Preview

Certainty Is Not A Bad Thing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
407 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Certainty Is Not A Bad Thing
Certainty is not a bad thing because it makes a person passionate and confident. During this scene,Jurors 3 and 4 were trying to convince 8 how the defendant was guilty. Juror 8 was the only juror to vote not guilty initially. As jurors 3 and 4 were explaining how clear it was that the defendant was guilty, juror 3 stated, “They proved it in a dozen ways. Do you want me to list them?”(556)This shows how much evidence there actually is, Rose intended to do this to show certainty in the jurors. This presents the theme of certainty, because it now shows that juror 3 and 4 are certain that the defendant is guilty. Although this is not a bad thing , rose will eventually make some jurors stubborn. Later in the play, Juror 3 has now changed his verdict

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He believes that Juror 8 and Juror 9’s input is driven by biases that are “a bit far-fetched” (Act I, page 32). However, Juror 8, as the center of the discussion, constructively points out certain aspects of the case the makes Juror 4 skeptical about Juror 8’s statements. For example, when Juror 8 wonders how long it takes for an elevated train to pass a given point, Juror 4 inquisitively states, “All right. Say ten Seconds. What are you getting at?” (Act I, page 34). This conveys that he understands that Juror 8 has a point to make, but his intentions are not truly rational in accordance with the facts. Furthermore, Juror 4 claims “You’ve made some excellent points. The last one… was very persuasive. But I still believe the boy is guilty of murder. I have two reasons. One: the evidence given by the woman across the street who actually saw the murder committed. Two: the fact that the woman described the stabbing…” (Act II, page 66). According to Juror 4, the woman’s claim makes logical sense. Although Juror 4 is not yet convinced that the young man is not a murderer, he does value Juror 8’s…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The jury is sent to a hot, crowded room to deliberate. Before any formal discussion, they cast a vote. Eleven of the jurors vote “guilty.” Only one juror votes “not guilty.” That juror, who is known in the script as Juror #8 is the protagonist of the play. As the tempers flare and the arguments begin, the audience learns about each member of the jury. And slowly but surely, Juror #8 guides the others toward a verdict of “Not Guilty.”…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of the play, he is the only person that believes the boy on trial could be not guilty. “There were eleven votes for guilty. It's not so easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.” (page 5). This quote from the story shows that juror eight is willing to give the boy’s story a chance and that he deserves a for the jury to at least discuss the trial opposed to them all immediately voting that he is guilty. Throughout the whole play, juror eight tried, not to convince the rest of the jury that he was not guilty, but try to get them to understand that a boy’s life was on the line. He was trying to show them that there was reasonable doubt, by showing the men through demonstrations of what happened (page 20/24) and logical reasoning about simple observations during the trial (page 29). During the whole play, juror number eight brought a theme of…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The various conflicts in Rose’s play are tools which he uses to teach us to do the right thing, even when we are the minority in a situation. Juror Eight is a quiet, thoughtful, gentle man who sees all sides of every question and always seeks the truth. For example, in the beginning of the play they decide…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the drama Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, there are twelve jurors to discuss and deliberate if the murder in the first degree is guilt or not. Because the verdict must be unanimous, twelve jurors have a critical thinking in their discussion and finally made the vote from eleven jurors vote for guilty to unanimous vote for not guilty. During the development of the voting, Juror Three is hardly to persuade because he has a serious prejudice to the murder. If Juror Three does not admit the murder is not guilty, they cannot settle a lawsuit. Therefore, Juror Three’s prejudice should be the key to get the final verdict.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reginald Rose’s play, Twelve Angry Men, is about a jury’s decision making process in a murder trial. The facts in this play become blinded by the prejudices that some Juror’s possess. A prejudice jury became formed due to a biased testimony and the facts became clouded as generalisations were formed by the Juror’s. Some Juror’s bigotry can be based on their past experiences and discrimination didn’t only happen to the defendant, but it was also experienced by Juror’s themselves…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Father Flynn Innocent

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Everyone knows what it is like to be accused of something. In the play doubt written by John Patrick Shanley the reader questions whether or not one of the main characters Father Flynn is innocent or guilty. Father Flynn is accused of sexually harassing a student. The students name is Donald Muller; he is the only African American child at his school. I believe that Father Flynn is innocent. I believe he is innocent. There is plenty of evidence to back up Father Flynn’s innocence, and there is none to prove that he is guilty; therefore I believe he is innocent.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After listening to the protagonist, juror started changing their original guilty decision one by one. This showed their willingness to change their stance having been convinced by the protagonist’s logic. Protagonist stuck to the practicality of the situation and logic in order to bring the possible flaws in the testimonies of the eye witnesses by reproducing the situations and verifying the possibility of authenticity of the testimony. In doing so, he influenced the…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Influence

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juror Three’s past negatively influences him to vote guilty despite all the evidence pointing to an acquittal. In Act One, Juror Three talks about his bitterness towards “tough kids”. He goes on and on…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginad Rose the twelve jurors have to decide if a young boy is guilty or not guilty. The boy is accused of the murder of his father. His fate lies in the hands of the twelve jurors. Will he get the death penalty? Will they prove that the young boy is not guilty? Will he get to live the rest of his life? There are many different versions of this story including William Friedkins film version produced in 1997. Friedkins film version is easier to comprehend because it includes more detail than Rose’s original play version of Twelve Angry Men. Friedkin goes more in depth in his version of the story unlike Rose. Its more effective to the reader because of the message its telling us.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Twelve Angry Men, the playwright Reginald Rose demonstrates through the characters of the jury the conflict between right and wrong and what can come from that conflict. The play was set in the 1950’s, when only men were chosen to be a part of a jury. Rose intentionally creates the characters of the jury to have contradicting values to show how conflict is often necessary before justice can be served. The only way to give the accused a fair trial is if there is conflict occurring between right and wrong between jurors. Each juror has their own pre-conceived ideas about right and wrong considering it was in the 1950’s. Juror 8 believes the accused has a right to a fair trial; this creates the initial conflict. Conflict is necessary to ensure the right thing is done, which in this case is that the defendant was given a fair hearing. The judge states that “if there’s any reasonable doubt then you must bring me a verdict of not-guilty”. Juror 8 has reasonable doubt and elaborates it to the jury; however some juror’s thoughts are blinded by their prejudice and personal experiences. Reginald Rose displays the conflict that can occur when decisions are being made using the jurors in Twelve Angry Men.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    the streets... he's got to die! Stay with me." (23) But Four sees the truth that…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is clearly observed in the beginning of the play where the 8th juror has told the other jurors “It’s not easy for him to raise his hand … and send a boy off to death without just talking about it first” this clearly shown the strength of the jury system where at the first jury vote Juror 8th is the only one who voted not guilty. This shows the fairness of the 8th juror where he values the life of the boy who is on trial. In a segment of the play the 8th has reminded other the responsibility of the jury system when he has said “Nine of us now seem to feel that the defendant is innocent…we may be wrong” this reminding the other juror that they are making a big decision and also says “But we have reasonable doubt…which is the enormous values in our system”. Audience can see how the 8th juror has shown strength where he has been fair from the start of the play.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics and Angry Men

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It’s here; in this setting that we see the judge, the jurors, the accused and the lawyers for the first time. The judge then introduces the serious nature of the case before them, reminding them that the decision must be unanimous and that the litmus test is “reasonable doubt”. As the…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although the men were upset with him, the thought had crossed their mind long enough to realize he may be right. By offering up his opinion and a new suggestion, he opened the door for character development of the other jurors. This then creates new options and processes for the group to explore. However, this also creates secondary tension and new power struggles.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics