Preview

chapter 2 discussion and thought questions 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
609 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
chapter 2 discussion and thought questions 1
1. Why were the leaders of the American Revolution not content to remain loyal British subjects? The first reason was after the Seven Years War we were no longer depended on Britain for protection against France and Spain. The second was the Stamp Act put in place by Parliament in March of 1765 requiring stamps to be purchased for all envelopes, newspapers, wills, playing cards, college degrees, marriage licenses, and land titles, among other things. Violators were subject to trial without jury. The following tax raising endeavor by Parliament was the Townshend duties which imposed taxes on all imports which caused the Boston Tea party.
2. What were the main reasons for the failure of the Articles of Confederation? Under the articles there was no president of the country, and they did not give Congress the power to regulate foreign or interstate commerce. They also did not give the power to tax, during the first two years under the Articles Congress received less than $1.5 million of the $10 million in taxes requested from the states. There also was no federal court system to settle disputes between the states, this alone meant that any state could veto another state in disagreement.
3. Why did the Framers of the U.S. Constitution reject the idea of a parliamentary system? What would the Framers say about the failure of legislation to pass because of the “gridlock” that sometimes develops when Congress is of one party and the president is of another? The Framers rejected the idea of a parliamentary system because they believed that it could be manipulated by monarchs and short-lived majorities. Parliaments provide little to no security for liberty or property. The resolution that resulted was the development of the House of Representatives that where representation is based on state population and Senate where all states are represented equally. The Framers created the distributive articles of the Constitutions which are the first

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Explain why decisions about acceptable audit risk, inherent risk the preliminary judgment about materiality and performance materiality should be made early in the audit during the planning phase.…

    • 327 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after the American Revolution took place, the Articles of Confederation were created to create a stronger and more effective government. However, the Articles of Confederation lead to the result of a weak and ineffective government. The two main issues of the Articles of Confederation creating a weak and ineffective government were political and economic issues.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In what areas does Texas consistently rank at the bottom in state spending compared to other states? 4…

    • 1116 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ap bio notes

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. How did the Great War for Empire change the relationship between England and its American colonies?…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Why did the Framers of the Constitution opt for a federal system rather than a unitary one?…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The delegates greatly feared the thought of becoming a monarchy; however, they also feared the thought of becoming too democratic. There was a great power struggle between the federal and state governments, as well as, large states and small states. Madison’s Virginia Plan to create a two-house state legislature on the basis of population was greatly favored in large states, such as Massachusetts, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Smaller states, however, favored the New Jersey Plan, which called for a single-house Congress in which each state cast one vote, as it was under the Articles of Confederation. Finally a compromise was reached that pacified all states. The nation would have a two-house Congress consisting of a Senate in which each state had two members and the House of Representatives would be appointed on the basis of population. In addition, Hamilton proposed the idea of Presidents and Senators serving life terms, on the basis of the idea that the rich (educated) had to control the nation; however, many delegates rejected that idea. Fortunately, a middle ground was reached and Senators served six-year terms and were chosen by state legislatures and representative served two years terms and were directly appointed by the people. These compromises have had lasting impact of this exceptional nation. They embody ideas and principals that are still widely accepted and…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boss

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    6. What were the primary achievements and failures of the US under the Articles of Confederation? What essentially motivated the drive to create a new foundation for government, and how did the constitution reflect the Founder’s central intensions?…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ch 12

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages

    d. What were the New England demands, as expressed in the 1814 Hartford Convention? When taken together with the end of the war on unexpectedly favorable terms, how did they contribute to the final demise of the Federalist Party?…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Founding Fathers had the intention for both the Houses of Congress, especially for the House of Representatives as a way of being more…

    • 652 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were very ineffective because it didn’t give the Federal government enough power, they couldn’t enact tariffs and each state did what was in the best interest of its own state not what was best for the country as a whole. The Articles of Confederation was more of a league of friendship than an actual government. The mere fact that it took four years to ratify should have warned the country of its shortcomings. It was very difficult to amend the Articles because a unanimous vote from each state. Under the Articles of Confederation, there wasn’t even a national currency.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confederation Flaws

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The federal government did not have the power to establish a common currency among the states or collect taxes. This resulted in an economic downturn and an increase in national debt. Congress did not have the power to regulate interstate and international trade as well. Also, creating laws became a challenge because a two thirds majority was needed to pass laws and all states needed to agree to amend the Articles ("The Articles of Confederation, 1777"). The Articles did not establish a court system or an executive branch, causing the acts of Congress to be left unenforced. Therefore, power no longer lied with the people, but with the states and a single assembly ("The Articles of Confederation, 1777"). The articles did not create the republican government that was called for by the…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I think that a large majority of Americans hold some degree of distrust for authority. I also think that as a people we hold much aversion to bureaucracy because of the corruption that we consistently witness. The questionable explanations for actions or the lack of explanations at all lead to a lack of legitimacy in the reasons for the politics to even exist or at least some of the political reasoning to be rewritten and renegotiatied on an extreme level.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Articles of Confederation

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The articles of confederation were introduced in 1777 and this gave the power to individual states. During 1781-1789 the Aricles of Confederation provided the United states with an ineffective movement, however there were some strong steps taken in the articles to try and make the United States a better country. The people of each state were given equal privileges and rights, freedom of movement was guaranteed, and procedures for the trails of accused criminals were outlined. The Articles of Confederation arranged a national government that would consist of a single house of congress, where each state would have one vote. One of the weaknesses was that the Congress could legislate only for states, not for individuals; because of this it could not enforce legislation. The problem of the Articles of Confederation was that limited the power to central government. This meant that the congress had no power to tax. Instead, it was to assess its expenses and divide those amounts the states on the basis of the value of land. States were then to tax their own citizens to raise the month for these expenses and turn the proceeds over to Congress. The states where not forced to do so, and in practice they rarely m…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Problems with the Articles appeared almost upon completion. The fact that full state approval was needed to pass any official proclamation meant that congress never had any real power. Such was the case when in 1783 the Rhode Island Assembly refused to place any taxes on imported goods. Because congress wasn't given any power to enforce the laws only "suggest" states enforce them the economy as well as national unity suffered.…

    • 354 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was one of the most difficult decisions the founding fathers had to make during the convention. They held at least sixteen votes on one issue. Some of the options that they considered were selection by state legislatures, selection by national legislatures, and an electoral system. They even considered direct election of the president, as many citizens propose today, but they rejected the idea. The fathers framed the constitution so that each public official was selected by a different method. Representatives are democratically elected by their district, and run for re-election every two years, and a most dependent on the public. While the Senators are democratically elected by whole state and serve six year terms and are somewhat dependent on the public. They see the congress relative to the president as being individuals who try and take stands on issues they believe in and what the public thinks should be done about it. Most of our founding fathers didn't envision a two party system and did not expect the government to be this…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays