Preview

Changing in Organizational Structure

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7785 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Changing in Organizational Structure
Journal of Business Research 63 (2010) 763–771

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Business Research

Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management
Wei Zheng a,⁎, Baiyin Yang b,1,2, Gary N. McLean c,3 a Human Resource Development, Department of Counseling, Adult and Higher Education, Northern Illinois University, Gabel Hall 201E, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, United States Department of Human Resources and Organizational Behavior, Tsinghua University, Mailing Address: Haidian District, Beijing, 100087 China c Department of Work and Human Resource Education, Texas A&M University, United States b a r t i c l e

i n f o

a b s t r a c t
Practices of knowledge management are context-specific and they can influence organizational effectiveness. This study examines the possible mediating role of knowledge management in the relationship between organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness. A survey was conducted of 301 organizations. The results suggest that knowledge management fully mediates the impact of organizational culture on organizational effectiveness, and partially mediates the impact of organizational structure and strategy on organizational effectiveness. The findings carry theoretical implications for knowledge management literature as they extend the scope of research on knowledge management from examining a set of independent management practices to examining a system-wide mechanism that connects internal resources and competitive advantage. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Article history: Received 1 February 2008 Received in revised form 1 March 2009 Accepted 1 June 2009 Keywords: Knowledge management Organizational culture Organizational structure Organizational strategy Organizational effectiveness

The internal characteristics of the organization make up critical sources



References: Argote L, Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Org Behav Hum Decis 2000;82(1):150–69. Amstrong JS, Overton TS. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 1977;14:396–402. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 1991;17 (1):99-120. Bennett R, Gabriel H. Organizational factors and knowledge management within large marketing departments: an empirical study. J Knowl Manag 1999;3(3):212–25. Bergeron F, Raymond L, Rivard S. Idea patterns of strategic alignment and business performance. Information and Management 2004;41:1003–20. Brockman BK, Morgan RM. The role of existing knowledge in new product innovativeness and performance. Decis Sci 2003;34(2):385–419. Burns T, Stalker M. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publications; 1961. Caruana A, Morris MH, Vella AJ. The effect of centralization and formalization on entrepreneurship in export firms. J Small Bus Manage 1998;36(1):16–29. Conner KR, Prahalad CK. A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism. Organ Sci 1996;7:477–501. Daft RL. Organizational theory and design. St. Paul: West Publishing; 1995. Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Manage J 1991;34(3):555–90. Darr E, Argote L, Epple D. The acquisition, transfer and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: productivity in franchises. Manag Sci 1995;41(11):1750–62. Davenport TH, Prusak L. Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1998. Deal TA, Kennedy AA. Corporate culture. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1982. De Long DW, Fahey L. Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Acad Manage Exec 2000;14(4):113–27. Demerest M. Understanding knowledge management. J Long Range Plan 1997;30 (3):374–84. Denison DR. Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. New York: Wiley; 1990. Denison DR, Mishra AK. Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organ Sci 1995;6(2):204–23. Denison DR, Neale WS. Denison organizational culture survey. Ann Arbor: Aviat; 1996. Deshpande R, Farley U, Webster F. Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis. J Mark 1993;57(1):23–37. Dewar R, Werbel J. Universalistic and contingency predictions of employee satisfaction and conflict. Adm Sci Q 1979;24(3):426–48. Drew S. From knowledge to action: the impact of benchmarking on organizational performance. Long Range Plan 1997;30(3):427–41. Epple D, Argote L, Murphy K. An empirical investigation of the micro structure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing. Oper Res 1996;44:77–86. Fey CF, Denison DR. Organizational culture and effectiveness: can American theory be applied in Asia? Organ Sci 2003;14(6):686–706. Ferrell OC, Skinner SJ. Ethical behavior and bureaucratic structure in marketing research organizations. J Mark Res 1988;25:103–9. Floyd SW, Wooldridge B. Managing strategic consensus: the foundation of effective implementation. Acad Manage Exec 1992;6(4):27–39. Gilley JW, Maycunich A. Organizational learning performance and change — an introduction to strategic human resource development. MA: Perseus Publishing; 2000. Gold AH, Malhotra A, Segars AH. Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. J Manage Inf Syst 2001;18(1):185–214. Gordon GG, Di Tomaso N. Predicting corporate performance from organizational culture. J Manag Stud 1992;29:783–98. Govindarajan V, Fisher J. Strategy, control systems, and resource sharing: effects on business-unit performance. Acad Manage J 1990;33(2):259–85. Grant RM. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manage J 1996;17:109–11. Grover V, Davenport TH. General perspectives on knowledge management: fostering a research agenda. J Manage Inf Syst 2001;18(1):5-21. Huber GP. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organ Sci 1991;2(1):88-115. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 7: a guide to the program applications. 2nd ed. Chicago: SPSS; 1989. Kennedy AM. The adoption and diffusion of new industrial products: a literature review. Eur J Mark 1983;17(3):31–88. Khandwalla PN. The design of organizations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1977. Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ Sci 1992;3(2):383–97. Konrad A, Linnehan F. Formalized HRM structures: coordinating equal employment opportunity or concealing organizational practices? Acad Manage J 1995;38: 787–820. Lee H, Choi B. Knowledge management enablers, process, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. J Manage Inf Syst 2003;20(1):179–228. Manvondo FT. Environment and strategy as antecedents for marketing effectiveness and organizational performance. J Strat Mark 1999;7(4):237–50. McEvily S, Chakravarthy B. The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strateg Manag J 2002;23:285–305. Miller R. Innovation, organization and environment: a study of sixteen American and West European steel firms. Sherbrooke: Institut de recherche et de perfectionnement en administration; 1971. Miller D, Friesen PH. Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strateg Manag J 1983;4:221–35. Nonaka I. The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Bus Rev 1991:96-104 (Nov-Dec). Nonaka I, Toyama R, Konno N. Seci, ba, and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Rang Plan 2000;33:5-34. O 'Reilly C. Corporations, culture, and commitment: motivation and social control in organizations. Calif Manage Rev 1989;18:9-25. Ouchi WG, Jaeger AM. Type Z organization: stability in the midst of mobility. Acad Manag Rev 1978;3(2):305–14. Pedler M, Burgoyne J, Boydell T. The learning company: a strategy for sustainable development. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1991. Penrose E. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley; 1959. Peters T, Waterman R. In search of excellence. New York: Harper and Row; 1982. Pettigrew AM. On studying organizational cultures. Adm Sci Q 1979;24:570–81. Podsakoff P, Organ DW. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manage 1986;12:531–44. Posner B, Kouzes J, Schmidt W. Shared values make a difference: an empirical test of corporate culture. Hum Resour Manag 1985;24:293–309. W. Zheng et al. / Journal of Business Research 63 (2010) 763–771 Prahalad CK, Hamel G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus Rev 1990;68(3):79–91. Rapert MI, Lynch D, Suter T. Enhancing functional and organizational performance via strategic consensus and commitment. J Strat Mark 1996;4:193–205. Rapert M, Wren B. Reconsidering organizational structure: a dual perspective of frameworks and processes. J Manag Issue 1998;10(3):287–302. Rastogi PN. Knowledge management and intellectual capital — the new virtuous reality of competitiveness. Hum Syst Manage 2000;19(1):39–49. Robbins SP. Organization theory: structure, design, and application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990. Rowley J. Knowledge management in pursuit of learning: the learning with knowledge cycle. J Inf Sci 2001;27(4):227–37. Ruekert RW, Walker OC, Roering KJ. The organization of marketing activities: a contingency theory of structure and performance. J Mark 1985;49:13–25. Schein EH. Organizational culture and leadership: a dynamic view. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1985. Schminke M, Ambrose ML, Cropanzano RS. The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness. J Appl Psych 2000;85:294–304. Senge PM. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Random House; 1990. Shin M. A framework for evaluating economics of knowledge management systems. Inf Manage 2004;42:179–96. Simonin BL. The importance of collaborative know-how: an empirical test of the learning organization. Acad Manage J 1997;40(5):1150–74. 771 Skivington JE, Daft RL. A study of organizational framework and process modalities for the implementation of business-level strategic decisions. J Manag Stud 1991;28 (1):45–68. Skyrme D, Arnindon D. Creating the knowledge based business. London: Business Intelligence; 1997. Smith KG, Guthrie JP, Chen M. Miles and Snow 's typology of strategy, organizational size and organizational performance. Acad Manage Proc 1986:45–9. Soliman F, Spooner K. Strategies for implementing knowledge management: role of human resource management. J Knowl Manag 2000;4(4):337–45. Tiwana A. An empirical study of the effect of knowledge integration on software development performance. Inf Softw Technol 2004;46(13):899–906. Tsai W. Social structure of “cooperation” within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organ Sci 2002;13 (2):179–90. Venkatraman N. Strategic orientation of business enterprises: the construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Manage Sci 1989;35:942–62. Waterman RH. Adhocracy: the power to change. Memphis, TN: Whittle Direct Books; 1990. Watkins KE, Marsick VJ. In action: creating the learning organization. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development; 1996. Wilkins AL, Ouchi WG. Efficient cultures: exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance. Adm Sci Q 1983;28:468–81. Young G, Sapienza H, Baumer D. The influence of flexibility in buyer–seller relationships on the productivity of knowledge. J Bus Res 1999;56(6):443–51.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    | The author points out that successful implementation of Knowledge management has determinants that are specific to different organizational contexts. However, some factors that have had a significant impact on making an organization’s Knowledge management system a success are: 1. A shared understanding of the concept of knowledge management 2. The identification of the value of the co-creation of the knowledge management strategies which make up the system 3. The positioning of knowledge management as a strategic focus area in the organization. 4. Appropriate management of information throughout all stages of the Knowledge life-cycle and the appropriate alignment of technology and information to ensure access to knowledge for all individuals involved. 5. Understanding the role of organizational culture in the working of the organization and its importance in making the knowledge management system a success.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    In order to create, develop and extract value from knowledge and information, the right operational and strategic processes are needed to put into place. Knowledge management leads to structure and management methods based upon idea sharing thus giving voice to customers, workers and partners. From the organizational perspective, the objectives of exploiting information and knowledge resources should aim to support the effective utilization of knowledge in every company. Generate new knowledge, access valuable knowledge from outside sources, use knowledge in decision making, embed knowledge in processes, products, and services; represent knowledge in documents, databases, and software; facilitate knowledge growth through culture and intensives, transfer existing knowledge into other parts of the organization, and measure the value of knowledge assets and/or the impact of knowledge management.…

    • 1899 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the mid-1990s, knowledge management has become increasingly significant for business managers and companies. ‘It is broadly accepted that systematic knowledge management is tightly linked with gaining and sustaining competitive advantage.’ (Bogner & Bansal, 2007, p658-6 as cited in Hislop, 2009, p1) The definition of knowledge management is various because of the wide range of this concept and its complexity (Al-Hawamdeh, 2003). For example, the broad definition provided by McAdam and McCreedy (2000, p155 as cited in Hislop 2009, p53) note that: ‘KM relates to the management of anything classified as knowledge’ Furthermore, Hislop (2009, p59) suggests that: ‘Knowledge management is an umbrella term which refers to any deliberate efforts to manage the knowledge of an organization’s workforce, which can be achieved via a wide range of methods including directly, through the use of particular types of ICT, or more indirectly through the management of social processes, the structuring of organizations in particular ways or via the use of particular culture and people management practices.’…

    • 1109 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Barney, Jay B., and Wright, Patrick M. (1998). On Becoming a Strategic Partner: The Role of Human Resources in Gaining Competitive Advnatage. Human Resource Management, Spring 1998, Vol. 37, No. 1, Pp. 31–46…

    • 2964 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Knowledge management can be considered to be an essential strategic function in any organisation today. As the world becomes more globalised, and traditional structures of intermediation are removed whilst new ones are created, it is clear that knowledge, and consequently a learning organisation is one that is more likely to find unique sources of competitive advantage, and be able to develop sustainable competitive strategies in the long term. A number of different processes and sub-processes have been identified with knowledge management, such as knowledge generation, knowledge codification, and knowledge transfer or realisation (Grover and Davenport, 2001). Nonaka (1994) suggests that knowledge itself is created through the conversion between tacit and explicit knowledge, through the processes of socialisation, internalisation, externalisation, and combination. Technology has often been used to facilitate and support the processes involved in knowledge management. Knowledge management is essential for sustaining the growth of an organisation and ensuring its success. From the perspective of investors, the worth or value of an organisation is as a result of its ability to strategically retain and generate knowledge that facilitates the organisation’s business activity. The sharing of practices throughout the organisational hierarchy, and adoption of effective techniques formulated by individuals having great expertise in the relevant field can help to improve the efficiency of the business activity. Yet the intertwining of knowledge management processes and information and communication technologies (ICT) may blind knowledge managers to the shortcomings of the use of ICT in knowledge management processes. This essay therefore seeks to present a critical evaluation of the benefits and limitations of ICT in knowledge management processes.…

    • 2359 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Transfer of Tacit Knowledge

    • 8154 Words
    • 33 Pages

    Davenport, T. H., Marchard, D. (1999): Is KM just good information management, in: Financial Times Mastering Information Management Supplement, Financial Times, London March 8th, 2-3 Faulkner, W., Senker, J. (1995): Knowledge frontiers: Public sector research and Industrial innovation in biotechnology, engineering ceramics and parallel computing, Oxford University Press, Oxford Forrest, J. E. (1991): Models of the Process of Technological Innovation, in: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 3(4), p. 439-453 Franke, N., von Braun, C. F. (1998): Innovationsforschung und Technologiemanagement: Konzepte, Strategien, Fallbeispiele, Berlin Goldhar, J. D. (1980): Some modest Conclusions, in: Management of Research and Innovation, Amsterdam/New York/Oxford, 283-284 Grant, R. M. (1997): The knowledge-based view of the firm: implications for Management Practice, in: Long Range Planning, 30(3), 450-454 Hall, R., Andriani, P. (2002): Managing knowledge for innovation, in: Long Range Planning, 35, 29-48 Hauschildt, J. (1993): Innovationsmanagement, Vahlen, München Howells, J. (1996): Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Technology Transfer, in: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8(2), 91-106 Imai, K. (1991): Globalization and Cross-border Networks of Japanese Firms, Paper presented to Japan in a Global Economy Conference, Stockholm School of Economics, 5-6 September Kieser, A. (1969): Innovationen, in: HWO (1), Grochla, v. E. (1969), 741-750 Knight, K. E. (1967): A Descriptive Model of the Intra-Firm Innovation-Process, in: The Journal of Business, 40, 478-496 König, H., Licht, G., Staat, M. (1994): F&E Kooperationen und Innovationsaktivität, in: Gahlen, B., Hesse, H., Ramser, H.J. (1994), Europäische Integrationsprobleme aus wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Sicht, Tübingen, 219-244 Leonard, D., Sensiper, S. (1998): The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation, in: California Management Review, 40(3), 112-125 Li, M., Gao, F. (2003): Why Nonaka highlights tacit knowledge: a critical review, in: Journal of Knowledge Management, 7 (4), 6-14 Madeuf, B.…

    • 8154 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Purpose – Through investigating the relationship among human resource management (HRM), organizational learning (OL), organizational innovation (OI), knowledge management capability (KMC), and organizational performance (OP), the aim of this paper was to find a way of improving organizational performance through learning and knowledge. Design/methodology/approach – A survey questionnaire was utilized to collect data. The population of this study included 659 employees from electronic industrial listed and over-the-counter listed technological companies in Taiwan (N ¼ 208, valid return rate 37.21 percent). Descriptive statistics, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, as well as structural equation modeling were used for data analysis. Findings – The results indicate that: HRM strategies result in better organizational learning, organizational innovation, and knowledge management capability, which ultimately contributes to achieving organizational performance; organizational learning improves organizational innovation and accumulates knowledge management capability; organizational innovation results in knowledge management capability development, which contributes to the establishment of organizational development; and technological companies should utilize organizational knowledge in order to enhance organizational performance. Research limitations/implications – The generalization of the present study is constrained by the existence of possible biases of the participants, and the regional-constrained data which were collected in and thus focused on Taiwan. Thus, the characteristics of the surveyed firms may be different from those in other areas or countries. Managerial implications…

    • 8700 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mckinsey Case Study

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Knowledge is fundamentally a cognitive phenomenon (Geisler, 2007.p. 467) which is embedded in the intellectual capital: the human and structural capital (Bercerra-Fernandez, Gonzales and Rajiv Sabherwal, 2002, p.3) of organizations. The acquisition or to be more precise to capture, preserve and to share knowledge has thus become the growing knowledge management trends of this century. Moreover, rapid advancement of technology has made knowledge easily accessible and transferable in an alarming fast rate. Thus, swift responses to address issues are demanded. Knowledge is treated as a broad and abstract notion as well as a significant organizational resource (Alavi, Cook & Cook, and Leidner, 2001, p.107). Thus, this has sparked the epistemological debate on knowledge management, more specifically the epistermetrics of measuring what we know- the nature of knowledge; how we know - the processes of transacting knowledge between individuals, and other individuals, and organisations; and why we know - the value chain and value proposition of knowledge (Geisler, 2007, p.469).…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Erp for Walmart

    • 5690 Words
    • 23 Pages

    References: Argote, L. (1999) Organizational Learning Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston). Badaracco Jr J.L. (1991) The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliance (Harvard Business School Press, Boston). Barley, S. (1990) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 61–103. Baskerville, R. (1999) Enterprise resource planning and knowledge management: convergence or divergence? Georgia State University working paper 99–6. Berger, L., Sikora, M. and Berger, D. (1994) The Change Management Handbook: A Road Map to Corporate (Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL). Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991) Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a uni ed view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.…

    • 5690 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Organisational Innovation

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Hansen, M.T. 2002. “Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies.” Organization Science, 13: 232-250. Karim,. S., W. Mitchell. Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978-1995 (with Samina Karim), Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue on the Evolution of Business Capabilities, 21 (1011), 1061-1081, 2000 Karim, S., W. Mitchell. Innovation through acquisition and internal development: A quartercentury of business reconfiguration at Johnson & Johnson, Long Range Planning, 37: 525-547, 2004. Mahmood, I., C.N. Chung, W. Mitchell. Innovation by Taiwanese business groups, 19812000: The impact of strategic scope and market development on local search arising from intragroup buyer-supplier ties. Duke University working paper, 2008. Tushman M.L., C.A. O’Reilly. Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 1996;38(4):8-30. Williams, F.C., W. Mitchell. Focusing firm evolution: The impact of information infrastructure on market entry by U.S. telecommunications companies, 1984-1998. Management Science, 50 (11), 1561-1575, 2004.…

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6. The problem symptom, Business strategy and IT are "not on the same page", is associated with which one of the following drivers of knowledge management: (Points : 10)…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Contribution to Society

    • 2806 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Welch, J., 2010. Performance Management Strategies for Knowledge Organizations. [Online] (1.0) Available at: http://ahtgroup.com/publications/performancearticle [Accessed 21 November 2011].…

    • 2806 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Netcom Computer House

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: Madura, J 2007, Introduction to Business, Thomson South-Western, Canada. Boyd, H, Walker, O, Larreche, J 1995, Marketing Management: A Strategic Approach With Global Orientation, Richard D.Irwin Inc, USA. Knowledge Management Quotes_ 2008, retrieved October 3, 2008 from http://www.12manage.com/quoteski.html Paul J.Meyer quotes, retrieved October 3, 2008, from http://thinkexist.com/quotation/productivity-is-never-an-accident-it-is-always/347681.html Company Profile 2005, retrieved October 3, 2008, from http://www.netcomwebsite.com/aboutus.php…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Efficient operations emerge from ensuring that both tacit and explicit knowledge is shared and contribute to a collective understanding about how things work and how they could work. This is close to the definition of culture as the ‘way we do things around here’ (M. Lemon∗, P.S. Sahota, 2004). Organizations must develop ways of ensuring that the culture is conducive to knowledge sharing (Wharton, 1998). Wah (1999) puts forward the idea that the key issue is to ‘instill a corporate-wide culture that encourages knowledge sharing’. All this indicates the importance of the aspects of organizational culture and knowledge sharing. It is only through the process of sharing and assimilating information, often determined in large part by high levels of reciprocal trust that organizations can move from collections of individuals to a more collective culture (M. Lemon∗, P.S. Sahota, 2004). This culture may retain knowledge of the past even when the key organizational members leave the organization. Culture can therefore act as a knowledge repository. Drawing upon a range of literatures (e.g. knowledge management, organizational learning and innovation) culture is conceptualized as a ‘bundle’ of knowledge repositories with knowledge storing and information processing capabilities (M. Lemon∗, P.S. Sahota, 2004).…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POS System

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As the focus on human capital and information technology intensifies within firms, an understanding of how to harness these two trends is increasingly important. This study examines how competitive advantage and higher firm performance depend on the presence of five moderating factors, not dollars spent on information technology. These moderating factors, identified in previous research, are: 1) Information Procurement and Dissemination, 2) Absorptive Capacity, 3) Cross-Functional Communication, 4) Culture and 5) Organization Assessment and Information Technology Strategy Review. Using a two-firm case study methodology, I analyze the presence or absence of these moderating factors in knowledge initiatives at Sun Microsystems and Lockheed Martin Corporation. The empirical evidence gathered from these cases supports the argument that the presence of moderating factors is critical for successful knowledge management implementation.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays