Preview

Charlemagne: Early Middle Ages

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
138 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Charlemagne: Early Middle Ages
Charlemagne
Definition:

Charlemagne was believed to be born in the year 742, 747 or 748. He died January 28, 818, at around 72 years old. Charlemagne was also known as Charles the Great or Charles I. He was the King of the Franks, he was responsible for bringing together most of Western Europe during the early Middle Ages.

Significance:
When Charlemagne’s father Pippin died, he inherited the Frankish Empire. The Empire was already powerful and Charlemagne made it even more powerful. He had governors throughout his Kingdom to help control the people and lands. Charlemagne sent out other men to check up on them to make sure they were doing a good job. Having governors helped make his kingdom larger and more powerful. He conquered France,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Alfred The Great Dbq

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Well for starters, Charlemagne did bring a whole lot to the table. The only significant thing I got out of him was the fact that he split his empire into “countries”, with a total of 300 counts watching those territories.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The oldest son of Pepin the Short and Bertrada of Laon, Charlemagne became king in 768 following the death of his father. He was initially co-ruler with his brother Carloman I. Carloman's sudden death in 771 under unexplained circumstances left Charlemagne as the undisputed ruler of the Frankish Kingdom. Charlemagne continued his father's policy towards the papacy and became its protector, removing the Lombards from power in northern Italy, and leading an incursion into Muslim Spain. He also campaigned against the Saxons to his east, Christianizing them upon penalty of death, leading to events such as the Massacre of Verden. Charlemagne reached the height of his power in 800 when he was crowned Emperor of the Romans by Pope Leo III on Christmas…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne (748-814), also known as Charles I or Charles the Great, was an emperor during the Middle Ages who ruled much of Western Europe from 768 until his death in 814. In 771, Charlemagne took the Frankish throne that ruled modern-day France and Germany, from the fifth through the tenth century. He embarked on a mission to rule the Roman Empire, and convert his subjects of those he just conquered to Christianity. A skilled military commander, Charlemagne spent much of his reign in warfare in order to accomplish his objectives. In 800, he was crowned emperor of the Romans by Pope Leo III. As emperor, he promoted the Carolingian Renaissance, a period of cultural and intellectual activity. Of the many scholars included in the Carolingian…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlemagne was the crowned ruler of "Emperor of the Romans" by Pope Leo III on Christmas Day. The significant is that he was the first over 300 years that Europe was not a broken compound of transferring and competing warrior tribes, but instead a collection of stable nation-states. Extreme stability happened when Charlemagne's Carolingian Frankish Empire was formed. Both parties involvement had different reasons behind the coronation. Pope Leo's drive for crowning Charles included an opportunity to reward Frankish King for saving him. Also, the need for protection from Roman rebels only an Empire could provide. For Charles, the imperial title was also the only way he could protect the Papacy from the Eastern Empire. Another reason for Charles…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modeled off of Suetonius’s Lives of the Caesars, Einhard’s Life of Charlemagne seeks to paint Charlemagne as the model emperor. As shown in his carefully vague reasoning for the family of Carloman’s flight into Lombardy and in his consolidation of Louis the Pious as the ordained and appropriate heir to the throne, Einhard constructs the image of Charlemagne into that of a historical hero. Charlemagne, through Einhard’s influence, becomes nothing less than the imperial…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is apparent that Charlemagne already had a firm grasp as a ruler of western Europe prior to his crowning of emperor and Augustus, yet, his official coronation gave him divine legitimacy in the eyes of his contemporaries. Charlemagne was initially reluctant to take the position of emperor early on. His reluctance wasn’t due to his own belief that he wasn’t fit to be emperor but because he felt that he already presently, unofficially ruled over western Europe. As we know, there were multiple reasons as to why he agreed to be crowned emperor but one of those was because his crowning would further sanctify his reign of power and prominence as a…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming Charlemagne

    • 2321 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Becoming Charlemagne, written by Jeff Speck. This book written by Jeff Speck, chronicles events around the life of a Germanic king name Karl. Becoming Charlemagne is a factual account of the events that took place in the empires of A.D 800. Jeff Sypeck explains key events in this time period and illustrates how the king Karl became the legend Charlemagne.…

    • 2321 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne brought some key administrative developments into his domain, which got to be known as the Carolingian Empire. He based on the current arrangement of seignorialism, whereby lords gave tracts of area to their nobles in return for faithfulness and administration. Charlemagne conceded vast landholdings called fiefs to numerous tribal military pioneers. Furthermore, he delegated various Frankish nobles to the posts of checks (the leader of a locale called an area) and margraves (the number of an outskirt region). These authorities were critical to regulating the domain. They were rulers in smaller than normal, with the majority of the managerial, legal, and military power of the sovereign inside of their separate locale. Each political region had its parallel in a congregation area, or see, headed by a diocesan, with comparable power in all matters identified with the congregation. Both checks and clerics were vassals of the sovereign, and were directed by agents of Charlemagne known as missi dominici, who went all through the realm regulating monetary and legitimate matters in his name. Consistently, both checks and religious administrators went to a general gathering at Charlemagne's court at Aachen (in advanced Germany), where they would exhort the ruler and hear his orders.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charlemagne was born in 742 at Aachen, the son of Pepin(or Pippin) the Short and…

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne's Downfall

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Charlemagne was conceived around 742, the child of Bertrada of Laon and Pepin the Short, whom became the ruler of the Franks in 751. Charlemagne's precise origin is obscure. He had a talent for languages and could speak Latin and understand Greek, among others. After Pepin's demise in 768, the Frankish kingdom was partitioned between Charlemagne and his younger sibling Carloman. The siblings had a strained relationship; in any case, with Carloman's passing in 771, Charlemagne turned into the sole leader of the Franconians.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Einhard’s book “Life of Charlemagne” sung the praises of the Frankish king and all he had accomplished during his reign. Einhard himself was taken under Charlemagne’s wing (Charlemagne fostered him), and Charlemagne even paid for his education. I think that in light of that it is easy to see why Einhard would write such a positive narrative about Charlemagne and the kingdom he created. In Einhard’s writing Charlemagne is depicted as hardworking, charismatic and always willing to learn something new or take on a difficult task. According to Einhard Charlemagne found the best tutor he could and learned about many things that were new to him including mathematics and astronomy. Einhard also speaks about Charlemagne’s devotion to the Christian religion and his troubles with the Saxons and their practice of “demon-worshipping”. Charlemagne is praised for his efforts against the Saxons as well as his moderation of food and drink, particularly the fact that he abhorred drunkenness.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlemagne was an important part of history. He was important because he was the grandson of Charles Martel and was King of the Franks. Also he briefly united western Europe when he built his empire. He also set up a strong government, and many rulers looked to his example to strengthen their kingdoms. Charlemagne spent most of his 46 year reign fighting Muslims in Spain. His conquest reunited much of the old western Roman empire. After Charlemagne died in 814 his son (Louis I) took over and fought for power, but it wasn’t until Charlemagne’s grandson drew up the Treaty of Verdun, and split the empire into 3 regions.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne king of the Franks for about 30 years and the Roman Emperor for 14 gained much land since he started ruling. Shown in source A, by his death, he had took what is now modern day Germany, most of Austria and half of Italy. Along with this he had a slim region of Spain and an island, Corsica. This just shows how good he is at negotiating (whatever form that might take), and his determinedness.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: Einhard and Notker the Stammerer. Two Lives of Charlemagne. Penguin Classics: New York. 30 July 1969.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our initial response to this question would be that the person gaining the power was surely the one that had to take the necessarry steps in order to get it. However, it has been disputed that Charlemagne didn't have much motivation to become Holy Roman Emperor and so he wouldn't have put a great deal of effort into the process or pushed for it, further still some sources argue that Charles did not even want the position. C. Delise Burns argues that Charles wanted the role beause of its “connection[...] with Christian Rome”. Even so, this is not very strong evidence for the amount of effort Charles would have had to put into becoming emperor, had it been him in charge of the movement. The position of Holy Roman Emperor did not entitle him to much more power, even the new rights, F. Lot says that he made “very limited use [of] his new imperial dignity” after the coronation, which is true, as he continued to use his old Royal seal even after becoming Emperor. This could be percieved as showing a disregard for Roman customs, Henri Fichtenau even suggests that he sought to “undermine the spiritual supremacy of Byzantium.” This points us in a direction that suggests that Charles may have simply 'went with it' (M. Costamberys claims that Charlemagne had “passed from the conception of a Roman Empire to that of a Frankish Empire”) in order to heighten his power over the Byzantines by taking their highest position so that no one else could take it, making the Frankish crown…

    • 1640 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays