Centralization vs Decentralization

Topics: Inventory, Operations research, Variance Pages: 39 (9770 words) Published: December 7, 2012
Centralization versus Decentralization: Risk Pooling, Risk Diversification, and Supply Uncertainty in a One-Warehouse Multiple-Retailer System Amanda J. Schmitt Lawrence V. Snyder
Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering Lehigh University Bethlehem, PA, USA

Zuo-Jun Max Shen
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research University of California Berkeley, CA, USA

May 27, 2008
ABSTRACT We investigate optimal system design in a One-Warehouse Multiple-Retailer system in which supply is subject to disruptions. We examine the expected costs and cost variances of the system in both a centralized and a decentralized inventory system. We show that using a decentralized inventory design reduces cost variance through the risk-diversification effect, and that when demand is deterministic and supply may be disrupted, a decentralized inventory system is optimal. This is in contrast to the classical result that when supply is deterministic and demand is stochastic, centralization is optimal due to the risk-pooling effect. When both supply may be disrupted and demand is stochastic, we demonstrate that a risk-averse firm should typically choose a decentralized inventory system design.

1

Introduction

As supply chains expand globally, supply risk increases. Classical inventory models have generally focused on demand uncertainty and established best practices to mitigate demand risk. However, supply risk can have very different impacts on the optimal inventory management policies and can even reverse what is known about best practices for system design. In this paper, we focus on the impact of supply uncertainty on the One-Warehouse MultipleRetailer (OWMR) system, and compare two policies: centralization (stocking inventory at the warehouse only) and decentralization (stocking inventory at the retailers only). While most research 1

on the OWMR model allows inventory to be held at both echelons, we allow inventory to be held at only one echelon in order to consider two opposing effects that can occur: risk pooling and risk diversification. The risk pooling effect occurs when inventory is held at a central location, which allows the demand variance at each retailer to be combined, resulting in a lower expected cost [12]. The risk diversification effect occurs when inventory is held at a decentralized set of locations, which allows the impact of each disruption to be reduced, resulting in a lower cost variance [23]. Whereas the risk-pooling effect reduces the expected cost but (as we prove) not the cost variance, the risk-diversification effect reduces the variance of cost but not the expected cost. We prove that the risk diversification effect occurs in systems with supply disruptions. We also consider systems with both supply and demand uncertainty, in which both risk pooling and risk diversification have some impact, and numerically examine the tradeoff between the two. We employ a risk-averse objective to determine which effect dominates the system and drives the choice for optimal inventory system design. Specifically, comparing centralized and decentralized inventory policies, we contribute the following: • The exact relationship between optimal costs and inventory levels when demand is deterministic and supply may be disrupted • The exact relationship between optimal cost variances when: – demand is deterministic and supply may be disrupted – supply is deterministic and demand is stochastic • Formulations of the expected cost and cost variance when supply is disrupted and demand is stochastic • Evidence that decentralization is usually optimal under risk-averse objectives The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we review the relevant literature. In Section 3 we analyze the risk-diversification effect in the OWMR system with deterministic demand and disrupted supply. We consider stochastic demand in Section 4. In Section 5 we consider both demand uncertainty and disrupted supply and again compare...


References: [1] V. Agrawal and S. Seshadri. Risk intermediation in supply chains. IIE Transactions, 32:819– 831, 2000. [2] S. Axsater. Inventory Control. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, first edition, 2000. [3] Y. Bassok and R. Akella. Ordering and production decisions with supply quality and demand uncertainty. Management Science, 37(12):1556–1574, Dec. 1991. [4] E. Berk and A. Arreola-Risa. Note on “Future supply uncertainty in EOQ models”. Naval Research Logistics, 41:129–132, 1994. [5] R. Bollapragada, U.S. Rao, and J. Zhang. Managing two-stage serial inventory systems under demand and supply uncertainty and customer service level requirements. IIE Transactions, 36:73–85, 2004. [6] R. Bollapragada, U.S. Rao, and J. Zhang. Managing inventory and supply performance in assembly systems with random supply capacity and demand. Management Science, 50(12):1729– 1743, Dec. 2004. [7] X. Chen, M. Sim, D. Simchi-Levi, and P. Sun. Risk aversion in inventory management. Operations Research, 55(5):828–842, 2007. [8] S. Chopra, G. Reinhardt, and U. Mohan. The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risks in a supply chain. Naval Research Logistics, 54(5):544–555, 2007. [9] L.Y. Chu and Z.J.M. Shen. A power-of-two ordering policy for one warehouse, multi-retailer systems with stochastic demand. Working paper, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2006. [10] M. Dada, N. Petruzzi, and L. Schwarz. A newsvendor’s procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9(1):9–32, 2007. [11] L. Eeckhoudt, C. Gollier, and H. Schlesinger. The risk-averse (and prudent) newsboy. Management Science, 41(5):786–794, May 1995. [12] G.D. Eppen. Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Management Science, 25(5):498–501, May 1979. ¨ ¨ [13] Guilliermo Gallego, Ozalp Ozer, and Paul Zipkin. Bounds, heuristics, and approximations for distribution systems. Operations Research, 55(3):503–517, 2007. [14] A. Grosfeld-Nir and Y. Gerchak. Multiple lotsizing in production to order with random yields: review of recent advances. Annals of Operations Research, 126:43–69, 2004. [15] H. Gurnani, R. Akella, and J. Lehoczky. Supply management in assembly systems with random yield and random demand. IIE Transactions, 32:701–714, 2000. [16] W.J. Hopp and Z. Yin. Protecting supply chain networks against catastrophic failures. Working paper, Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 2006.
27
[17] E. Lystad and M. Ferguson. Simple newsvendor heuristics for two-echelon distrbution networks. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2007. [18] M. Parlar and D. Berkin. Future supply uncertainty in EOQ models. Naval Research Logistics, 38:107–121, 1991. [19] A. Schmitt. Strategic inventory management for supply chains subject to supply uncertainty. PhD Dissertation, Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 2007. [20] A.J. Schmitt and L.V. Snyder. Infinite-horizon models for inventory control under yield uncertainty and disruptions. Working paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 2007. [21] A.J. Schmitt, L.V. Snyder, and Z.J.M. Shen. Inventory systems with stochastic demand and supply: Properties and approximations. Working paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 2008. [22] L.V. Snyder. A tight approximation for a continuous-review inventory model with supplier disruptions. Working paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, September 2006. [23] L.V. Snyder and Z.J.M. Shen. Supply and demand uncertainty in multi-echelon supply chains. Working paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 2006. [24] C.S. Tang. The impact of uncertainty on a production line. Management Science, 36:1518– 1531, Dec. 1990. [25] B. Tomlin. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science, 52(5):639–657, May 2006. [26] B. Tomlin and L.V. Snyder. Inventory management with advanced warning of disruptions. Working Paper, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 2007. [27] B. Tomlin and Y. Wang. On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 7(1):37–57, 2005. [28] J.A. Van Meighem. Risk mitigation in newsvendor networks: Resource diversification, flexibility, sharing and hedging. Management Science, 53(8):1269–1288, 2007. [29] C.A. Yano and H.L. Lee. Lot sizing with random yields: A review. Operations Research, 43(2):311–334, March-April 1995. [30] P.H. Zipkin. Foundations of Inventory Management. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston, MA, first edition, 2000.
28
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Centralization vs Decentralization Essay
  • Essay about Centralization vs. Decentralization in Warehouse and Returns Management
  • Types of Authority: Centralization and Decentralization Essay
  • Centralization and Decentralization Essay
  • Essay on Centralization
  • Essay on Decentralization
  • Centralization and Decentralization at Home Depot Essay
  • Centralization and Decentralization of Decision Making in Ptcl Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free