Emily Andrews argues in her essay “Why I Don’t Spare “Spare Change”” that it does more harm than good to give money to beggars on the street rather than giving to an organization such as United Way to help the needy, pointing out that “one cannot be certain that one is giving to a needy individual” and that by giving to a charitable organization “ones money is likely to be used wisely.”…
Charity is about helping others. Charitable donations should be made with the idea in mind that others will benefit from the donations that one is making. However this does not mean that it is ethically wrong for incentives to be offered in exchange for charitable acts.…
“Why should I do anything at all for anyone else without something in it for me?” that is the attitude of some people before doing a charity work. In today’s society we live in a world of opportunity but unfortunately not everyone get an opportunity. For those who are less fortunate, receiving donations may be the only way those people get to survive. In many high schools, clubs, and organization, charity drives are sponsored in exchange for incentives. In Randy Cohen’s column “The Ethicist” in the New York Times Magazine, he is told that “Some teachers offer bonus points on test and final averages as incentives”. Some people say to provide an incentive to do charitable acts undermines the purpose of charity itself. However, this does not mean that it is ethically wrong for incentives to be offered in exchange for charitable acts. Therefore I agree that incentives should be offered in exchange for charitable works.…
Should humans receive incentives for charitable acts? This question has been controversial over the last few years. Many people have seen an issue with this, believing that receiving incentives could send a morally wrong message but is that the case for everyone? I believe that wrongdoings sends a morally wrong message and not helping out the less fortunate is as much as a wrongdoing as not helping your fellow brethren. Helping others is good for one's own soul and others as well; it gives us a sense of hope and belonging. Whether it's to fulfill one's own selfish needs or to truly help out others; the motive doesn't matter because the outcome is always the same. People should be for receiving incentives because the gains outweigh the losses.…
Offering incentives for charitable acts can be acceptable depending on the true motivation of the person that is being charitable. It is morally unacceptable if the person does it only for the intention of receiving a reward; however, if their motivation is out of kindness, then it becomes morally acceptable to receive an incentive.…
Many people donate to charity in their everyday lives, while others do it as an assignment. Individuals even give to charity just to receive money, gifts, or bonuses in return. Giving to charity portrays an act that certain people want to do for others, by the goodness of their hearts. However, then why do high schools ask their students who perform these tasks for a reward, such as extra credit and the ability to graduate? High schools that offer incentives for charitable acts become unethical since it takes away from the true meaning of giving.…
Andrew Carnegie indicated, “In bestowing charity, the main consideration should be to help those who will help themselves; to provide part of the means by which those who desire to improve may do so; to give those who desire to use the aids by which they may rise; to assist, but rarely or never to do all” (Carnegie). He did not believe that alms giving provided value. While I understand the intent that Carnegie had, I do not believe it fits every situation.…
In the 1990s high schools around the U.S started doing mandatory community service, many believe this to be overkill as many students already want to help the community in various ways (Clemmet). Some believe that the students who do not want to perform community service are the exact reason why it should be mandatory. It could be argued however that these students that are forced to will end up resenting the community and not want to perform public service in the future on their own time. Many students in high school are more worried about their grades, significant others, and family and as such they simply do not have time to perform community service. This should suffice as these are the students who who will most likely learn a valuable skill in high school and college, which in turn can not only benefit the community, but the country by getting a good job.…
Students shouldn’t be required to perform seventy five hours of community service. This is because the work wouldn’t be done well if the students were forced. Also time would be taken away from clubs, sports, social life and school work. Then again it will make the town look better.…
A number of studies2 confirm that jurisdictions offering more favorable tax treatments for donations are likely to experience higher levels of charitable giving. When the tax treatment of charitable contributions offers greater…
Every high school has certain requirements to graduate, for example credit requirements. Although they may be too much sometimes, they do help in the long run. Schools are now deciding to require high school students to complete 100 hours of community serve as a requirement to graduate. I personally believe that this is a great idea. Although some may argue that these students have too much on their plates already, I believe the positives outweigh the negatives in this case.…
Philanthropy provides an alternative to taxation. How can this come under scrutiny? Millions of Americans contribute to different organizations and causes, among the largest contributors are big business and the rich. Everyone is eligible for this alternative to taxation. But the author brings to the reader, “We are supposed to applaud philanthropy – The very word connotes altruism and ‘giving back’—but Walton and Wal-Mart giving serves as a reminder that philanthropy provides an alternative to taxation, a way for rich people and corporations to decide what to do with their extra money, as opposed to letting the rest of us decide through our elected governments.”(Featherstone, 510). But this statement is flawed in many ways’ she isolates rich people and corporations but all American’s can ‘benefit’ from this tax write off that our elected governments put in place. The concept that this is a terrible thing is too altruistic in the worst way. The way that people spend their money should remain ultimately upon them. Only in an utopia would it be great if we all shared but the idea of having others choose how to spend your money is ultimately selfish on the taking end, whether greed is involved or…
I can reason with each of these reasons enough to understand the reasoning behind these objections. However; if an individual truly wants to give to charities and generate a real impact, they will question themselves while reading about effective altruists and ask themselves “what else can I do?” So, for the first argument I discussed an effective altruist would never feel satisfied with the amount they are giving, so they would not believe they are giving enough. An effective altruist would continuously find other ways to give as well. So, if you do usually think that you already give enough, why not try giving even five dollars additionally a month? All this would mean is sacrificing a trip to the coffee shop one morning. Then, maybe try donating ten dollars in addition than you originally are a month. This would be just two stops to your favorite coffee shop. In several cases, we can always give a little bit further than we are.…
Offering incentives in exchange for charitable acts is a great way to help a cause and have both the receiving and giving ends benefit. Some may argue that it sends a morally wrong message, but what they don’t understand is that it is not about what the people on the giving side receive, it’s about helping those in need. In today’s world very few are morally obligated to donate to a good cause, and if giving incentives is the only way to attract these people, then there is nothing wrong with such an act of reciprocation. These organizations have the right to take any step necessary to help the needy.…
To begin, requiring 75 hours of community service could be a disservice to students because it could hold many back from graduating. A lot of students have a very busy schedule and might not be able to do the required amount of time of community service. It may be mandatory to go somewhere or to do something such as, work, sports, and family occasions. They wouldn't be able to attend the voluntary work. Community service can lower students grades because of a lack of time to do homework and a lack in study habits. This can hurt a students' grades and record. In addition, physically and mentally disabled high school students might not be able to participate in community service and they may have to stay back.…