Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Cattle Ranching and It’s Increasing Affect on Deforestation

Good Essays
806 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cattle Ranching and It’s Increasing Affect on Deforestation
There is More to Your Burger Than Meats The Eye:
Cattle Ranching and It’s Increasing Affect on Deforestation

One may not look at the hamburger in their hands and automatically think, “What was done to our environment in order to make this delicious piece of meat?” but it really is a question that any meat consumer should consider. Believe it or not, eating that one hamburger indirectly causes the rate of deforestation to increase every single day! It actually is quite simple how this hamburger affects both our environment and agriculture. In order for meat industries to be able to distribute their products to consumers, they need the cattle to be raised, fed, and grown and of course, cattle ranchers need a place to raise their cattle. In order for these ranchers to have space for the cattle to do so, trees are actually being cut down to make room for these pastures. In turn, one of the largest impacts that the meat industry has on our environment is its contribution to the ever-increasing rise of deforestation all over the world. The thing that most people do not realize is that the land being used to raise the meat that they consume, was once a flourishing forest. This process of deforestation starts when the land inside a forest is cut through to make a reasonable enough size path for a road to reside. Once the area for the road is cleared, commercial farmers will move in and start to grow crops. The problem with this is that rainforest soil is not efficient enough to handle crops that need sustainable soil. Needless to say, the crops do not endure for more than two to three years. More often than not, ranchers use the remnants of these now beaten down crops and grassy fields for their cattle to graze. There are many negative impacts caused by this deforestation and pasture conversion. With every tree cut down and cleared away, carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are emitted into our atmosphere and pollute the air. The trees act as a sort of “canopy” and absorb much of the carbon to convert into woody tissue. Without having trees as tools of absorption, the carbon instead invades the air in which we breathe. Along with deforestation, the actual production of the aforementioned farming and meat industry emits many harmful chemicals into our world. According to Environmental Defense, if every American skipped one meal of chicken per week and substituted vegetarian foods instead, the carbon dioxide savings would be the same as taking more than a half-million cars off U.S. roads. (Goveg.com). This goes hand in hand with deforestation because the production, from the cutting down of the trees and the processing that must occur, there are many harmful gases, like carbon dioxide, being emitted into the air.
Soil degradation is also an outcome of this deforestation caused by the need for grazing land. The soil in the rainforests is very fragile. The different nutrients that the soil gains come from fallen leaves and branches from the trees. The trees also help to protect the soil from the radiating sun and any torrential rain. Native grasses provide few nutrients and little protection for the soil and the overgrazing actually accelerates the nutrient loss and erosion. The worst part is that livestock production compounds this damage, making it irreversible. To put things even more into perspective, here is another frightening fact: it only takes between five to ten years for the overgrazing and nutrient loss caused by cattle and deforestation to turn the rainforest land into an eroded wasteland. An area of rainforest the size of seven football fields is destroyed every minute to make room for grazing cattle (Goveg.com). In contrast to those who eat meat, vegetarians save one acre of trees every year by eating a meat-free diet, thereby saving the need to cut down the trees for grazing purposes (Goveg.com). This is the true because if there is a decrease in the demand for meat, then there is a decrease in the amount trees being cut down since fewer cattle will need room to graze.
The next time someone picks up a burger, I suggest you say to them, “I bet you didn’t know by eating that burger you are also killing acres of trees….”

Works Cited

Achor, Amy Blount. Animal Rights: A Beginner’s Guide. Ohio: WriteWare, Inc., 1996.
Brown, Michael L. “Limiting Corrupt Incentives in a Global REDD Regime.” Ecology Law Quarterly (2010): 237-267.
“Cattle Ranching and Deforestation.” Live Stock Policy Brief. Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations. 13 Sept. 2010
“Eating For Life.”GoVeg.com: Vegetarian and Vegan Information. PETA. Web. 8 Apr.
2010. .
Fox, Michael Allen. “Vegetarianism and Planetary Health.” Ethics and Environment
(2000):163-174.

Cited: Achor, Amy Blount. Animal Rights: A Beginner’s Guide. Ohio: WriteWare, Inc., 1996. Brown, Michael L. “Limiting Corrupt Incentives in a Global REDD Regime.” Ecology Law Quarterly (2010): 237-267. “Cattle Ranching and Deforestation.” Live Stock Policy Brief. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 13 Sept. 2010 “Eating For Life.”GoVeg.com: Vegetarian and Vegan Information. PETA. Web. 8 Apr. 2010. . Fox, Michael Allen. “Vegetarianism and Planetary Health.” Ethics and Environment (2000):163-174.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    THESIS: “Today the most serious environmental harm associated with the cattle industry takes place on the feedlot.” (70).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Only Way to Have a Cow" by Bill McKibben tries to inform humans to decrease the intake of meat eating and how this habit could harm our environment. Cow would release harmful substance like methane when they fart or belch. These actions could actually lead to a bigger problem, global warming. Turning into vegans could make environment more friendly. Eating grass fed cows are more healthy that eating corn fed cows. However another problem forms, grass fed cows are more expensive then corn fed grass which causes people with low incomes couldn't afford to eat…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The biggest reason for deforestation in the Amazon is the clearing of rainforest lands for cattle pastures. Today, Brazil is the world 's largest exporter and producer of beef. (Butler, “Deforestation in the Amazon”) So raising cattle is understandably a big deal for Brazil. A developing country like Brazil is always looking for new ways to advance and to generate more and more income for their country. It is only logical for them to want to keep expanding their beef production to better develop their country. This leads them to look to the…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buying any meat, dairy, and egg products is buying from the same four large companies that run the meat industry in America today. By using the Confined/Concentrated Animal Feeding Systems or CAFOs, these companies have made it to the top of the meat industry. CAFOs systems are unethical and pose a huge risk to our environment and our own health. Although these animals are being raised to be consumed does not mean they should live in small pins with no exercise, stand in their own feces, and be pumped with growth hormones and antibiotics. CAFO systems also have a huge impact on our environment, the CAFO systems have a vast amount of waste produced on small amounts of farmlands that cannot decompose properly. Causing farmers to dispose of the…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Too much of a good thing can be bad for us as human beings and the environment. We like to buy the biggest and best of everything. This has turned from buying big cars and big stereos to buying larger hamburgers and steaks. We as a nation have gone from having meat as a delicacy and eating it on occasion to most people eating only meat during every meal. We need to go back to eating more fruits and vegetables and less meat. We also need to find different ways to produce meat in ways that are safer for the animals and the environment.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many misconceptions regarding deforestation and pollution. Beef cattle are often the last that comes to your mind.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eric Schlosser’s book Fast Food Nation, Michael Moss’ article The Burger That Shattered Her Life and the documentary Food Inc. all come together to inform people on the facts about the food industry’s contamination issue. The food industry has many slaughterhouses and meat packing industries in the United States. People never think about where there meat has come from, how it is prepared, stored, or made. Unfortunately, the sanitation of our meat from where it starts to when we eat it is appalling. Many farms now raise livestock in mass groups in dirty environments, they gather into unsanitary slaughterhouses to be killed with unsanitary utensils, methods, and machinery, the meat gets combined with other meat in filthy meat packing industries, and is then packed away for us to eat. Farms should raise cows how they used to be raised, consumers…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sustainability Of CAFO

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    CAFO’s are undoubtedly less earth friendly than methods of traditional farming in more ways than one; the transport they require is a hefty waste of fossil fuels and the waste that these plants produce can cause massive environmental issues are just the tip of the iceberg. Another issue that can plague large CAFO’s is the threat of bacteria. Living conditions and animal health in this type of environment is not monitored very closely, which can lead to weakened animal immune systems, and eventually to risks for consumers of these meat products. Aside from health drawbacks, people also seem to be weary of the societal impacts of large scale agriculture. Studies have shown that increasing specialized farming in large communities has consistently led to a decrease in population, employment and income. In favour of the industrial method, some argue it is cheaper and more efficient to feed America’s appetite this way. What we don’t see are the hidden costs to the heavily manufactured, seemingly cheaper options: subsidies that our tax dollars account…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They also shape the landscape for better production of food. These interactions with the surrounding area can lead to environmental problems. The consequences can also range from taking over land leading to deforestation and change of climate patterns from human interactions on the…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The author starts off strong with logos, which appeals to logic. In response to the comments about animals in our food production, she writes, “the studies show only that the prevailing methods of producing meat — that is, crowding animals together in factory farms, storing their waste in giant lagoons and cutting down forests to grow crops to feed them — cause substantial greenhouse gases” (Niman), meaning that small farms and farms can cut down on greenhouse gases if, “they keep their animals outdoors on pasture and make little use of machinery.” (Niman) She points out, “In contrast to traditional farms, industrial livestock and poultry facilities keep animals in buildings with mechanized systems for feeding, lighting, sewage flushing, ventilation, heating and cooling, all of which generate emissions,” which are what most statistics pointing the guilt finger at meat production are referring to. The author, being a “rancher…who raises cattle, goats and turkeys the traditional way (on grass)” (Niman), neatly brushes off relations of “meat (especially beef) is closely linked to global warming” (Niman), to her own farm. Meat and dairy would certainly win the greenhouse gas competition if not…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question that arose was if a high meat diet is a factor in global warming? Global warming is causing largely by too much carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere. This CO2 is acting like a cover in the atmosphere inclosing the heat and this is warming the earth. The burning down of thousands of acres (deforestation) to make place to raise crops and cattle is one of the contributors to global warming. According to the Union of Concern Scientists "Any action to reduce or eliminate the release of heat-trapping gases to the atmosphere helps slow the rate of warming"(Ultimate Hot Map, 2011). Deforestation discharges hundreds of thousands of tons of carbon into the atmosphere sharing the blame on global warming. Reforestation won't totally fix the problem causing the global warming. But the more trees the earth has the lower the CO2 and the higher oxygen it will…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Agriculture Satire

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal agriculture is ruining our planet. Scientists say that animal agriculture is responsible for more than 18 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions, which is more than the combined exhaust gases from all transportation in the world. Therefore, this means that riding your bike, walking or taking the bus will not help if you want to be kind to our earth. Although I do understand that some people might enjoy eating meat and that they might not feel complete without it the consequences of it has no mercy.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal agriculture has an impact impact on the environment. It is estimated it accounts for 75% of greenhouse gas emissions in the developing world(walsh). About two thirds of agricultural land is used to feed livestock(Brooks). This is pretty bad I mean we could be using this land to feed the world; but instead we are using it for what? Bacon.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consuming meat is a potential threat to the environment because the modern way of raising livestock is polluting the community. Today’s major animal agriculture involves breeding a large number of animals by confining them in small and narrow spaces so that the 6 billion people on the earth can be assured to have sufficient meat supply. However, it seems perfect animal agriculture project has brought out severe problems. In the article “Factory Farms,” the author Bernard Rollin mentions that the industrialized agriculture causes the side effects such as water and air pollution, animal flesh quality and waste dispose treatment etc. This made me think of the movie called Fresh. It talks about the process of animal breeding in the factory farm. I was surprised when I was watching the scene of chicken feedlot, where there were approximately thousands of baby chickens enclosed in a small room. These chickens were thrown to the ground and the feather and waste were all everywhere. The air inside the room is blurry and the workers have to wear breathing mask while working. Virtually, the waste mix with the dusk that generated by animal’s daily activity causes air pollution, and the air pollutants results in having respiration disease such as asthma. Once the air pollutants reach to high concentration, it spreads out to nearby community, and people who live around that area would suffer from it. As a consequence, our environment is being affected by the process of producing meat. Therefore, eating less animal flesh is equal to own a healthier environment.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics