Censorship In Ayn Rand's The Call Of The Wild

Everyone deserves to enjoy what they like, even if other people don't like it. Some may say censorship is beneficial because it keeps us away from harmful content. But I believe that books like The call of the Wild should not be banned or censored. Censorship takes away freedom from the creators, takes away freedom from the readers, and it’s a pointless thing to do.

I beieve that everyone deserves to express themselves.. Censoring or banning content takes away freedom from the authors. In the story the main character (a dog) watches his friend (also a dog) get killed. The author chose to write this and more gory stuff and no one should keep him from doing stuff he likes to do. Banning or censoring content will also take away the creativity of the writers. The
In “The Call of The Wild” Buck gets kidnapped, watches his friend die, and kills a dog. I didn’t find this story to be entertaining. Censoring this wouldn't have changed anything about this story, except making it more boring for the people that did enjoy reading this. Plus it’s not like censoring the stuff will make us magically forget about violence or other stuff that I’m not sure I’m allowed to mention in this letter, and that also helps me prove my point that people act like if you ignore things that are natural and happen every day all over the world then it will all magically disappear. In “the Call of the Wild” the main character kills another dog. Censoring this wouldn’t change the fact that he killed a dog and that we know that there is violence in our world so it's pointless. Others may say that some younger audiences may not be able to handle more sensitive topics and that even older people might not like violence or certain topics. While that may be true, all those people can just stay away from content that they don’t like and let the ones who do like it enjoy