Journal of Business Venturing 20 (2005) 641 – 661
Champions of product innovations: defining, developing,
and validating a measure of champion behaviorB
Jane M. Howella,*, Christine M. Sheab,1, Christopher A. Higginsa,2 a
Richard Ivey School of Business, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada N6A 3K7 b
The Whittemore School of Business and Economics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824-3593, United States
Received 30 July 2002; received in revised form 30 June 2004; accepted 30 June 2004
This research defined, developed, and validated a measure of champion behavior by collecting data from different samples in multiple stages. Using the act frequency method, a comprehensive set of 102 items reflective of champion behavior was developed based on a survey of middle managers and executives. Next, a different managerial sample rated the extent to which each of the 102 items was representative of champion behavior, and 29 were deemed to represent the core of the domain of championship. Finally, to evaluate the psychometric properties of the champion behavior measure, 47 product innovations in 13 firms were studied. Forty-seven nominated champions completed personality measures, 47 top division managers rated project performance, and 216 innovation team members rated champion behavior and leadership style. Results from principal components and confirmatory factor analyses yielded a 14-item champion behavior measure composed of three factors: expressing enthusiasm and confidence about the success of the innovation, persisting under adversity, and getting the right people involved. This measure showed acceptable reliability as well as convergent
This research investigation was generously supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Grant (# 410-98-0373) awarded to the first author. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 519 661 3263; fax: +1 519 661 3495. E-mail addresses: email@example.com (J.M. Howell)8 firstname.lastname@example.org (C.M. Shea)8 email@example.com (C.A. Higgins).
Tel.: +1 603 862 3322; fax: +1 603 862 3383.
Tel.: +1 519 661 3269; fax: +1 519 661 3959.
0883-9026/$ - see front matter D 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.06.001
J.M. Howell et al. / Journal of Business Venturing 20 (2005) 641–661
and discriminant validity. Preliminary evidence of criterion-related validity indicated that the champion behavior measure was also positively related to project performance. Together these analyses provided support for the construct validity of the champion behavior measure. D 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keyword: Champion behavior measure
1. Executive summary
The successful introduction and acceleration of new product development is an important source of competitive advantage, survival, and renewal for many organizations. Studies of product innovation success highlight that champions, individuals who informally emerge to actively and enthusiastically promote innovations through the crucial organizational stages, are necessary to overcome the social and political pressures imposed by an organization and convert them to its advantage. While studies emphasize the importance of champions for keeping innovations alive and thriving, empirical investigations have conceived of champions as either present or absent in the innovation process. To date, the behaviors of champions, and the extent to which these behaviors must be enacted to contribute to successful project performance, have not been specified. This study adds to the innovation and champion literatures by defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion behavior that identifies and quantifies what champions actually do to promote innovations successfully in organizations.
The development of the champion behavior measure involved collection of data from different samples in multiple stages. First, using the act...
References: Achilladelis, B., Jervis, P., Robertson, A., 1971. A Study of Success and Failure in Industrial Innovation.
Bass, B.M., Avolio, B.J., 1990. Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Consulting Psychologist
Press, Palo Alto, CA.
Bentler, P.M., Bonett, D.G., 1980. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bigoness, W.J., Perreault, W.D., 1981. A conceptual paradigm and approach for the study of innovators. Acad.
Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.M., 1995. Product development: past research, present findings and future directions.
Burgelman, R.A., 1983. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Adm. Sci.
Burgelman, R.A., 1991. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: theory and
Buss, D.M., Craik, K.H., 1980. The frequency concept of disposition: dominance and prototypically dominant
Buss, D.M., Craik, K.H., 1983. The act frequency approach to personality. Psychol. Rev. 90, 105 – 126.
Buss, D.M., Craik, K.H., 1985. Why not measure that trait? Alternative criteria for identifying important dispositions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48, 934 – 946.
J.M. Howell et al. / Journal of Business Venturing 20 (2005) 641–661
Chakrabarti, A.K., 1974. The role of champion in product innovation. Calif. Manage. Rev. 17, 58 – 62.
Chakrabarti, A.K., Hauschild, J., 1989. The division of labor in innovation management. R&D Manage. 19,
161 – 171.
Cooper, W.H., Dyke, L., Kay, P., 1990. Developing act frequency measures of organizational behaviors. Academy
of Management Best Paper Proceedings, San Francisco.
Damanpour, F., 1991. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of determinants and moderators. Acad. Manage.
Day, D.L., 1994. Raising radicals: different processes for championing innovative corporate ventures. Organ. Sci.
Dougherty, D., Hardy, C., 1996. Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: overcoming
Downs, G.W., Mohr, L.B., 1976. Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 21, 700 – 714.
Frost, P.J., Egri, C.P., 1991. The political process of innovation. In: Staw, B.M., Cummings, L.L. (Eds.), Research
in Organizational Behavior
Galbraith, J.R., 1982. Designing the innovating organization. Organ. Dyn. 10, 5 – 25.
Garud, R., Van de Ven, A.H., 1992. An empirical evaluation of the internal corporate venturing process. Strateg.
Howell, J.M., Higgins, C.A., 1990. Champions of technological innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 35, 317 – 341.
Jackson, D.N., 1984. Jackson Personality Inventory. Sigma Assessment Systems, Port Huron, MI.
Jackson, D.N., 1987. Personality Research Form E. Sigma Assessment Systems, Port Huron, MI.
Keller, R.T., 1986. Predictors of performance of project groups in R&D organizations. Acad. Manage. J. 29,
715 – 726.
Kessler, E.H., Chakrabarti, A.K., 1996. Innovation speed: a conceptual model of context, antecedents, and
Kessler, E.H., Chakrabarti, A.K., 1999. Speeding up the pace of new product development. J. Prod. Innov. Manag.
Maidique, M.A., 1980. Entrepreneurs, champions and technological innovation. Sloan Manage. Rev., 59 – 76.
Markham, S.K., Griffin, A., 1998. The breakfast of champions: associations between champions and product
development environments, practices and performance
Markham, S.K., Green, S.G., Basu, R., 1991. Champions and antagonists: relationships with R&D project
characteristics and management
Nunnally, J.C., 1978. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Pearce II, J.A., Kramer, T.R., Robbins, D.K., 1997. Effects of managers’ entrepreneurial behavior on subordinates.
Roberts, E.B., Fusfeld, A.R., 1988. Critical functions: needed roles in the innovation process. In: Katz, R. (Ed.),
Managing Professionals in Innovative Organizations
Royer, I. 2001. Stopping-champions of Failing Projects . Paper presented at the Academy of Management
Conference, Washington, D.C
Schon, D.A., 1963. Champions for radical new inventions. Harvard Bus. Rev. 41, 77 – 86.
Shane, S.A., 1994. Are champions different from non-champions? J. Bus. Venturing 9, 397 – 421.
Shane, S., Venkataraman, S., MacMillan, I., 1995. Cultural differences in innovation championing strategies. J.
Stevens, G.A., Burley, J., 1997. 3000 raw ideas=1 commercial success! Res. Technol. Manag. 40, 16 – 28.
Tushman, M.L., Nadler, D., 1986. Organizing for innovation. Calif. Manage. Rev. 28, 74 – 92.
Van de Ven, A.H., 1986. Central problems in the management of innovation. Manage. Sci. 32, 590 – 607.
Van de Ven, A.H., Polley, D.E., Garud, R., Venkataraman, S., 1999. The Innovation Journey. Oxford Univ.
Venkataraman, S., MacMillan, I., McGrath, R., 1992. Progress in research on corporate venturing. In: Sexton, D.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document