Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Chamberlain was an Idiot - Discuss

Better Essays
1193 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chamberlain was an Idiot - Discuss
History Homework
Neville Chamberlain was an idiot. discuss.
Neville Chamberlain was Prime Minister of Britain from 28 May 1937-10 May 1940. He is famous for using his appeasement foreign policy against Adolf Hitler. His actions today are widely criticized for allowing Hitler to grow more powerful, the most famous example being the Munich Agreement of 1938 in which Hitler not only took over the agreed Sudetenland but went on to take over the rest of Czechoslovakia.
One hand Neville Chamberlain was a responsible Prime Minister. Britain’s economy was still crippled due to the First World War. Britain was in no position to be involved in a war, and so Chamberlain did as much as he could to keep war from breaking out in Europe. The biggest threat to European peace at the time was Adolf Hitler, Chancellor of Germany. Adolf Hitler rose to power in the early 1930’s mainly due to his promise that he would destroy the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler’s first step was to remilitarize the Rhineland, an area of Germany that according to The Treaty of Versailles, was to be demilitarized to act as a buffer zone between Germany and France.
Chamberlain turned a blind eye to Hitler’s move, as it was not in Britain’s interests to go to war with Germany over the reoccupation of Hitler’s own country. There was already growing sympathy in Britain for Germany, the vast majority of the general public started to believe that the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh on Germany. Many people admired Hitler, he was named as “Man of the Year” in the American Magazine “Time”. It was famously quoted that, “Hitler is walking into his own back yard”. Hitler had taken a risk and it had paid off. Hitler wasn’t ready for war, but to his favour, the Allies ignored his move. This is the first example of Chamberlain applying his appeasement policy to Adolf Hitler. It was based on giving Hitler what was reasonable and then when those demands were satisfied, they would stop.
France on the other hand was very worried about the remilitarized Rhineland. The Treaty of Versailles made sure the land was demilitarized to protect France from another possible German attack. Despite having built many fortresses along the border between France and Germany, France was worried that this would lead onto the eventual invasion of France by Germany, (which it did in May 1940). France like Britain also had been crippled by the First World War, and was in no position to go to war. However France couldn’t take action against Germany without Britain’s support.
Chamberlain was determined to keep peace, even if it meant France was slightly more prone to attack from Germany, he needed to make sure that a full scale war with Germany was out of the question, (for now).
Another section of the Treaty of Versailles prohibited the unification of Austria with Germany. Austria had a lot of political instability at the time. There was also increased amounts of riots, crime and demonstrations, mostly stirred up by the Austrian Nazi party. In 1938 the Austrian army invited the German army into Austria to keep order. The German army were greeted with cheers and celebrations in the streets. The German army never left. A plebiscite was held shortly afterwards to vote on the Anschluss of Austria and Germany. The outcome was 99.75%, (it is widely believed today that this election was rigged by the Austrian Nazi Party). Austria was then annexed into Germany under the territory of “Ostmark”. The Anschluss was complete. Hitler did not face any opposition to the Anschluss, despite it breaking the Treaty of Versailles.
Chamberlain did not want to get involved as Hitler argued he was using the principle of self-determination as an excuse for the Anschluss. Self-determination was mentioned in the Treaty of Versailles and was a founding principle of the League of Nations. Hitler was uniting two German speaking countries together, and Chamberlain could not intervene as technically the German army was “invited in”, and then a formal vote was held. Hitler’s demands appeared reasonable at the time, although in hindsight these demands should never have been allowed. Chamberlain once again used appeasement to let Hitler get what he wanted to keep peace in Europe. He was letting Hitler grow stronger and not setting a limit. Each time Hitler got what he wanted, he kept pushing for more.
In 1938 Hitler had talks with the PM of Czechoslovakia about annexing the Sudetenland, an area of land in Czechoslovakia that was predominantly German speaking. When the Czech PM refused, Hitler threatened war. This lead to the Munich Conference of 1938, where Hitler and Chamberlain discussed the fate of the Sudetenland. Ironically, the Czech PM wasn’t even there, despite the fact that Chamberlain and Hitler were discussing the future of his own country. Hitler once again argued that German-speakers were living in the Sudetenland that should be part of Germany. Hitler then went on to say he wouldn’t ask for any more land after this. Chamberlain agreed and the Munich Agreement was signed.
Neville Chamberlain came back to Britain a hero, waving a piece of white paper, and saying that peace has been secured for Britain and for Europe. Behind the scenes, he didn’t trust Hitler, and was quietly readying the armed forces for war.
Hitler went on to take the Sudetenland, where the German army were treated as heroes, but then went on to take the rest of Czechoslovakia as well, betraying his word.

After this point, Hitler was readying for WWII. Chamberlain had let him grow too powerful, and soon the Nazi-Soviet Pact was signed, ensuring the death of Poland. On September 1st 1939 Hitler invaded western Poland. Shortly afterwards, the Soviet Union also invaded on the East side, and WWII had started.

In some ways Neville Chamberlain was an idiot. He did not draw a line to the extent of Hitler’s demands, and in doing so made himself and the other allies look weak compared to Germany and her demands. Chamberlain let Hitler strengthen Germany, in the hope that Germany would be an important trading partner. Instead strengthening Germany lead to WWII. Chamberlain could have stopped Hitler when he remilitarized the Rhineland, which could have put a firm stop to Hitler’s campaign.
However, it must be remembered that everything that Chamberlain did was in Britain’s best interests. Britain was not ready for war, and Chamberlain did not want another world war, which he thought might lead to the end of civilization. Chamberlain used appeasement to keep peace in Europe. It was the easiest policy to please everyone and keep peace, but he did set a limit to Germany’s demands and in the end the policy backfired.
Chamberlain wasn’t an idiot. He knew what was going on behind the scenes, and he didn’t trust Hitler. He couldn’t go to war with Germany at the time, as he was still rebuilding the armed forces. However, Chamberlain should have done something when Hitler took the rest of Czechoslovakia. In my opinion this was the perfect time to intervene and stop the German warmongering.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Intimidation from Fascist leaders was a factor that led to the illogical events of World War II. Adolf Hitler, chancellor of Germany, justified his barbaric actions on his attempt to benefit the "superior" German race. The effects of his ambitions were displayed during the Munich Conference in 1938. Hitler invited the Prime Minister of Britain and the Premier of France and demanded that the Sudetenland become part of Germany. Due to France and Britain's fear of another war, Hitler's demand was accepted. The appeasement, or agreement in order to maintain peace, at the Munich Conference was said to have "saved Europe from a world war," as stated by William Shirer. Contrary to Shirer, Europe would still be involved in war and things would only get worse.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Neville Chamberlain was a British politician who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1937 - 1940. He signed the Munich Agreement in 1938. When Hitler continued his aggression on Poland, Chamberlain promised to defend Poland's independence, therefore Britain declared war on, and Chamberlain led Britain through the first eight months of World War II. “On the Nazi invasion of Poland” speech was announced hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. He died of cancer after six months of leaving the premiership and was replaced by Winston Churchill. This speech was announced to show the cruelty of the Nazi government and to stop the Germans aggression…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chamberlain suggested appeasement in hopes of keeping peace and avoiding war. He wanted to avoid war for as long as possible and keep the Europe out of war unless a bigger reason arose.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ world war 2

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Prime Minister Chamberlain suggested the best way to deal with Hitler was a policy of appeasement.…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The erosion of Neville Chamberlain’s# reputation was brought about quickly as his policy of appeasement failed to prevent WW2. The Cato# collective branded him as a criminal in the ‘Guilty men’#. Churchill# further reinforced this view telling the commons “England has been offered a choice between war and shame. She has chosen shame, and will get war.”#. These more orthodox views starkly contrast the reactions of the public and media pre-war. Hailed as a hero “Most newspapers supported Chamberlain uncritically, and he received thousands of gifts, from a silver dinner service to many of his trademark umbrellas.”#, with newspapers such as the Stockholm Tidningen# suggesting he receive the Nobel peace prize, Strasbourg renaming her streets overnight and the Telegram# concluding "Your name will go down in history as a statesman who saved civilisation from destruction”#. Ultimately appeasement, “the reduction of tensions between two states by the methodical removal of the principal causes of conflict and disagreement between them, which might otherwise lead to war.”# may not have been the only realistic option, but it was certainly an option and it was taken forward. Used as a synonym for weakness and ‘giving in’ in today’s world, there are Historians who argue that Chamberlain and his policy of appeasement was weak and lead to WW2 such as L.B. Namier, while there are also historians, such as A.J.P Taylor, who argue it was the only realistic option for him, during the years 1936-38.…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rise of Adolf Hitler

    • 606 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Treaty of Versailles played a crucial role in Hitler’s rise to power. Signed on June 28, 1919, the treaty was used to punish Germany for the damages and war crimes Germany committed during WWI. In the treaty, Germany was forced to pay immense war reparations. The Germans saw Hitler as a leader whom could create a solution for their problems and a more unified country. Prussian nobleman, Arnold Freiherr von Vietinghoff- Reisch stated “Hitler for many of us was the savior from the economic and social disaster, the unifier of the German people, the man who was restoring the its honor abroad...”…

    • 606 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was a man that stood up to what he believed in and filled up to the duties that called to him. Neville Chamberlain loved what he did and wouldn’t change his duties for nothing in the world. Neville Chamberlain would fight for his peace against any county even the strongest country. Neville Chamberlain lived up to his mother’s and father’s dream and went even bigger than his parents would ever imagine. Neville Chamberlain ended up being in people’s opinion, one of the greatest prime ministers that came through Britain and one of the most popular mayors that has ever come through Birmingham, England. Neville Chamberlain wanted to be the best man that he could possibly be, and people say he achieved just…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Appeasement was the right policy for England in 1938. This is because It was based on the idea that what Hitler wanted was reasonable and, when his reasonable demands had been satisfied, he would stop. Appeasement was the only practical action that could be held during that time. England and France were not ready to get into another war. They already had severe damages that they couldn’t afford to get into another war. This gave them time to prepare for war since it is inevitable anyways. It also gave them time to prepare for old and broken equipment. Alliances needed to be made and through this, that was all possible. Also, through this policy, they were able to get public support. Appeasement also allowed Britain time to retool factories for war. Many Britons during that time saw Hitler as a defence against Russian Communism. This all happened because they thought that Hitler would soon be satisfied after remilitarizing the Rhineland, annexation of Austria and czechoslovakia. Wanted to please Hitler this way. The empire was already overstretched and its financial resources quite limited. The U.S. was isolationist. Soviet communism was feared, France was weak. This was all done to prevent war and preventing war is something needed to be done. Their objective was for the collaboration of all nations in building up a lasting peace for Europe. The Czechs, left themselves and told they were going to get no help from the Western Powers, would have been able to make better terms than they have got. This also gave the greatest chance of securing protection for the country. Czechoslovak State would’ve not been able to be an independent entity without this. Chamberlain remembered the slaughter of the…

    • 2172 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One argument is the view that appeasement was the only realistic option because public opinion supported it and for Chamberlain to lead Britain to war would go against public favour. The First World War savaged Europe and Britain was hit very hard in terms of Human losses. Many families lost men within the family and left psychological scars nationwide. Chamberlain was therefore desperate to avoid another war on the continent at all costs. If Britain was to go to war they would have to rearm and build on their armed forces which had been neglected since world war one. However public opinion was that if Britain was rearming then they would be preparing for war, which was incredible unpopular. Evidence of this was in east Fulham by-election of 1933 the conservative who advocated rearmament turned a majority of 14,000 into a defeat by 5000 at the hands of his labour approach who supported disarmament. This illustrated the political affect that rearmament and policies that move towards War had which was a reason as to why Chamberlain saw appeasement as the only realistic option.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chamberlain's Influence

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Brigadier General Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain was a college professor, Governor of Maine, and a Civil War hero in the battle of Gettysburg, Chamberlain impacted local, state, and national levels of the United States, most notably at the Battle of Gettysburg. Chamberlain was born in Brewer, Maine on September 8th 1828 (“Joshua Chamberlain” 1 ). His parents were Joshua and Sarah Bratow Chamberlain (“Joshua Chamberlain” 1). He was the first of five siblings, his brother Thomas also served in the Civil War. His mother instilled a sense of religion, while his father taught, influenced his taste in military. When he was in his twenties, Chamberlain worked in the brickyard and the timber industry before setting his sights towards teaching. He studied…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain of Great Britain tried to restore the calm and wanted to preserve peace at all cost. He believed that meeting Hitler's demands could prevent war. Sudetenland was given to Germany because Hitler promised he would have no more territorial demands. French Premier Edouard Daladier and Chamberlain hoped this would satisfy Hitler and prevent war. In 1939, Hitler broke the Munich agreement and seized the rest of Czechoslovakia.…

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within two years of consolidating power over Germany, Hitler and the Nazi Party had commenced operations to reverse the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles which had treated the German people in an unfair manner. Among these reversals included foreign diplomatic measures which would ensure that Germany would annex the territories it had lost at the conclusion of World War One. In September of 1938, with Europe on the brink of yet another major war, Great Britain’s Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain called the four powers – Germany, Italy, France, and Great Britain – to convene in Munich and address German aggression against Czechoslovakia and the Sudetenland. Among Neville Chamberlain’s goals for the conference was the notion to avoid…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Hitler and the rest of Germany rose to power, he began to want to expand the land and invade other nations’ territories. He started to command Germany to fulfill one task after another, all breaking the Treaty of Versailles’ regulations. First, Hitler built up his German military, breaking one of the rules of the treaty. As the German army grew stronger, Britain and France kept their distance and supported it, as Hitler declared it was merely for defensive purposes. Next, Hitler commanded his troops to re-enter the Rhineland, violating the treaty. Again, Britain and France did not take action because they understood Germany’s perspective, as they believed they were doing nothing wrong by entering their own ‘backyard’. From this point on, Hitler believed he was invincible, as he could do whatever he wanted to. At the time, it did not seem like Britain or France or any other countries were planning on stopping him. Therefore, Hitler took advantage of this appeasement, as he saw this as his chance to command Germany to fulfill his personal desires.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain gave this speech to the House of Commons on September 1st, 1939, hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. Chamberlain and others had spent years negotiating with Hitler in order to prevent another war in Europe. The point of this speech is too inform people of what Hitler has done and of what the British response will be.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - Britain needed time - By giving Hitler what he wanted, Britain had more time to build up her armed forces.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays