Preview

Chapter 15: The Postwar Upsurge of Nationalism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1288 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chapter 15: The Postwar Upsurge of Nationalism
"Nullies" in the South
• The state legislature of South Carolina called for the Columbia Convention. The delegates of the convention called for the tariff to be void within South Carolina. The convention threatened to take South Carolina out of the Union if the government attempted to collect the customs duties by force.
• Henry Clay introduced the Tariff of 1833. It called for the gradual reduction of the Tariff of 1832 by about 10% over 8 years. By 1842, the rates would be back at the level of 1816.
• The compromise Tariff of 1833 ended the dispute over the Tariff of 1832 between the South and the White House. The compromise was supported by South Carolina but not much by the other states of the South.
The Trail of Tears
• Jackson's Democrats were committed to western expansion, but such expansion meant confrontation with the Indians who inhabited the land east of the Mississippi.
• The Society for Propagating the Gospel Among Indians was founded in 1787 in order to Christianize Indians.
• The five civilized tribes were the Cherokees, Creeks, Choctaws, Chickasaws, and Seminoles. President Jackson wanted to move the Indians so the white men could expand.
• In 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. It moved more than 100,000 Indians living east of the Mississippi to reservations west of the Mississippi. The five "civilized" tribes were hardest hit.
• Black Hawk, who led Sauk and Fox braves from Illinois and Wisconsin, resisted the eviction.
• The Seminoles in Florida retreated to the Everglades, fighting for several years until they retreated deeper into the Everglades. The Bank War
• President Andrew Jackson despised the Bank of the United States because he felt it was very monopolistic.
• The Bank of the United States was a private institution, accountable not to the people, but to its elite circle of investors. The bank minted gold and silver coins. Nicholas Biddle, the president of the Bank of the United States, held an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jackson had many similar views of the constitution as Thomas Jefferson when he became president. None of this was more apparent than with his feud with Nicholas Biddle and the national bank. He believed that there shouldn't be a national bank only state banks, or as his opponents called them “pet banks”. He said that the bank wasn't in the constitution itself and therefor would veto the recharter of the bank in 1832. He then withdrew all of the government deposits from the 2nd national bank and deposited them into the state banks. Although the national bank wasn't in the constitution, his opponents believe that his personal hatred toward the bank drove his reasoning, not the constitutionality of the bank itself.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the most important chapters of Andrew Jackson’s presidency was his “war” against the Federal bank. Jackson's stubborn skepticism of aristocrat institutions escalated into a highly personal battle between and the president of the bank, Nicholas Biddle. Economically speaking Jackson strongly opposed federal power and did almost everything in his power to destroy the successful bank which he deemed a Monster. The actions of Jackson included defeating the bank’s supporters politically and crushing the bank itself economically.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act. According to a page about Andrew Jackson Administration in the Zinn Education Project Cherokee/Seminole Removal Role Play,the Indian Removal Act was a law passed by Jackson forcing Natives to leave their land and move to Oklahoma. The purpose of this law was to get farmers more…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Andrew Jackson was a war hero turned president, but his battles did not end with his election. One type of problem Jackson faced was economic. South Carolinian planters saw that the protective tariff, passed by Congress in 1824, as oppressive since most of the revenue made from it was invested in the northeast’s manufacturing industry. They were more infuriated when the tariff was raised in the summer of 1828 (Brinkley 207). The South Carolinians and Vice President John C. Calhoun saw the taxes as “blatantly unconstitutional, exceeding Congress’s powers to raise necessary revenues and oppressing one section of the country while enriching others” (Wilentz 63). A nullification document written by Calhoun known as the South Carolina Exposition and Protest was passed by the state legislature in 1832 as a response. This text announced that any state could declare its original sovereignty and disregard federal laws that are found offensive in their borders. In retaliation, Jackson sent federal troops to South Carolina to enforce the law, but before any violence could ensure the state backed down (Brinkley 207). This created a strong rift between the Jackson and his vice president that turned in to a bitter rivalry between the two. Jackson’s…

    • 1818 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of slavery became an even greater concern when the Louisiana Purchase territories were to enter the Union as states. The question was, would new territories enter the Union as slave or free states? The South wanted a balance of power. They knew that if the North were to have more free states, then slavery in the south could be facing extinction through congress. In an attempt to conciliate with the South, the North agreed upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through this, slavery was banned above the 36 degrees 30 minute line and Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine a free state. For a while, it retained the balance of power. However, tempers in the south rose again later in the 1820s over high tariffs. The tariffs benefitted the north but threatened southern cotton exports. In 1828, the tariff was around 50%. President Jackson modified it to around 33% in 1832 only to have South Carolina nullify it in the state. It raised the question of whether or not the federal government could legally impose protective tariffs and whether it was constitutional for a state to nullify a federal law. "South…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Jacksonian reign, numerous advancements sped up the growth of the United States. A market revolution occurred as cash-crop agriculture and capitalist manufacturing replaced artisan economy. Despite the prosperity, a split was emerging between the industrializing, urban north, agrarian, rural South, and the expanding West. The Jacksonians passed the Tariff of 1828, which opened opportunity for western agriculture and New England manufacturing, but was damaging to the South. Andrew Jackson believed that the US bank placed too much control into the hands of a wealthy few (Document B). Therefore, Jackson vetoed the bank's re-charter in 1832. In attempt to benefit the lower, working classes, he placed the federal money in "pet" state banks. This attempt weakened the national currency. Like most Jacksonian economic policies, it failed. Jacksonians tried to assist only the whites through economic policies but failed in that also.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But then the tariff did pass after all. Vice President John C. Calhoun of South Carolina anonymously wrote an “Exposition and Protest” of the Tariff of 1828, which became known as the “Tariff of Abominations.” When a tariff bill passed again in 1832, because it was still too high to suit the needs of Southern agricultural interests, the State of South Carolina decided to nullify the tariff. They took their action very deliberately, calling a special convention and passing an “Ordinance of Nullification” that claimed not only that the tariff was not enforceable in South Carolina, but that any attempt to enforce it by state or federal officials would not be permitted within South…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Jackson was out of office when the Indian Removal act was actually carried out, he had set its path into motion, and shares just as much credit for the act if not more than his presidential and ideological successor, Martin Van Buren. As Jackson saw it, the tribes were not part of the union, but sovereign nations, so why should they have any sort of protection from the federal government? The is the notable minority as stated earlier. Their land, unfortunately according to Jackson, belonged in and to the states they resided in. Jackson was also a strong supporter of…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By 1837, Jackson’s administration had removed over 46,000 Native American people from their land east of the Mississippi River, Most of the Indian Territories had been relocated west.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Age of Jackson Dbq

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, dictating that all Indians living in the Deep South had to move to Eastern Oklahoma, because the Indians had something everyone else wanted, land. Jackson says in his First Inaugural Address,“It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people.” Jackson is saying that It will be his genuine and continuous desire towards the Indian tribes, and we want to give them a fair and open policy, and give humane and kind attention to their rights and their wants which is the same with the habits of our government and the feelings of our people. He wants to give the Indian tribes a good policy. Later on, he removes the Indian tribes from their homes in the Deep South and makes them march on the trail of tears, where they relocate to Eastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee Removal is a brief history with documents by Theda Perdue and Michael Green. In 1838-1839 the US troops expelled the Cherokee Indians from their ancestral homeland in the Southeast and removed them to the Indian Territory in what is now Oklahoma. The removal of the Cherokees was a product of the demand for land during the growth of cotton agriculture in the Southeast, the discovery of gold on the Cherokees land, and the racial prejudice that many white southerners had toward the Indians.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act DBQ

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since the colonization of America, there have been tensions and confrontations between white settlers and Native Americans over territory and civilization. President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, allowing him to communicate with Native American tribal leaders in order to negotiate their voluntary relocation to Federal reservations west of the Mississippi River. When several tribes refused to relocate, the conflict turned violent and was conducted through the use of militias and military force. Due to this violent conflict and the subsequent relocation of hundreds of thousands of Native Americans, relations between Native Americans and the United States Government have since been strained. Native Americans continually experience higher rates of poverty, fewer opportunities for educational advancement, higher rates of physical and mental illness, as well as general discrimination through social systems and policy. Strained relationships, societal, and economic opportunities have weakened and are less readily available to Native Americans, all factors that can be traced back to the Indian Removal Act.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28: 1830…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Choctaw Indians

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Choctaw Indians is a tribe of Musksgean stock .The Choctaws were once part of a larger tribe that included the Greeks and Seminoles and are considered one of the five civilized tribes (Cherokees , Greeks, Choctaws , Seminoles, and Chickasaws) . At one time Choctaw territory extended from Mississippi to Georgia, but by the time Europeans began to arrive in North America they were primarily in Mississippi and Louisiana.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tariff Crisis

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It also eventually became a factor in causing the southern states to nullify the Union itself, bringing about their secession and the creation of the Confederacy. Although the Compromise Tariff of 1833 was passed, which mollified the South Carolina legislature and caused them to withdraw the Ordinance of Nullification, unrest in the southern states continued, eventually leading to the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861. It also had a tremendous effect on the framers of the Confederate Constitution that they thought it was necessary to write into their Constitution a clause that forever settled the issue of protective tariffs within their new country. Unlike the Federal Constitution, which requires a supermajority of states to call for an amendment, the Confederate Constitution only requires three states to call for an amendment to be brought up before a national convention…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays