Preview

Castle Doctrine Thesis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1142 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Castle Doctrine Thesis
Thesis
This paper will discuss the stand your ground laws and also the castle doctrine. These laws play a big role in today’s society and also, at times create a blurry line in terms of self defense. This can be seen in the case of Trayvon martin and George Zimmerman. This was when an unarmed black teen by the name of Trayvon Martin, was shot and killed by George Zimmerman, the unofficial neighborhood watch man. Zimmerman stated that the death occurred due to self defense and that the case fell under the stand your ground law. The Jury’s verdict then acquitted Zimmerman of the charge of second degree murder. This high profile case caused much controversy and reawakened the question of what is self-defense and what is murder. Furthermore this paper will discuss whether or not these laws just and fair or are a license to kill.
What is the Castle doctrine and where it is applied:
The Castle Doctrine is a law that allows a person to attack an intruder, under certain circumstances inside their homes. The person is protected from the
…show more content…
States can be considered to have strong or soft castle laws. For example, in the state of Florida the Castle Doctrine can apply to any dwelling. The dwelling being protected does not need to have a roof; it can be moving or immobile and can be as temporary as a tent. In addition, the state of Texas allows citizens to protect their homes, car, and place of business or employment by using lethal or non lethal force (guns). This can occur when the intruder has unlawfully entered or is attempting to enter. The intruder must be using force (Rape, Robbery). The person is not required to retreat. These two states are considered to have strong Castle Doctrine Laws. An example of a state with a soft castle doctrine law is the state of New York. In New York you cannot use deadly force if you know you can retreat from the situation and can only used deadly force if you did not start the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Abolish Stand Your Ground

    • 1178 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the United States, stand-your-ground law states that an individual has no duty to retreat from any place they have lawful right to be and may use any level of force, including lethal, if they reasonably believe they face an imminent and immediate threat of serious bodily harm or death. Anyone that’s being violated or assaulted against their will and is threatened for their life can use this law. In order to present a case in court one must you have to be able to present a strong case and have evidence to defend yourself. Not all states use or possess this law, but there are a lot that do. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia are all the states that have the law in their state. There are a lot of states that use the law, but Florida has recently had the most problems occur with this law. Between the Trayvon Martin trial and Jordan Davis trial both instances where “stand your ground” took place.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stand your ground laws originated from the general right to self defense, rooted in both natural law and the constitution” (fair). For example the laws on self defense vary from state to state, but in general there allowed to use reasonable physical force to protect there self from imminent or immediate physical injury, you can only use that amount of force that’s necessary to stop the threat of harm. For example, if you get into an arguement with someone and the other person lunges at one or threatens to punch one, they can protect yourself by fighting back. We want less people hurt or…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I dissaree with the stand your ground law, becaues of the case of trayvon Martin. George Zimmerman says Trayvon Martin attacked him and shot him from self-defence( trayvon was an unarmed man). The Stand Your Ground Law states that if you are attacked or feel like your in danger, you had the right to kill that person.This is like saying if some one almost pushed me off the edge of a clif while running,i have the right to push them off that same clif leaving them dead. Although the stand your ground law help people defend them selves in life thretining situations, it gives a murderer a reason to kill innocent people.On the day trayvon martin died, he was on the phone with his girlfriend. she clames he saw a man following him and started to run. She also says he got away form a man,who turn out to be Zimmerman, but only temporaily Eventruly he stoped running, because he was close to the house he was staying in. when Zimmerman got closer to Trayvon, stated the girlfriend, Travon called out, "Why you following me for?" "I hear this man, like this old man, say, 'What are you doing around here?' " the girl said. The girl said she called out to Martin, asking what was happening, but he didn't answer. The next thing she heard was a bumping sound, followed by what might have been a scuffle. "I could hear it a little bit, 'Get off, get off,' then the phone just hung up," the girl said. This is some evidence that proves Zimmerman is guilty.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Trayvon Martin Case

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    February 26, 2012 marked the day that the innocent minor, Trayvon Martin, was shot to his death in a gated neighborhood in Sanford, Florida. The shooter, George Zimmerman, still has not faced any serious consequence for the murder. Many people in the Sanford community, and even around the country, believe that there is no question that Zimmerman should be convicted and sent to jail, but, unfortunately, it is not up to the people; it is up to the justice system. With the consideration of Florida’s state laws, this is a difficult case to foresee the outcome of George Zimmerman’s conviction and prosecution.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trayvon Martin Case Study

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With a controversial topic at hand, the case of Trayvon Martin and the real facts as to what happened the night he was shot come to conclusion. The Trayvon Martin Tragedy, exists as the undigestable story of an adolescent African American male who is shot upon by a neighborhood watch captin by the name of Geroge Zimmerman with nothing to defend himself but a bag of Skittles, an Arizona Iced Tea, and a cell phone. With factual eveidence, witnesses, and 911 phone call recordings we uncover wether Zimmerman shot Martin as anything but self defense. Due to the fact that Trayvon was walking back to his home while on the phone with his girlfriend, he wasn’t stirring up any causes for trouble. The act of his suspiousness was merely upon judgement and race. Zimmerman was not truthful in his statements during the trial and begins to show several slip ups in evidence and reasonable explanations.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Miranda Warning is intended to protect the guilty as well as the innocent and should be protected at all costs. Without the law, many suspects may be treated unfairly. It is a necessary safeguard. Its intentions were to give suspects an informed choice between their freedom of speech, their right not to speak, but be silent, and the prevent statements being given in a non-voluntary nature. Since the law was imposed police policies and procedures were promoted and enforced that effectively imposed safeguards throughout law enforcement agencies. However, with any law there is also discourse. In this essay I plan to give a brief summary of Miranda and discuss the advantages and disadvantages that Miranda provides for suspects and law enforcement officials.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tennessee statute at the time stated that the use of deadly force was acceptable, which was backed up by the department policy, in the event of successfully preventing the escape a suspect. The statute warranted the use of deadly force was acceptable if the defendant attempted to flee or forcibly resist an imminent arrest. The department policy was even more restrictive, however still allowed the use of deadly force was warranted in the event of a burglary. .…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The extent to which the Second Amendment applies and the particular laws that go hand in hand with it have long been contested by Americans. One of the more recent debates regarding it involves the Stand Your Ground laws. These laws outline that citizens have “No duty to retreat from the situation before resorting to deadly force; not limited to your property (home, office, etc.)” (“States That Have” Par. 3). These laws have been fiercely contested primarily due to the incident involving George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin in the February of 2012. People are often very stubborn regarding such issues, however, in her article “There is No Need to Change Stand Your Ground Laws” (published November 13, 2012 in the Palm Beach Post), Dara Kam uses her experience covering political issues along with a very straight forward…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Castle Doctrine is a double edge sword because it gives home owner way to protect their property but we that said in the case of Trayvon Martin who was shot and killed by a neighborhood watch should have never happen the kid was not a treat to any property at the time of the murder. I do believe that if someone is in your house and it becomes apparent that they will hurt you and your family you have the right to protect your house but if the person is walking away from your property and away from you it should be illegal to shoot and killed the person. If a person is running away from you it is not self-defense if you shoot someone in the back is not self-defense.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If nothing else, young George Stinney, accused and convicted of killing two young girls and executed at age 14 by the state of South Carolina in 1944, is the poster child for why now an appeal is automatic in a Capital Murder case where execution is a possible sentence. Secondly, Stinney’s death makes a case for why the Supreme Court has ruled that children and the mentally deficient should not be subjected to the death penalty – they cannot adequately stand-up for themselves against law enforcement and the criminal justice system. Thirdly, Stinney’s 3 hour trial (and guilty verdict handed-down in only 10 minutes by an all-white jury) is an illustration of why juries should be made-up of a group of the defendant’s peers – and fourthly, the…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Castle Doctrine

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A castle doctrine (also known as a Castle Law or a Defense of Habitation Law) is an American legal doctrine that designates a person's abode (or, in some states, any place legally occupied, such as a car or place of work) as a place in which the person has certain protections and immunities and may in certain circumstances attack an intruder without becoming liable to prosecution. Typically deadly force is considered justified, and a defense of justifiable homicide applicable, in cases “when the actor reasonably fears imminent peril of death or serious bodily harm to himself or another”. The doctrine is not a defined law that can be invoked, but a set of principles which is incorporated in some form in the law of most states. The term derives from the historic English common law dictum that “an Englishman's home is his castle”. Each state differs in the way it incorporates the castle doctrine into its laws, what premises are covered (abode only, or other places too), what degree of retreat or non-deadly resistance is required before deadly force can be used, etc.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In today’s world there are many disputes about the old and some new changes to the “Stand Your Ground” laws. Some believe that these laws are crazy and that a society like ours should not need them and that if you shot someone outside your home that it is a crime and need to be sentenced to prison some other form of punishment. And then there are those who believe that the changes have brought a better more positive side to the community and that the laws should be engorged.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    This essay will attempt to clarify when it is legal to defend yourself and when defending yourself becomes criminal behavior. There is some confusion on this subject. The United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit addressed this issue in the case United States v. Thomas. The defendant stated he shot and killed a man in self-defense while attempting to rob him so therefore in the defendant’s mind he cannot be charged with murder. The content of this essay will include discussion on what three elements constitute a criminal act and the protections of the Second and the Fourteenth Amendments. In conclusion, the essay will address the issue of the logic behind the statement…

    • 3363 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Understanding the law is very important when assessing the use of force for personal protection. In the case of People v. McManus it was stated that “Defense of oneself or one 's relations, deemed a natural, inalienable right at common law, justified the use of force, making even homicide lawful” (People, 1986). If one is unsure of the local law in relation to force they should leave it to the authorities. Self-defense of one’s self against an attack…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When is it acceptable to protect yourself? Is it when you're nearly beaten to death? Or a more suitable question would be does self defense only apply to certain individuals? Self defense is one of the biggest motives that individuals acclaim to while undergoing criminal court cases. This law specifically states that you are entitled to defend yourself when someone provokes you or pursue you in a violent manner. Although I am favorable of this law, I passionately disagree with certain circumstances where this law has been scene as obscure.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays