Union Planters Corporation was a 31.5 billion dollar holding company. They were the largest holding company headquartered in Tennessee and one of the largest thirty in the United States (Morgan, 6/17/2005, para. 10). Union Planters has 925 Automatic Teller Machines and 717 banking office. These banking offices are located in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Tennessee, and Texas (Morgan, 1/23/2004, para. 18). Before the merger, Union Planters revenues had decreased 11.86% from 2002 to 2003. Their net income also decreased by 2.3%. Union Planters ' compounded annual growth in the net income category was only .04% for both three and five years respectively (Thompson, 12/2003-5/2004). Union Planters has struggled the last few years due to their mortgage operations. If the merger had not taken place it would have struggled to reach the EPS guidance they gave a week before the merger announcement (Goldberg, Jason, 1/26/2004, para. 19). Union Planters does not have a good track record for integrating bank mergers, especially one of this size (Goldberg, Jason, 1/26/2004, para. 20). This might have been one reason why they fell into the arm of Regions. Union Planters has improved their balance sheet…
All facts in this case were established by the plaintiff in that the defendant called no witnesses and the plaintiff called seven witnesses (Palsgraf vs. Long Island RY. CO.). On August 24, 1924 between the hours of ten and eleven in the morning, the plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf, along with her two daughters were at the East New York station waiting to board a train. This station is owned and operated by the Long Island Railroad Company that is organized in the state of New York. A large crowd of people was gathered at the station that morning. Approximately five minutes after arriving at the station, Ms. Palsgraf was standing near a scale on the platform with her daughter several feet away from where the explosion would occur. Two unidentified males rushed to board the train as it was leaving the station. One of the males successfully boarded the…
In the case Palsgraf v. The Long Island Railroad, 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99, 1928 N.Y.Lexis 1269 (N.Y.), Justice Cardoza denied recovery for the plaintiff. Justice Cardoza found that the railroad was not the proximate cause of Helen Palsgraf's injuries. The concept of proximate cause is one that is less than precise. In today's world of business can we still be sure that the reasoning used by Cardoza still applies? Has a new standard developed? In reviewing the materials in the text you should be able to discuss the issue of causation in a meaningful and dispassionate manner.…
In 2003, the announcement was made of a merger between FedEx Corporation and Kinko’s, Inc. There are multiple reasons why corporate decision makers consider mergers, “the potential efficiency benefits from mergers and acquisitions include both operating and managerial efficiencies,” (Pautlar, 2003, p. 122). “These mergers and acquisitions are aimed at increasing growth, enhancing existing capabilities and developing new markets” and as a strategic consideration they can “generate cost efficiency through economies of scale, can enhance revenue through gains in market share and can even generate tax benefits,” (Saini & Singla, 2012, p. 284). In this paper, the merger between FedEx and Kinko’s is examined through an analysis of the financial ratios and environmental factors impacting them.…
A passenger carrying a package, while hurrying to catch and board a moving Long Island Rail Road train, appeared to two of the railroad's (Defendant's) employees to be falling. The employees were guards, one of whom was located on the car, the other of whom was located on the platform. The guard on the car attempted to pull the passenger into the car and the guard on the platform attempted to push him into the car from behind. The guards' efforts to aid the passenger caused the package the passenger was holding to fall on the rails. Unbeknownst to the guards, the package, which was approximately 15 inches (38 cm) long and wrapped in newspaper, contained fireworks, and the package exploded when it hit the rails. The shock reportedly knocked down scales at the other end of the platform (although later accounts suggest that a panicking bystander may have upset the scale), which injured Mrs. Helen Palsgraf (Plaintiff). Palsgraf sued the railroad, claiming her injury resulted from negligent acts of the employee. The trial court and the…
Conrail was the least efficient railroad in the East and faced tough competition from trucking. By merging with CSX, Contrail would become more efficient in terms of higher co-operation and greater manpower. The merged company could benefit from the exchange of market knowledge and client base to be better performed than its competitors.…
1. Complete a social-issues scorecard on this deal. Is this a true merger of equals? Does one…
largest railroad in the Eastern United States, announced the intent to undergo a friendly merger…
This case study is about the merger occurred in 1998 between two big companies in the auto industry: German company Daimler-Benz and American auto manufacturer Chrysler Group. At the end, this merger appeared to be a failure because of different types of problems. Chrysler benefited from Mercedes while benefits to Daimler were harder to find, so that Daimler decided to sell 80% of its stake in Chrysler for just 7.4 billion dollars.…
The merger was disruptive for a multitude of reasons. One being that the companies' technology was never implemented properly causing countless hours of problems which caused the company to lose much needed revenue and profit. This caused the brokers to be inadequate with the tools necessary when assisting their clients. The company's website was very marginal at best. It had several problems with functionality and maneuverability of the websites. The trade mechanism which allowed the purchasing and…
many industry experts feel that the merge was a bad idea because now, the company is…
Although successful mergers are said to be infrequent and rare (Weber 2003, Harrison 2007), the merger of these two rail corporations is undoubtedly a triumph. It can be directly seen from the gradually increased profit performance of MTR after the merger (MTRCL 2013).The success can be accounted by both macro and micro level, which are respectively the strategy and the culture of the company.…
The Daimler-Chrysler merger came with the intent of a huge change. When the two made the merge they had high potential with both their backgrounds which helped them become the world’s fifth largest auto company (C-41). However, it was never foreseen that Chrysler which was part of the 3/4 of U.S. auto sales would have a complete turnaround in profits within a couple years (C-41). Being a strong company based upon brands and products isn’t everything for success as shown here. The merger provided the duo with a large variety of vehicle choices to different consumers. However the downfall came when Chrysler was threatened by other competition and declining sales (C-41).…
And this is what exactly happened after the merger. The company also made it clear that it did not have solutions to every problem; so those who had major problems adjusting to the post-merger situation were given time to move on.…
Analyzing the history of the two companies, the reasons for the merger, the merger itself and the outcome of the takeover, as well as the impacts on society, economy and legislative are the major concerns.…