Preview

Castle Doctrine Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
728 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Castle Doctrine Theory
Castle Doctrine

Arising as a common law theory, the Castle Doctrine established the understanding that a citizen has the right to defend their legal place of residence with the use of up to deadly force against an intruder. If the use of force rather than fleeing was reasonable, the citizen is free from prosecution since the force was utilized in a self-defense manner. Therefore, the doctrine was meant to deter crime and provide public safety through empowering citizens to protect their life and property. “Castle doctrine laws support, and, by their extension serve to promote, the defensive use of firearms by private citizens” (Paquette-Boots, Bihari & Elliott, 2009). For this reason, pro-gun control advocates see the Castle Doctrine and the expanded lethal self-defense rights as detrimental towards safety, particularly in high crime and urban …show more content…
This is because life is precious and an integral part of the relationship between God and humanity since we are made in His image. “Whoever shed the blood of man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image” (Genesis 9:6, English Standard Version). However, the Word of God does not prohibit the use of violence in cases of self-defense. “If a thief is found breaking in and is struck so that he dies, there shall be no bloodguilt for him” (English Standard Version). Therefore, one can reconcile murder and self- defense by understanding the concept of self-defense as a God commanded obligation to protect one’s life and the life of others through a proportional punishment. In contrast, murder is allowing the heart to be swayed towards sin and an act against the divine image of God. “Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord” (Romans 12:19, English Standard Version). For this reason, the punishment for murder is capital
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Castle Doctrine Research Paper
    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page

    Castle Doctrine Research Paper

    I believe that Castle Doctrine is a double edge sword because it gives home owner way to protect their property but we that said in the case of Trayvon Martin who was shot and killed by a neighborhood watch should have never happen the kid was not a treat to any property at the time of the murder. I do believe that if someone is in your house and it becomes apparent that they will hurt you and your family you have the right to protect your house but if the person is walking away from your property and away from you it should be illegal to shoot and killed the person. If a person is running away from you it is not self-defense if you shoot someone in the back is not self-defense.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Execution Moratorium In Illinois: Killing The Innocent
    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Execution Moratorium In Illinois: Killing The Innocent

    Genesis 9:6: "Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man." They believe that capital punishment was created by God and man didn't have the right to oppose. However, the bible also talks about an eye for an eye. This proverb means one cannot get even with one who harmed them. The government supports killing a murderer as a punishment for him committing murder. It is a double standard and ineffective. (Vollum, S., Longmire, D. R., & Buffington-Vollum, J)…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Weapon Control
    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Weapon Control

    Americans that support strict weapon control have achieved the conclusion that this change guarantees the benefit of the states to claim guns. Firearm control laws specifically damage this privilege and accordingly should not be under thought. Regardless of the possibility that the issue is ignored, weapon control advocates express that with a specific end goal to diminish gun related viciousness, firearm control laws must be executed to expel the savagery created by guns. In spite of the fact that this may appear to be sensible, the outcomes of such laws are unexpectedly counterproductive; they worsen the issue as opposed to settling it. Other than the way that the Constitution ensures its residents the privilege to remain battle ready, possibly…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Research Paper
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gun Control Research Paper

    Throughout the long and storied history of the United States of America, the right to own, bear and keep firearms, along with the right to defend oneself, is as central to the American identity as apple pie. However, unlike American cuisine, the issue of “gun politics” (as many academics and pundits call the issue) or gun control in the United States is extremely polarizing. During the last couple decades, the debate over gun control has been characterized by a stalemate between the individual's right to own firearms protected by the Constitution and the duty of government to prevent crime and maintain order. Stated differently, the current debate surrounding the right to bear and keep firearms within…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Policy Paper
    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gun Control Policy Paper

    The fact that over 40% of households in the United States own a gun is terrifying. Despite the fact that owning a gun for the self-defense purpose is a human right, a lot of speculations and debate on the same is still contentious. Although a lot of efforts have previously been dedicated to ensuring policies are put in place, the problem related to the problem still exists. For many years, the congress has tried to institute gun control policies that do not entitle criminals to own guns in vain. In this respect, a need for effective gun licensing and ownership regulations is required.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Outline
    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gun Control Outline

    Possible introduction - A lot of questions were raised about the effects of everyone being allowed to carry guns. The rise of crime and murder are certain areas to think about being most impacted by the state carrying side arms. We also need to ask ourselves, how often are guns used for protection? Is the law helping citizens protect their family or is the law just making it easier to commit murder?…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Just Take Away Their Guns
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Just Take Away Their Guns

    In the essay “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson argues that restraining people from legally purchasing firearms do not have any effect on the illegal use of guns. About two-hundred million citizens privately own a gun and one-third of that two-hundred million own a hand gun. Only two percent of the citizens are using them in unlawful acts. Most guns are either stolen or borrowed, or privately purchased, which are rarely affected by gun laws. Any decrease in ammunition stock would reduce the right for law abiding citizens to defend themselves. Guns are fired about a million times a year out of self-defense. The number of people who defend themselves outnumbers the amount of arrests for crimes committed.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Right to Bear Arms
    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Right to Bear Arms

    “We should not blame a gun itself for any crime or any acts of violence, any more than we can blame a pen for misspelling a word.” Proven by this statement belonging to Robert Bennett but even more notably by the malevolence of the world’s past, time after time it has been proven that guns do not kill people; in fact it is the people themselves that do. Remaining stationary and innocuous until a force and a finger consciously pulls the trigger, a gun is and will always remain an inanimate object that only becomes dangerous when a deranged or wicked mind has willed it do so. As the controversy surrounding the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights - a proclamation of the ability for Americans to bear arms - escalates, gun ownership and the interpretation of US founding documents is put into question as arguments support the counterpoint that infringing said right could finally reduce gun violence to save the lives of countless individuals. Due to the evidence provided by the true intentions of the Founders to open the citizens’ eyes to the dangers of oppressive government, climbing crime rates, and the importance of the Second Amendment as a means of preserving moral duty, history itself reveals that stripping Americans of the right to bear arms inevitably rids them of their life and liberty.…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Laws
    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gun Control Laws

    David Hemenway, director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center, brings up many valid points that prove loose gun control laws are not favorable. David writes “Guns are not used millions of times each year in self-defense (Hemenway 1). This is absolutely true because some people use firearms for recreational uses. Two more important facts are stated on the Harvard Injury Control Research Center by David Hemenway. He writes “Criminals who are shot are typically victims of crime” (Hemenway 1). He is trying to say that criminals are not often shot by law abiding citizens but other criminals. He explains that “Guns in the home are used more often to intimidate intimates than to thwart crime” (Hemenway 1). This can be a bad use for a gun and furthermore strengthens the case that some citizens should not be allowed to own guns. Patrick J. Charles has written and edited many books on the Second Amendment which validates his knowledge about the right to bear arms. Patrick explained that in England in the seventeenth and eighteenth century, ““Such proposals failed, however, because they would “arm the mob” and thus were considered “not very safe for any government”” (Charles 1). Essentially, he is explaining that the England government gave too much power to the people by giving the people guns. The England government did not want the people to overthrow the government so they…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control
    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gun Control

    For many years the controversial topic of gun control has sparked countless passionate debates. The arguments posed in these debates vary widely concerning the possible solutions to solving the problem of violent crime due to the possession of firearms. This paper introduces three different views concerning gun control. The first illustrates the freedom to own firearms. The second view advocates the complete restriction of firearms owned by citizens, and the last one presents a modified freedom of possessing firearms. Each faction seeks to have its position supported by national legislation.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Anti Gun Control
    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti Gun Control

    Statistics show that there are, by far, more people defending themselves with gun use than there are people committing crimes with the use of guns. Per 100,000 people only 10.22 of them have committed a crimes where a gun was involved. (Lott 12) in the United States there are 80,000 to 82,000 defensive uses of guns during assaults, robberies and household burglaries. Out of the 1,000,000 times guns are used for defensive reasons in the world 400,000 of theses cases have saved lives or prevented lives from being taken. (Lott 2) The use of guns by law-abiding citizens may create a positive externality for others. Therefore,…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gun Laws Argumentative Essay
    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gun Laws Argumentative Essay

    Each year, a number of people die from guns. The popular saying is “guns do not kill people, people kill people” which is true; however, guns are used to aid in violence and many would argue that eliminating guns through stricter laws would decrease violence. As the number of gun owners in the world increases the government and its citizens would benefit from implementing stricter regulations regarding the safe keeping of guns in the home. The lack of gun safety results in the ability to access these guns with distressing outcomes. While many individuals argue that guns need to be restricted within the United States, the real argument is for allowing the Constitutional right to bear arms while implementing stricter laws to ensure these firearms do not fall within the wrong hands.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Thesis Statement
    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gun Control Thesis Statement

    * Keller, Barbara. “Guns are not An Effective Means of Self-Defense.” Gun Control: Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Tamara L. Roleff. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1997. 104-107. Print.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    gun violence
    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages

    gun violence

    Over the last years gun control has become a very widely debated topic. The city, county and state lawmakers seem to be having different stands about the public having easy access to guns. Adam Small states, “After centuries of relative obscurity, the Second Amendment has become the center of an intense academic and legal battle during the last twenty years” (1213). The supporters of gun control and its opponents both claim to have the best interest of this country’s citizens .However, there are private citizens who believe that there should be laws to limit the number of people who own a gun. Even though the United States has enacted laws for regulating firearms, the recent shootings at Aurora movie theatre and Sandy Hook Elementary School which both occurred in 2012, and many other school and public place shootings, has once again brought this issue to attention.…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    against the court’s decision to uphold the ruling inDistrict of Columbia V. Heller (2008)
    • 1477 Words
    • 4 Pages

    against the court’s decision to uphold the ruling inDistrict of Columbia V. Heller (2008)

    The case District of Columbia V. Heller (2008) settled questions surrounded the Second Amendment and gun control laws. The District of Columbia passed legislation banning the registration of handguns, requiring licenses for all pistols mandating that all legal firearms be kept unloaded, disassembled or on a trigger lock and could only be obtained with a license issued by the Chief of police. 1 A D.C. special policeman, Heller, applied to register his handgun and requested to keep it at home, however, his request was denied resulting in a lawsuit by the plaintiff. The Washington, D.C. Court of Appeals then held that the Second Amendment applied to only militias. The U.S. Court of Appeals then held that the Second Amendment protects the plaintiffs right and the right of any individual to posses a firearm like that of the plaintiffs. The Respondents then urged the court to review the case in order clearly define the relationship between federal gun control laws and the second amendment.2 The Supreme Court granted certiorari and a 5-4 decision was made in favor of the plaintiff. The court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to posses a firearm unconnected with militia service in a militia service in a militia and to use that weapon for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense. 3 In light of a recent series of high court decisions that directly challenge or conflict with the District of Columbia v. Heller case decision, petitioners request the Supreme Court to review its decision. This document will outline my reasoning for voting against the court’s decision to uphold the ruling.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics