2. Thomas Jefferson:
3. Midnight judges: Judges that came to Adam's right before he his term was over. So they were all to sign the federalist papers. Which were all later revoked by the new congress under Jefferson.
4. John Marshall: Chief Justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 until his death in 1835. Under Marshall’s leadership, the Court became as powerful a federal force as the executive and legislative branches. Marshall’s most notable decision came in the 1803 Marbury v. Madison case, in which he asserted the principle of judicial review.
5. Marbury v. Madison: In this 1803 case, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional because Congress had overstepped its bounds in granting the Supreme Court the power to issue a writ of mandamus (an ultimatum from the court) to any officer of the United States. This ruling established the principle of judicial review. Marbury's pay was cut.
6. Alexander Hamilton:
7. Barbary Pirates:
8. Mosquito fleet:
9. Louisiana Purchase: Territory purchased from Napoleon by the U.S. in 1803. The Louisiana Purchase nearly doubled the size of the nation and opened the West to exploration and settlement. But the new acquisition also caused strife: border disputes with foreign powers as well as congressional debates over the admission of new states from the region.
10. Aaron Burr:
11. Impressments:
12. Chesapeake Incident: The U.S. Frigate the Chesapeake off the coast of Virginia was demanded to give over sailors for deserting. Then the British ship shot at the frigate and caused a rage for war to go across the nation.
13. Embargo Act 1807: Endorsed by Thomas Jefferson and passed in December 1807. The act ended all importation and exportation in response to theChesapeake-Leopard affair. Jefferson hoped the embargo would put enough economic pressure on the French and British that the two nations would be forced to recognize U.S. neutrality rights in exchange for U.S. goods. The embargo, however, hurt the American economy more than it did Britain’s or France’s, leading to the act’s repeal in March 1809.
14. Non-Intercourse Act: After the repeal of the Embargo Act, this 1809 law restricted trade with Britain and France only, opening up trade with all other foreign ports.
15. James Madison:
16. Macon’s Bill #2: James Madison’s 1810 ploy to induce either Britain or France to lift trade restrictions. Under the bill, U.S. trade sanctions were lifted with the promise that if one country agreed to free trade with the U.S., sanctions would be reimposed against the other nation.
17. War Hawks: People who wanted to go to war with Britain and have the war of 1812.
18. Henry Clay: As Speaker of the House, Henry Clay was a prominent War Hawk, pushing for expansion and war with Britain.
19. John C. Calhoun:
20. Tecumseh and the Prophet: Tecumseh a Shawnee chief who tried to unite Native American tribes in Ohio and Indiana to thwart white settlement. His forces were defeated in the 1811 Battle of Tippecanoe. Tecumseh later allied with the British during the War of 1812. The prophet was Tecumseh's brother Tenskwatawa. He concluded that Indians must stop the expansion of Americans on the frontier to they banded together a confederacy of tribes/ They were to also avoid western influence likes clothes and culture. Was also the reason battle of Tippecanoe and lost the battle against Harrison.
21. Andrew Jackson:
22. Battle of Horseshoe Bend:
23. William Henry Harrison:
24. Battle of Tippecanoe:
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Josh Mason Ms. Neagle Civics/per. 3 5 February, 2013 Marbury v. Madison Marbury v. Madison was a very influential Supreme Court case in the history of the United States. Marbury v. Madison was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial review. This happened under Article III in the Constitution. The court case helped to make a boundary between the executive and judicial branches of the American form of government. In the final days of his presidency, John Adams appointed a large number of justices of peace for the District of Columbia whose commissions were approved by the Senate, signed by the president, and had the official seal of the government on them. William Marbury, who was the Justice of Peace, asked the Supreme Court to force James Madison, Secretary of State, to deliver the commissions. The commissions were not delivered, however, and when President Jefferson assumed office, March 5, 1801, he ordered Madison not to deliver them. Marbury then asked the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus forcing Madison to show reason not to receive his commission. It was through three questions asked by John Marshall that the case was resolved. First, did Marbury have a right to the writ for which he petitioned? Second, if he has a right and that right was violated, do the laws of the United States allow the courts to grant Marbury such a writ? And third, if they did, is it right to ask the Supreme Court to issue such a writ? (Nichols 1).…
- 942 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Marbury v Madison is the historical case that gave the authority of Judicial Review to the Supreme Court of the United States of America.…
- 938 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
On May 28, 1788 Alexander Hamilton wrote the Federalist 78. He stated “The Judiciary…has no influence over the sword or the purse… it may be truly said to have neither force nor will, but merely judgment… the judiciary is beyond comparison, the weakest of the three departments of power…” This statement has only grown more valid with each passing year due to biases and inefficiency.…
- 2030 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Marbury v Madison case (1803) the Supreme Court announced for the first time the principle that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution. William Marbury had been appointed a justice of the peace for the District of Columbia in the final hours of the Adams administration. When James Madison, Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state, refused to deliver Marbury’s commission, Marbury, joined by three other similarly situated appointees, petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling delivery of commissions (history.com).…
- 626 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Marbury vs Madison case would have to be one of the most important cases in Supreme Court history. The Marbury vs Madison cases was one of the first cases in U.S. history to ever to apply the principle of Judicial review the Judicial review had the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution , which was written by Chief Justice John Marshall. How it had all started was in 1803 in John Adams last few hours of office John Adams had appointed Marbury and many other judges in his last few hours of office. Republicans argued that these appointments were aimed at maintaining Federalist power. When Thomas Jefferson finally took office he ordered his secretary of states James Maddison to cease the work of…
- 235 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Marbury V. Madison (1803) Facts: Congress enacted the Organic Act which authorized John Adams to appoint forty-two justices of the peace for the District of Colombia.…
- 1131 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Madison. At the time, the secretary of state, James Madison, refused to deliver the commission of the District of Columbia’s designated justice of the peace, William Marbury. In response, Marbury requested a writ of mandamus (or “an order from a court to an inferior government official ordering the government official to properly fulfill their official duties or correct an abuse of discretion” (Mandamus).) to make commission delivery official amongst all members in government. Chief justice John Marshall refused Marbury’s request and concluded that the Supreme Court was not given the power by the Constitution to supply writs of mandamus even if elected officials, such as Marbury (or any other government officials), were entitled to their commissions (Marbury v. Madison). Even though the Supreme Court was denied power at the time, its power increased in the long-run by establishing that “it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is” (The Creation of the Federal Courts). Basically, the federal courts were given the power to strike down unconstitutional legislation and the concept of “judicial review” (which means that federal courts gained the power to null Congressional acts that conflicted with the Constitution) was officially established as a common practice during the lawmaking…
- 1117 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
APUSHI/AP US History I Marshall Court Rulings The Marshall Decisions 1. Marbury v. Madison (1803)…
- 442 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In Marbury v. Madison (1803) the Supreme Court announced for the first time the principle that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution. Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for a unanimous Court, denied the petition and refused to issue the writ. Although he found that the petitioners were entitled to their commissions, he held that the Constitution did not give the Supreme Court the power to issue writs of mandamus. Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 provided that such writs might be issued, but that section of the act was inconsistent with the Constitution and therefore invalid.…
- 534 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The constitution as a written document is very simple and vague, making it fundamentally political and thus requiring those who interpret it to take into account the present state of the country and the effects that their decision will have on the current populous. The founding fathers, like our politicians today, had conflicting ideas on how the country should be run, hence the length and vagueness of the document. Among these debates was the issue of the judiciary branch. Many believed that a branch whose members were not publicly elected, and thus not representing the will of the people, garnered more authority and power than the others. In response to such criticism, Alexander Hamilton wrote the Federalist 78, in which he said the courts as outlined by the constitution are the weakest branch of government because, "It [Judiciary Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments."(1) Hamilton, along with many others, believes that the constitution implies that the courts have the power to judge issues brought to the Supreme Court. The courts ability to rule on the constitutionality of issues is not specifically mentioned the constitution but was reaffirmed in the landmark Supreme Court decision, Marbury vs. Madison in 1803. In declaring that the courts have the ability to determine a laws constitutionality, chief justice John Marshall established a policy of judicial review. Marshall's decision gave the courts inherent powers the constitution didn't specifically mention but also created a new dilemma for the courts: how to go about interpreting laws.…
- 1144 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Influences on Judicial Power Under Article III of the Constitution the judicial branch was established, but rather implicit in proportion to the other two branches of government. This ambiguity allocates various opportunities for interpretation of judicial power. In Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton addresses the role of the judiciary branch within the federal government in regards to political immunity of judges through life tenure and contribution to checks and balances through power or judicial review. Chief Justice John Marshall, in his ruling of Marbury v. Madison, established the principle of judicial review advocated by Hamilton in the Federalist Papers. Originally designated as the weakest of the three branches in government by the framers of the Constitution, the Judiciary has accumulated an increase in political influence through judiciary review and has proven to be an essential institution in the separation of powers as well as an active participant in the system of checks and balances.…
- 1474 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
2. BACKGROUND 2.1 FACTS In the election of 1800, the newly organised Democratic-Republican party of Thomas Jefferson defeated the Federalist party of John Adams, creating an atmosphere of political panic. During his final days he made several appointments in Judiciary for the district of…
- 554 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the case McCulloch v. Maryland, John Marshall handed down one of his most important decisions regarding the expansion of Federal power. This case involved the power of Congress to charter a bank, which sparked the even broader issue of the division of powers between state and the Federal Government.…
- 633 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
With the Marbury v. Madison case, Marshall’s powerful opinion was based on three propositions. One, the Constitution is by it’s own terms, the supreme law of the land. Two, all the legislative acts and other actions of government are subordinate to the supreme law and cannot be allowed to conflict with it. Three, the judges are sworn to enforce the provisions of the Constitution, and therefore must refuse to enforce any government action they find to be in conflict with it. In this decision Chief Justice Marshall claimed for the Supreme Court the right to declare acts of…
- 549 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Court's power and prestige waxed during the Marshall Court (1801–1835). Under Marshall, the Court established the principle of judicial review, including specifying itself as the supreme expositor of the Constitution (Marbury v. Madison) and made several important constitutional rulings giving shape and substance to the balance of power between the federal government and the states (prominently, Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden).…
- 1080 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays