The lack of education among citizens to evaluate news is problematic and causes many people to misinterpret the information that is provided in the news. Modern day citizens and youth are entering a situation where many news sources are biased and are trying to further their own success. Therefore, as reported by the Stanford History Education Group (SHEG), citizens “need further instruction in how best to navigate social media content” and other news sources (Wineburg and McGrew 24). SHEG shows through their lesson plan how many students are unable to determine the difference between truthful news and helps to instruct students. In addition, many citizens lack the ability to compare multiple viewpoints when evaluating media. Instead of taking…
* Over the last decade, we have seen a significant increase in “opinion-based” news and news organizations. Using agenda setting and framing --You should be able to discuss the ways in which “opinion-based” news (right or left) could impact audience’s perceptions of the issue, of politics, and of news credibility and bias?…
As a biography, the purpose is to inform and educate about the life and career or Murrow. Edwards does a good job at touching on the highlights of his career, but I do not think he did a good job at stressing his importance in developing broadcast journalism. While the ties are there, I do not believe he accentuated his importance early on in the book of his development of the news roundup concept. The only reference to the development of this idea in the early chapters is the reference to Paley’s self-crediting of the news roundup in his autobiography (Edwards, 37). It does explain the current widespread usage of the news roundup idea and that the CBS team came up with the idea, but he is not credited for this and the television split screen until later in the book (Edwards, 81). Murrow’s trailblazing of the news media was more of a side note than a major theme throughout the book. While he was involved in the innovation of radio and TV news, it does not support the claim strongly even though we know that Murrow was a news icon and an idol for anybody looking to enter the news field. As such, it is extremely important for anybody who wants to understand modern news media to learn Murrow’s contributions to the field.…
Aside from watching the daily and nightly news, people nowadays rely on internet, you tube and even smart phones to get the latest news and happenings around the country. News about murder, fatal killings, sex, drugs, and police brutality are found interesting by public. News involving celebrity, sports and athletes, politicians and various authority figures are also among the popular stories followed by the media.…
Conceive of a time of an active shooter situation was occurring somewhere around the USA an instead of CNN’s Anderson Cooper report the news, a comedian such as Jon Stewart is the newscaster. Most likely viewers would shake their heads and change the TV channel to another news channel. An article by student Christopher Moore called “Information Plus Satire: Why The Daily Show and The Colbert are Good Sources of News for Young People” in the anthology Writing Arguments a Rhetoric with Readings by John d. Ramage, Jon c. Bean, and June Johnson; Moore writes about why satire news like The Colbert Report and The Daily Show good sources of news for young people This is not true, major news channels like CNN, FOX News…
Due to the competition of new media, traditional news organizations are risking the quality of their content in order to keep up and be the first to deliver the latest news. Additionally, traditional news organizations are realizing that society is gravitating towards receiving their news from ‘new media’ news outlets and they are compromising their credibility in order to be the first to report the news. New media news outlets are gaining more credibility and acceptance form society due to their ability to be on location and get their information reported immediately.…
For example, in Fox news, they reported an article from Trump’s side, he was portrayed as the victim, when in reality it was not certain why polls had been kept open longer. CBS reported both sides of this certain topic, but CBS is not excluded when bias is mentioned. CBS reports articles about Eric Trump’s “illegal ballot selfie”, and how Trump’s children were not able to vote in the primary either, due to the fact that they forgot to register. An article which was not reported on Fox. Although Fox reported about the fact that a man who was dying in Florida could not vote for Trump, because his signature did not match the one on the voting registration. It went on to state that this has been the cause of many votes not being counted, but this was not reported on CBS. Fox News reported around three articles in which people were not able to vote for Trump, none of which were mentioned on CBS. While CBS had multiple articles about Russia getting involved in the United States election. Fox not only did not mention anything about Russia, but tended to stay clear of any news about Putin. Fox news tends to report their articles from Trump’s point of view, while CBS tries to maintain an equal balance of views but tends to shift the blame to Trump. Fox goes on to describe Trump as a successful businessman and states that Hillary Clinton’s email investigation was “long overdue”. Both news sources displayed some kind…
First of all, television news is no longer the same. Media recorded by everyday people was important on 9/11 because “[e]ven though NYC is the world’s number one media market, reporters were craving ‘man on the street’ perspectives because of a desire for understanding (and…
Due to a popular trend of media outlets covering stories for publicity and ratings, it is challenging for Americans to get news accounts for events that don’t necessarily sell. In addition, media outlets tend to be bias in one way or another about people, events, and other topics. This causes people to only have one-sided knowledge or a shallow understanding of events if they only use one source to locate their information. Media coverage, for a large number of Americans, dictates what common people know and how they perceive things, simply because most Americans won’t find out about an event if it isn’t covered, or only vaguely mentioned, in a media…
According to the Article, “America’s biased view regarding international news” the article suggests that American news has been “delinquent in international news coverage and in other areas of news as well.” It mentions that during the US war against Iraq, the US news withheld a lot of information that was going on during the war. One incident involved 12 American soldiers being captured and killed on tape in which the American networks were forced not to show the tapes due to requests from the Pentagon. The article suggests that American news broadcasts choose not to show a lot of relevant information and instead choose to air only what the government wanted them to reveal such as things like adding “more emphasis in broadcasting images of soldiers giving children candy [and] Iraqi soldiers happily surrendering to their family.” The article also suggests that the majority of America’s news coverage has been focused on news that mainly American’s want to hear. I can believe this because today mainly all you hear about is news regarding celebrities and news that seems to be to entertaining to the people only. Cirino makes a great point about this in his article when he says how ABC, CBS and NBC chose to show live coverage of the royal wedding and the space launch over more important events that took place during the same time like the Kissinger Trip, the Watergate hearings and the Food and Agricultural Organizational meeting because an event like the royal wedding was considered more entertaining. Alisa Miller, head of Public Radio International, in her discussion in the video “The news about the news,” says the reason why we don’t hear about international news is because “networks have reduced the number of their foreign bureaus by half,” many of which these places are home to more than two billion people. She also found that local news being the main news source for people only accounts…
Apparently, many readers have shifted their news reading habit onto the more convenience Internet and abandoned the traditional newspaper. However, the tragic thing is, “the media is food chain that would fall apart without local newspapers,” said Oliver. He asserted that most news coverages appear on TV and the Internet are cited from printed sources. Thus, when the traditional newspaper outlets suffer from financial downsizing and struggle, there would be downsizing in journalists who will do the actual field research and reporting. As a result, the overall quality of news got affected. Moreover, reporting on Government activities suffered as well. Oliver pointed out that “between 2003 and 2014, number of full-time State House reporter declined by 35%.” Consequently, less State House reporter means the people will be less informed about government activities. David Simon, former Baltimore Sun reporter, referred to this problem as “a great time to be a corrupt politician.” Additionally, John Oliver asserted that since people are growing accustomed to free news on the Internet, they don’t want to pay for it anymore. However, that is what killing independent press. Traditional printed…
As technology has grown to make communication easier and easier, the sheer quantity of media has exploded into the insanely huge network of news options available today. In 1980, nearly 90% of all primetime television watchers were watching the “Big Three” networks of CBS, NBC, and ABC. By 2005, the number had fallen to 32% and is even lower today.1 Long time news agencies like The New York Times and The Atlantic are facing fierce competition from exclusively online media distributors like Buzzfeed and Breitbart. Not to mention the rising amount of people whose primary news sources are noncurated social media websites like Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit.2 With such a fragmented media landscape, it is now more important than ever for the responsible…
In the 1950's, television, having been introduced to political coverage as a new medium, surpassed the dominance of newspaper and radio media as the primary public source of information regarding politics by 1962. Political processes and events of various measures were all soon televised in recognition of overwhelmingly positive public feedback. By the 1970's, live coverage of major political events were as common as seeing grass on the ground.…
Being observed by many viewers gives them a chance to try and convince the audience to take a side on politics. Many news channel companies are told what to say even if some of the employers may disagree. They find ways to get to the public like exaggerating a story and even to lie on purpose. A Well know journalist such as John Stossel and Bernie Goldberg are witnesses of this action. Both worked for recognized news broadcasters and had very different viewpoints on what to say on issues. On, Stossel In The Classroom, Stossel interviews Bernie Goldberg on the subject of; dealing with media bias. In this interview Bernie explained why mainstream media is bias mentioning that the networks need reality checks and how groupthink happens among the information this means there are many people who think alike and believe that what they are writing is true. This “truth” is then filtered through a liberal prism. Goldberg also says that the problem with bias is the networks get to decide what viewers can hear or see on any issue that is being broadcasted. Goldberg and Stossel are both proof of bias in the media existing and once worked for well know news channels and were then fired for being libertarians, wanting to say truth, because in reality that is what a true journalist…
I chose to view CNN and Fox news to investigate the difference between how they relay information to the public. I have read that CNN publishes real news and that Fox is just an informational entertainment station filled with opinions about the news. Immediately it is seen that CNN is very detailed in their broadcasts. Upon watching several stories from both channels, I have found that they basically convey the same exact news stories, just in different ways. CNN was only a 30 minute segment but they thoroughly covered the most important world events. Fox News was an hour long segment and briefed the world news events. This is understandable since Fox news is a local station, they had to spend a majority of the air time on local news. Both stations do however relay the news in a bias manner.…