Yes, I think justice was served in the Patterson v. McLean Credit Union case. Although the case was not filed sooner, it was evident to the court that Patterson’s employer did not “ensure that everyone has an equal chance at the job, based on qualifications” (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2015, pg. 75) resulting in the case being “nullified by the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2015, pg. 124) which “overturned Patterson’s holding that section 1981 does not permit actions for racial discrimination during the performance of the contract but only in making or enforcing the contract …show more content…
How would your interview with Patterson be different if you were the manager? What have you learned from this case regarding the interview process?
Had I been the manager conducting the interview with Patterson, I would have made a conscious effort to avoid discriminatory questions and comments such as that alleged by Patterson who claims the supervisor “told her that she would be working with all white women and that they would not like working with her because she was black” (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2015, pg. 133). Questions and comments regarding race, color, gender, national origin, or religion other than those listed on the employment application are unacceptable.
I have learned that it is incumbent upon employers to ensure strict non-discrimination policies and procedures are in place and that supervisors conducting interviews are well informed and abiding by such policies at all times in order to protect against discrimination claims. Questions and comments during the interview process should be relevant to the skills and tasks associated with the position.
3. Do any of the actions Patterson alleged McLean engaged in seem appropriate? Why do you think it was done or