Case Study Of Tom Carr

In the case study of Tom Carr, prior to pursuing a lawsuit he should first exhaust all administrative remedies and mediation, allowing his case to become ripe for judicial review. If a lawsuit must continue, Tom should point out he is aggrieved in fact as the ramp will require the removal of his family cemetery. This grants him standing by setting him apart from other individuals who may be simply opposed to the highway but lack a particularized injury. It is pointless for Tom’s friend in Alabama to sue on Tom’s behalf. It would be very difficult, if not impossible, to prove that he would be impacted by the highway’s construction and consequently his case will not be reviewed as he is not aggrieved in fact. Tom should argue that the federal