Preview

Case Summary: Pennsylvania Railroad and Ny Central Railroad 1968

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
676 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Summary: Pennsylvania Railroad and Ny Central Railroad 1968
On February 1, 1968 Pennsylvania railroad and New York Central Railroad merged together, which at the time of publishing “Deals from Hell” (2005) was the largest US corporate merger. National interest was at stake due to the magnitude of this union as it was estimated to contribute 3% of national GDP and should the corporate entities fail it would also lead to an estimated 3% unemployment as well. Unfortunately this merger was doomed for failure only 29 months later when bankruptcy was filed as what was described as “a perfect storm of failure”. Leading up to the merger the Railroad industry had been changing, as a result many companies were merging to cope with the stress. Although in the 1920’s the railroad industry was experiencing the most profitable time ever, many new developments such as the diesel engine, airplanes, trucks and broadcasting reduced the need for the railroads. In 1962 the CFO of Pennsylvania (David Bevan) testified that the railroad industry was unable to support it’s self nor earn a profitable return for investors. For both companies it seems as though the only solution to the problems was merging. In fact, both companies seem as though they determined to merge no matter the cost nor the concession required. It appears as though there was very little foresight and planning for after the merger took place. Also, Pennsylvania was not the preferred choice for merging for New York Central but rather it was the default choice, as they had been turned down from merging with a different company previously. Finally, to ensure the deal took place they had made costly arrangements with Unions to rehire 5000 employees who had already been terminated as well they had to offer lifetime job protection which was a costly mistake due to the fact that the assumed cost savings were never realized. It appears as though both companies recognized the necessity to merge and were driven to that goal without proper planning for after the deal took place as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Union Planters Corporation was a 31.5 billion dollar holding company. They were the largest holding company headquartered in Tennessee and one of the largest thirty in the United States (Morgan, 6/17/2005, para. 10). Union Planters has 925 Automatic Teller Machines and 717 banking office. These banking offices are located in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Tennessee, and Texas (Morgan, 1/23/2004, para. 18). Before the merger, Union Planters revenues had decreased 11.86% from 2002 to 2003. Their net income also decreased by 2.3%. Union Planters ' compounded annual growth in the net income category was only .04% for both three and five years respectively (Thompson, 12/2003-5/2004). Union Planters has struggled the last few years due to their mortgage operations. If the merger had not taken place it would have struggled to reach the EPS guidance they gave a week before the merger announcement (Goldberg, Jason, 1/26/2004, para. 19). Union Planters does not have a good track record for integrating bank mergers, especially one of this size (Goldberg, Jason, 1/26/2004, para. 20). This might have been one reason why they fell into the arm of Regions. Union Planters has improved their balance sheet…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    All facts in this case were established by the plaintiff in that the defendant called no witnesses and the plaintiff called seven witnesses (Palsgraf vs. Long Island RY. CO.). On August 24, 1924 between the hours of ten and eleven in the morning, the plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf, along with her two daughters were at the East New York station waiting to board a train. This station is owned and operated by the Long Island Railroad Company that is organized in the state of New York. A large crowd of people was gathered at the station that morning. Approximately five minutes after arriving at the station, Ms. Palsgraf was standing near a scale on the platform with her daughter several feet away from where the explosion would occur. Two unidentified males rushed to board the train as it was leaving the station. One of the males successfully boarded the…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case Palsgraf v. The Long Island Railroad, 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99, 1928 N.Y.Lexis 1269 (N.Y.), Justice Cardoza denied recovery for the plaintiff. Justice Cardoza found that the railroad was not the proximate cause of Helen Palsgraf's injuries. The concept of proximate cause is one that is less than precise. In today's world of business can we still be sure that the reasoning used by Cardoza still applies? Has a new standard developed? In reviewing the materials in the text you should be able to discuss the issue of causation in a meaningful and dispassionate manner.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fedex Merges with Kinkos

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 2003, the announcement was made of a merger between FedEx Corporation and Kinko’s, Inc. There are multiple reasons why corporate decision makers consider mergers, “the potential efficiency benefits from mergers and acquisitions include both operating and managerial efficiencies,” (Pautlar, 2003, p. 122). “These mergers and acquisitions are aimed at increasing growth, enhancing existing capabilities and developing new markets” and as a strategic consideration they can “generate cost efficiency through economies of scale, can enhance revenue through gains in market share and can even generate tax benefits,” (Saini & Singla, 2012, p. 284). In this paper, the merger between FedEx and Kinko’s is examined through an analysis of the financial ratios and environmental factors impacting them.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A passenger carrying a package, while hurrying to catch and board a moving Long Island Rail Road train, appeared to two of the railroad's (Defendant's) employees to be falling. The employees were guards, one of whom was located on the car, the other of whom was located on the platform. The guard on the car attempted to pull the passenger into the car and the guard on the platform attempted to push him into the car from behind. The guards' efforts to aid the passenger caused the package the passenger was holding to fall on the rails. Unbeknownst to the guards, the package, which was approximately 15 inches (38 cm) long and wrapped in newspaper, contained fireworks, and the package exploded when it hit the rails. The shock reportedly knocked down scales at the other end of the platform (although later accounts suggest that a panicking bystander may have upset the scale), which injured Mrs. Helen Palsgraf (Plaintiff). Palsgraf sued the railroad, claiming her injury resulted from negligent acts of the employee. The trial court and the…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Conrail was the least efficient railroad in the East and faced tough competition from trucking. By merging with CSX, Contrail would become more efficient in terms of higher co-operation and greater manpower. The merged company could benefit from the exchange of market knowledge and client base to be better performed than its competitors.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Student

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Complete a social-issues scorecard on this deal. Is this a true merger of equals? Does one…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acquisition of Conrail

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    largest railroad in the Eastern United States, announced the intent to undergo a friendly merger…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case study is about the merger occurred in 1998 between two big companies in the auto industry: German company Daimler-Benz and American auto manufacturer Chrysler Group. At the end, this merger appeared to be a failure because of different types of problems. Chrysler benefited from Mercedes while benefits to Daimler were harder to find, so that Daimler decided to sell 80% of its stake in Chrysler for just 7.4 billion dollars.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morgan Stanley

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The merger was disruptive for a multitude of reasons. One being that the companies' technology was never implemented properly causing countless hours of problems which caused the company to lose much needed revenue and profit. This caused the brokers to be inadequate with the tools necessary when assisting their clients. The company's website was very marginal at best. It had several problems with functionality and maneuverability of the websites. The trade mechanism which allowed the purchasing and…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    many industry experts feel that the merge was a bad idea because now, the company is…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Strategy of MTR

    • 1736 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although successful mergers are said to be infrequent and rare (Weber 2003, Harrison 2007), the merger of these two rail corporations is undoubtedly a triumph. It can be directly seen from the gradually increased profit performance of MTR after the merger (MTRCL 2013).The success can be accounted by both macro and micro level, which are respectively the strategy and the culture of the company.…

    • 1736 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Daimler Chrysler Merger

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Daimler-Chrysler merger came with the intent of a huge change. When the two made the merge they had high potential with both their backgrounds which helped them become the world’s fifth largest auto company (C-41). However, it was never foreseen that Chrysler which was part of the 3/4 of U.S. auto sales would have a complete turnaround in profits within a couple years (C-41). Being a strong company based upon brands and products isn’t everything for success as shown here. The merger provided the duo with a large variety of vehicle choices to different consumers. However the downfall came when Chrysler was threatened by other competition and declining sales (C-41).…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alcatel-Lucent

    • 14200 Words
    • 57 Pages

    And this is what exactly happened after the merger. The company also made it clear that it did not have solutions to every problem; so those who had major problems adjusting to the post-merger situation were given time to move on.…

    • 14200 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mannesmann and Vodafone

    • 5728 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Analyzing the history of the two companies, the reasons for the merger, the merger itself and the outcome of the takeover, as well as the impacts on society, economy and legislative are the major concerns.…

    • 5728 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays