Preview

Causes of the Streltsy Revolt in 1698

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
425 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Causes of the Streltsy Revolt in 1698
Explain the causes of the Streltsy revolt in 1698

There were many causes leading up to the second Streltsy revolt in 1968. Peter left Russia almost immediately to go on his tour round the Great Embassy having no strong leader, rumors had circulated that he was not who he said he was and when the Streltsy went to Asov they were very far away from Moscow so couldn’t see there families.

Peter left Russia to try and westernize it. He went on the Great Embassy travelling to countries such as England and Holland etc to see how there country was run. In doing so, he left Russia in a state. There was no one running the country and there was no strong leadership or discipline therefore the Streltsy had no threat. In addition, when the Strelty were working in Asov, it was run by westerners something they really did not like, as they didn’t want Russia to become westernized.

Another reason why the Streltsy revolted in 1698 was due to rumors that Peter was actually the Anti-Christ and not himself. People believed that he had been bewitched and that was why he wanted to westernize the country. The Streltsy were not best pleased with this, as they thought there leader was therefore not very strong and couldn’t lead them to victory. Also, rumors were made that Peter died in the west and that Sophia was going to become Tsarina again something that the public and the Streltsy did not want.

Furthermore, this was a key reason that pushed the Streltsy over the edge and to revolt. When in Asov, the Streltsy were far away from Moscow so therefore could not see there families. They were treated very poorly when in Asov also, so they didn’t really see a reason to be there as they couldn’t be with the people they loved the most and were treated horribly and had awful living conditions. Many of them were also not paid at all, leaving the Streltsy angry and unhappy.

In conclusion, I believe that the Streltsy had a right to revolt as they didn’t have a strong leader at the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    War broke out in 1914, with Tsar Nicholas becoming commander-in-chief in 1915, meaning he was away from Petrograd. Not only was this poorly thought out by Nicholas because it gave the people an opportunity to plot against him, but as he was away he left Tsarina (also a German princess), Alexandra, in charge during his absence. Due to the war being against Germany, this made the Russian people nervous and skeptical towards the extreme power she had over them during such a crucial time. Not only were they disgruntled by this, but also Alexandra’s close friendship to Rasputin, a Serbian peasant. This particularly angered the aristocracy and middle classes as they believed they were being led by someone of lower demeanor than that of themselves. This weakened support for the autocratic rule and lost the Tsar many of his supporters, which put him in a vulnerable position in the case of revolutionary upturn. This also could have inspired the peasantry to discover greater aspirations and encourage their belief that they could have greater status which in turn could trigger new revolutionary ideas amongst the lower classes. This demonstrates a link between Nicholas being away in order to commandeer army movement for the war, however it is arguable that it was a lack of authority and respect for the Tsarist regime that caused the change of opinions towards the Tsar amongst all classes, lessening his support and leaving him far more vulnerable in the case of a revolution.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 9th January 1905 150,000 people gathered at 6 assembly points to move in on the Winter Palace. It began as a peaceful protest by disgruntled steel workers and led by a Russian Orthodox priest, Father Gapon. The purpose of the protest was to present a petition to the Tsar to ask for reform. The petition stated “Oh Sire, we working men and inhabitants of St. Petersburg, our wives, our children and our parents, helpless and aged women and men, have come to You our ruler, in search of justice and protection... . Do not refuse to help Your people. Destroy the wall between Yourself and Your people.” The protest was only ever intended as peaceful but instead workers were shot by soldiers who panicked as they had never seen such a large crowd before, killing 200 and injuring 800 more. This meant that the popularity of the Tsar declined even further and with this his authority. So much so that the US ambassador to Russia said “The present ruler has lost absolutely the affection of the Russian people, and whatever the future may have in store for the dynasty, the present Tsar will never again be safe in the midst of his…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another factor that was responsible for the survival of the Tsarist rule was the reluctance of the Peasantry to support opposition. The Peasants were extremely uneducated and they didn’t understand how these policies could change their lives. The Tsar had been the political power since the 13th century so it was all that they knew. They believed that the Tsar was appointed by god so whatever he did, they believed it was for the best. They were fearful that if they joined an opposition group the Tsar would be able to ‘see’ them and…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russian people wanted the government to change. There had been a dramatic increase in the number of radical newspapers. Therefore, people did not want a conservative reformation, but a radical revolution. They also did not trust the current government, because of many reasons, one of them being Rasputin.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many Russians were infuriated by the government because the Tsar did not take action when the country was deteriorating. In addition, he failed to carry his people during the war. With this catastrophe, the Russians demanded for their voices to be heard and for a change in the government and as a result, war occurred within the country. Selfish people, like Nicholas II who kept all the power to himself, often affect others deeply, or foster terrible consequences. For example, one may take all the credit for working on a group project. Other group members will feel injustice and demand for credit to be given to them since they worked as hard as all the others did. Likewise, the Tsar’s decision to maintain power led to citizens rioting and the fall of his power. People should always think about their actions before executing them, or else the aftermath would be…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    absolutism dbq

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cesar Peter the Great was an autocratic ruler whose actions turned Russia into a powerful force and left him labeled as an absolute king. In August 1700 Peter made the decision to declare war in Sweden. He hoped to open a road from Russia to the west by conquest of the Baltic littoral (Doc. 4). Peter the Great sought warm water ports on the Black Sea in order to expand and westernize Russia. He westernized Russia by imitating western customs like having the men’s beards shaved and ordering traditional coats cut. After winning access to the Baltic littoral Peter the Great ordered construction of St. Petersburg as the new capital. St. Petersburg was an important symbol of Peter the Great’s power because it showed how he expanded Russia’s borders which is one of the many reasons he was an absolute ruler.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    russia revision guide

    • 7465 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Explain why Alexander II introduced further reforms following the Emancipation Edict of 1861. (12 marks)…

    • 7465 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter the Great's reign became the turning point for Russia. Peter's Russia was an enormous, cold empire with almost no transportation; no navy, a limited army, very few decent roads, and few warm water ports. Peter hoped to strengthen his country by westernizing it. After a long visit to England and Holland, he returned to Russia convinced that the empire could only become powerful by imitating western successes. The way he would do this was through military reform, reorganization of the bureaucracy, and relocation of the capital.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, Peter the great of Russia wanted to modernized Russia. After sailing throughout Europe, and learning modernized way of life; he came back to Russia. He had a clear idea of what he wanted. He wanted to modernized Russia, Peter wanted to put Russia’s name big. He was aiming for Russia to have power. Peter worked really hard on it, Russia’s progress happened fast. With all the knowledge he had acquired in the western part…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autocratic DBQ

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Autocrat Czar Peter the Great greatly contributed to Russia’s economic weakness. Michael Gibson stated, “Peter signally [noticeably] failed to create the large, thriving middle class that Russia needed” (Doc.6). Peter was known for being poignant and oppressive, which often interfered with pursing this accomplishment. The costly taxes that attended his reforms, also had an effect on this acquisition. Unfortunately, this led to mutiny between citizens; bestowing the complications of this goal.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tsar Peter I, also known as Peter the Great, ruling Russia from 1689 to 1725, implemented major military and domestic reforms that centralized Russia and increased its role in Europe. He centralized his power and revolutionized the role of the servant nobility, creating a vast bureaucracy that would stabilize Russia. He would apply Western principles to his armies and the Russian Cossacks would expand throughout Eurasia. Peter also introduced radical reforms that discouraged the ancient traditions of the Boyars and in establishing St. Petersburg would create a model European city. His great changes would revolutionize Russia and establish the nation as a formidable power in Europe.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    With Russia’s improvements in the military, Peter thought this wasn’t going to be a very hard war, but he was wrong. Sweden didn’t want give up their land, but Peter really wanted the land. He really wanted to get the ports on the Baltic Sea. He also was suspected to have wanted control of Poland, but no one could understand why he wanted control of such a small, barely blossoming nation. Sweden was also Russia’s main threat, and he wanted to stop them from expanding incase of anything they could do to hurt Russia in the future (Hughes 27). A quote by Peter the Great explains his look on how he changes Russia “ I have a great bundle of grain, but I have no mill and there is not enough water close to build one. But there is water enough distance if only I shall have time to build a canal, but the length of my life is uncertain. Therefore I build the mill first and have only given order to build the canal, which will better force my successors to bring water.“ (Woodlock). It didn’t seem to me that Peter the Great gained a lot of land. Russia was already great in size, but he did gain very vital land and ports. Even though Russia was great in size, it lacked major ports and fertile land before Peter expanded. Russia really needed the ports, and Peter obtained them. This directly links to my thesis because he made Russia a major trading and more of an agricultural nation because of the land he…

    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    'Disputes over the succession to the English throne were the most common cause of rebellion in the period from 1485 to 1603.' How far do you agree with this view?…

    • 1214 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Tsar’s remodelled regime was highly opposed by the Russian people, which encouraged opposition towards their regime. The Tsars in general were majorly violent. They implemented this by the use of the Okhrana, which were the Russian secret police. They would fight out against people that did not believe in the Tsarist regime, usually killing them or sending them to Siberia, to where they would have to live in extreme conditions until their death. This meant that people were worried about their freedom in their own country and therefore disliked the leaders of their country, as they did not like the way the Tsars dealt with Russians who broke the law, or the powers they gave the Okhrana. The Tsars also believed they were chosen by God. This was because of the importance of the Christian church in the country, and by the Tsar, and this meant the Tsars believe they were valued highly by God to be born a Tsar. This infuriated the people, because of their strong Christian believes on equality “in God’s image”. This meant the Tsars had opposition from some of the Christian church because of their strong beliefs on why they were in power. The Tsar also had the problem of their knowledge of their people; the fact was they did not have much knowledge of them. The Tsar, because of the poor communication and connections throughout the country…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics