Preview

Chamberlain Appeasement Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
663 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chamberlain Appeasement Speech
Fellow parliament members, I stand here today, to address the topic of appeasement with Germany. As all of you may know, appeasement is something that is of utter importance to me. I personally believe that by all means, we should do whatever is necessary in order to prevent war. There are many points that I have to address that will help us to do so. These points will also make it more clear as to why appeasement is the most practical course of action, not only for the welfare of our country, but for the welfare of our people.
The first point that I will address is that frankly, many of our people want nothing more than to keep Britain out of war, no matter what it takes. These people remember clearly all of the hard times that occurred during and after World War I. Some of these struggles included losing almost an entire generation of men, and once the war was over, trying to recover economically which we still have not yet fully done. They all dislike even the thought of having to go through that again, which I fully support. If we can come to an agreement with Germany in order to prevent an outbreak of war, I believe that we should do everything in our power to do so.
Another reason that we should try our best to maintain peace with Germany is the brutality of their warfare. We can see this clearly portrayed by how they fought during the Spanish Civil War. Since World War 1, many new methods of fighting have been developed, some of which are much for deadly and destructive than any other that we have used before. A great example of this comes from the bombing at Geurnica. This attack occurred on April 26, 1937. The goal of this attack was to completely destroy Geurnica. If we were to enter the war, then the same fate could be brought upon us. As an enemy of Germany, Hitler would have no real reason not to just bomb us all if he felt the need to.
An obvious reason for trying to maintain peace with Germany is that Britain is simply unprepared for a war. We

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Which was a completely false because aforethought they were in a rough spot in the economy they had no intentions of sympathy. They only wanted to understand why this has happened, when they thought they were good allies with the British for the moment. Soon there was much talk there actually being a war between Britain and Germany. This was was a false political claim that was made just to see if Germany would retaliate to the information.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Unit 5 Study Guide

    • 2751 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Then, Britain’s anger was turned to the Germans and they wanted a peaceful settlement with the United States…

    • 2751 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Neville Chamberlain was a British politician who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1937 - 1940. He signed the Munich Agreement in 1938. When Hitler continued his aggression on Poland, Chamberlain promised to defend Poland's independence, therefore Britain declared war on, and Chamberlain led Britain through the first eight months of World War II. “On the Nazi invasion of Poland” speech was announced hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. He died of cancer after six months of leaving the premiership and was replaced by Winston Churchill. This speech was announced to show the cruelty of the Nazi government and to stop the Germans aggression…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assess the view that appeasement was the only realistic option for British policy towards Germany between 1936 and 1938…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of them being that Germany was frustrated over the Treaty of Versailles. Germany was upset that they had to follow unfair demands, including paying for all of the damages of World War I, lessening their armies, and limiting their military. In time, an aggressive ruler in Germany came to power named Adolf Hitler. Hitler felt that the outcome of the Treaty of Versailles was unfair, so he did the opposite of what the treaty stated and put all the money into building a stronger military. As time went on, Germany wanted to reunite their brother land (doc 1). Since other powerful countries feared the power of Hitler and his army, they gave into him, following the policy of appeasement. They agreed to the terms in which the “Big Four” gave Czechoslovakia over to Germany in order to resist war (doc 4). Hitler believed it was their right to the land because Germany owned it, post-World War I. In addition, at the start of World War II, most nations were in a worldwide depression. This state of depression, made it easier for aggressive and charismatic rulers to take control over weak nations. The people hoped the powerful rulers would help to fix and change the economy. Many of the great powers thought it was a good idea to give into appeasement. On the other hand, many disagreed and argued that by giving into one demand today would cause the nation to weaken “tomorrow” (doc…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Semitism In Ww2

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Article 231 the government agreed and signed the document accepting all the blame for World War 1 while many Germans disagreed with this idea. “The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.” (Article 231, Treaty of Versaille) While the treaty was made to create peace it only backlashed and was one of the biggest reasons for World War 2. German’s felt unfairly blamed since the war was not all their fault.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ww1 M.A.I.N Causes

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Britain had yet to decide it`s position . London was suspicious of the growing might of Germany , but she had clashed with France over the Sudan in 1898 . In late 1903 Britain and France signed the ` Entente Cordiale ` . It was not a formal alliance , but a friendly `understanding` , and neither country was under any obligation to come to the aid of the other in the event of war . In August 1907 Britain strengthened it`s commitment to France by signing an agreement with Russia. Europe was divided into two powerful blocs.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I find it amazing that Dwight Eisenhower went from a poor little boy to rise all the way to help win World War Two and become a two term president who ch aged the world forever. I hope you enjoyed hearing about this remarkable man who changed the world in so many ways and I hope you understand a little better of why I picked Dwight Eisenhower for my…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mass Conflict Dbq

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There is no way of knowing if War will erupt from an ambassador being assassinated or a dictator rising in a nation that was condemned by society. Nations may have different ways of dealing with mass conflict, some will try to appease another and others will create deadly alliances. Countries can better prepare themselves for war each time it arises,but they are never fully prepared for the consequences that follow. When England was on the Brink of War in 1938 they decided on a policy of appeasement that, “...the German dictator, instead of snatching his victuals from the table, has been content to have them served to him course by course”(Churchill, Document B). In this case England wanted to avoid conflict, even though it was inevitable. England wanted time to rebuild its nation, while in the process handing Adolf Hitler every piece of land and power that he requested. By obeying his every command England was unable to avoid the inevitable war, but was simply more prepared to carry out a mass conflict. When England delayed the start of War they gave themselves time to regenerate their army and the support of their people. This led to their ultimate victory against Germany as Churchill remarked “We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets . . . we shall never surrender”(qtd. in Beck 1860). Britain never did surrender to…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    5. Wilmot, Louise. “Germany`s Final Measures in World War Two”. BBC. BBC, February 17, 2011. Web. January 26, 2014.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reagan during his speech makes valid points on peace and war. He goes back and forth on how the government can not keep the peace because of war, and that we can not have peace because the government does not know how to help the people. Reagan then argues that there is no argument that can be made over peace and war. “There's no argument over the choice between peace and war, but there's only one guaranteed way you can have peace—and you can have it in the next second—surrender.” (Reagan ). What Reagan is trying to say is that when there is war, there can not be peace. If this nation is looking for peace, the only way to do it is to surrender. If the war is won, the Unites States still has enemies that still look for a fight years later. If the war is lost, the enemy sees more open chances to make the United states look like the weaker ones, and still attack. None of those outcomes are peace. That is the point Reagan is making. He is saying that if the nation were to surrender when…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We took Britain’s harassment way too long. This war was inevitable. It was bound to happen. People were waiting for the right time to break out and fight…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason for this is that there might’ve been a conflict in the Balkans (where WWI started) but because the British joined the conflict it became a bloody battle, which directly caused a World War. Before the war began the British aims were unclear and there really wasn’t a reason for Britain to join, only if Russia or France joined because they had a treaty with each other. But the involvement of Britain was not calculated by the Germans, they thought it would’ve been quick and a relatively bloodless victory of the Germans. But there also was a probability that if Britain warned the Germans that if they invaded Belgium and France, that Germany would have thought it through and backed out. Because this meant that it was going to be a two way war against Britain, France, and Russia as well. They could have realized that a German victory was almost…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain gave this speech to the House of Commons on September 1st, 1939, hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. Chamberlain and others had spent years negotiating with Hitler in order to prevent another war in Europe. The point of this speech is too inform people of what Hitler has done and of what the British response will be.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many reasons why Britain had such a negative and sceptical attitude towards Europe. The main reason being European organisations such as the EEC and EDC. The motivation for Britain’s decline of the EEC, was because Britain politicians didn’t want British national sovereignty to be challenged. Britain was simply opposed to any supranational organisation. (Meaning “above the nation,” where nations, like Britain, give some national sovereignty, power, to European institutions.) The first possible supranational organisation was the EDC, European Defence committee. This was proposed by the French, along with the Schuman Plan, which led to establishment of the European Coal and Steal Community, ECSC. These were in a similar fashion to the Pleven Plan, which was a French solution to possible threat from Germany.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays