Preview

Case: US V. Nixon

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1499 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case: US V. Nixon
CASE
United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974)

FACTS
A grand jury returned indictments against seven of President Nixon’s White House staff members and political supporters of the President for violation of federal statutes in the Watergate affair,. The President on the other hand was named as an un-indicted co-conspirator. The Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski filed a motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure - Rule 17 for a subpoena duces tecum, a court summons ordering the President to appear before the court and produce tapes, documents and other tangible evidence relating to precisely identified conversations and meeting between President Nixon and his aides. The District Court initially treated the subpoena material as presumptively privileged, but then concluded that the Special Prosecutor made sufficient showing to justify a subpoena for production before trial. The District Court then issued an order for an in camera examination of the subpoenaed material, rejecting President Nixon’s contentions that the judiciary lacked authority to review his assertion of absolute executive privileged and the dispute between him and the Special Prosecutor was nonjusticiable as an “intra-executive” conflict.
…show more content…
President Nixon then sought appellate review in the Court of Appeals. The Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski subsequently filed a writ of certiorari and President Nixon filed a cross-petition for a writ challenging the grand jury. The U.S Supreme Court granted both

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Special Court Martial, Convicted in violation of Articles 86, 91, 92 of the UMCJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886,891 and 892 (1982) United States v. Collier, Jr., 27 M.J.806 (A.C.M.R. 1988),…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson’s subpoena is a challenge to the separation of powers, because, the President strongly percieves, that if he makes an appearance in the court that the executive branch would introverted from its establishment with the power of any court. The president also voiced that, the Constitution is for independence of the three branches, however, their requests from him to do not fit what is desired under the constitution.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The stage was set for a great constitutional struggle between a President determined not to give up executive documents and materials and a Senate committee and a federal prosecutor who are determined to get them," The White House claimed “Executive Privilege” when they refused to disclose the recorded tapes of President Nixon and his aides. Nixon and his advisors became arrogant with their possession of power. The Executive Branch was disrupting the balance of power and the separation of powers written into the Constitution. No Branch, elected official, governmental worker, or even the President is above the law, but Nixon definitely…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He, along with the rest of the hired intruders, was caught in the act by security guards. Their mission was to install eavesdropping equipment in the chambers and to retrieve secret democratic files, so the president would know the Democrats’ secret plans. It was later confirmed that Nixon, along with most of his administration, was involved in the scandal. Nixon and his administration violated the constitution in two different ways. They violated the constitution by committing perjury and by obstructing justice. Nixon and his administration committed perjury b denying their involvement with the scandal. They obstructed justice by bribing individuals to remain silent towards the Scandal and by editing and erasing information off of the audio tapes. These audio tapes were key evidence that would have allowed the case to have been solved…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that nixon should have been pardoned by Ford. The first reason I believe that he should be pardoned is because the country already had many problems. One of the problems with the country was racism which needed to be at an end or at least addressed. Another problem was the recovering of the states after vietnam and economic issues. The second reason I believe in his pardoning is Nixon already had paid a price for the crime. Many people liked him in office and he had support and he had to give it all up so it was enough punishment. The third reason I believe Ford did the right thing is because he was acting as a leader and he said that the country needed to be more merciful. I think that maybe him acting…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gravel v. US

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Senator Mike Gravel of Alaska was given a copy of the classified “Pentagon Papers” in 1971. After he received the classified documents, he called a meeting of his subcommittee in the Senate and shared their contents with the others in the subcommittee. He also allegedly arranged to publish the documents through Beacon Press. A federal grand jury, in the process of an investigation of possible federal law violations, subpoenaed one of Senator Gravel’s aides. Senator Gravel protested this subpoena arguing that requiring the aide to testify would be a violation of the Speech and Debate clause.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard M. Nixon was the 37th president of the United States of ‘murica. He is the only president in American History to resign from his position in office. He was part of the Watergate scandal but still made many great achievements in his life time. Nixon is certainly a president that will forever be in American History.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -Nixon openly sought to use “executive privilege” on a number of occasions to circumvent the wishes of Congress and the Supreme Court.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman Dbq Analysis

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the executive order and executive privilege were introduced with good intentions, many believe that the latter was abused—especially during Richard Nixon’s presidency, however, this argument is and can be solely based off of a biased perspective. While in “Nixon’s Address to the Nation on his Secret Tape Recordings”, from 1974, which is a moderately strong document due to its author being a former president (the validity suffers because Nixon is biased in favor of himself), it can be seen that the president had a reason behind his controversial actions: “Ever since the existence of the White House taping system was first made known last summer, I have tried vigorously to guard the privacy of the tapes. I have been well aware that my effort to protect the confidentiality of Presidential conversations has heightened the sense of mystery about Watergate and, in fact, has…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karen L. Jerman had a mortgage with Countrywide Home Loans and was contacted by the law firm Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, on behalf of Country Wide, seeking a foreclosure on Jerman’s property.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To my knowledge the Constitution sets specific grounds for impeachment. They are “treason, bribery, and other high crimes and misdemeanors.” In this article I think that the George W Bush appointed treasurer busted for tax evasion was a reason for impeachment. The treasurer had a long term friendship with the President and was found to have failed to disclose and pay taxes on a substantial amount of income and of lying to investigators and destroying evidence. She was pledge guilty, and as the President tried to exclude himself from the scandal, it is difficult to believe that he had nothing to do with this. I also believe that affairs, illegitimate child and adultery,…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Cases Essay

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today's society has been largely impacted from cases years ago, these cases changed many peoples' lives. Before there was equality, there were arguments almost everyday regarding segregation and racism. To emphasize, some disagreements had to be settled by the Supreme Court, and the ruling made still have a lasting effect today. The Supreme Court has made many ruling effecting civil rights: Plessy vs. Ferguson, Brown vs. Board of Education, and Loving vs. Virginia.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison is considered one of the most important cases in U.S. Supreme Court history. This landmark case is of great importance in the American political system because John Marshall, chief justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 to 1835, was able to bring respect and prestige to the Court. The Marshall Court announced that a court has the power to declare an act of Congress void if it contradicts the Constitution. For the first time in history, the Supreme Court asserted its role in reviewing federal legislation, a principle today also known as judicial review. Courts have the ability to review bylaws, judicial decisions or administrative regulations for possible violations of existing laws, individual state Constitutions, or the…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every year millions of young adults graduate from their respective high schools, pack up their belongings, leave their parental guided homes behind, and set off for college. The first thing that comes to mind when leaving the parents behind is their first true sense of freedom. The freedom to do what they please with no curfew, no guidelines, and no pre-disposed consequences for their actions is the freedom they’ve been working hard throughout the maturing years of their childhood. Upon arrival it seems as though this is the case, but as time passes one realizes that the so called freedom they attained comes with an inherited circumstance. The privacy that you once had in the safety of your home in your bedroom is violated by the inheritance of a roommate and the dorm lifestyle. Some may not have ever had this privacy due to their initial guardians, but the fact remains, that you have to share your space, time, and livelihood with the accompanied male or female assigned.…

    • 2228 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays