Preview

Case Study: Reasonable Suspicion

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1643 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study: Reasonable Suspicion
Case Study: Reasonable Suspicion, Exigent Circumstances, Probable Cause, and Plain View
Lorna J. SteMarie
Kaplan University
CJ 227: Criminal Procedure
September 30, 2013

Case Study: Reasonable Suspicion, Exigent Circumstances, Probable Cause, and Plain View
Question 1. Did Officer Smith have reasonable suspicion to make the initial stop of this vehicle? Yes, Officer Smith had reasonable suspicion. “Reasonable suspicion” is a more relaxed standard than probable cause. Reasonable suspicion exists when a “reasonable person” under the circumstances would, based on specific facts, have reason to believe that a crime had been committed (Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion, n.d.). Probable cause exists when there is a reasonable basis
…show more content…
Officer Smith could rely on the premise of “exigent circumstances” to permit her to search the personal effects of the suspect/victim for identification. But the car was stopped on probable cause for a broken tail light, not for suspected possession of drugs. The law states that when a person is stopped for reasonable suspicion or probable cause, the police can only search for objects related to the reason for the search without obtaining a search warrant (When is a Search Warrant Not Necessary?, n.d.). If there were a warrant in this case, Coolidge v. New Hampshire would apply and during the search for the items on the warrant police may also lawfully seize items that are incriminating (Roberson, Wallace, & Stuckey, 2013). This only applies, however, to searches involving warrants. Legal discovery of evidence without a warrant must involve plain view and must be inadvertent. The marijuana baggie was not in plain view. The suspect/victim was unable to give consent for her effects to be searched. The suspect/victim was not in a location to have control over the vehicle and its contents. The traffic stop was for a broken tail light and not suspicion of drug paraphernalia. There was no probable cause for the officer to suspect that marijuana was within the vehicle. Although the discovery was inadvertent, none of the other tests for warrantless search were met. Had Officer Smith smelled marijuana when she stopped the …show more content…
Exigent circumstances (the driver fleeing at a high rate of speed) allowed the officer to give chase to protect herself and the public. The gun was in plain view and could be seized although it is unknown whether or not it was indicative of any crime that had been committed. The marijuana was not in plain view and could not legally be submitted as evidence in a court of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    1. The officer’s observation of the evidence must be lawful, meaning the officer had a legal right to be at the location, or the suspect did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the location,…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Pasco County Sheriff office in Florida received an anonymous tip that marijuana was being grown on respondent property. When an investigating officer discovered that he could not observe from ground level, he circle twice over the property in a helicopter at the height of 400 feet. With his naked eyes he was able to see through the content of the greenhouse roof, and it open sides of what he concluded were marijuana plants. A warrant was obtained based on what the officer had observed, and the ensuing search revealed marijuana growing in the greenhouse. The respondent was charged with possession of that substance under Florida law. The trial court granted his motion to suppress the evidence.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Probable Cause

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This paper discusses the underlying circumstances to obtaining a warrant, and proving probable cause. Certain exceptions are made by law in some situations, such as searching vehicles. All officers of the law, and court officials are legally obligated to follow all rights reserved by the Fourth Amendment, and without doing so they could jeopardize their case. Investigation must take place before an officer can prove probable cause to a judge, and obtain a warrant. Warrants are necessary documents in apprehending suspects, conducting searches, and seizures. Without warrants, in most cases, evidence will be ruled as inadmissible. There are several ways to prove probable cause to obtain warrants. Without sufficient probable cause a warrant can not be issued to officers.…

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most important facts is that the car was still warm and they observed the man drop something out of his pockets that looked like keys. The wife stated that she had not driven the vehicle all day and the man stated that he had not driven the car since he arrived 4 hours ago. The officer performed a sobriety test and a preliminary alcohol screening test which revealed that the man’s blood alcohol was twice the legal limit. There was also a domestic violence call which is the reason the officer responded to the house.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jack, Bert and Pratt

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    USLegal INC. (2010). Factual Imposibility Law & Legal Definition. Retrieved October 18, 2010, from US Legal.com: http://definitions.uslegal.com/f/factual-impossibility/…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    So Aldo did his job and alert that in the driver's side door smelled drugs which give Wheatley probable cause so that the police officer to search Harris truck. The reason, the police officer use a warrantless search and arrest was because at the commission moment it was not feasible to obtaining warrant prior to the search and arrest. Aldo's alert investigation give substantial evidence that Harry has committed a crime that lead to the discovery of "200 loose pseudoephedrine pills, 8,000 matches, a bottle of hydrochloric acid, two containers of antifreeze, and a coffee filter full of iodine crystals- all ingredients for making methamphetamine." Once again, the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution allows the police officer like Wheetley to conducted a warrantless search to Harris's truck because in that circumstances it was likely that the evidence will be destroyed. As a result, the trial court permitted the evidence to be submitted at trial that most likely will confirm the charged of possession of pseudoephedrine against…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dlk Case Study

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United States, police officers had suspicion about crime occurring (Doc A) but searched the suspect’s property in order to confirm their suspicion even though they did not have a warrant. In order to confirm their suspicion, the police officers, in the DLK case, used a thermal imager which detected heat radiating from the exterior of petitioner’s house (Doc E). The thermal imager did not invade the suspect’s privacy because it did not reveal any interior aspects of the home nor did it reveal any private activity in a private place but it rather detected the heat level from the exterior of the home. The heat waves measured escaped the home and entered the public domain (Doc F). Because it did not invade the privacy of DLK, the search did not require a…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4th Amendment

    • 2115 Words
    • 9 Pages

    All Americans are entitled to their rights. The Fourth Amendment states that we the people have to deny search and seizures from law enforcement without a warrant. The fourth amendment generally prohibits police from entering a home without a warrant unless the circumstances fit an established exception to the warrant requirement. According to the book The Constitution: Our Written Legacy by Joseph A. Melusky, the Fourth Amendment gives the right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Although we are entitled to these rights, police sometimes use and abuse their authority. In many cases, the Fourth Amendment has helped prove the innocence of one’s actions.…

    • 2115 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although the Fourth Amendment protects a man’s home, neither the home nor all the surrounding objects are beyond the capacity of being searched under proper circumstances. If the police officers possess a search warrant to search a particular home, the warrant may extend to include vehicles parked within the structure and those parked nearby if the objects of the search warrant could be hidden within the vehicle(s). Since the goal of a search is to find something, then if the vehicle(s) were not searched it could become frustrating and since vehicles could store marijuana, then a vehicle(s) should be searched found on or near the property or home just like other personal property would be searched.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There have been differences between the two contrasting types of models for the criminal justice system. Both models see the Constitution for the basics of it, but neither model is free from error. There are a sparse attributes of the two models where they can…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    #2 – Discuss some of the concerns and priorities of a responding officer when entering a crime scene.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The facts of the the story is that we were had an illegal substance that happen to be marijuana, and we were caught with substance by a law enforcement officer. The only reason the charges were drop was because the search that the officer conducted the courts considered it unconstitutional. With all factors included, we were arrested for possession of marijuana, and it was officially recorded. Basically, whether I…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Memo on Hearsay

    • 2036 Words
    • 9 Pages

    III. The seizure of the white packet was proper because the "plain view" doctrine applies in this case. The police officer acted reasonably when he pulled Ryan over for a broken tail light, and since he inadvertently came across the packet of white powder, the seizure was proper.…

    • 2036 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pennsylvania Vs Mimms

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This giving the officer reasonable suspicion that the person in the car may be armed and dangerous considering the broken tail light as well as the same vehicle description. Based on these hunches, as well as Pennsylvania vs. Mimms, “In Mimms, the U.S. Supreme Court noted that statistics indicated that 30 percent of the officers shot in the line of duty were shot as they approached a vehicle. The Court held that when officers make a traffic stop, they may routinely order the driver out of the car without giving any reason.” (Roberson, Wallace & Stuckey pg 83) Also, in my opinion this officer was now in the process of performing a terry-type-stop which is “A detention that will ordinarily be for a fairly short duration and that will be no longer than necessary to effectuate the purpose of the detention.” (Roberson, Wallace & Stuckey pg 405). For those reasons, I feel strongly that officer Smith 's choice on performing a pat down was…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: The victim, Charles Keitt, drove to an alley way to obtain windshield wipers off the defendant’s car, Mr. Peterson. Mr. Peterson observed the victim, Mr. Keitt, doing this and confronted him with an altercation. The victim went back to his car and the defendant, Mr. Peterson, returned inside his home. The victim was about to leave, but because the defendant provoked the situation by bringing a pistol out his home, he came out his car with a wrench. Mr. Peterson urged the victim that if he moved, then he would shoot him. The victim stepped out from his car and the defendant, Mr. Peterson, shot him in…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays