Preview

Cash Flow of Products

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1742 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cash Flow of Products
American Home Products Corporation 1. How much business risk does American Home Products face? How much financial risk would American Home Products face at each of the proposed levels of debt shown in case Exhibit 3? How much potential value, if any can American Home Products create for its shareholders at each of the proposed levels of debt?
A combination of business risk and financial risk shows the risk of an organization’s future return on equity. Business risk is related to make a firm’s operation without any debt, whereas financial risk requires that the firm’s common stockholders make a decision to finance it with debt. a) American Home Products has been operating on four main lines of business that are less uncertainty about product demand; for example, one of its business lines is food products because whenever people buy foods. It means that AHP’s business risk is low. As mentioned above, if a firm does its operation activities regularly without leverage, it means that its business risk is not significant high. Thus, ratio of cash to total assets is calculated by following:

Figure 1 Proportion of cash and total assets, 1976-1981 ($ in millions) | | | | | | | | | 1981 | 1980 | 1979 | 1978 | 1977 | 1976 | Cash | 729.1 | 593.3 | 493.8 | 436.6 | 322.9 | 358.8 | Total Assets | 2,588.5 | 2,370.3 | 2,090.7 | 1,862.2 | 1,611.3 | 1,510.9 | Proportion | 28.2% | 25.0% | 23.6% | 23.4% | 20.0% | 23.7% |

According to Figure 1, AHP’s cash was about 23% of total assets, rose constantly since 1978 to 1981, and reached 28.2% in 1981; thus, it has enough cash flow to finance its daily operation. Also, return on assets can show that a firm’s ability to cover its operating cost by generating income. According to the calculation below, American Home Products Corporation’s ROA was stable and approximately 19.2 % in 1981; consequently, AHP earned sufficient amount of income to cover its

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miss

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ROA (short for return on assets) is a measure of a company’s profitability relative to total assets invested in the business by the owners.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ACC 501 Case 3

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The return on Assets is defined by Investopedia as “An indicator of how profitable a company is relative to its total assets. ROA gives an idea as to how efficient management is at using its assets to generate earnings. Calculated by dividing a company's annual earnings by its total assets, ROA is displayed as a percentage. Sometimes this is referred to as "return on investment".…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Manage Risk

    • 7591 Words
    • 24 Pages

    2.Finance: The probability that an actual return on an investment will be lower than the expected return. Financial risk is divided into the following categories: Basic risk, Capital risk, Country risk, Default risk, Delivery risk, Economic risk, Exchange rate risk, Interest rate risk, Liquidity risk, Operations risk, Payment system risk, Political risk, Refinancing risk, Reinvestment risk, Settlement risk, Sovereign risk, and Underwriting risk.…

    • 7591 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Return on Assets (ROA) Ratio shows the after tax earnings of assets and is an indicator of how profitable a company is. Return on assets ratio is the key indicator of the profitability of a company. It matches net profits after taxes with the assets used to earn such profits. A high percentage rated indicates the company is well run and has a healthy return on assets. Net Profit After Taxes ÷ Total Assets…

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The return on total assets (ROA) is an overall measure of profitability which measures the total effectiveness of management in generating profits with its available assets. This ratio indicates the amount of net income generated by each dollar invested in assets. The higher the firm's return on total assets, the better. Harley Davidson's return on total assets was 14.04% for 2001, 14.27% for 2000. These percentages are high and show an upward trend, this shows strong performance in this area for the past two years.…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wal-Mart Financial Paper

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The return on assets ratio is a profitability ratio that is very helpful. The purpose of profitability ratios is to inform interested parties…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ROA & ROE comparisons between StilSim and competitor. “Return on assets (ROA) is a measure of profit per dollar of assets” (book 449) The ROA is calculated by dividing the net income by total assets. “The return on equity (ROE) is a measure of how the stockholders fared during the year” (book 449). The ROE is called by dividing the net income by the total equity. In 2016, StilSim’s ROA was 2.1% and ROE was 2.7%. StaffAces ROA was 2.7% and ROE was…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cash Flows Case

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    analyzed under ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows (FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows).…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rio Tinto Case Study

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | 21,898 | 21,459 | 2.05% | Total liabilities | 60,337 | 48,261 | 25.02%…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American Home Products Case

    • 2292 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Stages of Development AHP’s managerial philosophy was proven to be successful as it produced impressive results. AHP’s financial performance was stable with consistent growth and profitability. In the year 1981, the firm was able to increase sales, earnings, and dividends for 29 years. However, this growth has been steady…

    • 2292 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    c) Financial Risk * Financial Risk is the variation in earnings as a result of firm’s financing mix or proportion of financing that requires a fixed return.…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    study questions 4

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. What is financial risk? (0.5 points) the possibility that shareholders will lose money when they invest in a company that has debt.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    financial risk

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First, an overview of financial risk ( A ) The meaning of financial risk Financial risk is the risk of financial performance of all enterprises , the financial activities of enterprises in the process, due to a variety of unpredictable or uncontrollable factors that effect , is the company's actual return and expected return deviation occurs , which may suffer economic losses possibilities.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CASE STUDY

    • 1831 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Return on Assets (ROA) percentage shows how profitable a company 's assets are ingenerating revenue. An indicator of how profitable a company is relative to its total assets. ROA gives an idea as to how efficient management is at using its assets to generate earnings. ROA can be computed as Net Income/ Total Assets. To make it more effective QMSC can use: Multiple performance measure, management service histories, or strategy paining.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taina Hogu Interim Report

    • 735 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The return on assets ratio (ROA) proves how profitable a company is comparative to its total assets. The ROA shows how efficient management is at using its assets to generate earnings. The higher the ROA, the more likely a company can efficiently use assets to generate income. For reporting year June 2013-May 2014, General Mills was less efficient than Kellogg (January 2012-December 2013 FY) in generating income from total assets. Comparing just General Mills 2014 ROA to prior year, it decreased its’ ability to generate earnings by 67%. This shows that General Mills could not convert investments into net income better than prior year. By contrast, Kellogg’s ROA went up in 2014 by 4.5 points mainly by almost doubling its’ net income from the prior year. This can be explained by Kellogg’s pension obligation declining which had a positive impact on net income. The reason why General Mills’ ROA declined is due to the erosion in net earnings. The better investment in terms of ROA is Kellogg.…

    • 735 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics