff Graham and ignored/ and or rebuffed attempts to explain and treat Grahams condition. This case went to trial because Graham claimed that he sustained multiple injuries from the encounter and filed a law suit against this officer for violating his fourth amendment rights.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the medical field, it is extremely important to notify patients of any probability that during a procedure there are a number of things that could affect the outcome. Thus avoiding a case of malpractice or a violation of the HIPAA Act. In the case of Canterbury vs. Spence there was a violation of the HIPAA Act where a doctor did not inform the patient of the potential risks that are involved with a spinal surgery. The patient was told about the surgery but did not ask any further details of the surgery itself nor did the patient ask about the risks that are involved when the doctor did not inform him. As the patient was recovering from his surgery he had an incident where he had fallen when getting out of his hospital bed and was almost paralyzed. There can be many sides to a story but the most important subject of this case is the fact that the patient was not informed of the risks of the surgery nor did he ask for additional information.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robey v. Hinners Brief

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 2005, Robey who runs his business in Sikeston, Missouri sold a used 2002 Cadillac Escalade to a Kentucky resident, Hinner, over ebay auction. As Robey advertised, the car was “clean, better and average” and with an “ 1 month/1,000 mile Service Agreement”. After Hinner bought the car, he realized that the car was not as advertised. Robey argued that since he was not a resident, and the lack of personal jurisdiction that he should be dismissed.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New York Court of Appeals decision should be upheld in regards to Riggs et al v. Palmer case because one should not be granted inheritance by murdering one’s ancestor. For this reason, the New York Court of Appeals has decided on a naturalistic approach, which has deemed Elmer Palmer guilty for murdering his grandfather, thereby prohibiting Palmer from getting anything from his grandfather’s will. This essentially means that the court argues that judges use their morals in order to determine the outcome of cases. Therefore, rejecting the idea that it is morally acceptable to murder someone in order to personally benefit from their death. As a result, there has been a heated debate between naturalists like Judge Earl who argue that Elmer…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law 531 Case 5.1

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The results from the surveys conducted concluded that the food at Lucky Cheng’s rated a 9 and in the category of décor and service a 15; scores could range from 0-30. Keeping in mind the results came directly from consumers…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Civil Action by Jonathan Harr is about a nonfiction civil law case that takes place in Woburn, Massachusetts. It is centered around numerous kids who were diagnosed with leukemia and no one knew why. When Anne Anderson’s child, Jimmy was diagnosed, in the summer of 1772, she wanted to figure out the cause. She finds a childhood leukemia cluster in Woburn, “Of the twelve cases, eight were located in east Woburn, and six of those were clustered in the Pine Street neighborhood, where perhaps two hundred families lived” (Harr 40). She thought the cause was their water source. Their water came from Wells G and H, two sources that have been shut down and examined by the health department due to the water’s foul taste, odor and different color.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roper vs. Simmons was one of the few cases in almost two decades to address whether it’s constitutional under the eighth and fourteenth amendments to execute a juvenile offender who was over the age of fifteen but under the age of eighteen when he/she committed a capital crime. In 1988, Thompson vs. Oklahoma banned the execution of minors who were sixteen years of age when they committed a capital crime. Another case, Stanford vs. Kentucky (1989), divided the court which eventually rejected that the Constitution excludes capital punishment for minors of this age group. Roper vs. Simmons overturned the decision in Stanford vs. Kentucky. Only seven countries in the past century have favored execution of minors convicted of capital crimes: Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia,…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roper V. Simmons (2005)

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The case of Roper v Simmons revolves around the question, should children be sentenced to death for a crime that was committed prior to the age of 18. While the 8th and 14th Amendments guard against cruel and unusual punishment, does the punishment of death, for those whose crimes was committed when they were under the age of 18, automatically fall under the category cruel and unusual punishment? The Missouri Supreme Court, basing its decision partially on the Atkins v Georgia decision by the U.S Supreme Court which concluded that executing the mentally ill was a violation of the 8th and 14th Amendments, ruled that Roper v Simmons fell under the category of cruel and unusual punishment. This decision led the state…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every case starts with an alleged crime. In the Sandoval case, the crime was murder. Sandoval was soon put into the system after he was arrested. After the arrest, Sandoval would have been book and then gone to his first appearance hearing where he is informed that he was getting charged with first-degree murder. Next would be the preliminary hearing where the defense would have received an arraignment, formally charging the suspect of the crime and asking what his plea is. Some states do not have a preliminary hearing system so they would use a grand jury system. The defendant can plea guilty, not guilty or no contest. The prosecution must establish probable cause to the judge by showing that a crime occurred and that the accused cause that…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Death Penalty is a controversial topic on its own. However, if you add the possibility of a minor receiving the death penalty it gets even more interesting. The Supreme Court case of Roper v. Simmons was a perfect example of that. Roper v. Simmons presented the Supreme Court with two questions: 1) whether or not the execution of those who were sixteen or seventeen at the time of a crime is cruel and unusual punished and 2) does is violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment. The main audience for this particular case is the general American population, and specifically affects the juvenile population.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Being a dentist has become my one major long term goal. To understand the field of dentistry, I’m currently working in a Dental office as an assistant. For example, it is giving me an idea of what atmosphere I’m going to be working…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maddox declared that his rights to due process were violated as it is stated in the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland. This violation is proven by the state failing to disclose a photograph taken by the police of Elder’s bed neatly made shortly after the alleged rape. The police found no blood, semen, or fluids of other kinds on the bedspread during an examination, no rape kit was used either, and proof of a letter was found that Debbie Phillips had left the insurance Maddox belonged to for financial reasons by way of a written statement from a witness by the name of Brenda Phelps. Maddox had appealed the denial of habeas relief.…

    • 762 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The industry in healthcare requires that its foundation in leadership is to follow procedures, rules, and regulations, which will help an organization, succeed in their leadership role in healthcare. This paper will identify important aspects of governmental or other agency such as Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) that governs the health care industry or a particular segment of the industry.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics