Preview

Causes Of The Decembrist Uprising

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
142 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Causes Of The Decembrist Uprising
The Decembrist uprising was a political revolt in Russia in 1825; led by middle-level army officers who advocated for reforms. These officers arose when Russia had no clear leader as a chance to push Russia away from conservatism. The leaders of the revolt were well-educated bureaucrats fighting for liberalization. They hoped their actions would change Russia in the right direction. However, the revolt failed. The liberal tsar choice, Constantine, was not chosen. The tsar of Russia became Nicolas I, a more conservative individual than his predecessor. One of the factors contributing to its failure was that the followers were illiterate and ill-informed subjects of the authoritarian regime. Additionally, Nicholas I retaliated by repressing political
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How Effective Was Opposition to Governments in Russia Throughout the Period 1855-1964?
    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Effective Was Opposition to Governments in Russia Throughout the Period 1855-1964?

    In 1855, opposition to the Tsarist Government lacked an effective unifying ideology. This remained the case throughout the 1855-1964 period, even once the communists had taken power. A key contributing factor towards this was the lack of unity opposition possessed. Opposition throughout the period came from several sources, however it was dominated by division in opinion and ideology, only fully uniting in the February revolution of 1917 which brought down Nicholas II and the Romanov dynasty. Even then opposition still differed in opinion, however it was unified by one common cause. Throughout the period, the peasantry were providing opposition to Russian Government. However opposition was repeatedly ineffective. The Polish revolt of 1863 during Alexander II's reign was crushed by the army in much the same way as the 1953 East German revolt and the 1956 Hungarian rebellion were crushed under Khrushchev's tenure. A continuing feature throughout the period is the key role which the army played in limiting opposition from the peasantry, with military force frequently being deployed throughout the period. Lenin used it in the Civil War against the Green armies of the peasantry and Stalin used a similar style of brute force in the assault on the peasantry during the collectivisation process, albeit on a much grander scale. The army was very important to the state and their loyalty to Nicholas II during the 1905 revolution was vital in ensuring he was not deposed then instead of twelve years later. The peasantry also lacked a shared ideology and there were several other factors which meant that a full scale peasant revolt was never likely to occur. The demographic and general backwardness of Russia, whose weakness was repeatedly shown by failures in war throughout the period, meant that the peasantry were never going to unify because poor communications and transport links simply…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain How Far Had Russia Progressed From 1855 To 1900?
    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain How Far Had Russia Progressed From 1855 To 1900?

    Many of the opposition fled to other European countries where they continued to plot against the Tsar. This shows how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress politically by exiling all of their possible contenders. This allowed the Tsar to have much more control over Russia much like before Alexander ll reign. The persecution of Jews caused many to join radical parties and organisations. This shows us how there was not even the slightest bit of democracy within Russia, and how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress. Another major problem in Russia was the growing population of peasants. This caused famines within Russia in 1892 and 1893. This famine was a cause of many peasants death which shows how Russia did not have the money or resources to keep up with their growing population. This showed a lack in progress as they could not even support their country’s people with…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Decline and Fall of Romanovs Essay Example
    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Decline and Fall of Romanovs Essay Example

    The autocratic rule that dominated the 300 year old dynasty was also a key factor in its destruction; the social unrest, clamour for political reform, backwardness of the Russian economy and the lack of reforms were all created by the Tsarist regime. The Romanov family ruled with an iron fist and used brutal violence to control its subjects. The repressive policies such as Russification and lack of effective reforms prevented the modernisation of the social and political aspects of the nation. Autocratic rulers promoted the feudalistic style class system which created extreme poverty in the lower classes and gave the people no political power. The introduction of ideas of liberty and an elected government into Russian society, contributed to the creation of revolutionary groups that aimed to overthrow the autocratic rulers and establish more liberal governments. This was first seen with the attempted political coup of the Decembrists that ultimately failed, however they were significant as the introduced a revolutionary trend and liberal views to the people. With the introduction of liberal views and equality, the people began to show their anger and frustration, caused by the Romanovs, through protests and revolutions, of which ultimately ended the Romanov Dynasty. The style of autocratic rulership is a key factor that impacted the fall of the Romanovs primarily because of the social issues it created.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Draft ESSAY
    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Draft ESSAY

    An aspect of the Soviet Union that changed between 1801 and 1939 was the shift of the government from a czar ruled totalitarian government to a more distributed communist government. In March of 1801, Paul I was killed and his son Alexander I of Russia was appointed the ruler. Czar Alexander I was not too harsh of a leader. He led a government that was not too strict upon its people unlike his father. But this changed when the next czar came into power, Nicholas I in 1825. Anybody who was leading or supporting the Decembrist Revolt was executed. Nicholas I undid everything that Alexander I did. He censored media, ran secret police, and exiled 150,000 people. Alexander II was the next one in power who was extremely different from Nicholas I. He freed the serfs but did not let them leave. But he did allot power to the people by creating local councils called Zemstvos to give them control of their land and women the right to vote. Alexander III went back into a strict totalitarian government, censoring media and deploying secret police. Alexander III also wanted all Russian minorities to speak Russian and convert to Russian Orthodox. Russian Jews were specifically targeted; they had to live in ghettos and eventually many Jews fled to the United States. The last of the czars in this time period, Nicholas II, came into power in 1894. A decade after his appointment, over three thousand workers grouped outside the czar’s palace asking for reforms. The czar was not home, but he still did not approve the order to fire at the protestors. In order to bring back his name, he enabled a national assembly called Duma that would allow the people of Russia to elect. As one of his reforms, he gave more land to…

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Role Of Nicholas II In The Downfall Of The Romanov Dynasty
    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Role Of Nicholas II In The Downfall Of The Romanov Dynasty

    Nicholas’ autocratic method of ruling blinded him from the growing needs of Russia, and enforced a level of oppression which only heightened the discontent which led to the March Revolution in 1917. The diplomatic and military failures at war highlighted and showcased these flaws in Nicholas’s autocracy. If Nicholas had been more willing and able to adapt and reform, he could have ensured a gradual transition from an autocratic nation to a constitutional democratic nation, where the Romanov dynasty still existed to this…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Decembrists Revolt
    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Decembrists Revolt

    The Decembrists Rebellion occurred in December of 1825 after the death of Tsar Alexander I. Many Guards’ officers and elitists took the opportunity of Alexander’s death and the confusion of who should inherit the throne and attempted to overthrow the government and create a republic for Russia. Early in Alexander’s reign, he talked a great deal about granting a constitution for Russia and also freeing the serfs. The people of Russia had high hopes for what could be done, but when Alexander refused to give up his power over the Russians, they fought back. After his death, it was uncertain as to which one of Alexander’s brothers became the new tsar of Russia, enabling a rebellion to occur in the confusion. I will argue that the two main events that led to the Decembrists Rebellion was Alexander I’s refusal to grant Russians a constitution and legislature and the confusion as to who became the new tsar after his death.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy
    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anatomy Of Revolution By Crane Brinton
    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Anatomy Of Revolution By Crane Brinton

    In Crane Brintons's book , Anatomy of Revolution, Brinton compares revolution to a fever. He says, “revolution is not a good thing”. When and if it occurs, its like an illness or something to be avoided. However, he goes on to say that fever, and Revolution , in itself is a good thing....for those who survive it.…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How the Russian Revolution Changed Lives in Different Social Groups in Russian Society
    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How the Russian Revolution Changed Lives in Different Social Groups in Russian Society

    The Russian Revolution was supposed to bring about change for the better and be a fantastic new beginning for the troubled state of Russia. However, the concept of a revolution is sometimes a lot more appealing than the actual results of a revolution. Revolutions never occur without hurting a certain group of people, which goes without saying, but they also try to better life for other groups. The Russian Revolution seemed to cause much pain and misery, but the benefits from this revolution appeared to be few if any. Nobles, who once had incredible power and prestige, were then stripped to single room houses and bitter cold because they had to money to buy coal. The working class of society changed from being bitter poor to being moderately impoverished. The Russian Revolution hurt many people and helped few.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    History
    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    History

    I believe that one of the main reasons for the Tsar’s abdication and the collapse of the Romanov rule was the poor state which Russia was in. Russia’s economy was at the worst it had ever been. The economy was far worse than other countries in the War. There were millions of peasants in Russia who had very limited amount of money. With such a limited amount of money, many peasants were unable to buy food, and drink to help them to survive. Peasants believed that they weren’t getting rewarded fairly for the work which they were doing. The upper classes’ benefit greatly due to work done by the Peasants. This created a negative atmosphere around Russia and helped fuel the need for a change. Peasants wanted change; they wanted to be rewarded more for their efforts at work. Russia was in an economic crisis. They had borrowed a huge amount of money from capital countries in order to fuel Russia’s war effort. This was a problem for Russia because they simply didn’t have the money to repay these countries. During the war the country had suffered inflation. Prices had risen dramatically for everyday items such as bread. The country was suffering and the Russian people’s families were dyeing in a war which wasn’t being funded. The Russian people were bound to be discontent and they only had one person to blame and that was the Tsar.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution
    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A Nationwide Revolution

    In 1905 the massacre of innocent people during a peaceful protest outside the winter palace in St Petersburg sparked the start of a nationwide revolution. This mass murder of the innocent protestors became known as ‘Bloody Sunday’. During the revolution strikes occurred across the nation involving more than 400,000 people, peasants attacked and raided the homes of their landlords and the Tsar’s uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei, was assassinated. Although Bloody Sunday was the immediate reason for the revolution, there were several causes which had caused long term grievances towards the Tsarist regime among the population of Russia leading up to 1905. These include the developments in the countryside and the lives of the peasants, the treatment of the inner-city working class and ethnic minorities, the repression and growth of the political opposition and the impact of the Russo Japanese war. Although all these factors contributed to the initiation of a revolution in Russia, I believe that the attitudes towards and treatment of the working class and the peasants was the most prominent reason for the uprising in 1905.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes
    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Russian Revolution Causes

    The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Causes Of Revolutionary Rebellion
    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    Causes Of Revolutionary Rebellion

    Was a form of rebellion from a group called the sons of liberty. They dumped all of the tea into the Boston harbor. It was 92,000 pounds at cost roughly about $1,700,000 in today's value. Th sons of liberty threatened to tar and feather the people who sold the tea. They sent out a slip declaring that who ever sold tea will be punished and if you rip the paper down you will suffer the same fate.…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Decembrist Revolution
    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Decembrist Revolution

    Rebels in this sphere always are opposed to political systems and try to change it with the help of force. One of the most powerful rebels in the Russian history is Decembrists’ secret society. Three thousand Decembrists were trying to stop serfdom while it was becoming more and more popular in Imperial Russia. Decembrists were rich people, officers, and aristocracy. Officers who took part in the War of the Sixth Coalition (1813-1814) learned more about political and social life in the Western countries. Subsequently, the Decembrist revolt was planned because after considering facts about life in Europe, officers became opposed to the political system of their own Empire. Members of the secret society disagreed with Alexander’s I policies about feudalism and people, who worked for lords and could not leave. Those rich people and officers owned lands, had enough money, and power. However, they can be truly called the rebels due to the fact that they became goodwill Ambassadors, who desired to save slaves. As a result, the Decembrist uprising took place in Saint Petersburg, Russian Empire on December 26, 1825. Unfortunately, afterwards, most of them were convicted, sent to Siberia, and later killed. Nevertheless, Decembrists left a huge imprint on the people by showing that fighting for your rights is allowed. Moreover, the moral qualities should remain above…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Causes Of Civil Disobedience
    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Causes Of Civil Disobedience

    When governments continuously disenfranchise their population by lack of economic opportunity or education, they have a right to revolt against their governments. Both violent and nonviolent protests develop under the same conditions and fight for the same causes, therefore, both forms of civil disobedience are justifiable. Historically, marginalized groups, especially black communities in the United States, have experienced terror by the hands of police for centuries. After centuries of harassment, black communities have taken a stance against the injustices committed by those who are sworn in to protect them. Civil disobedience, whether violent or non-violent, is universally a justifiable method to achieve social change.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics