Preview

Case Summery Baroupue V Duplechin

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
488 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Summery Baroupue V Duplechin
Park Min-jung (20080534)

Fact :
On June 9, 1974, Jerome Bourque(Plaintiff) was playing second base on a softball game. Duplechin(Defendant), a member of the opposing team had hit the ball and advanced to first base. After his teammate hit the ball, to avoid double play Duplechin ran at full speed into Bourque. As Duplechin ran into Bourque, he brought his left arm up under Bourque's chin. Plaintiff Bourque filed this suit to recover damages for personal injuries received in the collision.

Procedural History: The trial court rendered judgement in favor of plaintiff against both defendants(Duplechin and Duplechin's liability insurer, Allstate Insurance Company). Both Duplechin and Allstate contend that the trial court erred: in not finding that Bourque assumed the risk of injury by participating in the softball game and was guilty of contributory negligence. Duplechin also contends that the trial court erred in negligent. Allstate further contends that the coverage under its policy which excludes injury intended or expected by the insured.

Issue: 1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident? 2. Whether the defendant Allstate coverage was excluded under the terms of its policy or not? 3. Whether the Duplechin's action was intended tort or negligence?

Holding: plaintiff Bourque's injuries resulted from negligence of defendant Duplechin; Bourque was not guilty of contributory negligence and did not asuume the risk of this particular accident; and defendant Allstate did not prove that coverage was excluded under the terms of its policy.

Rationale: For applying contributory negligence, Bourque should assume the risk of Duplechin's collision. Nevertheless, Duplechin's action was unusual and unsportsmanlike conduct. A participant does not assume the risk of injury from fellow players acting in an unexpected or unsportsmanlike way with a reckless lack of concern for others

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pleadings/Complaint

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. That the act of negligence by the Defendant Herman A. Schulman as stated herein were the direct and proximate cause of the injuries that Plaintiff Dale M. Roehnig sustained and that under the facts herein set out, the Defendant Herman A. Schulman is liable to the Plaintiff for all injuries and damages.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gng4170 Lecture Notes

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages

    EXAM PREVIEW!!! – Negligence hypothetical question – Given the facts of a case, describe all relevant material covered in the notes, give legal justification and plausible decision.…

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. How could this have happened when the insurance was in force at the time of the accident?…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. That as a direct and proximate result of the negligence of the Defendant, the Plaintiff was injured.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Turner V Mandalay

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case begin when Mrs. Turner filed a complaint in district court against the Las Vegas 51s, alleging negligence and Mr. Turner complaint for loss of consortium, and negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED). The district court concluded that Mrs. Turner’s negligence claim failed because the Las Vegas 51s did not owe a duty to protect her from the foul ball in question. Also, Mr. Turner’s claim for loss of consortium and NIED failed because 51s satisfied their legal duty in this case as matter of law. The court entered summary judgment in the 51’s favor on that claim.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plaintiff Robert Lopez flied a claim against Adelanto Stadium, Inc. claiming negligence on fault of Defendants insufficient design and/or installation of netting protection from foul balls under California Civil Code of Procedure §1714. Compl. ¶ 3. Also, Defendant’s negligence in failure to warn of dangers of foul balls. Compl ¶ 7. Mr. Lopez alleges that Adelanto Stadium, Inc. is liable on the sole grounds that they own the stadium in which Mr. Lopez suffered said injuries. Adelanto Stadium, Inc. moves to dismiss because Mr. Lopez’s claim fails as a matter of law, since it lacks sufficient factual matter to render a finding of negligence.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 1324 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The plaintiffs, Carol and Gary allege that on September 13, 1998, Carol Allen was injured while participating in a recreational softball game, while she was running to first base. She was hit in the head by the shortstop of the opposing team. This game was an adult and slow pitch softball tournament. The teams that were playing in this tournament were part of the Dover Co-Recreational Softball League, (league) and were sponsored by the Amateur Softball Association Inc. (ASA). The games were played on a softball field that was owned by defendant Martel-Roberge American Legion Post #47 (American Legion). The teams were sponsored by defendant Daniel’s Sports Bar and Grill (Daniel’s) and defendant Thompson Imports (Thompson) who also provided t-shirts for the players. Defendant Bollinger Fowler Company (Bollinger) provided liability insurance for the league, ASA, the American Legion, the Daniel’s team and the Thompson team. The plaintiff was playing for the Daniel’s team, and was using a smaller softball made for women to be able to hit more competitively when playing with men, this was an official rule set forth by the ASA. The defendants did not recommend, require, or provide the use of helmets. The ASA official rules are that there be five men and five women for each team, this game consisted of seven men and three women on each team. When Carol Allen was batting for the first time, she hit a ball towards the shortstop. The male player for the Thompson team threw the ball toward first base in order to get the runner Carol Allen out, but instead the ball struck Carol in the head. This caused her cognitive deficiencies including impaired speech.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In all actions brought to recover damage for negligence resulting in death or injury to person or property, the fact that the plaintiff may have been guilty of…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * Jones L Introduction to Business Law 1st, 2011, C11 the Tort Law of Negligence. P342…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Care Policy

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The final element needed to establish negligence requires that there be a close, reasonable, and casual relationship between the defendant’s negligent conduct and the resulting damages suffered by the plaintiff – in other words…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The respondent’s arguments on appeal were that the trial judge correctly found that it had not breached its duty of care, and if it had breached that duty, the appellant was 100% liable for contributory negligence. This argument gave rise to the second issue: if the respondent breached its duty of care, is the appellant guilty of contributory negligence, and to what extent?…

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    contract neglicence

    • 4053 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The plaintiff, an apprentice employed in the defendants' apprentice training school, was seriously injured by a practical joke played upon him by two fellow-apprentices. The Court of Appeal held the defendants not liable to the plaintiff in negligence, because his injury had occurred through an act of wilful misbehaviour which the defendants could not reasonably have foreseen.…

    • 4053 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defendant, had the basic duty to prevent outside vehicles from entering the danger zone during, their dangerous explosive activities. Defendant breached their duty when one of their employees fell asleep during their shift, leaving opportunity to allow entrance to a dangerous zone; hence allowing our Plaintiff’s vehicle to enter said danger zone. Had the Defendant’s employee performed their job under the basic reasonable standard of care, our Plaintiff would have then been prevented from entering said zone, which was neglectfully unsupervised at entrance by Defendants employee. If said mentioned employee had prevented the entrance of an explosive and dangerous construction zone, our plaintiff would have also been prevented of his injuries. Our Plaintiff has since suffered major injuries arising from Defendant’s formatted employee’s negligence in which a plausible and foreseeable event of explosions from Defendant’s construction site injured our Plaintiff.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    7. The damages and losses sustained by the Plaintiff were directly and proximately caused by the negligence in carelessness of the Defendant, their agents, servants and/or employees, in one or more of the following ways:…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a direct and proximate cause of defendant's negligent activity, as set forth above, plaintiff has incurred the following expenses for medical care and attention:…

    • 340 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays