Preview

Causation Theory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
408 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Causation Theory
Philosophy Essay
Explain Aristotle’s causation theory (25)

Aristotle was a Greek philosopher born in BC 384. He introduced the theory of causation, and he used causation to prove that this is the real world through senses, empirical evidence, the prime mover and the 4 causes.

Aristotle believes in two different things which are potentiality and Actuality. Potentiality is something that is possible as everyone has potential but it might not happen, whereas actuality is more realistic. Aristotle first introduced this theory of causality as a way of understanding the human experience of physical nature. There may be multiple causes, but there is one cause which is the final cause, the fundamental source of becoming, which can also be called teleology. Aristotle argued that there is a fundamental source of becoming in everything that everything tends towards some end, or form.

Aristotle proved this is the real world by using the four causes, the first one is the material cause, and this is the material of which it consists. For example, for a table, the material causes would be the wood. The next one is the formal cause, this is its form for i.e. the arrangement of the matter. The next cause is the efficient cause, this is why it has been made or put here on earth. The last cause is the final cause which is its aim or purpose.
Aristotle argued that behind every movement there must be a chain of events that brought about the movement that we see taking place. Aristotle argued that this chain of events must lead back to something which moves but is itself unmoved. This is referred to as the Prime Mover. In Aristotle’s view change is eternal. There cannot have been a first change, because something would have to have happened just before that change which set it off, and this itself would have been a change, and so on. The Prime Mover causes the movement of other things as a final cause. It does not start off the movement by giving it some kind of push, but it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Causation refers to whether the defendant's conduct caused the harm or damage in a crime and it must be established in all result crimes. Causation in criminal liability is divided into factual causation and legal causation. Factual causation is the starting point and consists of applying the 'but for' test. In most cases, factual causation alone will be enough to establish causation. However, in some circumstances it will also be necessary to consider legal causation. Legal causation is when the result must be caused by a culpable act, the act of the defendant may not necessarily need to be the only cause, but must be more than minimal. Factual causation is established by applying the 'but for' test. This asks, 'but for the actions of the defendant, would the result have occurred?' If the answer is yes, the result would have occurred in any circumstance and the defendant is not liable. If no the defendant is liable as it can be said that their action was a factual cause of the result.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summing up from these four points Aristotle came to a conclusion that something must exist which causes the motion and change to occur without being moved itself and the 'uncaused change' must be eternal. Aristotle reached this conclusion by observing that if something can change, it exists in one 'actual' state and has the 'potential' to become another state, for example, an actual child is potentially an adult and a cow in a field is potentially a piece of roast beef. He realised that if things come to existence they must be caused to exist by something else and if something is capable of change that means it is potentially…

    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s beliefs on living a good life start with careful deliberation of the ends and the means. Suppose I want a laptop--the laptop is my goal, purpose, or end. I can do various things to get the laptop--such as earn, steal, borrow, or save. These things are known as my means. The means I decide to use depends on which is more convenient and which leads to the most benefits. Contemplating about the end goal that we are pursuing, and the means we use to reach that goal is practical thinking. However, this type of thinking does not come to fruition, until purposeful action occurs; which is acting with some purpose, goal, or end in mind. This purposeful action is compared differently with thoughtless action, which is an action with no purpose…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the cosmological argument was expressed by Aquinas it was originally introduced and influenced by Aristotle. Aristotle stated ‘the series must start with something since nothing can come from nothing’. This suggests that Aristotle believed that the creation of universe is dependent on a supreme, ultimate primary mover, and is therefore an ‘unmoved mover’. Overall it is the vital cause of the creation of the universe, and is identified in Christianity as God. Aristotle persuaded this using the idea of planet motion which he highlighted as the cause of the change of seasons. For this transformation to happen, it required an ‘unmoved mover’ who would be capable of upholding order of the universe during the alterations. Aquinas used this concept as the labour of God.…

    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle is basically the first principle that focuses on the changeless and the discerning of the self-evidence that form the basis of all knowledge. Aristotle use logic as his main tool for inquiry. He also went further and found that syllogism is the main sequence that all logic thoughts follow. Following his teacher Plato, Aristotle argued that the goodness or a virtue of a thing lay basically in the realization of its specific nature. Aristotelian system majorly it focused on the reality of an individual. Aristotle bring about two important virtues that he said they are of great help to bring about the goodness in an individual,…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle In Blade Runner

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Few have had as much of an influence in as many fields of thought as Aristotle has. Plato’s pupil and consequently Alexander’s mentor, possibly the first polymath, the ripples of the Macedonian’s teachings are still being felt all across the world and formed the basis for Western culture for over a millennia until the arrival of the Scientific Revolution. Following from this, in this essay one will explore into Aristotle’s views on tragedy and final causation and comprehend how these can be applied to the movie Blade Runner. Aristotle, in his Metaphysics, laid the ground down for his theories of substance, of which the most important and influential one would be the final cause, or telos. This theory provided an explanation to the natural position of each…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the cosmological argument was expressed by Aquinas it was originally introduced and influenced by Aristotle. Aristotle stated ‘the series must start with something since nothing can come from nothing’. This suggests that Aristotle believed that the creation of universe is dependent on a supreme, ultimate primary mover, and is therefore an ‘unmoved mover’. Overall it is the vital cause of the creation of the universe, and is identified in Christianity as God. Aristotle persuaded this using the idea of planet motion which he highlighted as the cause of the change of seasons. For this transformation to happen, it required an ‘unmoved mover’ who would be capable of upholding order of the universe during the alterations. Aquinas used this concept as the labour of God.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle Research Paper

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He thought that each thing or event has more than one reason that helps to explain what, why, and where that thing or event is. Greek thinkers from earlier on thought that only one kind of cause could explain itself. Aristotle, on the other hand, said four could. The four causes he spoke of were: material cause, efficient cause, formal cause, and the final cause. For example, he would say that the material cause of a house is the supplies from which it was built. The efficient cause of the house would be the builder. The formal cause would be the shape the builder decided upon. The final cause would be the house's function, to be a home. Aristotle said that something could be understood more when its causes are in specific terms rather than in general ones. Therefore, Aristotle would say that it is more informative to know that a builder built the house rather than to know that it was built by a man. Even further, he would say that it was more informative to know who the builder was rather than just knowing that a builder built…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Title

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causation and Correlation

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are many similarities between causation and correlation but there are also just as many differences. Causation is when one or more factors contribute to the effect. As said in the PowerPoint review, for example, if you switch a light switch on it causes the light turns on. The one factor of flipping the light switch on causes the effect of the light to turn on. Correlation is when two or more factors contribute to one effect. There is two different types of correlation. One type of correlation is high correlation which is when the factors all match up in a row to cause the effect. Low correlation is when the results of one factor are scattered but a pattern can be recognized. The similarities between causation and correlation are that they both require factors that can point to a result. But remember that correlation is not causation. One factor does not mean it will make the effect happen. The difference between causation and correlation is causation has a direct factor that has a direct effect, correlation is many factors can possibly lead to an effect. Also correlation can have lurking factors. For instance, there are more studies being done on lung cancer because of higher rates of lung cancer. Why are there more studies on lung cancer? There are more studies because the increase of tobacco use. The lurking factor is the increase of tobacco use.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Causation and Correlation

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The statement “People with long hair do better on audio memory tests” is in fact a correlation, it is not a very strong correlation but it is indeed one.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle was a Greek philosopher who existed in the 300 BC period. Aristotle’s philosophy was more of a systematic concept of logic. His main objective was to come up with a process of reasoning that would help man learn every possible thing about…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotele V Sartre

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Let’s begin with discussing human nature. The concept itself is believed to have originated with Greek philosophers such as Socrates and Plato who first introduced the idea of ‘forms’ (by form they referred to the essences of all objects, the very thing that defines them, humans included, and without which the object in question would and could not be what it is) and linked that concept to human nature (nature being a form of the human). This pre-existing nature, based on predetermined qualities and characteristic which have always existed as forms or concepts independently of humans, were considered of higher, divine nature and responsible for leading and guiding humans to form their character and become the person they become. Aristotle believed that this nature was something that all men possessed already at the time of their birth and that would help them in life to follow their true path and purpose. Aristotle believed in fact in a grander scheme of things, in a universal plan of which humans are part of.…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    view, the ends of things are seen as providing the meaning for all that has…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle believes that ethics originate from real world experiences, that there is not a set of rules to apply to life that will mold us into ethical beings, but rather the “individual exists in relationship with others” (Brannigan, 2005:61). Thus, ethics is based upon how the individuals relate to each other and the cultivation of good character. How do we cultivate good character? Aristotle states we must fulfill our human nature. He tells us that all things existing in nature have their own specific end purpose, which he refers to as telos (Greek term for specific end). For example, an apple seed’s telos would be to grow into an apple tree and produce apples. Aristotle tells us that only humans are capable of using logos as a form of thought, and that all humans are, by nature, rational animals. Therefore, the human’s end purpose is to “fulfill our human nature as rational animals by properly exercising our reason” and he also asserts that, “only in this way can we be genuinely happy” (Brannigan, 2005:62).…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics