Categorical Imperative Research Paper
Categorical Imperative
The basis of Categorical Imperative has dominated the study of human reasoning and morality. This idea behind Categorical Imperative can be described as the root principal or morality according to Immanuel Kant. Philosophers define human reasoning as a process of guidance of symbols and sentences, while morality is founded on the principles of right and wrong decisions that are accepted by an individual. Kant believed that the only thing of crucial moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality “The good will is not good because of what it affects or accomplishes or because of it’s adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it’s willing, i.e., it is good of itself”. According to Kant, a will that is good is one that is acting by doing the right thing solely …show more content…
This idea may be a key to understanding the sense in which humanity is supposed to be an end in itself. In the case of the formula of universal law, we see the formation of moral law (i.e. suicide bad, etc). The case of the formula of humanity, we see the utility in the propagation of private ends (i.e. treat people as an end but never as a means). The formula of the kingdom of ends provides an environment for those precepts to be.
A Moral Human Race
Throughout Kant’s, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, some questionable ideas are portrayed. These ideas conflict with the present views of most people living today. In many ways Kant’s beliefs are tested and compared to other similar ideas while his work is still relevant today in making ethical decisions. All the while not involving a religious stand point onto the deliberative decisions making process, Kant illustrates the all too familiar ‘Golden Rule’ through Categorical Imperative, the basis of a moral human
The basis of Categorical Imperative has dominated the study of human reasoning and morality. This idea behind Categorical Imperative can be described as the root principal or morality according to Immanuel Kant. Philosophers define human reasoning as a process of guidance of symbols and sentences, while morality is founded on the principles of right and wrong decisions that are accepted by an individual. Kant believed that the only thing of crucial moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality “The good will is not good because of what it affects or accomplishes or because of it’s adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it’s willing, i.e., it is good of itself”. According to Kant, a will that is good is one that is acting by doing the right thing solely …show more content…
This idea may be a key to understanding the sense in which humanity is supposed to be an end in itself. In the case of the formula of universal law, we see the formation of moral law (i.e. suicide bad, etc). The case of the formula of humanity, we see the utility in the propagation of private ends (i.e. treat people as an end but never as a means). The formula of the kingdom of ends provides an environment for those precepts to be.
A Moral Human Race
Throughout Kant’s, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, some questionable ideas are portrayed. These ideas conflict with the present views of most people living today. In many ways Kant’s beliefs are tested and compared to other similar ideas while his work is still relevant today in making ethical decisions. All the while not involving a religious stand point onto the deliberative decisions making process, Kant illustrates the all too familiar ‘Golden Rule’ through Categorical Imperative, the basis of a moral human